Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Journal of Mathematical Physics

Direct calculation of the Berry phase for spins and helicities

Thomas F. Jordan

Published Aug 1, 1987• 23 citations
Publisher

Abstract

The Berry phase for spins or helicities is calculated in a simple way in which it appears more as a property of the spin states than of the Hamiltonian. The calculation applies to nonrelativistic particles or relativistic particles with either zero or nonzero mass. A simple way to see how the Berry phase corresponds to rotation of the electric and magnetic fields of plane-polarized light is also pointed out.

DOI
10.1063/1.527486

Related papers

Berry's Topological Phase in Quantum Mechanics and Quantum Field Theory

I. J. R. Aitchison

Berry's work on quantum systems described by adiabatically varying Hamiltonians is introduced. Some simple systems exhibiting the "Berry phase" phenomenon are discussed, including: a spin-½ particle in a slowly varying magnetic field, linearly polarised light propagating down a helically wound optical fibre, and dynamic Jahn-Teller E ⊗ systems. The way in which the Berry phase concept illuminates the origin of anomalies in chiral gauge field theories, and the fermionic behaviour of solitons in certain scalar field theories (skyrmions), is also indicated.

Physica Scripta•Jan 1, 1988•42 citations

Exact phases and probabilities for a spin-1/2 particle in a precessing magnetic field

Donald H. Kobe, Valdir C. Aguilera-Navarro, Samuel Maier Kurcbart +1 more

The probability amplitude for a spin-1/2 particle in a precessing magnetic field to be in an energy eigenstate is calculated exactly. The probability for the particle to be in a given energy eigenstate and the corresponding phase of the amplitude are obtained. In the adiabatic limit there are no transitions, and the phase is the sum of the dynamical phase and the Berry phase. When a unitary transformation is made, the Hamiltonian and the energy operator transform differently. The energy eigenvalues, Berry phases, and probability amplitudes calculated in a frame rotating with the magnetic field are the same as in the laboratory frame. If the energy operator is incorrectly taken to be the Hamiltonian in the rotating frame, incorrect energy eigenvalues, Berry phases, and probability amplitudes are obtained. Nevertheless, in the adiabatic limit the correct total phase results.

Physical Review A•Oct 1, 1990•14 citations

Nonadiabatic Berry’s phase for a spin particle in a rotating magnetic field

Shun-Jin Wang

The time-dependent Schr\"odinger equation for a spin particle in a rotating magnetic field is solved analytically by the cranking method, and the exact solutions are employed to study the nonadiabatic Berry's phase. An alternative expression for Berry's phase is given, which shows that Berry's phase is related to the expectation value of spin along the rotating axis and gives Berry's phase a physical explanation besides its gauge geometric interpretation. This expression also presents a simple algorithm for calculating the nonadiabatic Berry's phase for Hamiltonians that are nonlinear functions of the SU(2) generators. It is shown that nonadiabaticity alters the time evolution ray and in turn changes its Berry's phase. For the SU(2) dynamical group, the nonadiabatic effect on Berry's phase manifests itself as spin alignment (a phenomenon in nuclear physics), and spin-alignment quantization (observed recently in high-spin nuclear physics) is related to Berry's-phase quantization.

Physical Review A•Nov 1, 1990•89 citations

Geometric and Dynamic Phases for a Spin-1 Particle in a Rotating Magnetic Field

Xuehua Yi

The geometric and dynamic phase for spin-1 particle in a rotating magnetic field are studied.We derive formulae of how to calculate the geometric and dynamic phases for spin-1 particle in adiabatic and nonadiabatic evolutions,and calculate the phases by using these formulae.Finally,we discuss three kinds.Berry phase of When considering ω1ω,the system is in adiabatic approximation,at this time geometric phase is Berry phase.

Acta Sinica Quantum Optica•Jan 1, 2009•0 citations

Berry's phases for arbitrary spins nonlinearly coupled to external fields: application to the entanglement ofN> 2 non-correlated 1/2-spins

Marie-Anne Bouchiat, Claude C. Bouchiat

We derive the general formula giving Berry's phase for an arbitrary spin, having both magnetic-dipole and electric-quadrupole couplings with external time-dependent fields. We assume that the 'effective' electric and magnetic fields remain orthogonal during the quantum cycles. This mild restriction has many advantages. It provides simple symmetries leading to useful selection rules. Furthermore, the Hamiltonian parameter space coincides with the density matrix space for a spin S = 1. This implies a mathematical identity between Berry's phase and the Aharonov–Anandan phase, which is lost for S > 1. We have found that new physical features of Berry's phases emerge for integer spins ⩾2. We provide explicit numerical results of Berry's phases for S = 2, 3, 4. For any spin, one easily finds well-defined regions of the parameter space where instantaneous eigenstates remain widely separated. We have decided to stay within them and not deal with non-Abelian Berry's phases. We present a thorough and precise analysis of the non-adiabatic corrections with separate treatment for periodic and non-periodic Hamiltonian parameters. In both cases, the accuracy for satisfying the adiabatic approximation within a definite time interval is considerably improved if one chooses for the time derivatives of the parameters a time-dependence having a Blackman pulse shape. This has the effect of taming the non-adiabatic oscillation corrections which could be generated by a linear ramping. For realistic experimental conditions, the non-adibatic corrections can be kept below the 0.1% level. For a class of quantum cycles, involving as a sole periodic parameter the precession angle of the electric field around the magnetic field, the corrections odd upon the reversal of the associated rotation velocity can be canceled exactly if the quadrupole to dipole coupling is chosen appropriately ('magic values'). The even ones are eliminated by taking the difference of the Berry phases generated by two 'mirror' cycles. We end by indicating a possible application of the theoretical tools developed in this paper. We propose a way to perform a holonomic entanglement of N non-correlated 1/2-spins by performing adiabatic cycles governed by a Hamiltonian given as a nonlinear function of the total spin operator S , defined as the sum of the N individual spin operators. The basic idea behind this proposal is the mathematical fact that any non-correlated states can be expanded into eigenstates of S 2 and S z . The same eigenvalues appear several times in the decomposition when N > 2 but all these states differ by their symmetry properties under the N -spin permutations. The case N = 4 and S z = 1 is treated explicitly and a maximum entanglement is achieved.

