Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Canadian Journal of Physics

The physical interpretation of non-Hermitian Hamiltonians and other observables

H. B. Geyer, W. D. Heiss, Frederik G. Scholtz

Published Oct 1, 2008• 17 citations
Publisher

Abstract

A recent surge of publications about non-Hermitian Hamiltonians has led to considerable controversy and — in our opinion — to some misunderstandings of basic quantum mechanics. The present paper scrutinizes the metric associated with a quasi-Hermitian Hamiltonian and its physical implications. The consequences of the non-uniqueness such as the question of the probability interpretation and the possible and forbidden choices of additional observables are investigated and exemplified by specific illustrative examples. In particular, it is argued that the improper identification of observables lies at the origin of the claimed violation of the brachistchrone transition time between orthogonal states. The need for further physical input to remove ambiguities is pointed out.PACS Nos.: 03.65.–w, 03.65.Ca, 03.65.Ta, 03.65.Xp

DOI
10.1139/p08-060

Related papers

Non-Hermitian Hamiltonians, Metric, Other Observables and Physical Implications

H. B. Geyer, W. D. Heiss, Frederik G. Scholtz

The metric associated with a quasi-Hermitian Hamiltonian and its physical implications are scrutinised. Consequences of the non-uniqueness such as the question of the probability interpretation and the possible and forbidden choices of additional observables are investigated and exemplified by specific illustrative examples. In particular it is argued that the improper identification of observables lies at the origin of the claimed violation of the brachistchrone transition time between orthogonal states. The need for further physical input to remove ambiguities is pointed out.

arXiv:0710.5593•Oct 30, 2007•9 citations

Choice of a metric for the non-Hermitian oscillator

Dibwe Pierrot Musumbu, H. B. Geyer, W. D. Heiss

The harmonic oscillator Hamiltonian, when augmented by a non-Hermitian -symmetric part, can be transformed into a Hermitian Hamiltonian. This is achieved by introducing a metric which, in general, renders other observables such as the usual momentum or position as non-Hermitian operators. The metric depends on one real parameter, the full range of which is investigated. The explicit functional dependence of the metric and each associated Hamiltonian is given. A specific choice of this parameter determines a specific combination of position and momentum as being an observable; this can be in particular either standard position or momentum, but not both simultaneously. Singularities of the metric are explored and their removability is investigated. The physical significance of these findings is discussed.

arXiv:quant-ph/0611150•Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical•Dec 12, 2006•87 citations

Quantum Mechanics Based on Non-Hermitian Hamiltonians (Recent Trends in Exponential Asymptotics)

Carl M. Bender

A physical theory of quantum mechanics can be based on a complex Hamiltonian that is not Hermitian but instead satisfies the physical condition of space-time reflection symmetry ( $P\mathcal{T}$ symmetry).Thus, there are infinitely many new Hamiltonians that one can construct that might explain experimental data.One would think that a non-Hermitian Hamiltonian would give a quantum theory that violates unitarity.However, if $P\mathcal{T}$ symmetry is not broken, it is possible to use a physical symmetry of the Hamiltonian to construct an inner product whose associated norm is positive definite.This construction is general and works for any $P\mathcal{T}$ -symmetric Hamiltonian.The dynamics is governed by unitary time evolution.This formulation does not conflict with the requirements of conventional quantum mechanics.There are many possible observable and experimental consequences of extending quantum mechanics into the complex domain, both in particle physics and in solid state physics.

