Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

European Journal of Physics

Angular momentum in two dimensions

D. K. Sunko

Published Apr 19, 2010• 1 citation
Publisher

Abstract

It is shown by direct computation that angular momentum cannot be reduced to two dimensions by assuming lack of dependence on the z coordinate. Formally, this is because the independence of z breaks rotational invariance. As a physical example, it is shown that a gauge- and rotation-invariant description of planar electrons in a perpendicular magnetic field must have a three-dimensional form, even though all the terms refer to planar coordinates alone. The physical concepts underlying common formal manipulations with the quantum angular momentum operator are treated at a level directly useful to students encountering them thoroughly for the first time. The letter may also serve as a contextual introduction to advanced quantization issues, usually studied at graduate level.

DOI
10.1088/0143-0807/31/3/l03

Related papers

Elementary introduction to the properties of angular momentum operators through three-dimensional rotations

C. Leubner

For pedagogical purposes it is demonstrated that with little effort the customary discussion of rotations in introductory courses can be extended to naturally produce a number of angular momentum operator properties, if coordinate-free rotation operators are used in their exponential form. This form gives rise to a particularly useful coordinate-free representation of the generators of rotations in three-space, from which the student can derive the usual angular momentum formalism for the case j=1 by elementary vector algebra alone. Since in this approach the j=1 formalism appears as a set of relations among simple geometric objects in ordinary space, it admits of a geometric interpretation and will leave the student better prepared for a more profound appreciation of the abstract concepts of the full theory.

American Journal of Physics•Aug 1, 1980•0 citations

Aspects of Angular Momentum

P. Strange

Spin is well known to be an intrinsically relativistic property of particles. Nonetheless its effects are seen in many physical situations which are not obviously relativistic, perhaps the most obvious examples being magnets and the quantum mechanically permitted electronic configurations of the elements in the periodic table. The view of spin adopted in these and other problems is that the electron has a quantized spin ( s = 1/2) and that is a fundamental tenet of the theory, rather than something that has to be explained. In this chapter we are going to discuss the behaviour of spin-1/2 particles (electrons, protons and neutrons for example) without much direct reference to relativistic quantum theory and the origins of spin. This chapter should be instructive in its own right and as a guide to understanding spin when we come to discuss it in a fully relativistic context at various stages throughout this book. Unless otherwise specified, we will refer to electrons, but it should be borne in mind that the theory is equally applicable to any spin-1/2 particle. Students of quantum theory cannot delve very deeply into the subject without coming across the quantization of angular momentum. The orbital angular momentum usually surfaces in the theory leading up to the quantum description of the hydrogen atom.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Sep 17, 1998•0 citations

Angular Momentum and Rotational Motion in Three Dimensions

Jochen Autschbach

Abstract This chapter treats rotations in three dimensions and the angular momentum quantum mechanically. The angular momentum is a 3-vector that plays the same role in the kinetic energy of rotating particles as the linear momentum 3-vector plays in the kinetic energy for translational motion. The quantum operator for the three components do not commute, i.e. the full vector cannot be known. Each component commutes with the operator for the square-length of the angular momentum vector, and therefore one opts for calculating the square-length and one of the components, z, referred to as the projection. The angular momentum is quantized. The (azimuthal) quantum number ℓ = 0,1,2,3… quantifies the square-length as ℓ(ℓ+1), and the projection is quantified by the (magnbetic) quantum number mℓ = -ℓ…ℓ in integer steps. The eigenfunctions are called spherical harmonics. A ‘rigid rotor’ model is set up to treat the rotational spectrum of a diatomic molecule.

Oxford University Press eBooks•Dec 21, 2020•0 citations

Complementarity in Angular-Momentum States

Bernard A. Lippmann

By introducing operator representations for angular-momentum states referred to arbitrary axes of quantization, two independent angular momenta, each referred to its own axis of quantization, may be combined quantum-mechanically. An interpretation in terms of complementarity shows that this method of adding angular momenta corresponds to a "causal" description, while the usual method (using only one axis of quantization) is a "geometric" or spacetime description. "Causal" angular-momentum states automatically avoid the sums over magnetic quantum numbers in cascade processes.

Physical Review•Sep 1, 1953•0 citations

Angular momentum

P. C. W. Davies, David S. Betts

One of the most important applications of the quantum mechanical formalism developed in the previous chapter is to angular momentum. This is because many microsystems are spherically symmetric, or approximately so, and angular momentum is therefore conserved. This chapter discusses that a careful study of quantized angular momentum leads to a completely new physical phenomenon – intrinsic spin. The fact that the angular momentum vector of a quantum particle must point in certain restricted directions is a bizarre quantum property. In some respects the abstract idea of an internal angular momentum is reminiscent of the classical concept of a spinning body. In classical mechanics angular momentum is added vectorially but in the quantum case the issue is more subtle. The procedure will be illustrated by the example of the addition of two spins. As in classical mechanics a charged quantum system with angular momentum possesses a magnetic moment μ.