arXiv:1006.2528•Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical•Oct 28, 2010•1 citation

Berry's Phase Effects in Spin Precession of Relativistic Neutral Particle in Slowly Changing Magnetic Field

Chang-Pu Sun, Lin-Zhi Zhang

By making use of the adiabatic approximate method, we derive the spin rotation formula of a relativistic neutral particle propagating in a slowly changing magnetic field, which involves the effects of the Berry's phases. In the non–relativistic limit, the Berry's phases result in an additional rotation in OVV spin rotation.

Communications in Theoretical Physics•Dec 1, 1989•1 citation
The Berry phase for spins or helicities is calculated in a simple way in which it appears more as a property of the spin states than of the Hamiltonian. The calculation applies to nonrelativistic particles or relativistic particles with either zero or nonzero mass. A simple way to see how the Berry phase corresponds to rotation of the electric and magnetic fields of plane-polarized light is also pointed out.
Berry's work on quantum systems described by adiabatically varying Hamiltonians is introduced. Some simple systems exhibiting the "Berry phase" phenomenon are discussed, including: a spin-½ particle in a slowly varying magnetic field, linearly polarised light propagating down a helically wound optical fibre, and dynamic Jahn-Teller E ⊗ systems. The way in which the Berry phase concept illuminates the origin of anomalies in chiral gauge field theories, and the fermionic behaviour of solitons in certain scalar field theories (skyrmions), is also indicated.
The probability amplitude for a spin-1/2 particle in a precessing magnetic field to be in an energy eigenstate is calculated exactly. The probability for the particle to be in a given energy eigenstate and the corresponding phase of the amplitude are obtained. In the adiabatic limit there are no transitions, and the phase is the sum of the dynamical phase and the Berry phase. When a unitary transformation is made, the Hamiltonian and the energy operator transform differently. The energy eigenvalues, Berry phases, and probability amplitudes calculated in a frame rotating with the magnetic field are the same as in the laboratory frame. If the energy operator is incorrectly taken to be the Hamiltonian in the rotating frame, incorrect energy eigenvalues, Berry phases, and probability amplitudes are obtained. Nevertheless, in the adiabatic limit the correct total phase results.
The time-dependent Schr\"odinger equation for a spin particle in a rotating magnetic field is solved analytically by the cranking method, and the exact solutions are employed to study the nonadiabatic Berry's phase. An alternative expression for Berry's phase is given, which shows that Berry's phase is related to the expectation value of spin along the rotating axis and gives Berry's phase a physical explanation besides its gauge geometric interpretation. This expression also presents a simple algorithm for calculating the nonadiabatic Berry's phase for Hamiltonians that are nonlinear functions of the SU(2) generators. It is shown that nonadiabaticity alters the time evolution ray and in turn changes its Berry's phase. For the SU(2) dynamical group, the nonadiabatic effect on Berry's phase manifests itself as spin alignment (a phenomenon in nuclear physics), and spin-alignment quantization (observed recently in high-spin nuclear physics) is related to Berry's-phase quantization.
We derive the general formula giving Berry's phase for an arbitrary spin, having both magnetic-dipole and electric-quadrupole couplings with external time-dependent fields. We assume that the 'effective' electric and magnetic fields remain orthogonal during the quantum cycles. This mild restriction has many advantages. It provides simple symmetries leading to useful selection rules. Furthermore, the Hamiltonian parameter space coincides with the density matrix space for a spin S = 1. This implies a mathematical identity between Berry's phase and the Aharonov–Anandan phase, which is lost for S > 1. We have found that new physical features of Berry's phases emerge for integer spins ⩾2. We provide explicit numerical results of Berry's phases for S = 2, 3, 4. For any spin, one easily finds well-defined regions of the parameter space where instantaneous eigenstates remain widely separated. We have decided to stay within them and not deal with non-Abelian Berry's phases. We present a thorough and precise analysis of the non-adiabatic corrections with separate treatment for periodic and non-periodic Hamiltonian parameters. In both cases, the accuracy for satisfying the adiabatic approximation within a definite time interval is considerably improved if one chooses for the time derivatives of the parameters a time-dependence having a Blackman pulse shape. This has the effect of taming the non-adiabatic oscillation corrections which could be generated by a linear ramping. For realistic experimental conditions, the non-adibatic corrections can be kept below the 0.1% level. For a class of quantum cycles, involving as a sole periodic parameter the precession angle of the electric field around the magnetic field, the corrections odd upon the reversal of the associated rotation velocity can be canceled exactly if the quadrupole to dipole coupling is chosen appropriately ('magic values'). The even ones are eliminated by taking the difference of the Berry phases generated by two 'mirror' cycles. We end by indicating a possible application of the theoretical tools developed in this paper. We propose a way to perform a holonomic entanglement of N non-correlated 1/2-spins by performing adiabatic cycles governed by a Hamiltonian given as a nonlinear function of the total spin operator S , defined as the sum of the N individual spin operators. The basic idea behind this proposal is the mathematical fact that any non-correlated states can be expanded into eigenstates of S 2 and S z . The same eigenvalues appear several times in the decomposition when N > 2 but all these states differ by their symmetry properties under the N -spin permutations. The case N = 4 and S z = 1 is treated explicitly and a maximum entanglement is achieved.