Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physical Review A

Generalized center-of-mass coordinate and relative momentum operators studied through unitary transformations

Shen-xi Yu

Published Aug 1, 1996• 3 citations
Publisher

Abstract

A method for studying the generalized center-of-mass coordinate and relative momentum operators is provided. This method is based on unitary transformations. The eigenvectors of these operators can be easily obtained. Their properties and relationship with one-body system eigenvectors are also discussed. \textcopyright{} 1996 The American Physical Society.

DOI
10.1103/physreva.54.1161

Related papers

Common eigenstates of two particles’ center-of-mass coordinates and mass-weighted relative momentum

Fan Hong-Yi, Ye Xiong

We give the explicit form of the common eigenstate \ensuremath{\Vert}\ensuremath{\xi}〉 of the center-of-mass coordinate ${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\mu}}}_{1}$${\mathit{Q}}_{1}$+${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\mu}}}_{2}$${\mathit{Q}}_{2}$ and the mass-weighted relative momentum ${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\mu}}}_{2}$${\mathit{P}}_{1}$-${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\mu}}}_{1}$${\mathit{P}}_{2}$ of two particles, which is more complicated than the common eigenstate of the other pair of commutative operators ${\mathit{Q}}_{2}$-${\mathit{Q}}_{1}$ and ${\mathit{P}}_{1}$+${\mathit{P}}_{2}$. The orthonormal and completeness relation of \ensuremath{\Vert}\ensuremath{\xi}〉 are investigated easily by virtue of the technique of integration within an ordered product of operators. The normally ordered squeezing operator for ${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\mu}}}_{1}$${\mathit{Q}}_{1}$+${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\mu}}}_{2}$${\mathit{Q}}_{2}$ and ${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\mu}}}_{2}$${\mathit{P}}_{1}$-${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\mu}}}_{1}$${\mathit{P}}_{2}$ is also derived by using the \ensuremath{\Vert}\ensuremath{\xi}〉 representation.

Physical Review A•Apr 1, 1995•124 citations

Solving some two-body dynamical problems in 〈ζ|-〈η| representation

Fan Hong‐Yi, Chen Bozhan

We use the common eigenvectors \ensuremath{\Vert}\ensuremath{\zeta}〉 of two particles' center-of-mass position ${\mathit{X}}_{\mathit{c}}$=${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\mu}}}_{1}$${\mathit{X}}_{1}$+${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\mu}}}_{2}$${\mathit{X}}_{2}$ and mass-weighted relative momentum ${\mathit{P}}_{\mathit{r}}$=${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\mu}}}_{2}$${\mathit{P}}_{1}$-${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\mu}}}_{1}$${\mathit{P}}_{2}$, as well as the eigenvectors \ensuremath{\Vert}\ensuremath{\eta}〉 of the other pair commutative operators X=${\mathit{X}}_{1}$-${\mathit{X}}_{2}$ and P=${\mathit{P}}_{1}$+${\mathit{P}}_{2}$ to solve the dynamics of two coupled oscillators. The coupling involves both interbond potential and kinetic coupling. This approach seems to be simple, convenient, and natural. \textcopyright{} 1996 The American Physical Society.

Physical Review A•May 1, 1996•57 citations

Canonical Transformations and Spectra of Quantum Operators

Boris Leaf

The claim that unitary transformations in quantum mechanics correspond to the canonical transformations of classical mechanics is not correct. The spectra of operators produced by unitary transformation of Cartesian coordinate and momentum operators (q, k) are necessarily continuous over the entire real domain of their eigenvalues. Operators with spectra which are not everywhere continuous are generated from (q, k) by one-sided unitary transformations U for which U†U = 1 but for which UU† commutes with either q or k (but not both). If UU† commutes with k, the new coordinates and momenta (r, s) satisfy commutation relations [sm, rn] = 2πi1δm,n, [sm, sn] = 0, but [rm, rn] ≠ 0; (r, s) are canonical only for one-dimensional systems. The properties of one-sided unitary transformations are described; they are characterized by φ(K), the eigenvalue of UU†. The one-dimensional case for which the one-sided unitary transformation is canonical is discussed in detail. A prescription is given for obtaining the operator canonically conjugate to any one-dimensional observable. Generalization to higher dimensions is also discussed.

Journal of Mathematical Physics•Nov 1, 1969•35 citations

Effective Way of Finding Common Eigenvectors of Center-of-Mass Coordinate and Mass-Weighted Relative Momenta of Multi-Partite via IWOP Technique

刘述光, 范洪义

我们在场发现多国参加的一条方便途径与连续统变量纠缠了状态,它是并列的 center-of-mass 和团加权的相对 momenta 的普通特徵向量,由分解表示被构造由的完全性关系的通常订的 Gaussian 形式操作符分析特徵向量方程。整个推导在操作员的一个订的产品以内基于集成的技术。

理论物理通讯:英文版•Jan 1, 2010•0 citations

Entanglement of the Common Eigenvector of Two Particles‘ Center—of—Mass Coordinate and Mass—Weighted Relative Momentum

FANHong-Yi, SUNMing-Zhai

We reveal that the common eigenvector of two particles' center-of-mass coordinate and mass-weightedrelative momentum is an entangled state. Its Schmidt decomposition exhibits that the entanglement involves squeezingwhich depends on the ratio of two particles' masses. The corresponding entangling operators are derived.

