Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physical Review A

Implications of the noncrossing property of Bohm trajectories in one-dimensional tunneling configurations

Xavier Oriols, Ferran Martı́n, Jordi Suñé

Published Oct 1, 1996• 60 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Several practical implications of the noncrossing property of one-dimensional Bohm trajectories are examined. It is shown that the position of a Bohm particle, the average transmission, reflection and dwell times, and the probability distribution of these tunneling times, can all be obtained without actually calculating trajectories. On the other hand, the intuitive interpretation of the scattering of wave packets by potential barriers is discussed within the framework of Bohm's interpretation of quantum mechanics. In this regard, claims that Bohm's approach leads to counterintuitive results are shown to be subjective. \textcopyright{} 1996 The American Physical Society.

DOI
10.1103/physreva.54.2594

Related papers

Distributions of delay times and transmission times in Bohm’s causal interpretation of quantum mechanics

W. R. McKinnon, C. Richard Leavens

In Bohm's causal or trajectory interpretation of quantum mechanics, it is straightforward to determine, from a sufficiently large number of calculated particle trajectories, probability distributions for time delays caused by a potential barrier, or for transmission times through a barrier. We show that these distributions can be calculated directly and more efficiently from probability currents, without the calculation of Bohm trajectories as an intermediate step. The ideas are illustrated for Gaussian wave packets incident on a square potential barrier and used to explain why average causal delay times differ from the average delay times calculated in other approaches.

Physical Review A•Apr 1, 1995•68 citations

Some important aspects of the tunneling phenomenon through quantum structures

E. Polatdemir

Tunneling phenomenon is one of the wondrous events that take place particularly in quantum mechanics and it has no counterpart in classical physics. We focus on its two important implications : tunneling time and tunneling probability. There has been no consensus on tunneling times among the tunneling time community for last seven decades. So far, most of the attempts to calculate tunneling times have apparently been centered on a simple rectangular barrier example. We implement the tunneling times with the most widely accepted approach, which is using physical Larmor clock, into a nonsymmetrical barrier and a double barrier. It results in different and unique insights into the usual understanding of tunneling time. Three characteristics tunneling time expressions are thoroughly studied in these quantum structures. The difference between dwell time and phase-delay time is once again approved. The unique characteristics of the phase-delay time, which was thought to be exactly similar to dwell time when we assign higher energies to the particles, is also revealed in the nonsymmetrical barrier that it should actually be regarded as a distinct feature from the dwell time. The singularity of reflection time in rectangular barrier is no longer valid in nonsymmetrical barrier. The finiteness of reflection time fairly shows that different quantum structures might bear some taboo breaking results. Since a double barrier involves much more complicated features and calculations, the calculation of tunneling times under this barrier is praiseworthy. The dwell time is the most crucial, troublesome and distinctive tunneling time element to look into for a double barrier. Besides the dwell and phase-delay time, we also calculate the three characteristic times as well as the reflection time for a double barrier. Another area that we study within the context of tunneling phenomenon is the tunneling probability. Recently, there has been ground shaking attempts in modifying the conventional WKB formulae. We follow one of the modified versions of WKB formulae in order to be able to calculate the tunneling probability through different quantum structures where conventional WKB formulae fail. These generalized WKB connection formulae are applied to some complex quantum potentials by seeking aid from the Green's function and the path integral approach. One of the biggest problems in quantum mechanics (visualization) is partially overcome through implementing the method of diagrammatic representations that make the life easier in understanding the events happening in the quantum world when we attempt to calculate the transmission and reflection probabilities. This part therefore has a pedagogical sense too in terms of interpreting the results in a diagrammatic way with the help of the path integral approach.

•Jan 1, 2002•0 citations

ONE DIMENSIONAL SCATTERING PROBLEM IN BOHMIAN QUANTUM MECHANICS

Saeed Mohammadi

According to Standard Quantum Mechanics (SQM), known as the Copenhagen Interpretation, the complete description of a system of particles is provided by its wave function. However, in the de Broglie-Bohm theory of Bohmian Quantum Mechanics (BQM), the additional element which is introduced apart from the wave function is the particle position, conceived in the classical sense as pursuing a definite continuous track in space-time. In BQM formulation, depending on the configuration of the potential barrier and the energy of the packet, the particle trajectories have been shown to take distinct paths. We will consider several barrier heights and show that in a Bohmian interpretation of the problem, there is no such thing as Quantum Tunnelling.

