Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Foundations of Physics

Is the Epistemic View of Quantum Mechanics Incomplete?

Miguel Ferrero, David Cienfuegos Salgado, J. L. S�nchez-G�mez

Published Dec 1, 2004• 7 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/s10701-004-1632-3

Related papers

Einstein, Incompleteness, and the Epistemic View of Quantum States

Nicholas Harrigan, Robert W. Spekkens

arXiv:0706.2661•Foundations of Physics•Jan 8, 2010•394 citations

Einstein, Incompleteness, and the Epistemic View of Quantum States

Harrigan, Nicholas, Robert W. Spekkens

•Jan 9, 2010•279 citations

Realism and the epistemic view of quantum states

Terry Rudolph

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Mar 21, 2013•0 citations

On the unavoidability of the interpretations of quantum mechanics

Roberto Beneduci, Franklin E. Schroeck

American Journal of Physics•Dec 24, 2013•10 citations

Current Debates in the Philosophy of Quantum Mechanics

Jonas R. Becker Arenhart, Nahuel Sznajderhaus

•Jun 21, 2018•0 citations

ψ -epistemic interpretations of quantum theory have a measurement problem

Joshua B. Ruebeck, Piers Lillystone, Joseph Emerson

ψ -epistemic interpretations of quantum theory maintain that quantum states only represent incomplete information about the physical states of the world. A major motivation for this view is the promise to provide a reasonable account of state update under measurement by asserting that it is simply a natural feature of updating incomplete statistical information. Here we demonstrate that all known ψ -epistemic ontological models of quantum theory in dimension d≥3 , including those designed to evade the conclusion of the PBR theorem, cannot represent state update correctly. Conversely, interpretations for which the wavefunction is real evade such restrictions despite remaining subject to long-standing criticism regarding physical discontinuity, indeterminism and the ambiguity of the Heisenberg cut. This revives the possibility of a no-go theorem with no additional assumptions, and demonstrates that what is usually thought of as a strength of epistemic interpretations may in fact be a weakness.

arXiv:1812.08218•Quantum•Mar 16, 2020•10 citations
ψ -epistemic interpretations of quantum theory maintain that quantum states only represent incomplete information about the physical states of the world. A major motivation for this view is the promise to provide a reasonable account of state update under measurement by asserting that it is simply a natural feature of updating incomplete statistical information. Here we demonstrate that all known ψ -epistemic ontological models of quantum theory in dimension d≥3 , including those designed to evade the conclusion of the PBR theorem, cannot represent state update correctly. Conversely, interpretations for which the wavefunction is real evade such restrictions despite remaining subject to long-standing criticism regarding physical discontinuity, indeterminism and the ambiguity of the Heisenberg cut. This revives the possibility of a no-go theorem with no additional assumptions, and demonstrates that what is usually thought of as a strength of epistemic interpretations may in fact be a weakness.