Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physical Review Letters

Lin and Ballentine reply

W. A. Lin, L. E. Ballentine

Published Jul 1, 1991• 10 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1103/physrevlett.67.159

Related papers

Reply to Ballentine's Comments

Henry Pierce Stapp

American Journal of Physics•Jan 1, 1974•0 citations

Reply to comments by L E Ballentine

Delbert A. Greenwood

Proceedings of the Physical Society•Nov 1, 1966•0 citations

A Critical, But Hopefully Cordial, QBist Reply to Ballentine

Blake C. Stacey

L. E. Ballentine's remarks in Physics Today about the QBist interpretation of quantum mechanics are generally wide of the mark.

arXiv:2311.06904•Nov 12, 2023•0 citations

Reply to Leiter's Comment

E. T. Jaynes

Physical Review A•Jul 1, 1970•23 citations

Author's response

Sheldon R. Smith

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics•Apr 5, 2003•2 citations

Dynamical quasidegeneracies and quantum tunneling

Asher Peres

A Comment on the Letter by W. A. Lin and L. E. Ballentine, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 2927 (1990).Received 26 December 1990DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.67.158©1991 American Physical Society

Physical Review Letters•Jul 1, 1991•59 citations