We give the first exponential separation between quantum and bounded-error randomized one-way communication complexity. Specifically, we define the Hidden Matching Problem HMn: Alice gets as input a string x ∈ (0, 1)n and Bob gets a perfect matching M on the n coordinates. Bob's goal is to output a tuple [i,j,b] such that the edge (i,j) belongs to the matching M and b = xi ⊕ xj. We prove that the quantum one-way communication complexity of HMn is O(log n), yet any randomized one-way protocol with bounded error must use Ω(√n) bits of communication. No asymptotic gap for one-way communication was previously known. Our bounds also hold in the model of Simultaneous Messages (SM) and hence we provide the first exponential separation between quantum SM and randomized SM with public coins.For a Boolean decision version of HMn, we show that the quantum one-way communication complexity remains O(log n) and that the 0-error randomized one-way communication complexity is Ω(n). We prove that any randomized linear one-way protocol with bounded error for this problem requires Ω(√[3] n log n) bits of communication.
We give the first exponential separation between quantum and bounded-error randomized one-way communication complexity. Specifically, we define the Hidden Matching Problem HMn: Alice gets as input a string x ∈ (0, 1)n and Bob gets a perfect matching M on the n coordinates. Bob's goal is to output a tuple [i,j,b] such that the edge (i,j) belongs to the matching M and b = xi ⊕ xj. We prove that the quantum one-way communication complexity of HMn is O(log n), yet any randomized one-way protocol with bounded error must use Ω(√n) bits of communication. No asymptotic gap for one-way communication was previously known. Our bounds also hold in the model of Simultaneous Messages (SM) and hence we provide the first exponential separation between quantum SM and randomized SM with public coins.For a Boolean decision version of HMn, we show that the quantum one-way communication complexity remains O(log n) and that the 0-error randomized one-way communication complexity is Ω(n). We prove that any randomized linear one-way protocol with bounded error for this problem requires Ω(√[3] n log n) bits of communication.
Abstract. We give the first exponential separation between quantum and bounded-error randomized one-way communication complexity. Specifically, we define the Hidden Matching Problem HMn: Alice gets as input a string x ∈ {0,1} n, and Bob gets a perfect matching M on the n coordinates. Bob’s goal is to output a tuple 〈i, j, b 〉 such that the edge (i,j) belongs to the matching M and b = xi ⊕ xj. We prove that the quantum one-way communication complexity of HMn is O(logn), yet any randomized one-way protocol with bounded error must use Ω ( √ n) bits of communication. No asymptotic gap for one-way communication was previously known. Our bounds also hold in the model of Simultaneous Messages (SM), and hence we provide the first exponential separation between quantum SM and randomized SM with public coins. For a Boolean decision version of HMn, we show that the quantum one-way communication complexity remains O(logn) and that the 0-error randomized one-way communication complexity is Ω(n). We prove that any randomized linear one-way protocol with bounded error for this problem requires Ω ( 3 √ nlog n) bits of communication.
We give the first exponential separation between quantum and bounded-error randomized one-way communication complexity. Specifically, we define the Hidden Matching Problem HMn: Alice gets as input a string x∈{0,1}n, and Bob gets a perfect matching M on the n coordinates. Bob's goal is to output a tuple ⟨i,j,b⟩ such that the edge (i,j) belongs to the matching M and b=xi⊕xj. We prove that the quantum one-way communication complexity of HMn is O(logn), yet any randomized one-way protocol with bounded error must use Ω(n) bits of communication. No asymptotic gap for one-way communication was previously known. Our bounds also hold in the model of Simultaneous Messages (SM), and hence we provide the first exponential separation between quantum SM and randomized SM with public coins. For a Boolean decision version of HMn, we show that the quantum one-way communication complexity remains O(logn) and that the 0-error randomized one-way communication complexity is Ω(n). We prove that any randomized linear one-way protocol with bounded error for this problem requires Ω(3nlogn) bits of communication.