Routledge eBooks•Apr 27, 2018•0 citations

Rotational motion

Peter Atkins, Julio de Paula, James Keeler

This chapter focuses on the concept of rotational motion. It explains that energy and angular momentum for a particle rotating in two- or three-dimensions are quantized and satisfied cyclic boundary conditions, which imply the quantization of angular momentum's magnitude and z-component. The electronic structure of atoms showcases rotational motion because electrons orbit around nuclei and spin on their axis. The chapter details the solutions for the Schrödinger equation and the vector model of angular momentum. It also discusses the concept of space quantization revolving around the quantum mechanical result of a rotating body that may not take up an arbitrary orientation concerning some specified axis.

Oxford University Press eBooks•Dec 5, 2022•0 citations
It is shown by direct computation that angular momentum cannot be reduced to two dimensions by assuming lack of dependence on the z coordinate. Formally, this is because the independence of z breaks rotational invariance. As a physical example, it is shown that a gauge- and rotation-invariant description of planar electrons in a perpendicular magnetic field must have a three-dimensional form, even though all the terms refer to planar coordinates alone. The physical concepts underlying common formal manipulations with the quantum angular momentum operator are treated at a level directly useful to students encountering them thoroughly for the first time. The letter may also serve as a contextual introduction to advanced quantization issues, usually studied at graduate level.
For pedagogical purposes it is demonstrated that with little effort the customary discussion of rotations in introductory courses can be extended to naturally produce a number of angular momentum operator properties, if coordinate-free rotation operators are used in their exponential form. This form gives rise to a particularly useful coordinate-free representation of the generators of rotations in three-space, from which the student can derive the usual angular momentum formalism for the case j=1 by elementary vector algebra alone. Since in this approach the j=1 formalism appears as a set of relations among simple geometric objects in ordinary space, it admits of a geometric interpretation and will leave the student better prepared for a more profound appreciation of the abstract concepts of the full theory.
Spin is well known to be an intrinsically relativistic property of particles. Nonetheless its effects are seen in many physical situations which are not obviously relativistic, perhaps the most obvious examples being magnets and the quantum mechanically permitted electronic configurations of the elements in the periodic table. The view of spin adopted in these and other problems is that the electron has a quantized spin ( s = 1/2) and that is a fundamental tenet of the theory, rather than something that has to be explained. In this chapter we are going to discuss the behaviour of spin-1/2 particles (electrons, protons and neutrons for example) without much direct reference to relativistic quantum theory and the origins of spin. This chapter should be instructive in its own right and as a guide to understanding spin when we come to discuss it in a fully relativistic context at various stages throughout this book. Unless otherwise specified, we will refer to electrons, but it should be borne in mind that the theory is equally applicable to any spin-1/2 particle. Students of quantum theory cannot delve very deeply into the subject without coming across the quantization of angular momentum. The orbital angular momentum usually surfaces in the theory leading up to the quantum description of the hydrogen atom.
Abstract This chapter treats rotations in three dimensions and the angular momentum quantum mechanically. The angular momentum is a 3-vector that plays the same role in the kinetic energy of rotating particles as the linear momentum 3-vector plays in the kinetic energy for translational motion. The quantum operator for the three components do not commute, i.e. the full vector cannot be known. Each component commutes with the operator for the square-length of the angular momentum vector, and therefore one opts for calculating the square-length and one of the components, z, referred to as the projection. The angular momentum is quantized. The (azimuthal) quantum number ℓ = 0,1,2,3… quantifies the square-length as ℓ(ℓ+1), and the projection is quantified by the (magnbetic) quantum number mℓ = -ℓ…ℓ in integer steps. The eigenfunctions are called spherical harmonics. A ‘rigid rotor’ model is set up to treat the rotational spectrum of a diatomic molecule.
By introducing operator representations for angular-momentum states referred to arbitrary axes of quantization, two independent angular momenta, each referred to its own axis of quantization, may be combined quantum-mechanically. An interpretation in terms of complementarity shows that this method of adding angular momenta corresponds to a "causal" description, while the usual method (using only one axis of quantization) is a "geometric" or spacetime description. "Causal" angular-momentum states automatically avoid the sums over magnetic quantum numbers in cascade processes.
One of the most important applications of the quantum mechanical formalism developed in the previous chapter is to angular momentum. This is because many microsystems are spherically symmetric, or approximately so, and angular momentum is therefore conserved. This chapter discusses that a careful study of quantized angular momentum leads to a completely new physical phenomenon – intrinsic spin. The fact that the angular momentum vector of a quantum particle must point in certain restricted directions is a bizarre quantum property. In some respects the abstract idea of an internal angular momentum is reminiscent of the classical concept of a spinning body. In classical mechanics angular momentum is added vectorially but in the quantum case the issue is more subtle. The procedure will be illustrated by the example of the addition of two spins. As in classical mechanics a charged quantum system with angular momentum possesses a magnetic moment μ.
This chapter focuses on the concept of rotational motion. It explains that energy and angular momentum for a particle rotating in two- or three-dimensions are quantized and satisfied cyclic boundary conditions, which imply the quantization of angular momentum's magnitude and z-component. The electronic structure of atoms showcases rotational motion because electrons orbit around nuclei and spin on their axis. The chapter details the solutions for the Schrödinger equation and the vector model of angular momentum. It also discusses the concept of space quantization revolving around the quantum mechanical result of a rotating body that may not take up an arbitrary orientation concerning some specified axis.