Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physical Review A

Number and phase uncertainties of theq-analog quantized field

Charles A. Nelson, Mitchell H. Fields

Published Mar 1, 1995• 23 citations
Publisher

Abstract

The q-analog coherent states \ensuremath{\Vert}z${\mathrm{〉}}_{\mathit{q}}$ are used to identify some of the canonical physical properties of the single-mode q-analog quantized radiation field in the \ensuremath{\Vert}z${\mathrm{〉}}_{\mathit{q}}$ ``classical limit'' where \ensuremath{\Vert}z\ensuremath{\Vert} is large. In this quantum-optics-like limit, the fractional uncertainties of most physical quantities (momentum, position, amplitude, phase) which characterize the quantum field are shown to be O(1), and only vanish as O(1/\ensuremath{\Vert}z\ensuremath{\Vert}) when q=1. In contrast to this more-quantum-like behavior for q\ensuremath{\ne}1, the fractional uncertainties do still approach zero for the usual number operator, N, and the N-Hamiltonian ${\mathit{H}}_{\mathit{N}}$\ensuremath{\equiv}\ensuremath{\Elzxh}\ensuremath{\omega}(N+1/2) which describes a free q-boson gas. An empirical signature for q-boson counting statistics is that (\ensuremath{\Delta}N${)}^{2}$/〈N〉\ensuremath{\rightarrow}0 as \ensuremath{\Vert}z\ensuremath{\Vert}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\ensuremath{\infty}. Properties of the q-analog generalizations of the phase operators of Susskind and Glogower (SG) and of the phase operator \ensuremath{\varphi}${\mathrm{^}}_{\mathit{q}}$ of Pegg and Barnett are investigated. In contrast to the manifest q deformed properties of SG operators for moderate \ensuremath{\Vert}z${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Vert}}}^{2}$, the ``Hermitian'' phase operator \ensuremath{\varphi}${\mathrm{^}}_{\mathit{q}}$ still exhibits almost normal classical behavior in the \ensuremath{\Vert}z${\mathrm{〉}}_{\mathit{q}}$ basis. In particular, the conventional (approximate) number-phase uncertainty relation \ensuremath{\Delta}N\ensuremath{\Delta}\ensuremath{\varphi}${\mathrm{^}}_{\mathit{q}}$\ensuremath{\ge}1/2 and approximate commutation relation [N,\ensuremath{\varphi}${\mathrm{^}}_{\mathit{q}}$]=i are found to follow for the single-mode q-analog quantized field. So N and \ensuremath{\varphi}${\mathrm{^}}_{\mathit{q}}$ are almost canonically conjugate operators in the \ensuremath{\Vert}z${\mathrm{〉}}_{\mathit{q}}$ classical limit. The \ensuremath{\Vert}z${\mathrm{〉}}_{\mathit{q}}$ coherent states minimize this uncertainty relation for moderate \ensuremath{\Vert}z${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Vert}}}^{2}$. q-analog generalizations of the P, Q, and W phase-space representations are treated in the Appendix.

DOI
10.1103/physreva.51.2410

Related papers

q-bosons and the q-analogue quantized field

Charles A. Nelson

The q-analogue coherent states {vert_bar}z >{sub q} are used to identify physical signatures for the presence of a q-analogue quantized radiation field in the {vert_bar} >{sub q} classical limit where {vert_bar}z{vert_bar} is large. In this quantum-optics-like limit, the fractional uncertainties of most physical quantities (momentum, position, amplitude, phase) which characterize the quantum field are O(1). They only vanish as O(1/{vert_bar}z{vert_bar}) when q = 1. However, for the number operator, N, and the N-Hamiltonian for a free q-boson gas, H{sub N} = {Dirac_h}{omega}(N + 1/2), the fractional uncertainties do still approach zero. A signature for q-boson counting statistics is that ({Delta}N){sup 2}/<N> {yields} 0 as {vert_bar}z{vert_bar} {yields} {infinity}. Except for its O(1) fractional uncertainty, the q-generalization of the Hermitian phase operator of Pegg and Barnett, {phi}{sub q}, still exhibits normal classical behavior. The standard number-phase uncertainty-relation, {Delta}N {Delta}{phi}{sub q} = 1/2, and the approximate commutation relation, [N,{phi}{sub q}] = i, still hold for the single-mode q-analogue quantized field. So, N and {phi}{sub q} are almost canonically conjugate operators in the {vert_bar}z >{sub q} classical limit. The {vert_bar}z >{sub q} CS`s minimize this uncertainty relation for moderate {vert_bar}z{vert_bar}{sup 2}.

