Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Journal of Mathematical Physics

The relation between the Berry and the Anandan–Aharonov connections for U(𝒩) bundles

Arno Böhm, A. Mostafazadeh

Published Apr 1, 1994• 24 citations
Publisher

Abstract

The geometric phase has been defined as the holonomy of two bundles with different base spaces and different connections. In this article we establish the relation between the Berry–Simon and the Anandan–Aharonov definitions for a large class of cyclic Hamiltonians (with 𝒩-fold degeneracy) using the classifying theorem for principal fiber bundles.

DOI
10.1063/1.530601

Related papers

On geometric interpretation of Berry's phase and the Aharonov-Bohm effect

Mikhail Orionovich Katanaev

A geometric interpretation of Berry’s phase, its Wilczek–Zee non-Abelian generalization, and Aharonov–Bohm effect is given in terms of connections on principal fiber bundles. It is shown that a principal fiber bundle in all cases can be trivial while the connection and its holonomy group are nontrivial. Therefore the main role is played not by topological effects but geometrical ones. The Berry phase is also shown not to be connected to the adiabatic changes of the Hamiltonian parameters. 1

•Sep 2, 2009•0 citations

Geometric phase, bundle classification, and group representation

Ali Mostafazadeh

The line bundles that arise in the holonomy interpretations of the geometric phase display curious similarities to those encountered in the statement of the Borel–Weil–Bott theorem of the representation theory. The remarkable relationship between the mathematical structure of the geometric phase and the classification theorem for complex line bundles provides the necessary tools for establishing the relevance of the Borel–Weil–Bott theorem to Berry’s adiabatic phase. This enables one to define a set of topological charges for arbitrary compact connected semisimple dynamical Lie groups. These charges signify the topological content of the phase. They can be explicitly computed. In this paper, the problem of the determination of the parameter space of the Hamiltonian is also addressed. It is shown that, in general, the parameter space is either a flag manifold or one of its submanifolds. A simple topological argument is presented to indicate the relation between the Riemannian structure on the parameter space and Berry’s connection. The results about the fiber bundles and group theory are used to introduce a procedure to reduce the problem of the nonadiabatic (geometric) phase to Berry’s adiabatic phase for cranked Hamiltonians. Finally, the possible relevance of the topological charges of the geometric phase to those of the non-Abelian monopoles is pointed out.

arXiv:hep-th/9312173•Journal of Mathematical Physics•Mar 1, 1996•16 citations

Holonomy, the Quantum Adiabatic Theorem, and Berry's Phase

Barry Simon A

It is shown that the "geometrical phase factor" recently found by Berry in his study of the quantum adiabatic theorem is precisely the holonomy in a Hermitian line bundle since the adiabatic theorem naturally defines a connection in such a bundle. This not only takes the mystery out of Berry's phase factor and provides calculational simple formulas, but makes a connection between Berry's work and that of Thouless et al. This connection allows the author to use Berry's ideas to interpret the integers of Thouless et al. in terms of eigenvalue degeneracies.

Physical Review Letters•Dec 12, 1983•1,920 citations

Geometric Phase, Bundle Classification, and Group Representation

Alí Mostafazadeh

The line bundles which arise in the holonomy interpretations of the geometric phase display curious similarities to those encountered in the statement of the Borel-Weil-Bott theorem of the representation theory. The remarkable relation of the geometric phase to the classification of complex line bundles provides the necessary tools for establishing the relevance of the Borel-Weil-Bott theorem to Berry's adiabatic phase. This enables one to define a set of topological charges for arbitrary compact connected semisimple dynamical Lie groups. In this paper, the problem of the determination of the parameter space of the Hamiltonian is also addressed. A simple topological argument is presented to indicate the relation between the Riemannian structure on the parameter space and Berry's connection. The results about the fibre bundles and group theory are used to introduce a procedure to reduce the problem of the non-adiabatic (geometric) phase to Berry's adiabatic phase for cranked Hamiltonians. Finally, the possible relevance of the topological charges of the geometric phase to those of the non-abelian monopoles is pointed out.

