Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physical Review C

Center-of-Mass Motion in Many-Particle Systems. II. Critique of the Gartenhaus-Schwartz Transformation

David J. Ernst, Carl M. Shakin, Roy M. Thaler

Published Apr 1, 1973• 7 citations
Publisher

Abstract

We examine the Gartenhaus and Schwartz (G-S) transformation, which generates a translationally invariant wave function from one which does not possess this property. A clarification of the G-S procedure for the calculation of matrix elements is achieved if one takes two independent limits of the parameters $\ensuremath{\Lambda}$, ${\ensuremath{\Lambda}}^{\ensuremath{'}}$ which appear in the expression for a transformed operator ${\stackrel{\ensuremath{\rightarrow}}{\mathfrak{a}}}^{\ensuremath{'}}=({\mathrm{lim}}_{{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}^{\ensuremath{'}}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\ensuremath{\infty}}{U}_{{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}^{\ensuremath{'}}}^{\ifmmode\dagger\else\textdagger\fi{}})\stackrel{\ensuremath{\rightarrow}}{\mathfrak{a}}({\mathrm{lim}}_{\ensuremath{\Lambda}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\ensuremath{\infty}}{U}_{\ensuremath{\Lambda}})$. It is shown that the G-S operator, $U={\mathrm{lim}}_{\ensuremath{\Lambda}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\ensuremath{\infty}}{U}_{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}={\mathrm{lim}}_{\ensuremath{\Lambda}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\ensuremath{\infty}}\mathrm{exp}[\ensuremath{-}\frac{1}{2}i\ensuremath{\Lambda}(\stackrel{\ensuremath{\rightarrow}}{\mathcal{R}}\ifmmode\cdot\else\textperiodcentered\fi{}\stackrel{\ensuremath{\rightarrow}}{\mathcal{P}}+\stackrel{\ensuremath{\rightarrow}}{\mathcal{P}}\ifmmode\cdot\else\textperiodcentered\fi{}\stackrel{\ensuremath{\rightarrow}}{\mathcal{R}})]$, is equivalent to the operator $U={(2\ensuremath{\pi})}^{3}\ensuremath{\delta}(\stackrel{\ensuremath{\rightarrow}}{\mathcal{P}})\ensuremath{\delta}(\stackrel{\ensuremath{\rightarrow}}{\mathcal{R}})$. This operator is seen to be a specific example of the more general class of operators presented earlier.

DOI
10.1103/physrevc.7.1340

Related papers

Center-of-Mass Motion in Many-Particle Systems

David J. Ernst, Carl M. Shakin, Roy M. Thaler

We have reexamined the problem of constructing a nuclear ground-state wave function consistent with the requirement of translational invariance, beginning with a wave function which does not have this property. A class of transformations is constructed which transforms the initial-state vector into an eigenstate of total momentum. The particular transformation of this class which leads to the lowest intrinsic energy is given.

Physical Review C•Mar 1, 1973•18 citations

Linear transformation connecting mass-centre and laboratory wave functions of two particles

Mahmoud M. Bakri

Nuclear Physics A•Apr 1, 1967•8 citations

Relativistic Center-of-Mass Variables for Two-Particle Systems with Spin

H. Osborn

The definition of the total momentum, position, and spin for Galilean- or Lorentz-invariant two-free-particle systems is discussed by using the requirement that the generators of the respective invariance groups should have the same form expressed in terms of them as for a single particle. Internal c.m. dynamical variables are introduced by applying the singular transformation due to Gartenhaus and Schwartz on the basic single-particle dynamical variables, the transformation mapping the whole Hilbert space onto the c.m. subspace spanned by states of zero total momentum. The form of the internal c.m. position operator is given for particles with spin, for what appears to be the first time. Using these dynamical variables, it is shown how an interaction can be introduced while maintaining Galilean or Lorentz invariance and satisfying the asymptotic condition of freely propagating particles for large separations.

