Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Foundations of Physics

Interpretation of the quantum formalism and Bell's theorem

Emilio Santos

Published Feb 1, 1991• 15 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/bf01889534

Related papers

On Bell's Theorem and Quantum-Mechanically Predicted Perfect Correlation

Guang-Liang Li

The experimental test of the CHSH inequality confirms the quantum-mechanically predicted perfect correlation between two spatially separated photons. By interpreting the correlation non-locally as the so-called entanglement, Bell's theorem denies the existence of definite polarizations possessed by photons in the absence of measurement. The denial amounts to refuting Einstein's argument for defending his local-realist world view based on his separability principle and his ensemble interpretation of ψ-functions in the Einstein-Bohr debate on the conceptual foundations of quantum mechanics. This paper shows that Bell's theorem is incorrect and presents an explanation of the correlation based on Einstein's argument. The correlation is deterministic. A formal analysis supporting Einstein's explanation is also presented.

•Sep 14, 2026•0 citations

The quantum formalism and its main interpretations

André Julg

Lecture notes in chemistry•Jan 1, 1998•0 citations

Introduction to Quantum Formalism

IMPERIAL COLLEGE PRESS eBooks•Feb 28, 2016•0 citations

On Bell's Theorem and Quantum-Mechanically Predicted Perfect Correlation

Guang-Liang Li

The experimental test of the CHSH inequality confirms the quantum-mechanically predicted perfect correlation between two spatially separated photons. By interpreting the correlation non-locally as the so-called entanglement, Bell's theorem denies the existence of definite polarizations possessed by photons in the absence of measurement. The denial amounts to refuting Einstein's argument for defending his local-realist world view based on his separability principle and his ensemble interpretation of ψ-functions in the Einstein-Bohr debate on the conceptual foundations of quantum mechanics. This paper shows that Bell's theorem is incorrect and presents an explanation of the correlation based on Einstein's argument. The correlation is deterministic. A formal analysis supporting Einstein's explanation is also presented.

•Aug 28, 2026•0 citations

The Formalism of Quantum Mechanics

Sol Wieder

Elsevier eBooks•Jan 1, 1973•0 citations

On Bell's Theorem and Quantum-Mechanically Predicted Perfect Correlations

Guang-Liang Li

The experimental test of the CHSH inequality confirms the quantum-mechanically predicted perfect correlations between two spatially separated photons. By interpreting the correlations non-locally as the so-called entanglement, Bell's theorem denies the existence of definite polarizations possessed by photons in the absence of measurement. The denial amounts to refuting Einstein's argument for defending his local-realist world view in the Einstein-Bohr debate on the conceptual foundations of quantum mechanics. Einstein's argument is based on his separability principle and his ensemble interpretation of ψ-functions. This paper shows that Bell's theorem is incorrect, and an explanation of the correlations based on Einstein's argument is given. As shown by the explanation based on Einstein's argument, the correlations are deterministic. A formal analysis supporting Einstein's explanation is also presented.

•Oct 21, 2026•0 citations
The experimental test of the CHSH inequality confirms the quantum-mechanically predicted perfect correlation between two spatially separated photons. By interpreting the correlation non-locally as the so-called entanglement, Bell's theorem denies the existence of definite polarizations possessed by photons in the absence of measurement. The denial amounts to refuting Einstein's argument for defending his local-realist world view based on his separability principle and his ensemble interpretation of ψ-functions in the Einstein-Bohr debate on the conceptual foundations of quantum mechanics. This paper shows that Bell's theorem is incorrect and presents an explanation of the correlation based on Einstein's argument. The correlation is deterministic. A formal analysis supporting Einstein's explanation is also presented.
The experimental test of the CHSH inequality confirms the quantum-mechanically predicted perfect correlation between two spatially separated photons. By interpreting the correlation non-locally as the so-called entanglement, Bell's theorem denies the existence of definite polarizations possessed by photons in the absence of measurement. The denial amounts to refuting Einstein's argument for defending his local-realist world view based on his separability principle and his ensemble interpretation of ψ-functions in the Einstein-Bohr debate on the conceptual foundations of quantum mechanics. This paper shows that Bell's theorem is incorrect and presents an explanation of the correlation based on Einstein's argument. The correlation is deterministic. A formal analysis supporting Einstein's explanation is also presented.
The experimental test of the CHSH inequality confirms the quantum-mechanically predicted perfect correlations between two spatially separated photons. By interpreting the correlations non-locally as the so-called entanglement, Bell's theorem denies the existence of definite polarizations possessed by photons in the absence of measurement. The denial amounts to refuting Einstein's argument for defending his local-realist world view in the Einstein-Bohr debate on the conceptual foundations of quantum mechanics. Einstein's argument is based on his separability principle and his ensemble interpretation of ψ-functions. This paper shows that Bell's theorem is incorrect, and an explanation of the correlations based on Einstein's argument is given. As shown by the explanation based on Einstein's argument, the correlations are deterministic. A formal analysis supporting Einstein's explanation is also presented.