Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

IEEE International Symposium on Multiple-Valued Logic (ISMVL)

Boolean Functions of Low Polynomial Degree for Quantum Query Complexity Theory

Rūsiņš Freivalds, Liva Garkaje

Published May 1, 2007• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

The degree of a polynomial representing (or approximating) a function f is a lower bound for the quantum query complexity of f. This observation has been a source of many lower bounds on quantum algorithms. It has been an open problem whether this lower bound is tight. This is why Boolean functions are needed with a high number of essential variables and a low polynomial degree. Unfortunately, it is a well-known problem to construct such functions. The best separation between these two complexity measures of a Boolean function was exhibited by Ambai- nis [5]. He constructed functions with polynomial degree M and number of variables Omega(M2). We improve such a separation to become exponential. On the other hand, we use a computerized exhaustive search to prove tightness of this bound.

DOI
10.1109/ismvl.2007.11

Related papers

Polynomial degree vs. quantum query complexity

Andris Ambainis

The degree of a polynomial representing (or approximating) a function f is a lower bound for the number of quantum queries needed to compute f. This observation has been a source of many lower bounds on quantum algorithms. It has been an open problem whether this lower bound is tight. We exhibit a function with polynomial degree M and quantum query complexity Ω(M^{1.321...}). This is the first superlinear separation between polynomial degree and quantum query complexity. The lower bound is shown by a new, more general version of quantum adversary method.

arXiv:quant-ph/0305028•May 6, 2003•0 citations

Polynomial degree vs. quantum query complexity

Andris Ambainis

The degree of a polynomial representing (or approximating) a function f is a lower bound for the quantum query complexity of f. This observation has been a source of many lower bounds on quantum algorithms. It has been an open problem whether this lower bound is tight. We exhibit a function with polynomial degree M and quantum query complexity (M/sup 1.321.../). This is the first superlinear separation between polynomial degree and quantum query complexity. The lower bound is shown by a new, more general version of quantum adversary method.

Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science•Feb 3, 2004•39 citations

How Low Can Approximate Degree and Quantum Query Complexity be for Total Boolean Functions?

Andris Ambainis, Ronald de Wolf

It has long been known that any Boolean function that depends on n input variables has both degree and exact quantum query complexity of Omega(log n), and that this bound is achieved for some functions. In this paper we study the case of approximate degree and bounded-error quantum query complexity. We show that for these measures the correct lower bound is Omega(log n / loglog n), and we exhibit quantum algorithms for two functions where this bound is achieved.

arXiv:1206.0717•Jun 4, 2012•0 citations

How Low Can Approximate Degree and Quantum Query Complexity Be for Total Boolean Functions?

Andris Ambainis, Ronald de Wolf

It has long been known that any Boolean function that depends on n input variables has both degree and exact quantum query complexity of Omega(log n), and that this bound is achieved for some functions. In this paper we study the case of approximate degree and bounded-error quantum query complexity. We show that for these measures the correct lower bound is Omega(log n/log log n), and we exhibit quantum algorithms for two functions where this bound is achieved.

IEEE Conference on Computational Complexity (CCC)•Jun 1, 2013•3 citations

The polynomial method strikes back: tight quantum query bounds via dual polynomials

Mark Bun, Robin Kothari, Justin Thaler

The approximate degree of a Boolean function f is the least degree of a real polynomial that approximates f pointwise to error at most 1/3. The approximate degree of f is known to be a lower bound on the quantum query complexity of f (Beals et al., FOCS 1998 and J. ACM 2001).

arXiv:1710.09079•ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC)•Jun 20, 2018•39 citations