Physical Review•Dec 25, 1968•89 citations

On the eigenfunctions of many‐particle systems in quantum mechanics

Tosio Kato

Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics•Jan 1, 1957•2,041 citations

THE QUESTION OF THE TRANSFORMATION PROPERTIES OF WAVE FUNCTIONS OF PARTICLES WITH SPIN /1 OVER 2/

И.С. Шапиро

Zhur. Eksptl'. i Teoret. Fiz.•Oct 1, 1952•0 citations

Relativistic Covariance of Scattering

Norbert Dragon

Abstract Avoiding the assumption that relativistic scattering be describable by interacting fields we find in the Schrödinger picture relativistic scattering closely analogue to the non-relativistic case. On the space of scattering states the invariant mass operator $$M'$$ M ′ of the interacting time evolution has to be unitarily equivalent to the invariant mass $$M= \sqrt{P^2}$$ M = P 2 where P, acting on many-particle states, is the sum of the one-particle four-momenta. For an observer at rest $$P^0$$ P 0 generates the free time evolution. Poincaré symmetry requires the interacting Hamiltonian $$H'$$ H ′ to Lorentz transform as 0-component of a four-vector and to commute with the four-velocity $$U= P / M $$ U = P / M but not with P, else there is no scattering. Even though $$H'$$ H ′ does not commute with P, the scattering matrix does. The four-velocity U generates translations of states as they are seen by shifted observers. Superpositions of nearly mass degenerate particles such as a $$K_{\text {long}}$$ K long are seen by an inversely shifted observer as a shifted $$K_{\text {long}}$$ K long with an unchanged relative phase. In contrast, the four-momentum P generates oscillated superpositions e.g. a shifted $$K_{\text {short}}$$ K short with a changed relative phase. The probability of scattering of massive particles is shown to be approximately proportional to the spacetime overlap of their position wave functions. This is basic to macroscopic locality and justifies to represent the machinery of actual scattering experiments by the vacuum. In suitable variables the relativistic Hamiltonian of many-particle states is not the sum of a Hamiltonian for the motion of the center and a commuting Hamiltonian for the relative motion but factorizes as their product. They act on different variables of the wave functions.

