The problem of decaying states and resonances is examined within the framework of scattering theory in a rigged Hilbert space formalism. The stationary free,’’in,’’ and ’’out’’ eigenvectors of formal scattering theory, which have a rigorous setting in rigged Hilbert space, are considered to be analytic functions of the energy eigenvalue. The value of these analytic functions at any point of regularity, real or complex, is an eigenvector with eigenvalue equal to the position of the point. The poles of the eigenvector families give origin to other eigenvectors of the Hamiltonian: the singularities of the ’’out’’ eigenvector family are the same as those of the continued S matrix, so that resonances are seen as eigenvectors of the Hamiltonian with eigenvalue equal to their location in the complex energy plane. Cauchy theorem then provides for expansions in terms of ’’complete’’ sets of eigenvectors with complex eigenvalues of the Hamiltonian. Applying such expansions to the survival amplitude of a decaying state, one finds that resonances give discrete contributions with purely exponential time behavior; the background is of course present, but explicitly separated. The resolvent of the Hamiltonian, restricted to the nuclear space appearing in the rigged Hilbert space, can be continued across the absolutely continuous spectrum; the singularities of the continuation are the same as those of the ’’out’’ eigenvectors. The free, ’’in’’ and ’’out’’ eigenvectors with complex eigenvalues and those corresponding to resonances can be approximated by physical vectors in the Hilbert space, as plane waves can. The need for having some further physical information in addition to the specification of the total Hamiltonian is apparent in the proposed framework. The formalism is applied to the Lee–Friedrichs model and to the scattering of a spinless particle by a local central potential.
Within the rigged Hilbert space formulation of quantum mechanics idealized resonances (without background) are described by generalized eigenvectors of an essentially self-adjoint Hamiltonian with complex eigenvalue and a Breit–Wigner energy distribution. This establishes the link between the S matrix description of resonances by a pole and the usual description of states by vectors, overcomes theoretical problems connected with the deviation from exponential law and simplifies the calculation of the decay rate formula.
In this second in a series of four articles we create a mathematical formalism sufficient to represent nontrivial hamiltonian quantum dynamics, including resonances. Some parts of this construction are also mathematically necessary. The specific construction is the transforming of a pair of quantized free oscillators into a resonant system of coupled oscillators by analytic continuation which is performed algebraically by the group of complex symplectic transformations, thereby creating dynamical representations of numerous semi-groups. The quantum free oscillators are the quantum analogue of classical action angle variable solutions for the coupled oscillators and quantum resonances, including Breit-Wigner resonances. Among the exponentially decaying Breit-Wigner resonances represented by Gamow vectors are hamiltonian systems in which energy transfers from one oscillator to the other. There are significant mathematical constraints in order that complex spectra be accommodated in a well defined formalism which represents dynamics, and these may be met by using the commutative real algebra $\C (1,i)$ as the ring of scalars in place of the field of complex numbers. These mathematical constraints compel use of fundamental (spinor) representations rather than UIR's. By including distributional solutions to the Schr{ö}dinger equation, placing us in a rigged Hilbert space, and by using the Hamiltonian as a generator of canonical transformation of the space of states, the Schr{ö}dinger equation is the equation for parallel transport of generalized energy eigenvectors, explicitly establishing the Hamiltonian as the generator of dynamical time translations in this formalism.
After a summary of the Rigged Hilbert space formulation of quantum mechanics and a brief statement of its advantages over von Neumann’s formulation, a mathematically correct definition of Gamow’s exponentially decaying vectors as generalized energy eigenvectors is suggested. It is shown that exponentially decaying vectors are obtained from the S-matrix poles in the lower half of the second sheet and exponentially growing vectors from the S-matrix poles in the upper half of the second sheet. Decaying ’’state’’ vectors are defined as functionals over half of the space of physical states and growing ’’state’’ vectors are defined as functionals over the other half. On functionals over these subspaces, the dynamical group of time development splits into two semigroups, one for t ≳ 0 and the other for t < 0. The generalized basis system connected with the spectrum of the Hamiltonian is transformed into a new basis system in which the exponentially decaying component of the density matrix is separated.
The Rigged Hilbert Space (RHS) theory of resonance scattering and decay is reviewed and contrasted with the standard Hilbert space (HS) theory of quantum mechanics. The main difference is in the choice of boundary conditions. Whereas the conventional theory allows for the in-states
ϕ+ and the out-states (observables)
ψ− of the S-matrix elements
(ψ−,ϕ+)=(ψout,Sϕin) any elements of the HS $\H$,
{ψ−}={ϕ+}(=)˝, the RHS theory chooses the boundary conditions~:
ϕ+∈Φ−⊂⊂˝Φ−×,
ψ−∈Φ+⊂⊂˝Φ+×, where
Φ− (
Φ+) are Hardy class spaces associated to the lower (upper) half-plane of the second sheet of the analytically continued S-matrix. This can be phenomenologically justified by causality. The two RHS's for states
ϕ+ and observables
ψ− provide new vectors which are not in $\H$, e.g. the Dirac-Lippmann-Schwinger kets
∣E±∈Φ∓× (solutions of the Lippmann-Schwinger equation with
±iε respectively) and the Gamow vectors
∣ER−iΓ/2±∈Φ∓×. The Gamow vectors
∣ER−iΓ/2− have all the properties that one heuristically needs for quasistable states. In addition, they give rise to asymmetric time evolution expressing irreversibility on the microphysical level.