Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Canadian Journal of Physics

Dynamical quantization and classical limit

A. O. Bolivar

Published Apr 1, 2003• 5 citations
Publisher

Abstract

We have worked out a quantization method directly from classical dynamics without using Hamiltonian and Lagrangian functions; we call it dynamical quantization. The present article compares such a method with the Dirac and Feynman quantization procedures and also verifies the logical consistence of the dynamical quantization calculating the classical limit of a Brownian particle, for example. PACS Nos.: 03.65.–w, 05.30.–d, 05.40.+j, 52.65.Ff

DOI
10.1139/p02-121

Related papers

Quantum-Classical Correspondence: Dynamical Quantization and the Classical Limit

Lisa Turner

In only 150 pages, not counting appendices, references, or the index, this book is one author's perspective of the massive theoretical and philosophical hurdles in the no-man's-land separating the classical and quantum domains of physics. It ends with him emphasizing his own theoretical contribution to this area. In his own words, he has attempted to answer: 1. 'How can we obtain the quantum dynamics of open systems initially described by the equations of motion of classical physics (quantization process)? 2. 'How can we retrieve classical dynamics from the quantum mechanical equations of motion by means of a classical limiting process (dequantization process)?' However, this monograph seems overly ambitious. Although the publisher's description refers to this book as 'an accessible entrée', we find that this author scrambles too hastily over the peaks of information that are contained in his large collection of 272 references. Introductory motivating discussions are lacking. Profound ideas are glossed over superficially and shoddily. Equations morph. But no new convincing understanding of the physical world results. The author takes the viewpoint that physical systems are always in interaction with their environment and are thus not isolated and, therefore, not Hamiltonian. This impels him to produce a method of quantization of these stochastic systems without the need of a Hamiltonian. He also has interest in obtaining the classical limit of the quantized results. However, this reviewer does not understand why one needs to consider open systems to understand 'quantum-classical correspondence'. The author demonstrates his method using various examples of the Smoluchowski form of the Fokker--Planck equation. He then renders these equations in a Wigner representation, uses what he terms 'an infinitesimality condition', and associates with a constant having the dimensions of an action. He thereby claims to develop master equations, such as the Caldeira--Leggett equation, without use of a Hamiltonian. However, his procedure is seriously flawed. For example, he considers a case of anomalous Brownian motion using a Kolmogorov stochastic equation, and two cases of Brownian motion, the first with a constant force and the second with a linear force. In each of these three cases, his alleged solutions for a function F(x,p,t), which he wishes to interpret as a probability density, are not in fact solutions of their respective evolution equations. The author, in order to interpret these as probability densities, appears to have obtained the correct solutions of these equations, but then has normalized each of them with a time-dependent function, so that their integrals over the whole phase space remains unity for all time. However, an integration of the original equations over phase space demonstrates that an integral of their solutions over the whole phase space must be time-dependent. Despite the poor editing of this monograph, in which errors in equations abound, and in which the dimensionality of quantities is occasionally incorrect, this reviewer's interest in this subject was not extinguished. We are thus thankful for its extensive bibliography.

Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General•Oct 29, 2004•11 citations

Path-integrals in dynamics

A. M. Arthurs

The Lagrangian formulation of quantum dynamics in terms of path-integrals due to Feynman describes systems for which the Hamiltonian is classical in form and quantization is carried out in terms of commutators rather than anticommutators. The difficulty with the Feynman method is the actual evaluation of the pathintegral itself. An explicit evaluation is given for classical wave motion in one dimension. This requires an extension of the Feynman method which was introduced by Tobocman and studied in detail by Davies. The work of Corson on the question of a unified formulation of dynamics is discussed. (Author)

•Nov 1, 1965•0 citations

Repeated dynamic quantization

Yuri A. Rylov

In conventional quantum mechanics the quantum particle is a special object, whose properties are described by special concepts and quantum principles. The quantization is a special procedure, which is accompanied by introduction of special concepts, and this procedure cannot be repeated. In the model conception of quantum phenomena (MCQP) the quantum particle is a partial case of a stochastic particle, and the quantum dynamics is a special case of the stochastic particle dynamics. In MCQP the quantization is a dynamical procedure, where a special quantum term is added to the Lagrangian of the statistical ensemble of (classical) particles. This procedure can be repeated many times, because it is not accompanied by introduction of new concepts. It is very convenient from the formal viewpoint, because the set of dynamic quantizations forms a one-parameter group, which allows one to separate the dynamical and statistical (stochastic) properties.

