Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Progress of Theoretical Physics

A Quantum Theory of the Rigid Body in Terms of a Two-Component Spinor

Osamu Hara, Tetsuo Got o, S.-Y. Tsai, Haruichi Yabuki

Published Jun 1, 1967• 5 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1143/ptp.37.1319

Related papers

Description of Pauli Matter as a Continuous Assembly of Small Rotating Bodies

Takehiko Takabayasi, Jean Pierre Vigier

The method of Kramers to represent a two-component spinor is revised and developed into a consequent formulation of the quantum mechanical theory of a non-relativistic spinning particle (§4). Furthermore the method is unified with the hydrodynamical representation of the Pauli electron theory established in the previous article, giving the picture of the Pauli field as an assembly of very small rotating bodies (distinct from usual rigid bodies) continuously distributed in space (§3). The formalistic and physical features of these new representations are considered. Also some remarks are given on the characteristics of the former hydrodynamical formulation (§2). Particularly it is pointed out that Planck's constant enters this scheme only as the constant signifying the magnitude of the spin.

Progress of Theoretical Physics•Dec 1, 1957•22 citations

A Quantum Dynamical, Relativistically Invariant Rigid Body System

Richard F. Arens

Transactions of the American Mathematical Society•Jan 1, 1970•8 citations

GEOMETRY OF THE DIRAC THEORY

David Hestenes

The Dirac wave function is represented in a form where all its components have obvious geometrical and physical interpretations. Six components compose a Lorentz transformation determining the electron velocity are spin directions. This provides the basis for a rigorous connection between relativistic rigid body dynamics and the time evolution of the wave function. The scattering matrix is given a new form as a spinor-valued operator rather than a complex function. The approach reveals a geometric structure of the scattering matrix and simplifies scattering calculations. This claim is supported by an explicit calculation of the differential crosssection and polarization change in Coulomb scattering. Implications for the structure and interpretation of relativistic quantum theory are discussed.

•Jan 1, 1998•8 citations

The Quantum Theory of a Rotating and Deformable Particle

V. G. Nevzglyadov

SPhD•Jul 1, 1962•0 citations

The relation between classical and quantum mechanical rigid motion

G. F. Bertsch

Annals of Physics•Apr 1, 1971•5 citations

Spin ½: the rigid rotator

Peter Holland

Classical dynamics of rigid bodies The difficulties in formulating the theory of spin ½ systems outlined at the end of the last chapter may be avoided if we start from a classical theory of rotation in which the translational and orientational coordinates enter on a symmetrical footing, and pass to the quantum theory via the standard canonical quantization procedure. The result is not simply the Pauli theory written in a different matrix representation but a more general physical theory which explicitly incorporates in the wave equation the extended character of the bodies considered, through moment-of-inertia-dependent terms. As expected, the spin ½ character of the wave is manifested through the dependence of the body motion on the total quantum state via quantum potential and torque terms. Spin is not usually approached from this angle in basic quantum mechanics texts so it is worthwhile to build up the theory from scratch (for a more rigorous treatment see Normand (1980) and for further details: Bopp & Haag (1950), Rosen (1951, 1984), van Winter (1954), Dankel (1970), Holland (1988a, b)). We begin by reviewing some basic results in the classical canonical theory of rigid body motion. Our treatment is confined to a rigid homogeneous sphere with moment of inertia I about any axis passing through its centre, where the centre of mass is located. The sphere carries a rigid charge and a magnetic moment. By Chasle's theorem an arbitrary displacement of a rigid body is composed of a translation together with a rotation about a line fixed in the body.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•May 13, 1993•0 citations
The method of Kramers to represent a two-component spinor is revised and developed into a consequent formulation of the quantum mechanical theory of a non-relativistic spinning particle (§4). Furthermore the method is unified with the hydrodynamical representation of the Pauli electron theory established in the previous article, giving the picture of the Pauli field as an assembly of very small rotating bodies (distinct from usual rigid bodies) continuously distributed in space (§3). The formalistic and physical features of these new representations are considered. Also some remarks are given on the characteristics of the former hydrodynamical formulation (§2). Particularly it is pointed out that Planck's constant enters this scheme only as the constant signifying the magnitude of the spin.
The Dirac wave function is represented in a form where all its components have obvious geometrical and physical interpretations. Six components compose a Lorentz transformation determining the electron velocity are spin directions. This provides the basis for a rigorous connection between relativistic rigid body dynamics and the time evolution of the wave function. The scattering matrix is given a new form as a spinor-valued operator rather than a complex function. The approach reveals a geometric structure of the scattering matrix and simplifies scattering calculations. This claim is supported by an explicit calculation of the differential crosssection and polarization change in Coulomb scattering. Implications for the structure and interpretation of relativistic quantum theory are discussed.
Classical dynamics of rigid bodies The difficulties in formulating the theory of spin ½ systems outlined at the end of the last chapter may be avoided if we start from a classical theory of rotation in which the translational and orientational coordinates enter on a symmetrical footing, and pass to the quantum theory via the standard canonical quantization procedure. The result is not simply the Pauli theory written in a different matrix representation but a more general physical theory which explicitly incorporates in the wave equation the extended character of the bodies considered, through moment-of-inertia-dependent terms. As expected, the spin ½ character of the wave is manifested through the dependence of the body motion on the total quantum state via quantum potential and torque terms. Spin is not usually approached from this angle in basic quantum mechanics texts so it is worthwhile to build up the theory from scratch (for a more rigorous treatment see Normand (1980) and for further details: Bopp & Haag (1950), Rosen (1951, 1984), van Winter (1954), Dankel (1970), Holland (1988a, b)). We begin by reviewing some basic results in the classical canonical theory of rigid body motion. Our treatment is confined to a rigid homogeneous sphere with moment of inertia I about any axis passing through its centre, where the centre of mass is located. The sphere carries a rigid charge and a magnetic moment. By Chasle's theorem an arbitrary displacement of a rigid body is composed of a translation together with a rotation about a line fixed in the body.