Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE

On quasi-classical nature of spin

Tamara P. Ershova, Natalia N. Gorobey, Alexander S. Lukyanenko

Published Apr 3, 2006• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

A special form of a quasiclassical approximation in non-relativistic and relativistic quantum mechanics is considered. It consists in the demand of classical interpretation for a natural time of the theory. As the consequence, in passing to quantum level, there arises the necessity of introduction of half-integer spin.
DOI
10.1117/12.676297

Related papers

On the relativistic concept of the Dirac's electron spin

Nizar Hamdan, A. Chamaa, José Luis López-Bonilla

Despite the success of the Dirac equation, the incorporation of the special theory of relativity into quantum mechanics predicts some paradoxes, like that the spin prediction from Dirac equation can be only identified with non- relativistic approximations (Pauli and Foldy-Wouthysen), as well as the spin predication is a relativistic quantum phenomena because the spin prediction is a necessary requirement of the relativistic quantum mechanics only. In this paper we show that the derivation of the spin and its magnetic moment can be done with a pure classical treatment. Since we start from the classical physical laws and the classical relativity principle to get the linear Schrödinger equation as a result the derivation of the spin and its magnetic moment can be done with a pure classical treatment. This approach result a Schrödinger equation, in which we show that the spin of the electron is a non relativistic quantum phenomenon too.

Latin American journal of physics education•Jan 1, 2008•1 citation

A reconstruction of quantum theory for spinning particles

U. Klein

As part of a probabilistic reconstruction of quantum theory (QT), we show that spin is not a purely quantum mechanical phenomenon, as has long been assumed. Rather, this phenomenon occurs before the transition to QT takes place, namely in the area of the quasi-classical (here better quasi-quantum) theory. This borderland between classical physics and QT can be reached within the framework of our reconstruction by the replacement $p \rightarrow M (q, t)$, where $p$ is the momentum variable of the particle and $M(q, t)$ is the momentum field in configuration space. The occurrence of spin, and its special value $1/2$ , is a consequence of the fact that $M(q,t)$ must have exactly three independent components $M_{k}(q,t)$ for a single particle because of the three-dimensionality of space. In the Schrödinger equation for a "particle with spin zero", the momentum field is usually represented as a gradient of a single function $S$. This implies dependencies between the components $M_{k}(q,t)$ for which no explanation exists. In reality, $M(q,t)$ needs to be represented by three functions, two of which are rotational degrees of freedom. The latter are responsible for the existence of spin. All massive structureless particles in nature must therefore be spin-one-half particles, simply because they have to be described by $4$ real fields, one of which has the physical meaning of a probability density, while the other three are required to represent the momentum field in three-dimensional space. We derive the Pauli-Schrödinger equation, the correct value $g=2$ of the gyromagnetic ratio, the classical limit of the Pauli-Schrödinger equation, and clarify some other open questions in the borderland between classical physics and QT.

arXiv:2202.13364•Feb 27, 2022•0 citations

Quasi-Classical Theory of a Relativistic Spinning Electron

Ralph Schiller

The quasi-classical spin theory is a modified Hamilton-Jacobi theory for a classical relativistic dipole whose space-time trajectory is coupled to its spin motion. The equations of this quasi-classical theory are almost identical with the second-order (squared) Dirac equation, and, in fact, form a new WKB approximation to the second-order Dirac equation. We quantize this theory by requiring that a classical spinor "wave function" be continuous and single valued, and that it satisfy an eigenvalue equation. We find for a particle in a uniform magnetic field, and in a Coulomb field, that this quasi-classical theory predicts the same energy and angular momentum eigenvalues as the Dirac theory. The quasi-classical theory is invariant under Lorentz transformation, spin rotations, and charge conjugation. The spinor wave functions are form invariant with respect to arbitrary canonical transformations.

Physical Review•Nov 1, 1962•21 citations

Quasiclassical Methods in Spin Dynamics

D. M. Kaplan, George C. Summerfield

We present an extension of the concept of the Wigner distribution to include spin. The results are then used to indicate a method by which classical approximations to spin dynamics emerge naturally from the exact quantum theory, and estimates of the accuracy of these classical approximations can be computed.

Physical Review•Nov 10, 1969•27 citations

Quantum Mechanics as a Classical Theory IV: The Negative Mass Conjecture

L. S. F. Olavo

The following two papers form a natural development of a previous series of three articles on the foundations of quantum mechanics; they are intended to take the theory there developed to its utmost logical and epistemological consequences. We show in the first paper that relativistic quantum mechanics might accommodate without ambiguities the notion of negative masses. To achieve this, we rewrite all of its formalism for integer and half integer spin particles and present the world revealed by this conjecture. We also base the theory on the second order Klein-Gordon's and Dirac's equations and show that they can be stated with only positive definite energies. In the second paper we show that the general relativistic quantum mechanics derived in paper II of this series supports this conjecture.

arXiv:quant-ph/9503024•Mar 28, 1995•1 citation

Introduction of a Quantum of Time ("chronon"), and its Consequences for Quantum Mechanics

Ruy Farias, Erasmo Recami

In this review-article, we discuss the consequences of the introduction of a quantum of time tau_0 in the formalism of non-relativistic quantum mechanics (QM) by referring ourselves in particular to the theory of the "chronon" as proposed by P.Caldirola. Such an interesting "finite difference" theory, forwards --at the classical level-- a solution for the motion of a particle endowed with a non-negligible charge in an external electromagnetic field, overcoming all the known difficulties met by Abraham-Lorentz's and Dirac's approaches (and even allowing a clear answer to the question whether a free falling charged particle does or does not emit radiation), and --at the quantum level-- yields a remarkable mass spectrum for leptons. After having briefly reviewed Caldirola's approach, we compare one another the new Schroedinger, Heisenberg and density-operator (Liouville-von Neumann) pictures resulting from it. Moreover, for each representation, three (retarded, symmetric and advanced) formulations are possible, which refer either to times t and t-tau_0, or to times t-tau_0/2 and t+tau_0/2, or to times t and t+tau_0, respectively. It is interesting to notice that, e.g., the "retarded" QM does naturally appear to describe QM with friction, i.e., to describe dissipative quantum systems (like a particle moving in an absorbing medium). In this sense, discretized QM is much richer than the ordinary one. When the density matrix formalism is applied to the solution of the measurement problem in QM, very interesting results are met, so as a natural explication of "decoherence".