International Journal of Theoretical Physics•Dec 24, 2024•0 citations
We examine the Gartenhaus and Schwartz (G-S) transformation, which generates a translationally invariant wave function from one which does not possess this property. A clarification of the G-S procedure for the calculation of matrix elements is achieved if one takes two independent limits of the parameters \ensuremathΛ\ensuremath{\Lambda}\ensuremathΛ, \ensuremathΛ\ensuremath′{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}^{\ensuremath{'}}\ensuremathΛ\ensuremath′ which appear in the expression for a transformed operator a\ensuremath→\ensuremath′=(lim\ensuremathΛ\ensuremath′\ensuremath→\ensuremath∞U\ensuremathΛ\ensuremath′\ifmmode†\else\textdagger\fi)a\ensuremath→(lim\ensuremathΛ\ensuremath→\ensuremath∞U\ensuremathΛ){\stackrel{\ensuremath{\rightarrow}}{\mathfrak{a}}}^{\ensuremath{'}}=({\mathrm{lim}}_{{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}^{\ensuremath{'}}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\ensuremath{\infty}}{U}_{{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}^{\ensuremath{'}}}^{\ifmmode\dagger\else\textdagger\fi{}})\stackrel{\ensuremath{\rightarrow}}{\mathfrak{a}}({\mathrm{lim}}_{\ensuremath{\Lambda}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\ensuremath{\infty}}{U}_{\ensuremath{\Lambda}})a\ensuremath→\ensuremath′=(lim\ensuremathΛ\ensuremath′\ensuremath→\ensuremath∞​U\ensuremathΛ\ensuremath′\ifmmode†\else\textdagger\fi​)a\ensuremath→(lim\ensuremathΛ\ensuremath→\ensuremath∞​U\ensuremathΛ​). It is shown that the G-S operator, U=lim\ensuremathΛ\ensuremath→\ensuremath∞U\ensuremathΛ=lim\ensuremathΛ\ensuremath→\ensuremath∞exp[\ensuremath−12i\ensuremathΛ(R\ensuremath→\ifmmode⋅\else\textperiodcentered\fiP\ensuremath→+P\ensuremath→\ifmmode⋅\else\textperiodcentered\fiR\ensuremath→)]U={\mathrm{lim}}_{\ensuremath{\Lambda}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\ensuremath{\infty}}{U}_{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}={\mathrm{lim}}_{\ensuremath{\Lambda}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\ensuremath{\infty}}\mathrm{exp}[\ensuremath{-}\frac{1}{2}i\ensuremath{\Lambda}(\stackrel{\ensuremath{\rightarrow}}{\mathcal{R}}\ifmmode\cdot\else\textperiodcentered\fi{}\stackrel{\ensuremath{\rightarrow}}{\mathcal{P}}+\stackrel{\ensuremath{\rightarrow}}{\mathcal{P}}\ifmmode\cdot\else\textperiodcentered\fi{}\stackrel{\ensuremath{\rightarrow}}{\mathcal{R}})]U=lim\ensuremathΛ\ensuremath→\ensuremath∞​U\ensuremathΛ​=lim\ensuremathΛ\ensuremath→\ensuremath∞​exp[\ensuremath−21​i\ensuremathΛ(R\ensuremath→​\ifmmode⋅\else\textperiodcentered\fiP\ensuremath→​+P\ensuremath→​\ifmmode⋅\else\textperiodcentered\fiR\ensuremath→​)], is equivalent to the operator U=(2\ensuremathπ)3\ensuremathδ(P\ensuremath→)\ensuremathδ(R\ensuremath→)U={(2\ensuremath{\pi})}^{3}\ensuremath{\delta}(\stackrel{\ensuremath{\rightarrow}}{\mathcal{P}})\ensuremath{\delta}(\stackrel{\ensuremath{\rightarrow}}{\mathcal{R}})U=(2\ensuremathπ)3\ensuremathδ(P\ensuremath→​)\ensuremathδ(R\ensuremath→​). This operator is seen to be a specific example of the more general class of operators presented earlier.
The definition of the total momentum, position, and spin for Galilean- or Lorentz-invariant two-free-particle systems is discussed by using the requirement that the generators of the respective invariance groups should have the same form expressed in terms of them as for a single particle. Internal c.m. dynamical variables are introduced by applying the singular transformation due to Gartenhaus and Schwartz on the basic single-particle dynamical variables, the transformation mapping the whole Hilbert space onto the c.m. subspace spanned by states of zero total momentum. The form of the internal c.m. position operator is given for particles with spin, for what appears to be the first time. Using these dynamical variables, it is shown how an interaction can be introduced while maintaining Galilean or Lorentz invariance and satisfying the asymptotic condition of freely propagating particles for large separations.
Abstract Avoiding the assumption that relativistic scattering be describable by interacting fields we find in the Schrödinger picture relativistic scattering closely analogue to the non-relativistic case. On the space of scattering states the invariant mass operator M′M'M′ M ′ of the interacting time evolution has to be unitarily equivalent to the invariant mass M=P2M= \sqrt{P^2}M=P2​ M = P 2 where P, acting on many-particle states, is the sum of the one-particle four-momenta. For an observer at rest P0P^0P0 P 0 generates the free time evolution. Poincaré symmetry requires the interacting Hamiltonian H′H'H′ H ′ to Lorentz transform as 0-component of a four-vector and to commute with the four-velocity U=P/MU= P / M U=P/M U = P / M but not with P, else there is no scattering. Even though H′H'H′ H ′ does not commute with P, the scattering matrix does. The four-velocity U generates translations of states as they are seen by shifted observers. Superpositions of nearly mass degenerate particles such as a KlongK_{\text {long}}Klong​ K long are seen by an inversely shifted observer as a shifted KlongK_{\text {long}}Klong​ K long with an unchanged relative phase. In contrast, the four-momentum P generates oscillated superpositions e.g. a shifted KshortK_{\text {short}}Kshort​ K short with a changed relative phase. The probability of scattering of massive particles is shown to be approximately proportional to the spacetime overlap of their position wave functions. This is basic to macroscopic locality and justifies to represent the machinery of actual scattering experiments by the vacuum. In suitable variables the relativistic Hamiltonian of many-particle states is not the sum of a Hamiltonian for the motion of the center and a commuting Hamiltonian for the relative motion but factorizes as their product. They act on different variables of the wave functions.