arXiv:physics/0403077•Mar 13, 2004•0 citations

Quantization of Hamiltonian and non-Hamiltonian systems

Sergey A. Rashkovskiy

The quantization process was always tightly connected to the Hamiltonian formulation of classical mechanics. For non-Hamiltonian systems, traditional quantization algorithms turn out to be unsuitable. Numerous attempts to quantize non-Hamiltonian systems have shown that this problem is nontrivial and requires the development of new approaches. In this paper, we present the quantization methods that do not depend upon the Hamiltonian formulation of classical mechanics. Two approaches to the quantization of mechanical systems are considered: axiomatic and hydrodynamic. It is shown that the formal application of these approaches to the classical Hamilton-Jacobi theory allows obtaining the wave equation for the corresponding quantum system in natural way. Examples are considered that show the effectiveness of the proposed approaches, both for Hamiltonian and non-Hamiltonian systems. The spinor form of the relativistic Hamilton-Jacobi theory for classical particles is considered. It is shown that it naturally leads to the Dirac equation for the corresponding quantum particle and to its non-Hamiltonian generalization, the bispinor relativistic Kostin equation.

Communications in Analysis and Mechanics•Jan 1, 2023•2 citations

A proposal of quantization of systems without standard lagrangians

Dehai Bao, Zhongyuan Zhu

For many classical systems which disobey Helmholtz conditions and thus possess no standard Lagrangian formulation on velocity phase space TQ , ordinary quantization procedures cannot be directly applied. By shifting to an enlarged space TTQ and viewing the systems as typically constrained ones, we propose a quantization method which seems to be practicable as illustrated by the examples.

Acta Physica Sinica (Overseas Edition)•Jun 1, 1996•2 citations

Semiclassical quantization of non-Hamiltonian dynamical systems without memory

E. D. Vol

We propose a new method of quantization of a wide class of dynamical systems that originates directly from the equations of motion. The method is based on the correspondence between the classical and the quantum Poisson brackets, postulated by Dirac. This correspondence applied to open (non-Hamiltonian) systems allows one to point out the way of transition from the quantum description based on the Lindblad equation to the dynamical description of their classical analogs by the equations of motion and vice versa. As the examples of using of the method we describe the procedure of the quantization of three widely considered dynamical systems: (1) the harmonic oscillator with friction, (2) the oscillator with a nonlinear damping that simulates the process of the emergence of the limit cycle, and (3) the system of two periodic rotators with a weak interaction that synchronizes their oscillations. We discuss a possible application of the method for a description of quantum fluctuations in Josephson junctions with a strong damping and for the quantization of open magnetic systems with a dissipation and a pumping.