•Dec 21, 1993•14 citations

Some geometric properties of quantum phases and calculation of phase formulas

Paul Bracken

Abstract An introduction to several geometrical ideas which are of use to quantum mechanics is presented. The Aharonov‐Anandan phase is introduced and without reference to any dynamical equation, this phase is formulated by defining an appropriate connection on a specific fiber bundle. The holonomy element gives the phase. By introducing another connection, the Pancharatnam phase formula is derived following a different procedure. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Int J Quantum Chem, 2008

arXiv:math-ph/0607052•International Journal of Quantum Chemistry•Jan 1, 2008•2 citations

Geometric Phase in Eigenspace Evolution of Invariant and Adiabatic Action Operators

Jeffrey C. Y. Teo, Z. D. Wang

The theory of geometric phase is generalized to a cyclic evolution of the eigenspace of an invariant operator with N-fold degeneracy. The corresponding geometric phase is interpreted as a holonomy inherited from the universal Stiefel U(N) bundle over a Grassmann manifold. Most significantly, for an arbitrary initial state, this holonomy captures the inherent geometric feature of the state evolution that may not be cyclic. Moreover, a rigorous theory of geometric phase in the evolution of the eigenspace of an adiabatic action operator is also formulated, with the corresponding holonomy being elaborated by a pullback U(N) bundle.

arXiv:quant-ph/0502168•Physical Review Letters•Jul 29, 2005•9 citations
The geometric phase has been defined as the holonomy of two bundles with different base spaces and different connections. In this article we establish the relation between the Berry–Simon and the Anandan–Aharonov definitions for a large class of cyclic Hamiltonians (with 𝒩-fold degeneracy) using the classifying theorem for principal fiber bundles.
A geometric interpretation of Berry’s phase, its Wilczek–Zee non-Abelian generalization, and Aharonov–Bohm effect is given in terms of connections on principal fiber bundles. It is shown that a principal fiber bundle in all cases can be trivial while the connection and its holonomy group are nontrivial. Therefore the main role is played not by topological effects but geometrical ones. The Berry phase is also shown not to be connected to the adiabatic changes of the Hamiltonian parameters. 1
The line bundles that arise in the holonomy interpretations of the geometric phase display curious similarities to those encountered in the statement of the Borel–Weil–Bott theorem of the representation theory. The remarkable relationship between the mathematical structure of the geometric phase and the classification theorem for complex line bundles provides the necessary tools for establishing the relevance of the Borel–Weil–Bott theorem to Berry’s adiabatic phase. This enables one to define a set of topological charges for arbitrary compact connected semisimple dynamical Lie groups. These charges signify the topological content of the phase. They can be explicitly computed. In this paper, the problem of the determination of the parameter space of the Hamiltonian is also addressed. It is shown that, in general, the parameter space is either a flag manifold or one of its submanifolds. A simple topological argument is presented to indicate the relation between the Riemannian structure on the parameter space and Berry’s connection. The results about the fiber bundles and group theory are used to introduce a procedure to reduce the problem of the nonadiabatic (geometric) phase to Berry’s adiabatic phase for cranked Hamiltonians. Finally, the possible relevance of the topological charges of the geometric phase to those of the non-Abelian monopoles is pointed out.
It is shown that the "geometrical phase factor" recently found by Berry in his study of the quantum adiabatic theorem is precisely the holonomy in a Hermitian line bundle since the adiabatic theorem naturally defines a connection in such a bundle. This not only takes the mystery out of Berry's phase factor and provides calculational simple formulas, but makes a connection between Berry's work and that of Thouless et al. This connection allows the author to use Berry's ideas to interpret the integers of Thouless et al. in terms of eigenvalue degeneracies.
The line bundles which arise in the holonomy interpretations of the geometric phase display curious similarities to those encountered in the statement of the Borel-Weil-Bott theorem of the representation theory. The remarkable relation of the geometric phase to the classification of complex line bundles provides the necessary tools for establishing the relevance of the Borel-Weil-Bott theorem to Berry's adiabatic phase. This enables one to define a set of topological charges for arbitrary compact connected semisimple dynamical Lie groups. In this paper, the problem of the determination of the parameter space of the Hamiltonian is also addressed. A simple topological argument is presented to indicate the relation between the Riemannian structure on the parameter space and Berry's connection. The results about the fibre bundles and group theory are used to introduce a procedure to reduce the problem of the non-adiabatic (geometric) phase to Berry's adiabatic phase for cranked Hamiltonians. Finally, the possible relevance of the topological charges of the geometric phase to those of the non-abelian monopoles is pointed out.
The theory of geometric phase is generalized to a cyclic evolution of the eigenspace of an invariant operator with N-fold degeneracy. The corresponding geometric phase is interpreted as a holonomy inherited from the universal Stiefel U(N) bundle over a Grassmann manifold. Most significantly, for an arbitrary initial state, this holonomy captures the inherent geometric feature of the state evolution that may not be cyclic. Moreover, a rigorous theory of geometric phase in the evolution of the eigenspace of an adiabatic action operator is also formulated, with the corresponding holonomy being elaborated by a pullback U(N) bundle.