Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

International Journal of Modern Physics A

ALGEBRAIC THEORY OF SUPERSELECTION SECTORS AND THE MEASUREMENT PROBLEM IN QUANTUM MECHANICS

Nicolaas P. Landsman

Published Dec 20, 1991• 44 citations
Publisher

Abstract

A synthesis is attempted between the algebraic theory of superselection sectors (not necessarily of infinite systems), which is based on the representation theory of C* algebras (which we review), and recent ideas on the measurement problem, classical behavior in open quantum systems, and the peculiar nature of subsystems in quantum mechanics. The key point is a proper use of the notion of a state, in combination with an appropriate choice of algebras of observables for which the superposition “principle” may be invalid. In this way, a major part of the measurement problem becomes equivalent to the study of superselection sectors in models for a measurement situation, and can in principle be resolved unambiguously. Special emphasis is placed on the transition from pure to mixed states, and the (non)uniqueness of the decomposition of the latter into pure states.

DOI
10.1142/s0217751x91002513

Related papers

QUANTIZATION AND SUPERSELECTION SECTORS I: TRANSFORMATION GROUP C*-ALGEBRAS

Nicolaas P. Landsman

Quantization is defined as the act of assigning an appropriate C*-algebra [Formula: see text] to a given configuration space Q, along with a prescription mapping self-adjoint elements of [Formula: see text] into physically interpretable observables. This procedure is adopted to solve the problem of quantizing a particle moving on a homogeneous locally compact configuration space Q=G/H. Here [Formula: see text] is chosen to be the transformation group C*-algebra corresponding to the canonical action of G on Q. The structure of these algebras and their representations are examined in some detail. Inequivalent quantizations are identified with inequivalent irreducible representations of the C*-algebra corresponding to the system, hence with its superselection sectors. Introducing the concept of a pre-Hamiltonian, we construct a large class of G-invariant time-evolutions on these algebras, and find the Hamiltonians implementing these time-evolutions in each irreducible representation of [Formula: see text]. “Topological” terms in the Hamiltonian (or the corresponding action) turn out to be representation-dependent, and are automatically induced by the quantization procedure. Known “topological” charge quantization or periodicity conditions are then identically satisfied as a consequence of the representation theory of [Formula: see text].

Reviews in Mathematical Physics•Jan 1, 1990•36 citations

The Quantum Measurement Problem: Foundations, Interpretations, and Recent Developments

Adam Dakhil Nasser

Quantum mechanics famously posits two distinct evolution rules for the state of a system: a deterministic, unitary time evolution under the Schr¨odinger equation, and a probabilistic “collapse” of the wavefunction upon measurement as dictated by the Born rule. The apparent inconsistency of these two dynamical laws – one continuous and one discontinuous – constitutes the quantum measurement problem. This foundational problem, which underlies the emergence of definite outcomes from quantum superpositions, has persisted since the theory’s inception. In this review, we present a comprehensive and rigorous examination of the measurement problem and survey the leading approaches that seek to resolve or circumvent it. We begin by formulating the measurement problem and its conceptual challenges. We then discuss in detail the major interpretations of quantum mechanics and theoretical frameworks addressing the problem: the Copenhagen interpretation, Everett’s many-worlds interpretation, de Broglie–Bohm pilot-wave theory, objective collapse models, the role of decoherence and environment-induced superselection, and epistemic approaches such as QBism. For each interpretation, we describe the core principles and mathematical formalism, assessing how (and whether) it attempts to solve the measurement problem. We also review modern developments and experiments relevant to quantum measurements, including tests of Bell inequalities, observations of decoherence and macroscopic superpositions, weak measurements and quantum eraser experiments, and thought experiments ‘a la Wigner’s friend. We highlight how these results inform the ongoing debate. Finally, we discuss open problems and challenges that remain in fully resolving the measurement problem.

•Apr 15, 2025•4 citations

Towards a Measurement Theory for Off-Shell Quantum Fields

Kazuya Okamura

In this study, we develop quantum measurement theory for quantum systems described by C∗-algebras. This is the first step to establish measurement theory for interacting quantum fields with off-shell momenta. Unlike quantum mechanics (i.e., quantum systems with finite degrees of freedom), measurement theory for quantum fields is still in development because of the difficulty of quantum fields that are typical quantum systems with infinite degrees of freedom. Furthermore, the mathematical theory of quantum measurement is formulated in the von Neumann algebraic setting in previous studies. In the paper, we aim to extend the applicable area of quantum measurement theory to quantum systems described by C∗-algebras from a mathematical viewpoint, referring to the sector theory that is related to symmetry and based on the theory of integral decomposition of states. In particular, we define central subspaces of the dual space of a C∗-algebra and use them to define instruments. This attempt makes the connection between measurement theory and sector theory explicit and enables us to understand the macroscopic nature and the physical meaning of measurement.