arXiv:quant-ph/9706059•Jun 27, 1997•18 citations
Despite the success of the Dirac equation, the incorporation of the special theory of relativity into quantum mechanics predicts some paradoxes, like that the spin prediction from Dirac equation can be only identified with non- relativistic approximations (Pauli and Foldy-Wouthysen), as well as the spin predication is a relativistic quantum phenomena because the spin prediction is a necessary requirement of the relativistic quantum mechanics only. In this paper we show that the derivation of the spin and its magnetic moment can be done with a pure classical treatment. Since we start from the classical physical laws and the classical relativity principle to get the linear Schrödinger equation as a result the derivation of the spin and its magnetic moment can be done with a pure classical treatment. This approach result a Schrödinger equation, in which we show that the spin of the electron is a non relativistic quantum phenomenon too.
As part of a probabilistic reconstruction of quantum theory (QT), we show that spin is not a purely quantum mechanical phenomenon, as has long been assumed. Rather, this phenomenon occurs before the transition to QT takes place, namely in the area of the quasi-classical (here better quasi-quantum) theory. This borderland between classical physics and QT can be reached within the framework of our reconstruction by the replacement p→M(q,t)p \rightarrow M (q, t)p→M(q,t), where ppp is the momentum variable of the particle and M(q,t)M(q, t)M(q,t) is the momentum field in configuration space. The occurrence of spin, and its special value 1/21/21/2 , is a consequence of the fact that M(q,t)M(q,t)M(q,t) must have exactly three independent components Mk(q,t)M_{k}(q,t)Mk​(q,t) for a single particle because of the three-dimensionality of space. In the Schrödinger equation for a "particle with spin zero", the momentum field is usually represented as a gradient of a single function SSS. This implies dependencies between the components Mk(q,t)M_{k}(q,t)Mk​(q,t) for which no explanation exists. In reality, M(q,t)M(q,t)M(q,t) needs to be represented by three functions, two of which are rotational degrees of freedom. The latter are responsible for the existence of spin. All massive structureless particles in nature must therefore be spin-one-half particles, simply because they have to be described by 444 real fields, one of which has the physical meaning of a probability density, while the other three are required to represent the momentum field in three-dimensional space. We derive the Pauli-Schrödinger equation, the correct value g=2g=2g=2 of the gyromagnetic ratio, the classical limit of the Pauli-Schrödinger equation, and clarify some other open questions in the borderland between classical physics and QT.
The quasi-classical spin theory is a modified Hamilton-Jacobi theory for a classical relativistic dipole whose space-time trajectory is coupled to its spin motion. The equations of this quasi-classical theory are almost identical with the second-order (squared) Dirac equation, and, in fact, form a new WKB approximation to the second-order Dirac equation. We quantize this theory by requiring that a classical spinor "wave function" be continuous and single valued, and that it satisfy an eigenvalue equation. We find for a particle in a uniform magnetic field, and in a Coulomb field, that this quasi-classical theory predicts the same energy and angular momentum eigenvalues as the Dirac theory. The quasi-classical theory is invariant under Lorentz transformation, spin rotations, and charge conjugation. The spinor wave functions are form invariant with respect to arbitrary canonical transformations.
The following two papers form a natural development of a previous series of three articles on the foundations of quantum mechanics; they are intended to take the theory there developed to its utmost logical and epistemological consequences. We show in the first paper that relativistic quantum mechanics might accommodate without ambiguities the notion of negative masses. To achieve this, we rewrite all of its formalism for integer and half integer spin particles and present the world revealed by this conjecture. We also base the theory on the second order Klein-Gordon's and Dirac's equations and show that they can be stated with only positive definite energies. In the second paper we show that the general relativistic quantum mechanics derived in paper II of this series supports this conjecture.
In this review-article, we discuss the consequences of the introduction of a quantum of time tau_0 in the formalism of non-relativistic quantum mechanics (QM) by referring ourselves in particular to the theory of the "chronon" as proposed by P.Caldirola. Such an interesting "finite difference" theory, forwards --at the classical level-- a solution for the motion of a particle endowed with a non-negligible charge in an external electromagnetic field, overcoming all the known difficulties met by Abraham-Lorentz's and Dirac's approaches (and even allowing a clear answer to the question whether a free falling charged particle does or does not emit radiation), and --at the quantum level-- yields a remarkable mass spectrum for leptons. After having briefly reviewed Caldirola's approach, we compare one another the new Schroedinger, Heisenberg and density-operator (Liouville-von Neumann) pictures resulting from it. Moreover, for each representation, three (retarded, symmetric and advanced) formulations are possible, which refer either to times t and t-tau_0, or to times t-tau_0/2 and t+tau_0/2, or to times t and t+tau_0, respectively. It is interesting to notice that, e.g., the "retarded" QM does naturally appear to describe QM with friction, i.e., to describe dissipative quantum systems (like a particle moving in an absorbing medium). In this sense, discretized QM is much richer than the ordinary one. When the density matrix formalism is applied to the solution of the measurement problem in QM, very interesting results are met, so as a natural explication of "decoherence".