arXiv:quant-ph/0509159•Physical Review A•Jun 20, 2006•1 citation
We have worked out a quantization method directly from classical dynamics without using Hamiltonian and Lagrangian functions; we call it dynamical quantization. The present article compares such a method with the Dirac and Feynman quantization procedures and also verifies the logical consistence of the dynamical quantization calculating the classical limit of a Brownian particle, for example. PACS Nos.: 03.65.–w, 05.30.–d, 05.40.+j, 52.65.Ff
In only 150 pages, not counting appendices, references, or the index, this book is one author's perspective of the massive theoretical and philosophical hurdles in the no-man's-land separating the classical and quantum domains of physics. It ends with him emphasizing his own theoretical contribution to this area. In his own words, he has attempted to answer: 1. 'How can we obtain the quantum dynamics of open systems initially described by the equations of motion of classical physics (quantization process)? 2. 'How can we retrieve classical dynamics from the quantum mechanical equations of motion by means of a classical limiting process (dequantization process)?' However, this monograph seems overly ambitious. Although the publisher's description refers to this book as 'an accessible entrée', we find that this author scrambles too hastily over the peaks of information that are contained in his large collection of 272 references. Introductory motivating discussions are lacking. Profound ideas are glossed over superficially and shoddily. Equations morph. But no new convincing understanding of the physical world results. The author takes the viewpoint that physical systems are always in interaction with their environment and are thus not isolated and, therefore, not Hamiltonian. This impels him to produce a method of quantization of these stochastic systems without the need of a Hamiltonian. He also has interest in obtaining the classical limit of the quantized results. However, this reviewer does not understand why one needs to consider open systems to understand 'quantum-classical correspondence'. The author demonstrates his method using various examples of the Smoluchowski form of the Fokker--Planck equation. He then renders these equations in a Wigner representation, uses what he terms 'an infinitesimality condition', and associates with a constant having the dimensions of an action. He thereby claims to develop master equations, such as the Caldeira--Leggett equation, without use of a Hamiltonian. However, his procedure is seriously flawed. For example, he considers a case of anomalous Brownian motion using a Kolmogorov stochastic equation, and two cases of Brownian motion, the first with a constant force and the second with a linear force. In each of these three cases, his alleged solutions for a function F(x,p,t), which he wishes to interpret as a probability density, are not in fact solutions of their respective evolution equations. The author, in order to interpret these as probability densities, appears to have obtained the correct solutions of these equations, but then has normalized each of them with a time-dependent function, so that their integrals over the whole phase space remains unity for all time. However, an integration of the original equations over phase space demonstrates that an integral of their solutions over the whole phase space must be time-dependent. Despite the poor editing of this monograph, in which errors in equations abound, and in which the dimensionality of quantities is occasionally incorrect, this reviewer's interest in this subject was not extinguished. We are thus thankful for its extensive bibliography.
The Lagrangian formulation of quantum dynamics in terms of path-integrals due to Feynman describes systems for which the Hamiltonian is classical in form and quantization is carried out in terms of commutators rather than anticommutators. The difficulty with the Feynman method is the actual evaluation of the pathintegral itself. An explicit evaluation is given for classical wave motion in one dimension. This requires an extension of the Feynman method which was introduced by Tobocman and studied in detail by Davies. The work of Corson on the question of a unified formulation of dynamics is discussed. (Author)
In conventional quantum mechanics the quantum particle is a special object, whose properties are described by special concepts and quantum principles. The quantization is a special procedure, which is accompanied by introduction of special concepts, and this procedure cannot be repeated. In the model conception of quantum phenomena (MCQP) the quantum particle is a partial case of a stochastic particle, and the quantum dynamics is a special case of the stochastic particle dynamics. In MCQP the quantization is a dynamical procedure, where a special quantum term is added to the Lagrangian of the statistical ensemble of (classical) particles. This procedure can be repeated many times, because it is not accompanied by introduction of new concepts. It is very convenient from the formal viewpoint, because the set of dynamic quantizations forms a one-parameter group, which allows one to separate the dynamical and statistical (stochastic) properties.
The quantization process was always tightly connected to the Hamiltonian formulation of classical mechanics. For non-Hamiltonian systems, traditional quantization algorithms turn out to be unsuitable. Numerous attempts to quantize non-Hamiltonian systems have shown that this problem is nontrivial and requires the development of new approaches. In this paper, we present the quantization methods that do not depend upon the Hamiltonian formulation of classical mechanics. Two approaches to the quantization of mechanical systems are considered: axiomatic and hydrodynamic. It is shown that the formal application of these approaches to the classical Hamilton-Jacobi theory allows obtaining the wave equation for the corresponding quantum system in natural way. Examples are considered that show the effectiveness of the proposed approaches, both for Hamiltonian and non-Hamiltonian systems. The spinor form of the relativistic Hamilton-Jacobi theory for classical particles is considered. It is shown that it naturally leads to the Dirac equation for the corresponding quantum particle and to its non-Hamiltonian generalization, the bispinor relativistic Kostin equation.
We propose a new method of quantization of a wide class of dynamical systems that originates directly from the equations of motion. The method is based on the correspondence between the classical and the quantum Poisson brackets, postulated by Dirac. This correspondence applied to open (non-Hamiltonian) systems allows one to point out the way of transition from the quantum description based on the Lindblad equation to the dynamical description of their classical analogs by the equations of motion and vice versa. As the examples of using of the method we describe the procedure of the quantization of three widely considered dynamical systems: (1) the harmonic oscillator with friction, (2) the oscillator with a nonlinear damping that simulates the process of the emergence of the limit cycle, and (3) the system of two periodic rotators with a weak interaction that synchronizes their oscillations. We discuss a possible application of the method for a description of quantum fluctuations in Josephson junctions with a strong damping and for the quantization of open magnetic systems with a dissipation and a pumping.