•Jan 1, 1995•0 citations

Novel properties of the q-analogue quantized radiation field

Charles A. Nelson

The 'classical limit' of the q-analog quantized radiation field is studied paralleling conventional quantum optics analyses. The q-generalizations of the phase operator of Susskind and Glogower and that of Pegg and Barnett are constructed. Both generalizations and their associated number-phase uncertainty relations are manifestly q-independent in the n greater than g number basis. However, in the q-coherent state z greater than q basis, the variance of the generic electric field, (delta(E))(sup 2) is found to be increased by a factor lambda(z) where lambda(z) greater than 1 if q not equal to 1. At large amplitudes, the amplitude itself would be quantized if the available resolution of unity for the q-analog coherent states is accepted in the formulation. These consequences are remarkable versus the conventional q = 1 limit.

Presented at•Jan 1, 1992•1 citation

Macro-deformed coherent states and theq-analogue quantized field

William C Kimler IV, Charles A Nelson

The q-analogue coherent states are used to identify some of the canonical physical properties of the single-mode of the q-analogue quantized radiation field. Macro-deformed coherent states (CSs) with striking number and phase signatures are found to arise as , equivalently as . In particular, the CS expectation value of the mean number of particles, where is a `stair function' with equally spaced, integer steps as increases. Macro q-deformation provides a simple model with one region which simultaneously exhibits features from two distinct regions in the well known bosonic case: the quantum mechanical limit with occupation number states and the semi-classical limit with coherent states where |z| is large. The role of the deformation parameter `q' is to enable a smooth interpolation between the classic bosonic CSs (q = 1) and the fermionic CSs ( or 0).

Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General•Feb 7, 1997•5 citations

Quantum phase measurement: A system-theory perspective

Jeffrey H. Shapiro, Scott Roger Shepard

Phase measurements on a single-mode radiation field of annihilation operator a^ are examined from a system-theoretic viewpoint. Quantum estimation theory is used to establish the primacy of the Susskind-Glogower (SG) phase operator, exp^(i\ensuremath{\varphi})==(a^a${\mathrm{^}}^{\mathrm{\ifmmode^\circ\else\textdegree\fi{}}}$${)}^{\mathrm{\ensuremath{-}}1/2}$a^; its phase eigenkets generate the probability operator measure (POM) for maximum-likelihood phase estimation. When used with an optimum input state, the SG-POM produces a local phase accuracy \ensuremath{\delta}\ensuremath{\varphi}\ensuremath{\sim}1/${\mathit{N}}^{2}$, where N is the average photon number of the state. This performance is far superior to the \ensuremath{\delta}\ensuremath{\varphi}\ensuremath{\sim}1/ \ensuremath{\surd}N and \ensuremath{\delta}\ensuremath{\varphi}\ensuremath{\sim}1/N behaviors of coherent-state and optimized squeezed-state interferometers, respectively. A commuting-observables description for the SG-POM on an extended, signal\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}apparatus, state space is derived. It is analogous to the signal-band\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}image-band formulation for optical heterodyne detection. Because heterodyne detection realizes the a^-POM, this analogy may help realize the SG-POM. Two new classes of nonclassical states are identified through study of the SG operator---the coherent phase states and the squeezed phase states. These are direct analogs of the familiar coherent and squeezed states associated with the annihilation operator. Linear system theory is used to elicit a broader class of states---the rational phase states---which includes the coherent and squeezed phase states as special cases, and affords a filter-theory derivation of the minimum average-energy quantum state with prescribed phase-measurement statistics. Fourier theory is also used to prove a number-phase uncertainty relation without recourse to the usual linearization procedures, and to show that the Pegg-Barnett phase operator has the same measurement statistics as the SG-POM for arbitrary quantum states.

