Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

European Journal of Physics

A comment on the deduction of the Dirac equation

J. Buitrago

Published Apr 1, 1988• 1 citation
Publisher
DOI
10.1088/0143-0807/9/2/113

Related papers

The quantum mechanics based on a general kinetic energy

Yuchuan Wei

In this paper, we introduce the Schrodinger equation with a general kinetic energy operator. The conservation law is proved and the probability continuity equation is deducted in a general sense. Examples with a Hermitian kinetic energy operator include the standard Schrodinger equation, the relativistic Schrodinger equation, the fractional Schrodinger equation, the Dirac equation, and the deformed Schrodinger equation. We reveal that the Klein-Gordon equation has a hidden non-Hermitian kinetic energy operator. The probability continuity equation with sources indicates that there exists a different way of probability transportation, which is probability teleportation. An average formula is deducted from the relativistic Schrodinger equation, the Dirac equation, and the K-G equation.

arXiv:1602.05844•Jan 25, 2016•2 citations

A remark on the Dirac equation

G. Coddens

Foundations of Physics Letters•Jun 1, 1995•1 citation

Remarks to Dirac's theory

Viktor Trkal

Časopis pro pěstování matematiky a fysiky•Jan 1, 1935•0 citations

On the deduction of the Dirac-Fock-Podolski equations from the quantum theory of fields

K. L. Nagy

Acta Physica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae•Aug 1, 1956•1 citation

Comment on “Nondispersive analytical solutions to the Dirac equation”

Iwo Białynicki‐Birula, Zofia Białynicka-Birula

In our Comment we question the validity of the claim made by Campos and Cabrera [Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 013051 (2020)] that their solutions of the Dirac equation in an external time-dependent electromagnetic field describe beams of electrons. In every time-dependent field, no matter how weak, which has an infinite time duration, there is continuous electron-positron pair creation and annihilation. Without the proper accounting for these processes, the mathematical solutions of the Dirac equation are not directly applicable to realistic physical situations. In particular, the time evolution of the average values $\ensuremath{\langle}x\ensuremath{\rangle}$ and $\ensuremath{\langle}y\ensuremath{\rangle}$ does not describe the electron trajectory but the motion of some combination of the electron and positron charge distributions with pathological properties (zitterbewegung).

arXiv:2006.07615•Physical Review Research•Jul 6, 2020•1 citation

Toward the Dirac Viewpoint

Philip R. Wallace

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 1996•2 citations
In this paper, we introduce the Schrodinger equation with a general kinetic energy operator. The conservation law is proved and the probability continuity equation is deducted in a general sense. Examples with a Hermitian kinetic energy operator include the standard Schrodinger equation, the relativistic Schrodinger equation, the fractional Schrodinger equation, the Dirac equation, and the deformed Schrodinger equation. We reveal that the Klein-Gordon equation has a hidden non-Hermitian kinetic energy operator. The probability continuity equation with sources indicates that there exists a different way of probability transportation, which is probability teleportation. An average formula is deducted from the relativistic Schrodinger equation, the Dirac equation, and the K-G equation.
In our Comment we question the validity of the claim made by Campos and Cabrera [Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 013051 (2020)] that their solutions of the Dirac equation in an external time-dependent electromagnetic field describe beams of electrons. In every time-dependent field, no matter how weak, which has an infinite time duration, there is continuous electron-positron pair creation and annihilation. Without the proper accounting for these processes, the mathematical solutions of the Dirac equation are not directly applicable to realistic physical situations. In particular, the time evolution of the average values $\ensuremath{\langle}x\ensuremath{\rangle}$ and $\ensuremath{\langle}y\ensuremath{\rangle}$ does not describe the electron trajectory but the motion of some combination of the electron and positron charge distributions with pathological properties (zitterbewegung).