理论物理通讯:英文版•Jan 1, 2002•0 citations

Some intricacies of the momentum operator in quantum mechanics

Utpal Roy, Suranjana Ghosh, Bhattacharya, Kaushik

In quantum mechanics textbooks the momentum operator is defined in the Cartesian coordinates and rarely the form of the momentum operator in spherical polar coordinates is discussed. Consequently one always generalizes the Cartesian prescription to other coordinates and falls in a trap. In this work we introduce the difficulties one faces when the question of the momentum operator in general curvilinear coordinates arises. We have tried to elucidate the points related to the definition of the momentum operator taking spherical polar coordinates as our specimen coordinate system and proposed an elementary method in which we can ascertain the form of the momentum operator in general coordinate systems.

arXiv:0706.0924•Jun 6, 2007•4 citations
A method for studying the generalized center-of-mass coordinate and relative momentum operators is provided. This method is based on unitary transformations. The eigenvectors of these operators can be easily obtained. Their properties and relationship with one-body system eigenvectors are also discussed. \textcopyright{} 1996 The American Physical Society.
We give the explicit form of the common eigenstate \ensuremath{\Vert}\ensuremath{\xi}〉 of the center-of-mass coordinate ${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\mu}}}_{1}$Q1{\mathit{Q}}_{1}Q1​+${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\mu}}}_{2}$Q2{\mathit{Q}}_{2}Q2​ and the mass-weighted relative momentum ${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\mu}}}_{2}$P1{\mathit{P}}_{1}P1​-${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\mu}}}_{1}$P2{\mathit{P}}_{2}P2​ of two particles, which is more complicated than the common eigenstate of the other pair of commutative operators Q2{\mathit{Q}}_{2}Q2​-Q1{\mathit{Q}}_{1}Q1​ and P1{\mathit{P}}_{1}P1​+P2{\mathit{P}}_{2}P2​. The orthonormal and completeness relation of \ensuremath{\Vert}\ensuremath{\xi}〉 are investigated easily by virtue of the technique of integration within an ordered product of operators. The normally ordered squeezing operator for ${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\mu}}}_{1}$Q1{\mathit{Q}}_{1}Q1​+${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\mu}}}_{2}$Q2{\mathit{Q}}_{2}Q2​ and ${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\mu}}}_{2}$P1{\mathit{P}}_{1}P1​-${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\mu}}}_{1}$P2{\mathit{P}}_{2}P2​ is also derived by using the \ensuremath{\Vert}\ensuremath{\xi}〉 representation.
We use the common eigenvectors \ensuremath{\Vert}\ensuremath{\zeta}〉 of two particles' center-of-mass position Xc{\mathit{X}}_{\mathit{c}}Xc​=${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\mu}}}_{1}$X1{\mathit{X}}_{1}X1​+${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\mu}}}_{2}$X2{\mathit{X}}_{2}X2​ and mass-weighted relative momentum Pr{\mathit{P}}_{\mathit{r}}Pr​=${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\mu}}}_{2}$P1{\mathit{P}}_{1}P1​-${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\mu}}}_{1}$P2{\mathit{P}}_{2}P2​, as well as the eigenvectors \ensuremath{\Vert}\ensuremath{\eta}〉 of the other pair commutative operators X=X1{\mathit{X}}_{1}X1​-X2{\mathit{X}}_{2}X2​ and P=P1{\mathit{P}}_{1}P1​+P2{\mathit{P}}_{2}P2​ to solve the dynamics of two coupled oscillators. The coupling involves both interbond potential and kinetic coupling. This approach seems to be simple, convenient, and natural. \textcopyright{} 1996 The American Physical Society.
The claim that unitary transformations in quantum mechanics correspond to the canonical transformations of classical mechanics is not correct. The spectra of operators produced by unitary transformation of Cartesian coordinate and momentum operators (q, k) are necessarily continuous over the entire real domain of their eigenvalues. Operators with spectra which are not everywhere continuous are generated from (q, k) by one-sided unitary transformations U for which U†U = 1 but for which UU† commutes with either q or k (but not both). If UU† commutes with k, the new coordinates and momenta (r, s) satisfy commutation relations [sm, rn] = 2πi1δm,n, [sm, sn] = 0, but [rm, rn] ≠ 0; (r, s) are canonical only for one-dimensional systems. The properties of one-sided unitary transformations are described; they are characterized by φ(K), the eigenvalue of UU†. The one-dimensional case for which the one-sided unitary transformation is canonical is discussed in detail. A prescription is given for obtaining the operator canonically conjugate to any one-dimensional observable. Generalization to higher dimensions is also discussed.
In quantum mechanics textbooks the momentum operator is defined in the Cartesian coordinates and rarely the form of the momentum operator in spherical polar coordinates is discussed. Consequently one always generalizes the Cartesian prescription to other coordinates and falls in a trap. In this work we introduce the difficulties one faces when the question of the momentum operator in general curvilinear coordinates arises. We have tried to elucidate the points related to the definition of the momentum operator taking spherical polar coordinates as our specimen coordinate system and proposed an elementary method in which we can ascertain the form of the momentum operator in general coordinate systems.