Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Solid State Communications

Semiclassical tunneling through opaque barriers, external interactions and the traversal time wavefunction

D. Sokolovski, J. N. L. Connor

Published Feb 1, 1994• 27 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1016/0038-1098(94)90216-x

Related papers

Tunnelling through a time-modulated barrier-relation to tunnelling times

Antti‐Pekka Jauho, M. Jonson

The authors analyse tunnelling through time-modulated barriers. The numerical results for the transmitted sideband intensities, obtained with wave-packet simulations, are in quantitative agreement with the analytical results of Buttiker and Landauer (1982, 1985). For opaque barriers the asymmetry of the sideband intensities can be characterized with a single frequency whose inverse Buttiker and Landauer interpret as the traversal time. This simple behaviour does not hold in general, and the authors discuss some of the difficulties one meets in an attempt to generalise the one-parameter description to arbitrary barriers. Furthermore, they examine analytically the transmitted wavefunction in the adiabatic limit, and show that the related density and current involve both the dwell time and the Buttiker time, defined in the context of a Larmor clock. This suggests the possibility that experiments probing different aspects of the transmitted wavefunction may yield different, but complementary, information about the tunnelling process.

Journal of Physics Condensed Matter•Nov 13, 1989•28 citations

Tunneling and the semiclassical propagator: A new perspective

Neepa T. Maitra, Eric J. Heller

Springer eBooks•Apr 7, 2008•1 citation

Quantum Tunneling in Complex Systems: The Semiclassical Approach

Joachim Ankerhold

•Feb 15, 2007•26 citations

Determination of barrier traversal time by modulation of the incident wave

Mark J. Hagmann

The semiclassical expression for barrier traversal time results from a variety of theoretical procedures, but it appears that an opaque barrier is required in each derivation. Following Büttiker and Landauer [IBM J. Res. Dev. 30, 451 (1986)], we use two interfering plane waves as the incident wave and determine the traversal time by attributing differences in the transmitted and incident waves to the ratio of dispersion in the transit time to the modulation period. Calculations are made for rectangular barriers with different sizes. There is essentially agreement with Büttiker and Landauer for opaque barriers which they considered, but the present solution does not diverge for energies near the top of the barrier.

Applied Physics Letters•Jan 11, 1993•11 citations

A traversal time for tunneling particles through a potential barrier

Chun-Fang Li, Qi Wang

Physica B Condensed Matter•Jan 1, 2001•10 citations

Larmor precession and the traversal time for tunneling

Μ. Büttiker

Baz' and Rybachenko have proposed the use of the Larmor precession as a clock to measure the time it takes a particle to traverse a barrier. An applied magnetic field is confined to the barrier. The spin of the incident particles is polarized perpendicular to this field. The extent of the Larmor precession occurring during transmission is used as a measurement of the time spent traversing the barrier. However, the particles tunneling through an opaque barrier also acquire a spin component parallel to the field since particles with spin parallel to the field have a higher transmission probability than particles with spin antiparallel to the field. Similar effects are actually used to polarize electrons and neutrons. An interpretation of this experiment compares the results with an approach which determines the traversal time by studying transmission of particles through a time-modulated barrier. This leads to three characteristic times describing the interaction of particles with a barrier. A dwell time measures the average time interval during which a particle interacts with the barrier whether it is reflected or transmitted at the end of its stay, a traversal time measures the time interval during which a particle interacts with the barrier if it is finally transmitted, and a reflection time measures the interaction time of a reflected particle.

Physical review. B, Condensed matter•May 15, 1983•699 citations
The authors analyse tunnelling through time-modulated barriers. The numerical results for the transmitted sideband intensities, obtained with wave-packet simulations, are in quantitative agreement with the analytical results of Buttiker and Landauer (1982, 1985). For opaque barriers the asymmetry of the sideband intensities can be characterized with a single frequency whose inverse Buttiker and Landauer interpret as the traversal time. This simple behaviour does not hold in general, and the authors discuss some of the difficulties one meets in an attempt to generalise the one-parameter description to arbitrary barriers. Furthermore, they examine analytically the transmitted wavefunction in the adiabatic limit, and show that the related density and current involve both the dwell time and the Buttiker time, defined in the context of a Larmor clock. This suggests the possibility that experiments probing different aspects of the transmitted wavefunction may yield different, but complementary, information about the tunnelling process.
The semiclassical expression for barrier traversal time results from a variety of theoretical procedures, but it appears that an opaque barrier is required in each derivation. Following Büttiker and Landauer [IBM J. Res. Dev. 30, 451 (1986)], we use two interfering plane waves as the incident wave and determine the traversal time by attributing differences in the transmitted and incident waves to the ratio of dispersion in the transit time to the modulation period. Calculations are made for rectangular barriers with different sizes. There is essentially agreement with Büttiker and Landauer for opaque barriers which they considered, but the present solution does not diverge for energies near the top of the barrier.
Baz' and Rybachenko have proposed the use of the Larmor precession as a clock to measure the time it takes a particle to traverse a barrier. An applied magnetic field is confined to the barrier. The spin of the incident particles is polarized perpendicular to this field. The extent of the Larmor precession occurring during transmission is used as a measurement of the time spent traversing the barrier. However, the particles tunneling through an opaque barrier also acquire a spin component parallel to the field since particles with spin parallel to the field have a higher transmission probability than particles with spin antiparallel to the field. Similar effects are actually used to polarize electrons and neutrons. An interpretation of this experiment compares the results with an approach which determines the traversal time by studying transmission of particles through a time-modulated barrier. This leads to three characteristic times describing the interaction of particles with a barrier. A dwell time measures the average time interval during which a particle interacts with the barrier whether it is reflected or transmitted at the end of its stay, a traversal time measures the time interval during which a particle interacts with the barrier if it is finally transmitted, and a reflection time measures the interaction time of a reflected particle.