Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physical review. B, Condensed matter

Canonical-ensemble results for the Ising model with random bonds in two dimensions

Julio F. Fernández

Published Jan 1, 1982• 22 citations
Publisher

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to show how some interesting numerically exact thermal averages can be computed for finite two-dimensional Ising models by a transfer-matrix method, and to apply these methods to the Ising version of the Edwards-Anderson (EA) model of a spin-glass to ascertain whether there is a phase transition. We do not study the spatial dependence of $〈{\ensuremath{\sigma}}_{0}{\ensuremath{\sigma}}_{l}〉$ for, as we show with an example, its behavior for finite systems can be misleading. It is first shown how to obtain ${\ensuremath{\chi}}_{\mathrm{EA}}^{\ensuremath{'}}$, defined by ${\ensuremath{\chi}}_{\mathrm{EA}}^{\ensuremath{'}}={N}^{\ensuremath{-}1}\ensuremath{\Sigma}{〈{〈{\ensuremath{\sigma}}_{i}{\ensuremath{\sigma}}_{j}〉}_{T}^{2}〉}_{J}$. We compute ${\ensuremath{\chi}}_{\mathrm{EA}}^{\ensuremath{'}}$ and study the quantity $\ensuremath{\Lambda}=\frac{\ensuremath{-}\ensuremath{\partial}\mathrm{ln}({\ensuremath{\chi}}_{\mathrm{EA}}^{\ensuremath{'}})}{\ensuremath{\partial}T}$, both as a function of temperature ($T$) and of the number of spins ($N$) in the system. The results obtained for square systems of up to 100 spins in the case where $J=\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}1$ with equal probability and for square systems of up to 121 spins in the case where each $J$ is normally distributed about $J=0$ are in accord with the existence of a critical point at ${T}_{0}\ensuremath{\simeq}1.0$ and at ${T}_{0}\ensuremath{\simeq}0.6$, respectively. In addition the value $\ensuremath{\nu}\ensuremath{\approx}1$ is obtained. The value $q=0$ for $T>0$ is consistent with the results obtained. The low-temperature entropy per spin ($S$) is computed for long strips of different widths. Extrapolation to an infinite width yields $\frac{S}{k}\ensuremath{\simeq}0.07$. It is also shown how to calculate the probability, $P(\ensuremath{\eta})$, that the quantity, $\ensuremath{\eta}={N}^{\ensuremath{-}1}\ensuremath{\Sigma}{\ensuremath{\tau}}_{i}{\ensuremath{\sigma}}_{i}$, where each ${\ensuremath{\tau}}_{i}=0,\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}1$ take any value in the range $1<~\ensuremath{\eta}<~1$. The probability, $P(\ensuremath{\eta})$, obtained for the EA model at low temperatures often has several maxima separated by regions of improbable values of $\ensuremath{\eta}$, as is to be expected of a system with metastable states.

DOI
10.1103/physrevb.25.417

Related papers

Comment on "Canonical-ensemble results for the Ising model with random bonds in two dimensions"

Kurt Binder, I. Morgenstern

In numerical calculations of a quantity $\ensuremath{\Lambda}(T)\ensuremath{\equiv}\ensuremath{-}\frac{\ensuremath{\partial}\mathrm{ln}{\ensuremath{\chi}}_{\mathrm{EA}}^{{}^{\ensuremath{'}}}}{\ensuremath{\partial}T}$, where ${\ensuremath{\chi}}_{\mathrm{EA}}^{\ensuremath{'}}\ensuremath{\equiv}\ensuremath{\Sigma}{({〈{\ensuremath{\sigma}}_{i}{\ensuremath{\sigma}}_{j}〉}_{T}^{2})}_{J}$ for finite $L\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}L$ Edwards-Anderson (EA) models, Fern\'andez [Phys. Rev. B 25, 417 (1982)] finds that $\ensuremath{\Lambda}(T)$ has a peak at ${T}_{0}\ensuremath{\approx}0.6$ (Gaussian model) or ${T}_{0}\ensuremath{\approx}1.0$, for $L=4,6,8,10,or 11$, respectively. He finds that the peak height ${\ensuremath{\Lambda}}_{max}=\ensuremath{\Lambda}({T}_{0})$ increases in direct proportion to $L$, and interprets his results in terms of a phase transition at ${T}_{0}$, where the correlation length ${\ensuremath{\xi}}_{\mathrm{EA}}\ensuremath{\propto}{(T\ensuremath{-}{T}_{0})}^{\ensuremath{-}1}$. This conclusion is in disagreement with our previous findings that ${\ensuremath{\xi}}_{\mathrm{EA}}$ is finite in this temperature range, although a (dynamic) "freezing transition" of the spins occurs at ${T}_{f}\ensuremath{\approx}1.0$ (Gaussian model) or ${T}_{f}\ensuremath{\approx}1.3$ ($\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}J$ model), which lead us to suggest that the two-dimensional EA model has a phase transition at zero temperature only.

