Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

American Journal of Physics

Comment on “An underrated entanglement: Riccati and Schrödinger equations,” by S. B. Haley [Am. J. Phys. 65 (3), 237–243 (1997)]

A. A. Stahlhofen

Published Mar 1, 1999• 3 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1119/1.19234

Related papers

Comments on ‘‘Assumptions implying the Schrödinger equation,’’ by Thomas F. Jordan [Am. J. Phys. 59, 606–608 (1991)]

Nicolas Gisin

American Journal of Physics•Jan 1, 1993•10 citations

Time-Independent Schrödinger and Riccati Equations

Dieter Schuch

Fundamental theories of physics•Jan 1, 2018•0 citations

Comment on “Quantum mechanics of the 1∕x2 potential,” by Andrew M. Essin and David J. Griffiths [Am. J. Phys. 74 (2), 109–117 (2006)]

C. Cisneros, R. P. Martı́nez-y-Romero, H. N. Núñez‐Yépez +1 more

American Journal of Physics•Sep 11, 2007•11 citations

Comment on ‘‘Quantum mysteries revisited,’’ by N. David Mermin [Am. J. Phys. 5 8, 731–734 (1990)]

Achin Sen

American Journal of Physics•Aug 1, 1991•9 citations

Comment on “A quantum bouncing ball,” by Julio Gea-Banacloche [Am. J. Phys. 67 (9), 776–782 (1999)]

Olivier Vallée

American Journal of Physics•Jul 1, 2000•29 citations

Comment on ‘‘Probability theory in quantum mechanics’’ [L.E. Ballentine, Am. J. Phys. 5 4, 883 (1986)]

Lazar Mayants

American Journal of Physics•Jul 1, 1987•3 citations