Symmetry•Jun 30, 2021•4 citations

Interaction between classical and quantum systems: A new approach to quantum measurement.I

T. N. Sherry, E. C. G. Sudarshan

We introduce an unconventional approach to the measurement problem in quantum mechanics: we treat the apparatus as a classical system belonging to the macroworld. To describe the quantum measurement process we must couple the classical apparatus to the quantum system. In this paper we explain how this is to be done: we embed the classical apparatus into a larger quantum-mechanical structure, making use of a superselection principle. The apparatus can now be coupled to the quantum system in a straightforward manner. We discuss what constraints should be placed on the coupling so that an interpretation of the interaction as a measurement results. We require that unambiguous information of the values of a quantum observable should be transferred to the variables of the apparatus. We also require that the apparatus should retain its classical identity. This latter requirement is formulated as a principle of integrity, in both weak and strong forms.

Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields•Dec 15, 1978•70 citations

Measurement in Quantum Mechanics: From Probabilities to Objective Events

M. Simonius

The problem of measurement in quantum mechanics is reanalyzed within a general, strictly probabilistic framework (without reduction postulate). Based on a novel comprehensive definition of measurement the natural emergence of objective events is demonstrated and their formal representation within quantum mechanics is obtained. In order to be objective an event is required to be observable or readable in at least two independent, mutually non-interfering ways with necessarily agreeing results. Consistency in spite of unrestricted validity of reversibility of the evolution or the superposition principle is demonstrated and the role played by state reduction, in a properly defined restricted sense, is discussed. Some general consequences are pointed out.

arXiv:quant-ph/9811074•Jan 17, 1994•0 citations

Pure States

K. Kong Wan

This chapter presents a systematic treatment of quantum theory in terms of six groups of postulates on the fundamental properties of quantum systems: postulate on the description of pure states, postulate on the description of observables and their values, postulate on the transition from classical to quantum systems, postulates on the probabilistic relationship between states and observables, postulates on the time evolution of the system and postulate on states after measurement. It extends the basic theory to discuss mixed states, superselection rules and many-particle systems. The chapter presents a brief discussion of conceptual problems in quantum mechanics. A maximum amount of information about the system corresponds to a set of simultaneously measured values of a complete set of discrete observables of the system. Such an amount of information characterises a state of the system. States characterised by such a maximum amount of information about the system are called pure states.