Physical Review A•Apr 1, 1991•253 citations

Phase states and phase operators for the quantum harmonic oscillator

Antoine Royer

How does the classical notion of ``phase'' apply to a quantum harmonic oscillator H=1/2(q${\mathrm{^}}^{2}$+p${\mathrm{^}}^{2}$), [q^,p^]=i\ensuremath{\Elzxh}, which cannot have sharp position and momentum? A quantum state \ensuremath{\rho}^ can be assigned a definite classical phase only if it is a large-amplitude localized state. Our only demand, therefore, on a (Hermitian) phase operator \ensuremath{\varphi}^ is that the phase distribution P(\ensuremath{\Phi})= Tr{\ensuremath{\delta}(\ensuremath{\varphi}^-\ensuremath{\Phi})\ensuremath{\rho}^} attribute the correct sharp phase to any such ``classical phase'' state. This requires that the Weyl symbol [\ensuremath{\varphi}^${]}_{\mathit{w}}$(q,p) of \ensuremath{\varphi}^ tend to \ensuremath{\theta} mod2\ensuremath{\pi} as r\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\ensuremath{\infty}, where \ensuremath{\theta}=${\mathrm{tan}}^{\mathrm{\ensuremath{-}}1}$(p/q) and r=(${\mathit{q}}^{2}$+${\mathit{p}}^{2}$${)}^{1/2}$. There are infinitely many such phase operators. Each is expressible as \ensuremath{\varphi}^=[${\mathrm{tan}}^{\mathrm{\ensuremath{-}}1}$(p^/q^)${]}_{\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Omega}}}$, where \ensuremath{\Omega} specifies an ordering rule for q^ and p^. The commutator -i[H^,\ensuremath{\varphi}^]=1-2\ensuremath{\pi}[\ensuremath{\delta}(${\mathrm{tan}}^{\mathrm{\ensuremath{-}}1}$p^/q^)${]}_{\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Omega}}}$ corresponds to the Poisson bracket {H,${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\varphi}}}_{\mathrm{cl}}$${\mathrm{}}}_{\mathrm{}\mathrm{PB}}$=1-2\ensuremath{\pi}\ensuremath{\delta}(\ensuremath{\theta}) for the single-valued classical phase ${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\varphi}}}_{\mathrm{cl}}$=\ensuremath{\theta} mod2\ensuremath{\pi}. Phase states \ensuremath{\Gamma}^(\ensuremath{\Phi}) are defined by the condition that their Weyl symbols [\ensuremath{\Gamma}^(\ensuremath{\Phi})${]}_{\mathit{w}}$(r,\ensuremath{\theta})\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\ensuremath{\delta}(\ensuremath{\theta}-\ensuremath{\Phi}) as r\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\ensuremath{\infty}. If moreover ${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\int}}}_{0}^{2\mathrm{\ensuremath{\pi}}}$d\ensuremath{\Phi}\ensuremath{\Gamma}^(\ensuremath{\Phi})=1^, then \ensuremath{\Gamma}^(\ensuremath{\Phi}) is a phase probability operator measure (POM). In particular, \ensuremath{\delta}(\ensuremath{\varphi}^-\ensuremath{\Phi}) is a phase POM.Normalizable approximate phase states \ensuremath{\Gamma}${\mathrm{^}}^{\mathrm{\ensuremath{\varepsilon}}}$(\ensuremath{\Phi}) are defined by [\ensuremath{\Gamma}${\mathrm{^}}^{\mathrm{\ensuremath{\varepsilon}}}$(\ensuremath{\Phi})${]}_{\mathit{w}}$(r,\ensuremath{\theta}) =2\ensuremath{\pi}${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\varepsilon}}}^{2}$${\mathit{e}}^{\mathrm{\ensuremath{-}}\mathrm{\ensuremath{\varepsilon}}\mathit{r}}$[\ensuremath{\Gamma}^(\ensuremath{\Phi})${]}_{\mathit{w}}$(r,\ensuremath{\theta}), \ensuremath{\varepsilon}\ensuremath{\ll}1. Phase states are not, in general, ``pure orthogonal'' in the sense \ensuremath{\Gamma}^(\ensuremath{\Phi})\ensuremath{\Gamma}^(\ensuremath{\Phi}\ensuremath{'})=\ensuremath{\delta}(\ensuremath{\Phi}-\ensuremath{\Phi}\ensuremath{'})\ensuremath{\Gamma}^(\ensuremath{\Phi}), unless they are of the form \ensuremath{\delta}(\ensuremath{\varphi}^-\ensuremath{\Phi}). However, any phase state \ensuremath{\Gamma}${\mathrm{^}}_{1}$(\ensuremath{\Phi}) is trace orthogonal to any phase POM \ensuremath{\Gamma}${\mathrm{^}}_{2}$(\ensuremath{\Phi}), in the sense that Tr{\ensuremath{\Gamma}${\mathrm{^}}_{2}$(\ensuremath{\Phi}\ensuremath{'})\ensuremath{\Gamma}${\mathrm{^}}_{1}^{\mathrm{\ensuremath{\varepsilon}}}$(\ensuremath{\Phi})}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\ensuremath{\delta}(\ensuremath{\Phi}-\ensuremath{\Phi}\ensuremath{'}) as \ensuremath{\varepsilon}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}0. This implies that measurement of the POM \ensuremath{\Gamma}${\mathrm{^}}_{2}$(\ensuremath{\Phi}\ensuremath{'}) on the state \ensuremath{\Gamma}${\mathrm{^}}_{1}^{\mathrm{\ensuremath{\varepsilon}}}$(\ensuremath{\Phi}) yields the outcome \ensuremath{\Phi} with probability 1 as \ensuremath{\varepsilon}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}0. Phase measurements of the first kind are possible in principle; they would allow one to prepare (approximate) phase states and monitor their phase evolution in a quantum (phase) nondemolishing manner. Cases of special interest are the Susskind-Glogower and the Cahill-Glauber ordered phase states and operators. The energy-phase (or number-phase) uncertainty relation is \ensuremath{\Delta}H\ensuremath{\Delta}\ensuremath{\varphi}\ensuremath{\ge}0, the lower limit \ensuremath{\Delta}H\ensuremath{\Delta}\ensuremath{\varphi}=0 being realized by pure number states; however, for states whose Wigner functions are localized away from the origin and from the extremities of the (single-valued) phase window (0,2\ensuremath{\pi}), the uncertainty relation is effectively \ensuremath{\Delta}H\ensuremath{\Delta}\ensuremath{\varphi}\ensuremath{\ge}1/2. \textcopyright{} 1996 The American Physical Society.

