Quantum dynamics, measurement and entropy

Robert Alicki

Noboru Watanabe

In quantum information theory, Emch, Conne, and Stormer were the first who studied the complexity of quantum dynamical processes. After that, Ohya introduced the [Formula: see text]-mixing entropy for general quantum systems and he defined the mean entropy and the mean mutual entropy for quantum dynamical systems based on the [Formula: see text]-mixing entropy. Conne, Narnhoffer and Thirring introduced the dynamical entropy (CNT entropy) and several researchers discussed this concept. Alicki and Fannes defined a different dynamical entropy — AF entropy. In 1995, Voiculescu proposed the dynamical approximation entropy. Accardi, Ohya and Watanabe defined yet another dynamical entropy (AOW entropy) through a quantum Markov process in 1997. In 1999, Kossakowski, Ohya and Watanabe introduced the dynamical entropy (KOW entropy) with respect to completely positive maps. In this paper, we discuss the complexity of quantum dynamical processes to calculate the dynamical entropy for noisy optical channels. In order to discuss the efficiency of information communication processes, a measure of complexity of initial state itself and a measure of transmitted complexity through communication channels are necessary. Quantum entropies were formulated on the basis of the quantum probability theory. In quantum communication systems, von Neumann entropy and Ohya mutual entropy relate to these measures of complexities, respectively. Recently, several mutual entropy type measures (Lindblad-Nielsen entropy and coherent entropy) were defined making use of entropy exchange with respect to a channel and initial state. In this paper, we show which of the measures is the most suitable one for discussing the efficiency of information transmission for quantum processes.

Noboru Watanabe, Luigi Accardi, Guillaume Adenier +5 more

The classical entropies were formulated by means of the classical probability theory. The essence of the classical probability theory corresponds to the use of c‐number with commutative property. On the base of the classical probability theory, the classical information theory can be discussed by using the classical entropies. On the other hand, the principle of the quantum phenomenon seems to be having non‐commutative behavior. It leads to the use of the q‐operator with non‐commutative property to introduce the quantum entropies based on the quantum probability theory. In order to discuss the efficiency of the information communication processes, a measure of complexity of initial state itself and a measure of transmitted complexity through communication channels are necessary. Shannon’s entropy and the mutual entropy represent these measures of complexities in classical communication system, respectively. Von Neumann entropy and Ohya mutual entropy relate to these measures of complexities in quantum communication system, respectively. Recently, several mutual entropy type measures (Lindblad—Nielsen entropy and Coherent entropy) were proposed by using an entropy exchange with respect to a channel and an initial state. In this paper, we will show the most suitable one for discuss the efficiency of information transmission for quantum processes. In classical information theory, one of the most important tools to analyze communication processes are the classical coding theorems, which was investigated through the classical dynamical entropy. The classical dynamical entropy was discussed in [1] with respect to a measure preserving transformation defined on a message space for finite partitions of the measure space. In quantum information theory, Emch [2] and Conne, Stormer [3] first studied a complexity of quantum dynamical processes. After that, Ohya introduced a S‐ mixing entropy in general quantum systems, which was natural extension of the von Neumann entropy. Using the S—mixing entropy, Ohya defined a mean entropy and a mean mutual entropy for the quantum dynamical systems. Conne, Narnhoffer and Thirring introduced a dynamical entropy (CNT entropy) [4] and several researchers discussed the CNT entropy [5,6,7,8]. Alicki and Fannes defined a dynamical entropy (AF entropy) [9] using a finite operational partitions of unity. In 1995, Voiculescu proposed a dynamical entropy (dynamical approximation entropy) [10] in C* and W* algebras. Through the quantum Markov process, Accardi, Ohya and Watanabe defined a dynamical entropy (AOW entropy) [11,12] in 1997. Base on transition expectations and liftings in the sense of Accardi and Ohya [13], Kossakowski, Ohya and Watanabe introduced a dynamical entropy (KOW entropy) [14] with respect to completely positive maps in 1999. In this paper, we will discuss the complexity of the quantum dynamical process to calculate the generalized AOW entropy given by KOW entropy.

Takahiro Sagawa

Anilesh Mohari

In this exposition we prove an existence theorem for a quantum mechanical dynamical entropy based on von-Neumann’s measurement theory. To that end we introduced a Shannon type of information associated with a quantum channel or measurement based on Araki’s relative entropy. This is an invariance for the dynamics which generalizes Kolmogorov-Sinai ’s notion of dynamical entropy of a measure preserving transformation. In this context we also introduce a natural notion of channel capacity as a generalization of Shannon’s capacity of a channel and finds its relation with A.S. Holevo’s notion of capacity. 2 A measurement in classical dynamics gives rise to a measurable partition ζ = (ζi) of the configuration space ( measure space) (M, B, µ). For a par-µ(E∩ζi) tition ζ, we can associate a family of measure µζi(E) =

ARMEN E. ALLAHVERDYAN, Roger Balian, Theo M. Nieuwenhuizen