Physical review. B, Condensed matter•May 1, 1983•8 citations

Numerical results for the Edwards-Anderson spin glass model in two dimensions

Julio F. Fernández

A computational method which yields exact thermal averages is reported and applied to L*L Ising systems with random bonds, gaussian distributed (E-A model), in two dimensions. The author obtains Phi =N -1 Sigma (( sigma i sigma j ) T 2 ) J and look for a divergence by examining Psi =-(1/ phi )( delta phi / delta T). Psi obtains its maximum value, Psi max at a temperature of 0.6 approximately, and Psi max increases approximately linearly with L, at least for L<or=11, indicating a phase transition.

Journal of Physics C Solid State Physics•Aug 10, 1980•9 citations

’’Exact’’ calculations for finite Ising spin glass lattices (invited)

I. Morgenstern, Kurt Binder

By a recursive method numerically exact free energies and correlation functions are calculated for finite two- and three-dimensional Ising lattices with bonds chosen randomly either ±J or from a gaussian distribution. While (dynamic) Monte Carlo simulations of precisely the same systems show the onset of Edwards-Anderson ordering at rather sharply defined nonzero freezing temperature Tf, the exact static calculations imply that there is no static order parameter qEA = [<Si≳2T]av at nonzero temperature. The correlation length, which would become infinite when qEA would start to become nonzero, is found at Tf to be of the order of a few lattice spacings only. As a result, the freezing-in of these models is identified as a dynamic phenomenon, and not a phase transition associated with static Edwards-Anderson order. The specific heat of the gaussian spin glass is found to vary nearly linear with temperature. On the other hand, in two-dimensional Ising systems with random fields a nonzero (Mattis-like) spin glass order is found.

Journal of Applied Physics•Mar 1, 1981•13 citations

Equilibrium properties of the two-dimensional random (+or-J) Ising model

H -F Cheung, W. L. McMillan

The thermodynamic properties of the two-dimensional Ising model with random (+or-J) nearest-neighbour interactions are determined using a numerical transfer matrix method. The calculations are performed on a long strip of width L(3<or=L<or=11) with periodic boundary conditions and finite-size scaling arguments are used to extrapolate to L= infinity . The central result is that the spin-glass correlation length diverges as T- nu at low temperature T with nu =2.59+or-0.13. The heat capacity is similar to the Schottky anomaly. At zero temperature the entropy per spin is 0.0701+or-0.0005 and the internal energy per spin is -(1.4024+or-0.0012)J.

Journal of Physics C Solid State Physics•Dec 30, 1983•66 citations

Equilibrium properties of a two-dimensional random Ising model with a continuous distribution of interactions

H -F Cheung, W. L. McMillan

The equilibrium properties of the two-dimensional Ising model with nearest-neighbour interactions uniformly distributed between -J and J have been determined using a numerical transfer matrix method. The calculations are performed on a long strip of width L(3<or=L<or=11) with periodic boundary conditions and finite-size scaling arguments are used to extrapolate to L= infinity . The spin-glass correlation length diverges as T - nu at low temperature with nu =2.96+or-0.22. The correlation length scaling function differs from that for the random Ising model with interactions of magnitude J and random sign showing that the two models with different distribution functions belong to different universality classes. The heat capacity is linear at low temperature and can be interpreted using a continuous distribution of two-level states which is finite at zero energy and increases approximately linearly with energy. At zero temperature the entropy is zero and the internal energy extrapolated to L= infinity is -(0.7943+or-0.0010)J.