Physical Review A•Jan 1, 1996•38 citations

Phase properties of the quantized single-mode electromagnetic field

David Thomas Pegg, Stephen Mark Barnett

The usual mathematical model of the single-mode electromagnetic field is the harmonic oscillator with an infinite-dimensional state space, which unfortunately cannot accommodate the existence of a Hermitian phase operator. Recently we indicated that this difficulty may be circumvented by using an alternative, and physically indistinguishable, mathematical model of the single-mode field involving a finite but arbitrarily large state space, the dimension of which is allowed to tend to infinity after physically measurable results, such as expectation values, are calculated. In this paper we investigate the properties of a Hermitian phase operator which follows directly and uniquely from the form of the phase states in this space and find them to be well behaved. The phase-number commutator is not subject to the difficulties inherent in Dirac's original commutator, but still preserves the commutator--Poisson-bracket correspondence for physical field states. In the quantum regime of small field strengths, the phase operator predicts phase properties substantially different from those obtained using the conventional Susskind-Glogower operators. In particular, our results are consistent with the vacuum being a state of random phase and the phases of two vacuum fields being uncorrelated. For higher-intensity fields, the quantum phase properties agree with those previously obtained by phenomenological and semiclassical approaches, where such approximations are valid. We illustrate the properties of the phase with a discussion of partial phase states. The Hermitian phase operator also allows us to construct a unitary number-shift operator and phase-moment generating functions. We conclude that the alternative mathematical description of the single-mode field presented here provides a valid, and potentially useful, quantum-mechanical approach for calculating the phase properties of the electromagnetic field.