International Journal of Quantum Information•Aug 1, 2009•0 citations

Transmission and reflection times for scattering of wave packets off tunneling barriers

E. H. Hauge, J. P. Falck, Tor A. Fjeldly

The proper basis for the calculation of transmission and reflection times for wave packets scattered off arbitrary tunneling structures in one dimension is considered. With packets narrow in wave-number space, we demonstrate that the classic phase times are indeed correct to lowest order. Explicit, general expressions for the leading correction terms for finite wave packets are given. The physics associated with these corrections is discussed. We also consider the dwell time, as it is currently defined, and derive a general relation between this dwell time and the phase times. This relation shows when the dwell time can and cannot be used. Finally, we discuss wave packets transmitted from narrow resonances, and derive an explicit, exact formula for the tunneling time with resonance transmission from a symmetric double barrier. Comparison with earlier approximate results is made.

Physical review. B, Condensed matter•Sep 15, 1987•212 citations

Bohmian dwell times without trajectories

Sabine Kreidl

Within the framework of Bohmian mechanics dwell times find a straightforward formulation. The computation of associated probabilities and distributions however needs the explicit knowledge of a relevant sample of trajectories and therefore implies formidable numerical effort. Here a trajectory free formulation for average dwell times in quite arbitrary spacetime regions is given. Moreover explicit trajectory free formulas for the average transmission and reflection times within static spatial intervals [a,b] are given for one-dimensional scattering problems.