Journal of Physics C Solid State Physics•Dec 30, 1983•22 citations

Temperature Chaos and Bond Chaos in Edwards-Anderson Ising Spin Glasses: Domain-Wall Free-Energy Measurements

M. Sasaki, Koji Hukushima, Hajime Yoshino +1 more

Domain-wall free energy $\ensuremath{\delta}F$, entropy $\ensuremath{\delta}S$, and the correlation function ${C}_{\mathrm{temp}}$ of $\ensuremath{\delta}F$ are measured independently in the four-dimensional $\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}J$ Edwards-Anderson (EA) Ising spin glass. The stiffness exponent $\ensuremath{\theta}$, the fractal dimension of domain walls ${d}_{s}$, and the chaos exponent $\ensuremath{\zeta}$ are extracted from the finite-size scaling analysis of $\ensuremath{\delta}F$, $\ensuremath{\delta}S$, and ${C}_{\mathrm{temp}}$, respectively, well inside the spin-glass phase. The three exponents are confirmed to satisfy the scaling relation $\ensuremath{\zeta}={d}_{s}/2\ensuremath{-}\ensuremath{\theta}$ derived by the droplet theory within our numerical accuracy. We also study bond chaos induced by random variation of bonds, and find that the bond and temperature perturbations yield the universal chaos effects described by a common scaling function and the chaos exponent. These results strongly support the appropriateness of the droplet theory for the description of chaos effect in the EA Ising spin glasses.