Physical Review A•Feb 1, 1989•873 citations
The q-analog coherent states \ensuremath{\Vert}z〉q{\mathrm{〉}}_{\mathit{q}}〉q​ are used to identify some of the canonical physical properties of the single-mode q-analog quantized radiation field in the \ensuremath{\Vert}z〉q{\mathrm{〉}}_{\mathit{q}}〉q​ classical limit'' where \ensuremath{\Vert}z\ensuremath{\Vert} is large. In this quantum-optics-like limit, the fractional uncertainties of most physical quantities (momentum, position, amplitude, phase) which characterize the quantum field are shown to be O(1), and only vanish as O(1/\ensuremath{\Vert}z\ensuremath{\Vert}) when q=1. In contrast to this more-quantum-like behavior for q\ensuremath{\ne}1, the fractional uncertainties do still approach zero for the usual number operator, N, and the N-Hamiltonian ${\mathit{H}}_{\mathit{N}}$\ensuremath{\equiv}\ensuremath{\Elzxh}\ensuremath{\omega}(N+1/2) which describes a free q-boson gas. An empirical signature for q-boson counting statistics is that (\ensuremath{\Delta}N${)}^{2}$/〈N〉\ensuremath{\rightarrow}0 as \ensuremath{\Vert}z\ensuremath{\Vert}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\ensuremath{\infty}. Properties of the q-analog generalizations of the phase operators of Susskind and Glogower (SG) and of the phase operator \ensuremath{\varphi}${\mathrm{^}}_{\mathit{q}}$ of Pegg and Barnett are investigated. In contrast to the manifest q deformed properties of SG operators for moderate \ensuremath{\Vert}z${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Vert}}}^{2}$, the Hermitian'' phase operator \ensuremath{\varphi}{\mathrm{^}}_{\mathit{q}} still exhibits almost normal classical behavior in the \ensuremath{\Vert}z〉q{\mathrm{〉}}_{\mathit{q}}〉q​ basis. In particular, the conventional (approximate) number-phase uncertainty relation \ensuremath{\Delta}N\ensuremath{\Delta}\ensuremath{\varphi}{\mathrm{^}}_{\mathit{q}}\ensuremath{\ge}1/2 and approximate commutation relation [N,\ensuremath{\varphi}{\mathrm{^}}_{\mathit{q}}]=i are found to follow for the single-mode q-analog quantized field. So N and \ensuremath{\varphi}{\mathrm{^}}_{\mathit{q}} are almost canonically conjugate operators in the \ensuremath{\Vert}z〉q{\mathrm{〉}}_{\mathit{q}}〉q​ classical limit. The \ensuremath{\Vert}z〉q{\mathrm{〉}}_{\mathit{q}}〉q​ coherent states minimize this uncertainty relation for moderate \ensuremath{\Vert}z\ensuremath∥2{\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Vert}}}^{2}\ensuremath∥2. q-analog generalizations of the P, Q, and W phase-space representations are treated in the Appendix.
The q-analogue coherent states {vert_bar}z >{sub q} are used to identify physical signatures for the presence of a q-analogue quantized radiation field in the {vert_bar} >{sub q} classical limit where {vert_bar}z{vert_bar} is large. In this quantum-optics-like limit, the fractional uncertainties of most physical quantities (momentum, position, amplitude, phase) which characterize the quantum field are O(1). They only vanish as O(1/{vert_bar}z{vert_bar}) when q = 1. However, for the number operator, N, and the N-Hamiltonian for a free q-boson gas, H{sub N} = {Dirac_h}{omega}(N + 1/2), the fractional uncertainties do still approach zero. A signature for q-boson counting statistics is that ({Delta}N){sup 2}/<N> {yields} 0 as {vert_bar}z{vert_bar} {yields} {infinity}. Except for its O(1) fractional uncertainty, the q-generalization of the Hermitian phase operator of Pegg and Barnett, {phi}{sub q}, still exhibits normal classical behavior. The standard number-phase uncertainty-relation, {Delta}N {Delta}{phi}{sub q} = 1/2, and the approximate commutation relation, [N,{phi}{sub q}] = i, still hold for the single-mode q-analogue quantized field. So, N and {phi}{sub q} are almost canonically conjugate operators in the {vert_bar}z >{sub q} classical limit. The {vert_bar}z >{sub q} CS`s minimize this uncertainty relation for moderate {vert_bar}z{vert_bar}{sup 2}.