•Apr 1, 2005•0 citations

The metric for non-Hermitian Hamiltonians: a case study

Dibwe Pierrot Musumbu

We are studying a possible implementation of an appropriate framework for a proper non-Hermitian quantum theory.We present the case where for a non-Hermitian Hamiltonian with real eigenvalues, we define a new inner product on the Hilbert space with respect to which the non-Hermitian Hamiltonian is Quasi-Hermitian.The Quasi-hermiticity of the Hamiltonian introduces the bi-orthogonality between the left-hand eigenstates and the right-hand eigenstates, in which case the metric becomes a basis transformation.We use the non-Hermitian quadratic Hamiltonian to show that such a metric is not unique but can be uniquely defined by requiring to hermitize all elements of one of the irreducible sets defined on the set of all observables.We compare the constructed metric with specific known examples in the literature in which cases a unique choice is made.Opsomming Ons ondersoek die implementering van n gepaste raamwerk virn nie-Hermitiese kwantumteorie.Ons beskoun nie-Hermitiese Hamilton-operator met reele eiewaardes en definieer in gepaste binneproduk ten opsigte waarvan die operator kwasi-Hermitiese is.Die kwasi-Hermities aard van die Hamilton operator lei dan tot n stel bi-ortogonale toestande.Ons konstrueer n basistransformasie wat die linker en regter eietoestande van hierdie stel koppel.Hierdie transformasie word dan gebruik omn nuwe binneproduk op die Hilbert-ruimte te definieer.Die oorspronklike nie-HermitieseHamilton-operator is danHermitiesmet betrekking tot hierdie nuwe binneproduk.Ons gebruik die nie-Hermitiese kwadratieseHamilton-operator om te toon dat hierdie metriek nie uniek is nie, maar wel uniek bepaal kan word deur verder te vereis dat dit al die elemente van n onherleibare versameling operatoreHermitiseer. Ons vergelyk hierdie konstruksie met die bekende voorbeelde in die literatuur en toon dat die metriek in beide gevalle uniek bepaal kan word.

•Dec 1, 2006•0 citations

6th International Workshop on Pseudo-Hermitian Hamiltonians in Quantum Physics

Andreas Fring, Hugh F Jones, Miloslav Znojil

Attempts to understand the quantum mechanics of non-Hermitian Hamiltonian systems can be traced back to the early days, one example being Heisenberg's endeavour to formulate a consistent model involving an indefinite metric. Over the years non-Hermitian Hamiltonians whose spectra were believed to be real have appeared from time to time in the literature, for instance in the study of strong interactions at high energies via Regge models, in condensed matter physics in the context of the XXZ-spin chain, in interacting boson models in nuclear physics, in integrable quantum field theories as Toda field theories with complex coupling constants, and also very recently in a field theoretical scenario in the quantization procedure of strings on an AdS 5 x S 5 background. Concrete experimental realizations of these types of systems in the form of optical lattices have been proposed in 2007. In the area of mathematical physics similar non-systematic results appeared sporadically over the years. However, intensive and more systematic investigation of these types of non- Hermitian Hamiltonians with real eigenvalue spectra only began about ten years ago, when the surprising discovery was made that a large class of one-particle systems perturbed by a simple non-Hermitian potential term possesses a real energy spectrum. Since then regular international workshops devoted to this theme have taken place. This special issue is centred around the 6th International Workshop on Pseudo-Hermitian Hamiltonians in Quantum Physics held in July 2007 at City University London. All the contributions contain significant new results or alternatively provide a survey of the state of the art of the subject or a critical assessment of the present understanding of the topic and a discussion of open problems. Original contributions from non-participants were also invited. Meanwhile many interesting results have been obtained and consensus has been reached on various central conceptual issues in the growing community of this subject. It is, for instance, well understood that the reality of the spectrum can be attributed either to the unbroken PT-symmetry of the entire system, that is, invariance of the Hamiltonian and the corresponding wavefunctions under a simultaneous parity transformation and time reversal, or more generally to its pseudo-Hermiticity . When the spectrum is real and discrete the Hamiltonian is actually quasi-Hermitian, with a positive-definite metric operator, and can in principle be related by a similarity transformation to an isospectral Hermitian counterpart. For all approaches well-defined procedures have been developed, which allow one to construct metric operators and therefore a consistent description of the underlying quantum mechanical observables. Even though the general principles have been laid out, it remains a challenge in most concrete cases to implement the entire procedure. Solvable models in this sense, some of which may be found in this issue, remain a rare exception. Nonetheless, despite this progress some important questions are still unanswered. For instance, according to the current understanding the non-Hermitian Hamiltonian does not uniquely define the physics of the system since a meaningful metric can no longer be associated with the system in a non-trivial and unambiguous manner. A fully consistent scattering theory has also not yet been formulated. Other issues remain controversial, such as the quantum brachistochrone problem, the problem of forming a mixture between a Hermitian and non-Hermitian system, the new phenomenological possibilities of forming a kind of worm-hole effect, etc. We would like to acknowledge the financial support of the London Mathematical Society, the Institute of Physics, the Doppler Institute in Prague and the School of Engineering and Mathematical Science of City University London. We hope this special issue will be useful to the newcomer as well as to the expert in the subject. Participants of the 6th International Workshop on Pseudo-Hermitian Hamiltonians in Quantum Physics.

Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical•Jun 3, 2008•13 citations

The Interpretation of Quantum-Mechanical Models with Non-Hermitian Hamiltonians and Real Spectra

R. Kretschmer, L. Szymanowski

We study the quantum-mechanical interpretation of models with non-Hermitian Hamiltonians and real spectra. We set up a general framework for the analysis of such systems in terms of Hermitian Hamiltonians defined in the usual Hilbert space $L_2(-\infty,\infty)$. Special emphasis is put on the correct definition of the algebra of physical observables. Within this scheme we consider various examples, including the model recently introduced by Cannata et al. and the model of Hatano and Nelson.

arXiv:quant-ph/0105054•May 11, 2001•25 citations
A recent surge of publications about non-Hermitian Hamiltonians has led to considerable controversy and — in our opinion — to some misunderstandings of basic quantum mechanics. The present paper scrutinizes the metric associated with a quasi-Hermitian Hamiltonian and its physical implications. The consequences of the non-uniqueness such as the question of the probability interpretation and the possible and forbidden choices of additional observables are investigated and exemplified by specific illustrative examples. In particular, it is argued that the improper identification of observables lies at the origin of the claimed violation of the brachistchrone transition time between orthogonal states. The need for further physical input to remove ambiguities is pointed out.PACS Nos.: 03.65.–w, 03.65.Ca, 03.65.Ta, 03.65.Xp
The metric associated with a quasi-Hermitian Hamiltonian and its physical implications are scrutinised. Consequences of the non-uniqueness such as the question of the probability interpretation and the possible and forbidden choices of additional observables are investigated and exemplified by specific illustrative examples. In particular it is argued that the improper identification of observables lies at the origin of the claimed violation of the brachistchrone transition time between orthogonal states. The need for further physical input to remove ambiguities is pointed out.
The harmonic oscillator Hamiltonian, when augmented by a non-Hermitian -symmetric part, can be transformed into a Hermitian Hamiltonian. This is achieved by introducing a metric which, in general, renders other observables such as the usual momentum or position as non-Hermitian operators. The metric depends on one real parameter, the full range of which is investigated. The explicit functional dependence of the metric and each associated Hamiltonian is given. A specific choice of this parameter determines a specific combination of position and momentum as being an observable; this can be in particular either standard position or momentum, but not both simultaneously. Singularities of the metric are explored and their removability is investigated. The physical significance of these findings is discussed.
A physical theory of quantum mechanics can be based on a complex Hamiltonian that is not Hermitian but instead satisfies the physical condition of space-time reflection symmetry ( PTP\mathcal{T}PT symmetry).Thus, there are infinitely many new Hamiltonians that one can construct that might explain experimental data.One would think that a non-Hermitian Hamiltonian would give a quantum theory that violates unitarity.However, if PTP\mathcal{T}PT symmetry is not broken, it is possible to use a physical symmetry of the Hamiltonian to construct an inner product whose associated norm is positive definite.This construction is general and works for any PTP\mathcal{T}PT -symmetric Hamiltonian.The dynamics is governed by unitary time evolution.This formulation does not conflict with the requirements of conventional quantum mechanics.There are many possible observable and experimental consequences of extending quantum mechanics into the complex domain, both in particle physics and in solid state physics.
We are studying a possible implementation of an appropriate framework for a proper non-Hermitian quantum theory.We present the case where for a non-Hermitian Hamiltonian with real eigenvalues, we define a new inner product on the Hilbert space with respect to which the non-Hermitian Hamiltonian is Quasi-Hermitian.The Quasi-hermiticity of the Hamiltonian introduces the bi-orthogonality between the left-hand eigenstates and the right-hand eigenstates, in which case the metric becomes a basis transformation.We use the non-Hermitian quadratic Hamiltonian to show that such a metric is not unique but can be uniquely defined by requiring to hermitize all elements of one of the irreducible sets defined on the set of all observables.We compare the constructed metric with specific known examples in the literature in which cases a unique choice is made.Opsomming Ons ondersoek die implementering van n gepaste raamwerk virn nie-Hermitiese kwantumteorie.Ons beskoun nie-Hermitiese Hamilton-operator met reele eiewaardes en definieer in gepaste binneproduk ten opsigte waarvan die operator kwasi-Hermitiese is.Die kwasi-Hermities aard van die Hamilton operator lei dan tot n stel bi-ortogonale toestande.Ons konstrueer n basistransformasie wat die linker en regter eietoestande van hierdie stel koppel.Hierdie transformasie word dan gebruik omn nuwe binneproduk op die Hilbert-ruimte te definieer.Die oorspronklike nie-HermitieseHamilton-operator is danHermitiesmet betrekking tot hierdie nuwe binneproduk.Ons gebruik die nie-Hermitiese kwadratieseHamilton-operator om te toon dat hierdie metriek nie uniek is nie, maar wel uniek bepaal kan word deur verder te vereis dat dit al die elemente van n onherleibare versameling operatoreHermitiseer. Ons vergelyk hierdie konstruksie met die bekende voorbeelde in die literatuur en toon dat die metriek in beide gevalle uniek bepaal kan word.
