Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Theoretical and Mathematical Physics

Generalized energy-time uncertainty relation

Alexander D. Sukhanov

Published Nov 1, 2000• 5 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/bf02551009

Related papers

Energy-time uncertainty relation

Yu.I. Vorontsov

Soviet physics. Doklady•Apr 1, 1980•8 citations

Entropic Energy-Time Uncertainty Relation

Patrick J. Coles, Vishal Katariya, Seth Lloyd +2 more

Energy-time uncertainty plays an important role in quantum foundations and technologies, and it was even discussed by the founders of quantum mechanics. However, standard approaches (e.g., Robertson's uncertainty relation) do not apply to energy-time uncertainty because, in general, there is no Hermitian operator associated with time. Following previous approaches, we quantify time uncertainty by how well one can read off the time from a quantum clock. We then use entropy to quantify the information-theoretic distinguishability of the various time states of the clock. Our main result is an entropic energy-time uncertainty relation for general time-independent Hamiltonians, stated for both the discrete-time and continuous-time cases. Our uncertainty relation is strong, in the sense that it allows for a quantum memory to help reduce the uncertainty, and this formulation leads us to reinterpret it as a bound on the relative entropy of asymmetry. Because of the operational relevance of entropy, we anticipate that our uncertainty relation will have information-processing applications.

arXiv:1805.07772•Physical Review Letters•Mar 12, 2019•39 citations

Time-energy and time-entropy uncertainty relations in dissipative quantum dynamics

Gian Paolo Beretta

We derive exact relations and general inequalities that extend the usual time-energy uncertainty relations from the domain of unitary Hamiltonian dynamics to that of dissipative dynamics as described by a broad class of linear and nonlinear evolution equations for the density operator. For non-dissipative dynamics, by using the Schroedinger inequality instead of the Heisenberg-Robertson inequality, we obtain a general exact time-energy uncertainty relation which is sharper than the usual Mandelstam-Tamm-Messiah relation $τ_FΔ_H\ge \hbar/2$. For simultaneous unitary/dissipative dynamics, the usual time-energy uncertainty relation is replaced by a less restrictive relation that depends on the characteristic time of dissipation, $τ$, and the uncertainty associated with the generalized nonequilibrium Massieu-function operator which defines the structure of the dissipative part of the assumed class of evolution equations. Within the steepest-entropy-ascent dissipative quantum dynamics of an isolated system introduced earlier by this author, we obtain the interesting time-energy and time-entropy uncertainty relation $(2τ_FΔ_H/ \hbar)^2+ (τ_FΔ_S/k_Bτ)^2 \ge 1$. We illustrate this result and various other inequalities by means of numerical simulations.

arXiv:quant-ph/0511091•Nov 9, 2005•5 citations

On the Time—Energy Uncertainty Relation

Eugene Paul Wigner

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 1988•21 citations

Time in the Quantum Theory and the Uncertainty Relation for Time and Energy

Yakir Aharonov, David Böhm

Because time does not appear in Schr\"odinger's equation as an operator but only as a parameter, the time-energy uncertainty relation must be formulated in a special way. This problem has in fact been studied by many authors and we give a summary of their treatments. We then criticize the main conclusion of these treatments; viz., that in a measurement of energy carried out in a time interval, $\ensuremath{\Delta}t$, there must be a minimum uncertainty in the transfer of energy to the observed system, given by $\ensuremath{\Delta}({E}^{\ensuremath{'}}\ensuremath{-}E)>~\frac{h}{\ensuremath{\Delta}t}$. We show that this conclusion is erroneous in two respects. First, it is not consistent with the general principles of the quantum theory, which require that all uncertainty relations be expressible in terms of the mathematical formalism, i.e., by means of operators, wave functions, etc. Secondly, the examples of measurement processes that were used to derive the above uncertainty relation are not general enough. We then develop a systematic presentation of our own point of view, with regard to the role of time in the quantum theory, and give a concrete example of a measurement process not satisfying the above uncertainty relation.

Physical Review•Jun 1, 1961•481 citations

On the Time—Energy Uncertainty Relation

E. P. Wigner

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 1997•10 citations
Energy-time uncertainty plays an important role in quantum foundations and technologies, and it was even discussed by the founders of quantum mechanics. However, standard approaches (e.g., Robertson's uncertainty relation) do not apply to energy-time uncertainty because, in general, there is no Hermitian operator associated with time. Following previous approaches, we quantify time uncertainty by how well one can read off the time from a quantum clock. We then use entropy to quantify the information-theoretic distinguishability of the various time states of the clock. Our main result is an entropic energy-time uncertainty relation for general time-independent Hamiltonians, stated for both the discrete-time and continuous-time cases. Our uncertainty relation is strong, in the sense that it allows for a quantum memory to help reduce the uncertainty, and this formulation leads us to reinterpret it as a bound on the relative entropy of asymmetry. Because of the operational relevance of entropy, we anticipate that our uncertainty relation will have information-processing applications.
We derive exact relations and general inequalities that extend the usual time-energy uncertainty relations from the domain of unitary Hamiltonian dynamics to that of dissipative dynamics as described by a broad class of linear and nonlinear evolution equations for the density operator. For non-dissipative dynamics, by using the Schroedinger inequality instead of the Heisenberg-Robertson inequality, we obtain a general exact time-energy uncertainty relation which is sharper than the usual Mandelstam-Tamm-Messiah relation τFΔH≥ℏ/2τ_FΔ_H\ge \hbar/2τF​ΔH​≥ℏ/2. For simultaneous unitary/dissipative dynamics, the usual time-energy uncertainty relation is replaced by a less restrictive relation that depends on the characteristic time of dissipation, τττ, and the uncertainty associated with the generalized nonequilibrium Massieu-function operator which defines the structure of the dissipative part of the assumed class of evolution equations. Within the steepest-entropy-ascent dissipative quantum dynamics of an isolated system introduced earlier by this author, we obtain the interesting time-energy and time-entropy uncertainty relation (2τFΔH/ℏ)2+(τFΔS/kBτ)2≥1(2τ_FΔ_H/ \hbar)^2+ (τ_FΔ_S/k_Bτ)^2 \ge 1(2τF​ΔH​/ℏ)2+(τF​ΔS​/kB​τ)2≥1. We illustrate this result and various other inequalities by means of numerical simulations.
Because time does not appear in Schr\"odinger's equation as an operator but only as a parameter, the time-energy uncertainty relation must be formulated in a special way. This problem has in fact been studied by many authors and we give a summary of their treatments. We then criticize the main conclusion of these treatments; viz., that in a measurement of energy carried out in a time interval, $\ensuremath{\Delta}t$, there must be a minimum uncertainty in the transfer of energy to the observed system, given by $\ensuremath{\Delta}({E}^{\ensuremath{'}}\ensuremath{-}E)>~\frac{h}{\ensuremath{\Delta}t}$. We show that this conclusion is erroneous in two respects. First, it is not consistent with the general principles of the quantum theory, which require that all uncertainty relations be expressible in terms of the mathematical formalism, i.e., by means of operators, wave functions, etc. Secondly, the examples of measurement processes that were used to derive the above uncertainty relation are not general enough. We then develop a systematic presentation of our own point of view, with regard to the role of time in the quantum theory, and give a concrete example of a measurement process not satisfying the above uncertainty relation.