The 'classical limit' of the q-analog quantized radiation field is studied paralleling conventional quantum optics analyses. The q-generalizations of the phase operator of Susskind and Glogower and that of Pegg and Barnett are constructed. Both generalizations and their associated number-phase uncertainty relations are manifestly q-independent in the n greater than g number basis. However, in the q-coherent state z greater than q basis, the variance of the generic electric field, (delta(E))(sup 2) is found to be increased by a factor lambda(z) where lambda(z) greater than 1 if q not equal to 1. At large amplitudes, the amplitude itself would be quantized if the available resolution of unity for the q-analog coherent states is accepted in the formulation. These consequences are remarkable versus the conventional q = 1 limit.
The q-analogue coherent states are used to identify some of the canonical physical properties of the single-mode of the q-analogue quantized radiation field. Macro-deformed coherent states (CSs) with striking number and phase signatures are found to arise as , equivalently as . In particular, the CS expectation value of the mean number of particles, where is a `stair function' with equally spaced, integer steps as increases. Macro q-deformation provides a simple model with one region which simultaneously exhibits features from two distinct regions in the well known bosonic case: the quantum mechanical limit with occupation number states and the semi-classical limit with coherent states where |z| is large. The role of the deformation parameter `q' is to enable a smooth interpolation between the classic bosonic CSs (q = 1) and the fermionic CSs ( or 0).
Phase measurements on a single-mode radiation field of annihilation operator a^ are examined from a system-theoretic viewpoint. Quantum estimation theory is used to establish the primacy of the Susskind-Glogower (SG) phase operator, exp^(i\ensuremath{\varphi})==(a^a${\mathrm{^}}^{\mathrm{\ifmmode^\circ\else\textdegree\fi{}}}$${)}^{\mathrm{\ensuremath{-}}1/2}$a^; its phase eigenkets generate the probability operator measure (POM) for maximum-likelihood phase estimation. When used with an optimum input state, the SG-POM produces a local phase accuracy \ensuremath{\delta}\ensuremath{\varphi}\ensuremath{\sim}1/N2{\mathit{N}}^{2}N2, where N is the average photon number of the state. This performance is far superior to the \ensuremath{\delta}\ensuremath{\varphi}\ensuremath{\sim}1/ \ensuremath{\surd}N and \ensuremath{\delta}\ensuremath{\varphi}\ensuremath{\sim}1/N behaviors of coherent-state and optimized squeezed-state interferometers, respectively. A commuting-observables description for the SG-POM on an extended, signal\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}apparatus, state space is derived. It is analogous to the signal-band\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}image-band formulation for optical heterodyne detection. Because heterodyne detection realizes the a^-POM, this analogy may help realize the SG-POM. Two new classes of nonclassical states are identified through study of the SG operator---the coherent phase states and the squeezed phase states. These are direct analogs of the familiar coherent and squeezed states associated with the annihilation operator. Linear system theory is used to elicit a broader class of states---the rational phase states---which includes the coherent and squeezed phase states as special cases, and affords a filter-theory derivation of the minimum average-energy quantum state with prescribed phase-measurement statistics. Fourier theory is also used to prove a number-phase uncertainty relation without recourse to the usual linearization procedures, and to show that the Pegg-Barnett phase operator has the same measurement statistics as the SG-POM for arbitrary quantum states.