Attempts to understand the quantum mechanics of non-Hermitian Hamiltonian systems can be traced back to the early days, one example being Heisenberg's endeavour to formulate a consistent model involving an indefinite metric. Over the years non-Hermitian Hamiltonians whose spectra were believed to be real have appeared from time to time in the literature, for instance in the study of strong interactions at high energies via Regge models, in condensed matter physics in the context of the XXZ-spin chain, in interacting boson models in nuclear physics, in integrable quantum field theories as Toda field theories with complex coupling constants, and also very recently in a field theoretical scenario in the quantization procedure of strings on an AdS 5 x S 5 background. Concrete experimental realizations of these types of systems in the form of optical lattices have been proposed in 2007. In the area of mathematical physics similar non-systematic results appeared sporadically over the years. However, intensive and more systematic investigation of these types of non- Hermitian Hamiltonians with real eigenvalue spectra only began about ten years ago, when the surprising discovery was made that a large class of one-particle systems perturbed by a simple non-Hermitian potential term possesses a real energy spectrum. Since then regular international workshops devoted to this theme have taken place. This special issue is centred around the 6th International Workshop on Pseudo-Hermitian Hamiltonians in Quantum Physics held in July 2007 at City University London. All the contributions contain significant new results or alternatively provide a survey of the state of the art of the subject or a critical assessment of the present understanding of the topic and a discussion of open problems. Original contributions from non-participants were also invited. Meanwhile many interesting results have been obtained and consensus has been reached on various central conceptual issues in the growing community of this subject. It is, for instance, well understood that the reality of the spectrum can be attributed either to the unbroken PT-symmetry of the entire system, that is, invariance of the Hamiltonian and the corresponding wavefunctions under a simultaneous parity transformation and time reversal, or more generally to its pseudo-Hermiticity . When the spectrum is real and discrete the Hamiltonian is actually quasi-Hermitian, with a positive-definite metric operator, and can in principle be related by a similarity transformation to an isospectral Hermitian counterpart. For all approaches well-defined procedures have been developed, which allow one to construct metric operators and therefore a consistent description of the underlying quantum mechanical observables. Even though the general principles have been laid out, it remains a challenge in most concrete cases to implement the entire procedure. Solvable models in this sense, some of which may be found in this issue, remain a rare exception. Nonetheless, despite this progress some important questions are still unanswered. For instance, according to the current understanding the non-Hermitian Hamiltonian does not uniquely define the physics of the system since a meaningful metric can no longer be associated with the system in a non-trivial and unambiguous manner. A fully consistent scattering theory has also not yet been formulated. Other issues remain controversial, such as the quantum brachistochrone problem, the problem of forming a mixture between a Hermitian and non-Hermitian system, the new phenomenological possibilities of forming a kind of worm-hole effect, etc. We would like to acknowledge the financial support of the London Mathematical Society, the Institute of Physics, the Doppler Institute in Prague and the School of Engineering and Mathematical Science of City University London. We hope this special issue will be useful to the newcomer as well as to the expert in the subject. Participants of the 6th International Workshop on Pseudo-Hermitian Hamiltonians in Quantum Physics.
We study the quantum-mechanical interpretation of models with non-Hermitian Hamiltonians and real spectra. We set up a general framework for the analysis of such systems in terms of Hermitian Hamiltonians defined in the usual Hilbert space L2(−∞,∞)L_2(-\infty,\infty)L2​(−∞,∞). Special emphasis is put on the correct definition of the algebra of physical observables. Within this scheme we consider various examples, including the model recently introduced by Cannata et al. and the model of Hatano and Nelson.