Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physics Essays

Comments on Marmet's “Quantum Mechanics and its Paradoxes: A Realistic Solution to Mermin's EPR Apparatus”

Damian Canals‐Frau

Published Jun 1, 1996• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.4006/1.3029232

Related papers

Quantum Mechanics and Its Paradox: A Realistic Solution to Mermin's EPR Apparatus

P. Marmet

Physics Essays•Sep 1, 1993•0 citations

An algebraic approach to quantum mechanics and the EPR paradox

Kay-Kong Wan, R. G. McLean

Physics Letters A•May 1, 1984•4 citations

Measurement in quantum mechanics, and the EPR paradox

Paul F. Zweifel

International Journal of Theoretical Physics•Jul 1, 1974•11 citations

Notes on the EPR paradox

秀樹 鯖田, 薫 藤田

Abstract In this second part of the series of comments for foundation of quantum mechanics,we concentrate ourselves in the EPR paradox.The recent development of this field is critically surveyed and our comments or suggestions for further investigations are added.We show that quantum mechanics can be rewritten realistically by using the so-called hidden variables.The local realistic theory is the common feature in most theory of natural science.Quantum mechanics also has this common feature and is not an exceptional theory in science.|量子力学の基礎についてのコメントと題するシリーズの第2部では、EPRパラドックスに重点をおく。この分野の最近の発展が批判的に概観され、さらなる研究へのコメントと示唆が付加されている。量子力学はいわゆるかくされた変数を用いて実在論的に書き直すことが可能である。この局所実在論は多くの自然科学の理論で共通にみられることである。量子力学もまたこの共通点をもち、科学における例外的な理論ではない。

•Sep 30, 1992•0 citations

A reformulation and a possible modification of quantum mechanics and the EPR paradox

G. C. Ghirardi, A. Rimini, T. Weber

Il Nuovo cimento della Società italiana di fisica. B/Il Nuovo cimento B•Dec 1, 1976•19 citations

Über das Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradoxon / On the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox

Peter Mittelstaedt

The EPR experiment is analysed in terms of ordinary quantum mechanics and shown to be compatible with the orthodox interpretation of this theory. There is no need to refer to Bohrs resolution of the EPR paradox, nor is it necessary to assume any further unusual properties of the quantum physical reality. In particular, it is shown that the EPR experiment does not contradict the fact that incommensurable properties cannot be objectivized simultaneously in a quantum mechanical system, and that the measuring process can be understood in terms of quantum theory as an interaction of the measuring apparatus and the object system. From these results it follows that there is no reason to search for modifications of the quantum theory which might be more convenient for a realistic interpretation of the EPR experiment. Furthermore, the EPR experiment cannot be used as a motivation for introducing hidden variables into the quantum theory. Experimental investigations which try to test quantum mechanics in respect to the possibility of introducing local hidden variables can therefore not be justified by the EPR paradox.

Zeitschrift für Naturforschung A•Apr 1, 1974•1 citation
Abstract In this second part of the series of comments for foundation of quantum mechanics,we concentrate ourselves in the EPR paradox.The recent development of this field is critically surveyed and our comments or suggestions for further investigations are added.We show that quantum mechanics can be rewritten realistically by using the so-called hidden variables.The local realistic theory is the common feature in most theory of natural science.Quantum mechanics also has this common feature and is not an exceptional theory in science.|量子力学の基礎についてのコメントと題するシリーズの第2部では、EPRパラドックスに重点をおく。この分野の最近の発展が批判的に概観され、さらなる研究へのコメントと示唆が付加されている。量子力学はいわゆるかくされた変数を用いて実在論的に書き直すことが可能である。この局所実在論は多くの自然科学の理論で共通にみられることである。量子力学もまたこの共通点をもち、科学における例外的な理論ではない。
The EPR experiment is analysed in terms of ordinary quantum mechanics and shown to be compatible with the orthodox interpretation of this theory. There is no need to refer to Bohrs resolution of the EPR paradox, nor is it necessary to assume any further unusual properties of the quantum physical reality. In particular, it is shown that the EPR experiment does not contradict the fact that incommensurable properties cannot be objectivized simultaneously in a quantum mechanical system, and that the measuring process can be understood in terms of quantum theory as an interaction of the measuring apparatus and the object system. From these results it follows that there is no reason to search for modifications of the quantum theory which might be more convenient for a realistic interpretation of the EPR experiment. Furthermore, the EPR experiment cannot be used as a motivation for introducing hidden variables into the quantum theory. Experimental investigations which try to test quantum mechanics in respect to the possibility of introducing local hidden variables can therefore not be justified by the EPR paradox.