•Jul 9, 2019•0 citations
A synthesis is attempted between the algebraic theory of superselection sectors (not necessarily of infinite systems), which is based on the representation theory of C* algebras (which we review), and recent ideas on the measurement problem, classical behavior in open quantum systems, and the peculiar nature of subsystems in quantum mechanics. The key point is a proper use of the notion of a state, in combination with an appropriate choice of algebras of observables for which the superposition “principle” may be invalid. In this way, a major part of the measurement problem becomes equivalent to the study of superselection sectors in models for a measurement situation, and can in principle be resolved unambiguously. Special emphasis is placed on the transition from pure to mixed states, and the (non)uniqueness of the decomposition of the latter into pure states.
Quantization is defined as the act of assigning an appropriate C*-algebra [Formula: see text] to a given configuration space Q, along with a prescription mapping self-adjoint elements of [Formula: see text] into physically interpretable observables. This procedure is adopted to solve the problem of quantizing a particle moving on a homogeneous locally compact configuration space Q=G/H. Here [Formula: see text] is chosen to be the transformation group C*-algebra corresponding to the canonical action of G on Q. The structure of these algebras and their representations are examined in some detail. Inequivalent quantizations are identified with inequivalent irreducible representations of the C*-algebra corresponding to the system, hence with its superselection sectors. Introducing the concept of a pre-Hamiltonian, we construct a large class of G-invariant time-evolutions on these algebras, and find the Hamiltonians implementing these time-evolutions in each irreducible representation of [Formula: see text]. “Topological” terms in the Hamiltonian (or the corresponding action) turn out to be representation-dependent, and are automatically induced by the quantization procedure. Known “topological” charge quantization or periodicity conditions are then identically satisfied as a consequence of the representation theory of [Formula: see text].
Quantum mechanics famously posits two distinct evolution rules for the state of a system: a deterministic, unitary time evolution under the Schr¨odinger equation, and a probabilistic “collapse” of the wavefunction upon measurement as dictated by the Born rule. The apparent inconsistency of these two dynamical laws – one continuous and one discontinuous – constitutes the quantum measurement problem. This foundational problem, which underlies the emergence of definite outcomes from quantum superpositions, has persisted since the theory’s inception. In this review, we present a comprehensive and rigorous examination of the measurement problem and survey the leading approaches that seek to resolve or circumvent it. We begin by formulating the measurement problem and its conceptual challenges. We then discuss in detail the major interpretations of quantum mechanics and theoretical frameworks addressing the problem: the Copenhagen interpretation, Everett’s many-worlds interpretation, de Broglie–Bohm pilot-wave theory, objective collapse models, the role of decoherence and environment-induced superselection, and epistemic approaches such as QBism. For each interpretation, we describe the core principles and mathematical formalism, assessing how (and whether) it attempts to solve the measurement problem. We also review modern developments and experiments relevant to quantum measurements, including tests of Bell inequalities, observations of decoherence and macroscopic superpositions, weak measurements and quantum eraser experiments, and thought experiments ‘a la Wigner’s friend. We highlight how these results inform the ongoing debate. Finally, we discuss open problems and challenges that remain in fully resolving the measurement problem.
In this study, we develop quantum measurement theory for quantum systems described by C∗-algebras. This is the first step to establish measurement theory for interacting quantum fields with off-shell momenta. Unlike quantum mechanics (i.e., quantum systems with finite degrees of freedom), measurement theory for quantum fields is still in development because of the difficulty of quantum fields that are typical quantum systems with infinite degrees of freedom. Furthermore, the mathematical theory of quantum measurement is formulated in the von Neumann algebraic setting in previous studies. In the paper, we aim to extend the applicable area of quantum measurement theory to quantum systems described by C∗-algebras from a mathematical viewpoint, referring to the sector theory that is related to symmetry and based on the theory of integral decomposition of states. In particular, we define central subspaces of the dual space of a C∗-algebra and use them to define instruments. This attempt makes the connection between measurement theory and sector theory explicit and enables us to understand the macroscopic nature and the physical meaning of measurement.
We introduce an unconventional approach to the measurement problem in quantum mechanics: we treat the apparatus as a classical system belonging to the macroworld. To describe the quantum measurement process we must couple the classical apparatus to the quantum system. In this paper we explain how this is to be done: we embed the classical apparatus into a larger quantum-mechanical structure, making use of a superselection principle. The apparatus can now be coupled to the quantum system in a straightforward manner. We discuss what constraints should be placed on the coupling so that an interpretation of the interaction as a measurement results. We require that unambiguous information of the values of a quantum observable should be transferred to the variables of the apparatus. We also require that the apparatus should retain its classical identity. This latter requirement is formulated as a principle of integrity, in both weak and strong forms.
The problem of measurement in quantum mechanics is reanalyzed within a general, strictly probabilistic framework (without reduction postulate). Based on a novel comprehensive definition of measurement the natural emergence of objective events is demonstrated and their formal representation within quantum mechanics is obtained. In order to be objective an event is required to be observable or readable in at least two independent, mutually non-interfering ways with necessarily agreeing results. Consistency in spite of unrestricted validity of reversibility of the evolution or the superposition principle is demonstrated and the role played by state reduction, in a properly defined restricted sense, is discussed. Some general consequences are pointed out.
This chapter presents a systematic treatment of quantum theory in terms of six groups of postulates on the fundamental properties of quantum systems: postulate on the description of pure states, postulate on the description of observables and their values, postulate on the transition from classical to quantum systems, postulates on the probabilistic relationship between states and observables, postulates on the time evolution of the system and postulate on states after measurement. It extends the basic theory to discuss mixed states, superselection rules and many-particle systems. The chapter presents a brief discussion of conceptual problems in quantum mechanics. A maximum amount of information about the system corresponds to a set of simultaneously measured values of a complete set of discrete observables of the system. Such an amount of information characterises a state of the system. States characterised by such a maximum amount of information about the system are called pure states.