arXiv:cond-mat/0411138•Physical Review Letters•Dec 20, 2005•44 citations
The purpose of this paper is to show how some interesting numerically exact thermal averages can be computed for finite two-dimensional Ising models by a transfer-matrix method, and to apply these methods to the Ising version of the Edwards-Anderson (EA) model of a spin-glass to ascertain whether there is a phase transition. We do not study the spatial dependence of 〈\ensuremathσ0\ensuremathσl〉〈{\ensuremath{\sigma}}_{0}{\ensuremath{\sigma}}_{l}〉〈\ensuremathσ0​\ensuremathσl​〉 for, as we show with an example, its behavior for finite systems can be misleading. It is first shown how to obtain \ensuremathχEA\ensuremath′{\ensuremath{\chi}}_{\mathrm{EA}}^{\ensuremath{'}}\ensuremathχEA\ensuremath′​, defined by \ensuremathχEA\ensuremath′=N\ensuremath−1\ensuremathΣ〈〈\ensuremathσi\ensuremathσj〉T2〉J{\ensuremath{\chi}}_{\mathrm{EA}}^{\ensuremath{'}}={N}^{\ensuremath{-}1}\ensuremath{\Sigma}{〈{〈{\ensuremath{\sigma}}_{i}{\ensuremath{\sigma}}_{j}〉}_{T}^{2}〉}_{J}\ensuremathχEA\ensuremath′​=N\ensuremath−1\ensuremathΣ〈〈\ensuremathσi​\ensuremathσj​〉T2​〉J​. We compute \ensuremathχEA\ensuremath′{\ensuremath{\chi}}_{\mathrm{EA}}^{\ensuremath{'}}\ensuremathχEA\ensuremath′​ and study the quantity \ensuremathΛ=\ensuremath−\ensuremath∂ln(\ensuremathχEA\ensuremath′)\ensuremath∂T\ensuremath{\Lambda}=\frac{\ensuremath{-}\ensuremath{\partial}\mathrm{ln}({\ensuremath{\chi}}_{\mathrm{EA}}^{\ensuremath{'}})}{\ensuremath{\partial}T}\ensuremathΛ=\ensuremath∂T\ensuremath−\ensuremath∂ln(\ensuremathχEA\ensuremath′​)​, both as a function of temperature (TTT) and of the number of spins (NNN) in the system. The results obtained for square systems of up to 100 spins in the case where J=\ifmmode±\else\textpm\fi1J=\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}1J=\ifmmode±\else\textpm\fi1 with equal probability and for square systems of up to 121 spins in the case where each JJJ is normally distributed about J=0J=0J=0 are in accord with the existence of a critical point at T0\ensuremath≃1.0{T}_{0}\ensuremath{\simeq}1.0T0​\ensuremath≃1.0 and at T0\ensuremath≃0.6{T}_{0}\ensuremath{\simeq}0.6T0​\ensuremath≃0.6, respectively. In addition the value \ensuremathν\ensuremath≈1\ensuremath{\nu}\ensuremath{\approx}1\ensuremathν\ensuremath≈1 is obtained. The value q=0q=0q=0 for T>0T>0T>0 is consistent with the results obtained. The low-temperature entropy per spin (SSS) is computed for long strips of different widths. Extrapolation to an infinite width yields Sk\ensuremath≃0.07\frac{S}{k}\ensuremath{\simeq}0.07kS​\ensuremath≃0.07. It is also shown how to calculate the probability, P(\ensuremathη)P(\ensuremath{\eta})P(\ensuremathη), that the quantity, \ensuremathη=N\ensuremath−1\ensuremathΣ\ensuremathτi\ensuremathσi\ensuremath{\eta}={N}^{\ensuremath{-}1}\ensuremath{\Sigma}{\ensuremath{\tau}}_{i}{\ensuremath{\sigma}}_{i}\ensuremathη=N\ensuremath−1\ensuremathΣ\ensuremathτi​\ensuremathσi​, where each \ensuremathτi=0,\ifmmode±\else\textpm\fi1{\ensuremath{\tau}}_{i}=0,\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}1\ensuremathτi​=0,\ifmmode±\else\textpm\fi1 take any value in the range 1< \ensuremathη< 11<~\ensuremath{\eta}<~11< \ensuremathη< 1. The probability, P(\ensuremathη)P(\ensuremath{\eta})P(\ensuremathη), obtained for the EA model at low temperatures often has several maxima separated by regions of improbable values of \ensuremathη\ensuremath{\eta}\ensuremathη, as is to be expected of a system with metastable states.
In numerical calculations of a quantity $\ensuremath{\Lambda}(T)\ensuremath{\equiv}\ensuremath{-}\frac{\ensuremath{\partial}\mathrm{ln}{\ensuremath{\chi}}_{\mathrm{EA}}^{{}^{\ensuremath{'}}}}{\ensuremath{\partial}T}$, where ${\ensuremath{\chi}}_{\mathrm{EA}}^{\ensuremath{'}}\ensuremath{\equiv}\ensuremath{\Sigma}{({〈{\ensuremath{\sigma}}_{i}{\ensuremath{\sigma}}_{j}〉}_{T}^{2})}_{J}$ for finite $L\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}L$ Edwards-Anderson (EA) models, Fern\'andez [Phys. Rev. B 25, 417 (1982)] finds that $\ensuremath{\Lambda}(T)$ has a peak at ${T}_{0}\ensuremath{\approx}0.6$ (Gaussian model) or ${T}_{0}\ensuremath{\approx}1.0$, for L=4,6,8,10,or11L=4,6,8,10,or 11L=4,6,8,10,or11, respectively. He finds that the peak height ${\ensuremath{\Lambda}}_{max}=\ensuremath{\Lambda}({T}_{0})$ increases in direct proportion to LLL, and interprets his results in terms of a phase transition at T0{T}_{0}T0​, where the correlation length ${\ensuremath{\xi}}_{\mathrm{EA}}\ensuremath{\propto}{(T\ensuremath{-}{T}_{0})}^{\ensuremath{-}1}$. This conclusion is in disagreement with our previous findings that ${\ensuremath{\xi}}_{\mathrm{EA}}$ is finite in this temperature range, although a (dynamic) "freezing transition" of the spins occurs at ${T}_{f}\ensuremath{\approx}1.0$ (Gaussian model) or ${T}_{f}\ensuremath{\approx}1.3$ ($\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}J$ model), which lead us to suggest that the two-dimensional EA model has a phase transition at zero temperature only.
