Dynamics of a three-level Λ -type system driven by trains of ultrashort laser pulses
Ekaterina Ilinova, Andrei Derevianko
We study the dynamics of three-level $\ensuremath{\Lambda}$-type atoms driven by a coherent train of short, nonoverlapping laser pulses. We derive analytical nonperturbative expressions for the density matrix by approximating the pulses by a $\ensuremath{\delta}$ function. We demonstrate that, depending on the train parameters, several scenarios of system dynamics can be realized. We show the possibility of driving Raman transitions between the two ground states of the $\ensuremath{\Lambda}$ system, avoiding populating excited states by using pulses with effective area equal to $2\ensuremath{\pi}$. The number of $2\ensuremath{\pi}$ pulses needed to transfer the entire population from one ground state to another depends on the ratio between the Rabi frequencies of two allowed transitions. In the case of equal Rabi frequencies, the system can be transferred from one ground state to another with a single $2\ensuremath{\pi}$ pulse. When the total pulse area differs from $2\ensuremath{\pi}$ and the two-photon resonance condition is fulfilled, the system evolves into a ``dark'' state and becomes transparent to subsequent pulses. The third possible scenario is the quasi-steady-state regime when neither the total single-pulse area is equal to $2\ensuremath{\pi}$ nor is the two-photon resonance condition fulfilled. In this regime the radiative-decay-induced drop in the population following a given pulse is fully restored by the subsequent pulse. We derive an analytical expression for the density matrix in the quasi-steady-state regime. We analyze the dependence of the postpulse excited-state population in the quasi-steady-state regime on the train parameters. We find the optimal values for the train parameters corresponding to the maximum of the excited-state population. The maximum of the excited-state population in the steady-state regime is reached at an effective single-pulse area equal to $\ensuremath{\pi}$ and is equal to $2/3$ in the limiting case when its radiative lifetime is much shorter than the pulse repetition period.
arXiv:1203.0034•Physical Review A•Jul 26, 2012•8 citations