Algorithmic Polynomials

Alexander A. Sherstov

The approximate degree of a Boolean function $f(x_{1},x_{2},\ldots,x_{n})$ is the minimum degree of a real polynomial that approximates $f$ pointwise within $1/3$. Upper bounds on approximate degree have a variety of applications in learning theory, differential privacy, and algorithm design in general. Nearly all known upper bounds on approximate degree arise in an existential manner from bounds on quantum query complexity. We develop a first-principles, classical approach to the polynomial approximation of Boolean functions. We use it to give the first constructive upper bounds on the approximate degree of several fundamental problems: - $O\bigl(n^{\frac{3}{4}-\frac{1}{4(2^{k}-1)}}\bigr)$ for the $k$-element distinctness problem; - $O(n^{1-\frac{1}{k+1}})$ for the $k$-subset sum problem; - $O(n^{1-\frac{1}{k+1}})$ for any $k$-DNF or $k$-CNF formula; - $O(n^{3/4})$ for the surjectivity problem. In all cases, we obtain explicit, closed-form approximating polynomials that are unrelated to the quantum arguments from previous work. Our first three results match the bounds from quantum query complexity. Our fourth result improves polynomially on the $Θ(n)$ quantum query complexity of the problem and refutes the conjecture by several experts that surjectivity has approximate degree $Ω(n)$. In particular, we exhibit the first natural problem with a polynomial gap between approximate degree and quantum query complexity.

arXiv:1801.04607•Jan 14, 2018•0 citations
The degree of a polynomial representing (or approximating) a function f is a lower bound for the quantum query complexity of f. This observation has been a source of many lower bounds on quantum algorithms. It has been an open problem whether this lower bound is tight. This is why Boolean functions are needed with a high number of essential variables and a low polynomial degree. Unfortunately, it is a well-known problem to construct such functions. The best separation between these two complexity measures of a Boolean function was exhibited by Ambai- nis [5]. He constructed functions with polynomial degree M and number of variables Omega(M2). We improve such a separation to become exponential. On the other hand, we use a computerized exhaustive search to prove tightness of this bound.
The degree of a polynomial representing (or approximating) a function f is a lower bound for the number of quantum queries needed to compute f. This observation has been a source of many lower bounds on quantum algorithms. It has been an open problem whether this lower bound is tight. We exhibit a function with polynomial degree M and quantum query complexity Ω(M^{1.321...}). This is the first superlinear separation between polynomial degree and quantum query complexity. The lower bound is shown by a new, more general version of quantum adversary method.
The degree of a polynomial representing (or approximating) a function f is a lower bound for the quantum query complexity of f. This observation has been a source of many lower bounds on quantum algorithms. It has been an open problem whether this lower bound is tight. We exhibit a function with polynomial degree M and quantum query complexity (M/sup 1.321.../). This is the first superlinear separation between polynomial degree and quantum query complexity. The lower bound is shown by a new, more general version of quantum adversary method.
The approximate degree of a Boolean function f(x1,x2,…,xn)f(x_{1},x_{2},\ldots,x_{n})f(x1​,x2​,…,xn​) is the minimum degree of a real polynomial that approximates fff pointwise within 1/31/31/3. Upper bounds on approximate degree have a variety of applications in learning theory, differential privacy, and algorithm design in general. Nearly all known upper bounds on approximate degree arise in an existential manner from bounds on quantum query complexity. We develop a first-principles, classical approach to the polynomial approximation of Boolean functions. We use it to give the first constructive upper bounds on the approximate degree of several fundamental problems: - O(n34−14(2k−1))O\bigl(n^{\frac{3}{4}-\frac{1}{4(2^{k}-1)}}\bigr)O(n43​−4(2k−1)1​) for the kkk-element distinctness problem; - O(n1−1k+1)O(n^{1-\frac{1}{k+1}})O(n1−k+11​) for the kkk-subset sum problem; - O(n1−1k+1)O(n^{1-\frac{1}{k+1}})O(n1−k+11​) for any kkk-DNF or kkk-CNF formula; - O(n3/4)O(n^{3/4})O(n3/4) for the surjectivity problem. In all cases, we obtain explicit, closed-form approximating polynomials that are unrelated to the quantum arguments from previous work. Our first three results match the bounds from quantum query complexity. Our fourth result improves polynomially on the Θ(n)Θ(n)Θ(n) quantum query complexity of the problem and refutes the conjecture by several experts that surjectivity has approximate degree Ω(n)Ω(n)Ω(n). In particular, we exhibit the first natural problem with a polynomial gap between approximate degree and quantum query complexity.