•Jun 8, 2004•0 citations

Tunneling times

Partha Ghose

Introduction In classical physics it is meaningful to ask the question, ‘How much time does a particle take to pass through a given region?’ The interesting question in quantum mechanics is: does a particle take a definite time to tunnel through a classically forbidden region? The question has been debated ever since the idea that there was such a time in quantum theory was first put forward by MacColl way back in 1932 [253]. A plethora of times has since then been proposed, and the answer seems to depend on the interpretation of quantum mechanics one uses. A reliable answer is clearly of great importance for the design of high-frequency quantum devices, tunnelling phenomena (as, for example, in scanning tunneling microscopy), nuclear and chemical reactions and, of course, for purely conceptual reasons. Most of the controversies centre around simple and intuitive notions in idealized one-dimensional models in a scattering configuration in which a particle (usually represented by a wave packet) is incident on a potential barrier localized in the interval [ a, b ]. Three kinds of time have been defined in this context. One, called the transmission time τ T ( a, b ), is the average time spent within the barrier region by the particles that are eventually transmitted. Similarly, the reflection time τ R ( a, b ) is the average time spent within the barrier region by the particles that are eventually reflected.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Apr 29, 1999•0 citations
Several practical implications of the noncrossing property of one-dimensional Bohm trajectories are examined. It is shown that the position of a Bohm particle, the average transmission, reflection and dwell times, and the probability distribution of these tunneling times, can all be obtained without actually calculating trajectories. On the other hand, the intuitive interpretation of the scattering of wave packets by potential barriers is discussed within the framework of Bohm's interpretation of quantum mechanics. In this regard, claims that Bohm's approach leads to counterintuitive results are shown to be subjective. \textcopyright{} 1996 The American Physical Society.
In Bohm's causal or trajectory interpretation of quantum mechanics, it is straightforward to determine, from a sufficiently large number of calculated particle trajectories, probability distributions for time delays caused by a potential barrier, or for transmission times through a barrier. We show that these distributions can be calculated directly and more efficiently from probability currents, without the calculation of Bohm trajectories as an intermediate step. The ideas are illustrated for Gaussian wave packets incident on a square potential barrier and used to explain why average causal delay times differ from the average delay times calculated in other approaches.
Tunneling phenomenon is one of the wondrous events that take place particularly in quantum mechanics and it has no counterpart in classical physics. We focus on its two important implications : tunneling time and tunneling probability. There has been no consensus on tunneling times among the tunneling time community for last seven decades. So far, most of the attempts to calculate tunneling times have apparently been centered on a simple rectangular barrier example. We implement the tunneling times with the most widely accepted approach, which is using physical Larmor clock, into a nonsymmetrical barrier and a double barrier. It results in different and unique insights into the usual understanding of tunneling time. Three characteristics tunneling time expressions are thoroughly studied in these quantum structures. The difference between dwell time and phase-delay time is once again approved. The unique characteristics of the phase-delay time, which was thought to be exactly similar to dwell time when we assign higher energies to the particles, is also revealed in the nonsymmetrical barrier that it should actually be regarded as a distinct feature from the dwell time. The singularity of reflection time in rectangular barrier is no longer valid in nonsymmetrical barrier. The finiteness of reflection time fairly shows that different quantum structures might bear some taboo breaking results. Since a double barrier involves much more complicated features and calculations, the calculation of tunneling times under this barrier is praiseworthy. The dwell time is the most crucial, troublesome and distinctive tunneling time element to look into for a double barrier. Besides the dwell and phase-delay time, we also calculate the three characteristic times as well as the reflection time for a double barrier. Another area that we study within the context of tunneling phenomenon is the tunneling probability. Recently, there has been ground shaking attempts in modifying the conventional WKB formulae. We follow one of the modified versions of WKB formulae in order to be able to calculate the tunneling probability through different quantum structures where conventional WKB formulae fail. These generalized WKB connection formulae are applied to some complex quantum potentials by seeking aid from the Green's function and the path integral approach. One of the biggest problems in quantum mechanics (visualization) is partially overcome through implementing the method of diagrammatic representations that make the life easier in understanding the events happening in the quantum world when we attempt to calculate the transmission and reflection probabilities. This part therefore has a pedagogical sense too in terms of interpreting the results in a diagrammatic way with the help of the path integral approach.
According to Standard Quantum Mechanics (SQM), known as the Copenhagen Interpretation, the complete description of a system of particles is provided by its wave function. However, in the de Broglie-Bohm theory of Bohmian Quantum Mechanics (BQM), the additional element which is introduced apart from the wave function is the particle position, conceived in the classical sense as pursuing a definite continuous track in space-time. In BQM formulation, depending on the configuration of the potential barrier and the energy of the packet, the particle trajectories have been shown to take distinct paths. We will consider several barrier heights and show that in a Bohmian interpretation of the problem, there is no such thing as Quantum Tunnelling.
The proper basis for the calculation of transmission and reflection times for wave packets scattered off arbitrary tunneling structures in one dimension is considered. With packets narrow in wave-number space, we demonstrate that the classic phase times are indeed correct to lowest order. Explicit, general expressions for the leading correction terms for finite wave packets are given. The physics associated with these corrections is discussed. We also consider the dwell time, as it is currently defined, and derive a general relation between this dwell time and the phase times. This relation shows when the dwell time can and cannot be used. Finally, we discuss wave packets transmitted from narrow resonances, and derive an explicit, exact formula for the tunneling time with resonance transmission from a symmetric double barrier. Comparison with earlier approximate results is made.
Within the framework of Bohmian mechanics dwell times find a straightforward formulation. The computation of associated probabilities and distributions however needs the explicit knowledge of a relevant sample of trajectories and therefore implies formidable numerical effort. Here a trajectory free formulation for average dwell times in quite arbitrary spacetime regions is given. Moreover explicit trajectory free formulas for the average transmission and reflection times within static spatial intervals [a,b] are given for one-dimensional scattering problems.
Introduction In classical physics it is meaningful to ask the question, ‘How much time does a particle take to pass through a given region?’ The interesting question in quantum mechanics is: does a particle take a definite time to tunnel through a classically forbidden region? The question has been debated ever since the idea that there was such a time in quantum theory was first put forward by MacColl way back in 1932 [253]. A plethora of times has since then been proposed, and the answer seems to depend on the interpretation of quantum mechanics one uses. A reliable answer is clearly of great importance for the design of high-frequency quantum devices, tunnelling phenomena (as, for example, in scanning tunneling microscopy), nuclear and chemical reactions and, of course, for purely conceptual reasons. Most of the controversies centre around simple and intuitive notions in idealized one-dimensional models in a scattering configuration in which a particle (usually represented by a wave packet) is incident on a potential barrier localized in the interval [ a, b ]. Three kinds of time have been defined in this context. One, called the transmission time τ T ( a, b ), is the average time spent within the barrier region by the particles that are eventually transmitted. Similarly, the reflection time τ R ( a, b ) is the average time spent within the barrier region by the particles that are eventually reflected.