Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physical Review

A Comment on the Validity of the Bloch Formulation for the Interpretation of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Phenomena

Ellis Strick, R. S. Bradford, Clarence S. Clay, A. Craft

Published Oct 15, 1951• 4 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1103/physrev.84.363.3

Related papers

Bloch-Siegert Shift and Berry Phase Effect in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance

G. B. Furman, I. M. Kadzhaya

Journal of Magnetic Resonance Series A•Oct 1, 1993•7 citations

Reply to the Comment on: Is multiple quantum nuclear magnetic resonance of water real?

W. S. Warren, Qiuhong He, Mark A. McCoy +1 more

The Journal of Chemical Physics•Jan 15, 1992•38 citations

On the description of relaxation processes in nuclear magnetic resonance

J. Grunzweig-Genossar

Il Nuovo Cimento•Aug 1, 1965•1 citation

Spin relaxation: is there anything new under the Sun?

Bogdan A. Rodin, Daniel Abergel

Spin relaxation has been at the core of many studies since the early days of nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and the underlying theory worked out by its founding fathers. This Bloch-Redfield-Abraham relaxation theory has been recently reinvestigated () in the perspective of Lindblad theory of quantum Markovian master equations in order to account for situations where the widely used semi-classical relaxation theory breaks down. In this article, we review the conventional approach of quantum mechanical theory of NMR relaxation and show that, under the usual assumptions, it is equivalent to the Lindblad formulation. We also comment on the debate on semi-classical versus quantum versions of spectral density functions involved in relaxation.

Magnetic Resonance•Feb 9, 2022•12 citations

Stochastic Resonance and Nonlinear Response using NMR Spectroscopy

Lorenza Viola, Evan M. Fortunato, Seth Lloyd +2 more

We revisit the phenomenon of quantum stochastic resonance in the regime of validity of the Bloch equations. We find that a stochastic resonance behavior in the steady-state response of the system is present whenever the noise-induced relaxation dynamics can be characterized via a single relaxation time scale. The picture is validated by a simple nuclear magnetic resonance experiment on water.

arXiv:quant-ph/0001095•Physical Review Letters•Jun 12, 2000•37 citations

Classical versus quantum mechanical description of nuclear magnetic resonance

昭二 市村

•Mar 1, 1968•0 citations
Spin relaxation has been at the core of many studies since the early days of nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and the underlying theory worked out by its founding fathers. This Bloch-Redfield-Abraham relaxation theory has been recently reinvestigated () in the perspective of Lindblad theory of quantum Markovian master equations in order to account for situations where the widely used semi-classical relaxation theory breaks down. In this article, we review the conventional approach of quantum mechanical theory of NMR relaxation and show that, under the usual assumptions, it is equivalent to the Lindblad formulation. We also comment on the debate on semi-classical versus quantum versions of spectral density functions involved in relaxation.