A computational method which yields exact thermal averages is reported and applied to L*L Ising systems with random bonds, gaussian distributed (E-A model), in two dimensions. The author obtains Phi =N -1 Sigma (( sigma i sigma j ) T 2 ) J and look for a divergence by examining Psi =-(1/ phi )( delta phi / delta T). Psi obtains its maximum value, Psi max at a temperature of 0.6 approximately, and Psi max increases approximately linearly with L, at least for L<or=11, indicating a phase transition.
By a recursive method numerically exact free energies and correlation functions are calculated for finite two- and three-dimensional Ising lattices with bonds chosen randomly either ±J or from a gaussian distribution. While (dynamic) Monte Carlo simulations of precisely the same systems show the onset of Edwards-Anderson ordering at rather sharply defined nonzero freezing temperature Tf, the exact static calculations imply that there is no static order parameter qEA = [<Si≳2T]av at nonzero temperature. The correlation length, which would become infinite when qEA would start to become nonzero, is found at Tf to be of the order of a few lattice spacings only. As a result, the freezing-in of these models is identified as a dynamic phenomenon, and not a phase transition associated with static Edwards-Anderson order. The specific heat of the gaussian spin glass is found to vary nearly linear with temperature. On the other hand, in two-dimensional Ising systems with random fields a nonzero (Mattis-like) spin glass order is found.
The thermodynamic properties of the two-dimensional Ising model with random (+or-J) nearest-neighbour interactions are determined using a numerical transfer matrix method. The calculations are performed on a long strip of width L(3<or=L<or=11) with periodic boundary conditions and finite-size scaling arguments are used to extrapolate to L= infinity . The central result is that the spin-glass correlation length diverges as T- nu at low temperature T with nu =2.59+or-0.13. The heat capacity is similar to the Schottky anomaly. At zero temperature the entropy per spin is 0.0701+or-0.0005 and the internal energy per spin is -(1.4024+or-0.0012)J.
The equilibrium properties of the two-dimensional Ising model with nearest-neighbour interactions uniformly distributed between -J and J have been determined using a numerical transfer matrix method. The calculations are performed on a long strip of width L(3<or=L<or=11) with periodic boundary conditions and finite-size scaling arguments are used to extrapolate to L= infinity . The spin-glass correlation length diverges as T - nu at low temperature with nu =2.96+or-0.22. The correlation length scaling function differs from that for the random Ising model with interactions of magnitude J and random sign showing that the two models with different distribution functions belong to different universality classes. The heat capacity is linear at low temperature and can be interpreted using a continuous distribution of two-level states which is finite at zero energy and increases approximately linearly with energy. At zero temperature the entropy is zero and the internal energy extrapolated to L= infinity is -(0.7943+or-0.0010)J.
Domain-wall free energy $\ensuremath{\delta}F$, entropy $\ensuremath{\delta}S$, and the correlation function Ctemp{C}_{\mathrm{temp}}Ctemp​ of $\ensuremath{\delta}F$ are measured independently in the four-dimensional $\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}J$ Edwards-Anderson (EA) Ising spin glass. The stiffness exponent $\ensuremath{\theta}$, the fractal dimension of domain walls ds{d}_{s}ds​, and the chaos exponent $\ensuremath{\zeta}$ are extracted from the finite-size scaling analysis of $\ensuremath{\delta}F$, $\ensuremath{\delta}S$, and Ctemp{C}_{\mathrm{temp}}Ctemp​, respectively, well inside the spin-glass phase. The three exponents are confirmed to satisfy the scaling relation $\ensuremath{\zeta}={d}_{s}/2\ensuremath{-}\ensuremath{\theta}$ derived by the droplet theory within our numerical accuracy. We also study bond chaos induced by random variation of bonds, and find that the bond and temperature perturbations yield the universal chaos effects described by a common scaling function and the chaos exponent. These results strongly support the appropriateness of the droplet theory for the description of chaos effect in the EA Ising spin glasses.