How does the classical notion of ``phase'' apply to a quantum harmonic oscillator H=1/2(q${\mathrm{^}}^{2}$+p${\mathrm{^}}^{2}$), [q^,p^]=i\ensuremath{\Elzxh}, which cannot have sharp position and momentum? A quantum state \ensuremath{\rho}^ can be assigned a definite classical phase only if it is a large-amplitude localized state. Our only demand, therefore, on a (Hermitian) phase operator \ensuremath{\varphi}^ is that the phase distribution P(\ensuremath{\Phi})= Tr{\ensuremath{\delta}(\ensuremath{\varphi}^-\ensuremath{\Phi})\ensuremath{\rho}^} attribute the correct sharp phase to any such ``classical phase'' state. This requires that the Weyl symbol [\ensuremath{\varphi}^]w{]}_{\mathit{w}}]w​(q,p) of \ensuremath{\varphi}^ tend to \ensuremath{\theta} mod2\ensuremath{\pi} as r\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\ensuremath{\infty}, where \ensuremath{\theta}=${\mathrm{tan}}^{\mathrm{\ensuremath{-}}1}$(p/q) and r=(q2{\mathit{q}}^{2}q2+p2{\mathit{p}}^{2}p2)1/2{)}^{1/2})1/2. There are infinitely many such phase operators. Each is expressible as \ensuremath{\varphi}^=[${\mathrm{tan}}^{\mathrm{\ensuremath{-}}1}$(p^/q^)${]}_{\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Omega}}}$, where \ensuremath{\Omega} specifies an ordering rule for q^ and p^. The commutator -i[H^,\ensuremath{\varphi}^]=1-2\ensuremath{\pi}[\ensuremath{\delta}(${\mathrm{tan}}^{\mathrm{\ensuremath{-}}1}$p^/q^)${]}_{\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Omega}}}$ corresponds to the Poisson bracket {H,${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\varphi}}}_{\mathrm{cl}}$${\mathrm{}}}_{\mathrm{}\mathrm{PB}}$=1-2\ensuremath{\pi}\ensuremath{\delta}(\ensuremath{\theta}) for the single-valued classical phase ${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\varphi}}}_{\mathrm{cl}}$=\ensuremath{\theta} mod2\ensuremath{\pi}. Phase states \ensuremath{\Gamma}^(\ensuremath{\Phi}) are defined by the condition that their Weyl symbols [\ensuremath{\Gamma}^(\ensuremath{\Phi})]w{]}_{\mathit{w}}]w​(r,\ensuremath{\theta})\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\ensuremath{\delta}(\ensuremath{\theta}-\ensuremath{\Phi}) as r\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\ensuremath{\infty}. If moreover ${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\int}}}_{0}^{2\mathrm{\ensuremath{\pi}}}$d\ensuremath{\Phi}\ensuremath{\Gamma}^(\ensuremath{\Phi})=1^, then \ensuremath{\Gamma}^(\ensuremath{\Phi}) is a phase probability operator measure (POM). In particular, \ensuremath{\delta}(\ensuremath{\varphi}^-\ensuremath{\Phi}) is a phase POM.Normalizable approximate phase states \ensuremath{\Gamma}${\mathrm{^}}^{\mathrm{\ensuremath{\varepsilon}}}$(\ensuremath{\Phi}) are defined by [\ensuremath{\Gamma}${\mathrm{^}}^{\mathrm{\ensuremath{\varepsilon}}}$(\ensuremath{\Phi})]w{]}_{\mathit{w}}]w​(r,\ensuremath{\theta}) =2\ensuremath{\pi}${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\varepsilon}}}^{2}$${\mathit{e}}^{\mathrm{\ensuremath{-}}\mathrm{\ensuremath{\varepsilon}}\mathit{r}}$[\ensuremath{\Gamma}^(\ensuremath{\Phi})]w{]}_{\mathit{w}}]w​(r,\ensuremath{\theta}), \ensuremath{\varepsilon}\ensuremath{\ll}1. Phase states are not, in general, ``pure orthogonal'' in the sense \ensuremath{\Gamma}^(\ensuremath{\Phi})\ensuremath{\Gamma}^(\ensuremath{\Phi}\ensuremath{'})=\ensuremath{\delta}(\ensuremath{\Phi}-\ensuremath{\Phi}\ensuremath{'})\ensuremath{\Gamma}^(\ensuremath{\Phi}), unless they are of the form \ensuremath{\delta}(\ensuremath{\varphi}^-\ensuremath{\Phi}). However, any phase state \ensuremath{\Gamma}${\mathrm{^}}_{1}$(\ensuremath{\Phi}) is trace orthogonal to any phase POM \ensuremath{\Gamma}${\mathrm{^}}_{2}$(\ensuremath{\Phi}), in the sense that Tr{\ensuremath{\Gamma}${\mathrm{^}}_{2}$(\ensuremath{\Phi}\ensuremath{'})\ensuremath{\Gamma}${\mathrm{^}}_{1}^{\mathrm{\ensuremath{\varepsilon}}}$(\ensuremath{\Phi})}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\ensuremath{\delta}(\ensuremath{\Phi}-\ensuremath{\Phi}\ensuremath{'}) as \ensuremath{\varepsilon}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}0. This implies that measurement of the POM \ensuremath{\Gamma}${\mathrm{^}}_{2}$(\ensuremath{\Phi}\ensuremath{'}) on the state \ensuremath{\Gamma}${\mathrm{^}}_{1}^{\mathrm{\ensuremath{\varepsilon}}}$(\ensuremath{\Phi}) yields the outcome \ensuremath{\Phi} with probability 1 as \ensuremath{\varepsilon}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}0. Phase measurements of the first kind are possible in principle; they would allow one to prepare (approximate) phase states and monitor their phase evolution in a quantum (phase) nondemolishing manner. Cases of special interest are the Susskind-Glogower and the Cahill-Glauber ordered phase states and operators. The energy-phase (or number-phase) uncertainty relation is \ensuremath{\Delta}H\ensuremath{\Delta}\ensuremath{\varphi}\ensuremath{\ge}0, the lower limit \ensuremath{\Delta}H\ensuremath{\Delta}\ensuremath{\varphi}=0 being realized by pure number states; however, for states whose Wigner functions are localized away from the origin and from the extremities of the (single-valued) phase window (0,2\ensuremath{\pi}), the uncertainty relation is effectively \ensuremath{\Delta}H\ensuremath{\Delta}\ensuremath{\varphi}\ensuremath{\ge}1/2. \textcopyright{} 1996 The American Physical Society.
The usual mathematical model of the single-mode electromagnetic field is the harmonic oscillator with an infinite-dimensional state space, which unfortunately cannot accommodate the existence of a Hermitian phase operator. Recently we indicated that this difficulty may be circumvented by using an alternative, and physically indistinguishable, mathematical model of the single-mode field involving a finite but arbitrarily large state space, the dimension of which is allowed to tend to infinity after physically measurable results, such as expectation values, are calculated. In this paper we investigate the properties of a Hermitian phase operator which follows directly and uniquely from the form of the phase states in this space and find them to be well behaved. The phase-number commutator is not subject to the difficulties inherent in Dirac's original commutator, but still preserves the commutator--Poisson-bracket correspondence for physical field states. In the quantum regime of small field strengths, the phase operator predicts phase properties substantially different from those obtained using the conventional Susskind-Glogower operators. In particular, our results are consistent with the vacuum being a state of random phase and the phases of two vacuum fields being uncorrelated. For higher-intensity fields, the quantum phase properties agree with those previously obtained by phenomenological and semiclassical approaches, where such approximations are valid. We illustrate the properties of the phase with a discussion of partial phase states. The Hermitian phase operator also allows us to construct a unitary number-shift operator and phase-moment generating functions. We conclude that the alternative mathematical description of the single-mode field presented here provides a valid, and potentially useful, quantum-mechanical approach for calculating the phase properties of the electromagnetic field.