We consider the problem of bounded-error quantum state identification: given either state α0 or state α1, we are required to output '0', '1' or 'DONO' ("don't know"), such that conditioned on outputting '0' or '1', our guess is correct with high probability. The goal is to maximize the probability of not outputting 'DONO'. We prove a direct product theorem: if we're given two such problems, with optimal probabilities a and b, respectively, and the states in the first problem are pure, then the optimal probability for the joint bounded-error state identification problem is O(ab). Our proof is based on semidefinite programming duality and may be of wider interest.Using this result, we present two exponential separations in the simultaneous message passing model of communication complexity. First, we describe a relation that can be computed with O(log n) classical bits of communication in the presence of shared randomness, but needs Ω(n1/3) communication if the parties don't share randomness, even if communication is quantum. This shows the optimality of Yao's recent exponential simulation of shared-randomness protocols by quantum protocols without shared randomness. Second, we describe a relation that can be computed with O(log n) classical bits of communication in the presence of shared entanglement, but needs Ω((n/log n)1/3) communication if the parties share randomness but no entanglement, even if communication is quantum. This is the first example in communication complexity where entanglement buys you much more than quantum communication does.
Numbers-on-Forehead (NOF) communication model is a central model in communication complexity. As a restricted variant, one-way NOF model is of particular interest. Establishing strong one-way NOF lower bounds would imply circuit lower bounds, resolve well-known problems in additive combinatorics, and yield wide-ranging applications in areas such as cryptography and distributed computing. However, proving strong lower bounds in one-way NOF communication remains highly challenging; many fundamental questions in one-way NOF communication remain wide open. One of the fundamental questions, proposed by Gavinsky and Pudlák (CCC 2008), is to establish an explicit exponential separation between quantum and classical one-way NOF communication.
In this paper, we resolve this open problem by establishing the first exponential separation between quantum and randomized communication complexity in one-way NOF model. Specifically, we define a lifted variant of the Hidden Matching problem of Bar-Yossef, Jayram, and Kerenidis (STOC 2004) and show that it admits an (O(logn))-cost quantum protocol in the one-way NOF setting. By contrast, we prove that any k-party one-way randomized protocol for this problem requires communication Ω(2k/3n1/3). Notably, our separation applies even to a generalization of k-player one-way communication, where the first player speaks once, and all other k−1 players can communicate freely.
We give a tight lower bound of Omega(\sqrt{n}) for the randomized one-way communication complexity of the Boolean Hidden Matching Problem [BJK04]. Since there is a quantum one-way communication complexity protocol of O(\log n) qubits for this problem, we obtain an exponential separation of quantum and classical one-way communication complexity for partial functions. A similar result was independently obtained by Gavinsky, Kempe, de Wolf [GKdW06]. Our lower bound is obtained by Fourier analysis, using the Fourier coefficients inequality of Kahn Kalai and Linial [KKL88].
We study the relative power of public randomness and quantum communication in the multiparty Simultaneous Message Passing (SMP) model. By analyzing a total Boolean function and a relational problem, we establish polynomial and exponential separations between classical public-coin protocols and quantum protocols without shared randomness or prior entanglement.
We first introduce XOR Equality, a total Boolean function in which each of k players receives an unrestricted string xj∈{0,1}n, and the referee must decide whether x1⊕⋯⊕xk=0n. For k≥8 and worst-case error at most 1/3, we prove quantum lower bounds of Ω(min{n,k2}) on total communication and Ω(min{n/k,k}) on maximum message length. A classical public-coin protocol uses two bits per player with error at most 1/4. For n=k2 and worst-case error at most 1/3, we prove that quantum protocols require maximum message length Ω(n) qubits, whereas two public-coin bits per player suffice.
We then turn to relations, for which we obtain exponential separations. Specifically, we study Multiparty Index Coordination, a k-player generalization of the two-player relation studied by Gavinsky, Kempe, Regev, and de Wolf (STOC 2006). We prove an unambiguous quantum lower bound of Ω(n1−1/k) on maximum message length, matched by a classical private-coin protocol. For any fixed error ε∈(0,1/8), we also prove a bounded-error quantum lower bound of Ω(n(k−1)/(k+1)) while we show that public-coin protocols solve the relation unambiguously with maximum message length O(logn), giving exponential separations in both regimes. The implicit constants are independent of k, and both quantum lower bounds become linear when k≥clogn for any fixed c>0.