Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physical Review

Boundary Conditions and the Meaning of Wave Groups in Wave Mechanics

Harold Albert Wilson

Published Apr 15, 1930• 24 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Reasons are given for believing that the boundary conditions at a discontinuity in the potential ($V$) in wave mechanics may be ${\ensuremath{\varphi}}_{1}={\ensuremath{\varphi}}_{2}{\ensuremath{\mu}}^{\frac{1}{2}}$ and $\frac{{\ensuremath{\varphi}}_{1}d{\ensuremath{\varphi}}_{1}}{\mathrm{dx}}=\frac{{\ensuremath{\varphi}}_{2}d{\ensuremath{\varphi}}_{2}}{\mathrm{dx}}$. Here $\ensuremath{\varphi}$ is the wave function and $\ensuremath{\mu}$ the ratio of the group velocities. With these boundary conditions the waves are either completely transmitted or completely reflected according as the energy $E$ is greater or less than $V$. The particles therefore need not be supposed to enter the region in which $V>E$ where their velocities would be imaginary and their kinetic energies negative. It is suggested that the group of waves associated with a particle should be identified with the particle and that the energy and momentum of the particle are the energy and momentum of the group of waves. When the group is stopped or absorbed it contracts to small dimensions and so becomes a particle.

DOI
10.1103/physrev.35.948

Related papers

Scattering, Quantum Current, and Resonant Tunneling

Duncan G. Steel

Abstract Having examined free particles and particles that are confined in space by a potential energy term, we now consider the impact of a disturbance in the flat energy landscape for a free particle. By disturbance we means some kind of fixed “obstacle” which is either a positive (repelling) or negative (attractive) potential. We are interested in determining the impact on the free particle. Continuing to work mostly in one dimension, the particle described by a plane wave corresponding to momentum moving in the positive direction (a positive k−vector in the x−direction), we study elastic scattering. In one dimension, this means that we determine the probability that the particle is transmitted (continuing in the forward direction) or reflected (now moving in the backward direction.) We will also determine the nature of the solution inside the potential and in the case that the potential energy maximum is greater than the kinetic energy of the particle, we will show that the particle tunnels through the barrier. Interestingly, when we have two barriers, we can find conditions where the probability that the particle is transmitted is unity. This is the result of resonance, a feature of the wave-like nature of the particle’s wave function.

•Apr 30, 2021•0 citations

A collision problem in the wave mechanics

C. G. DARWIN

Abstract In the present work the wave mechanics are applied to the discussion of a collision problem of a more complicated type than has, I think, hitherto been done. Though there is nothing very new in the process it is rather interesting to see how a wave function behaves which involves two bodies, and is therefore outside our ordinary space intuitions. But the work had a much more general aim, as an attempt to see whether a sharper line of demarcation could be drawn between the particle-like and the wave-like properties of matter. Put briefly, I take a problem which would be regarded at first sight as irreconcilable with a pure wave theory, but thoroughly typical of the behaviour of particles, and show how in fact the correct result arises naturally from the consideration of wave alone. I have been led in this way to certain not very original speculation on the basis of the quantum theory and these are given at the end of the paper. These are not in the least intended to be a general formulation of the theory, but rather as an examination of a particular type of attempted formulation. I fear that the views expressed will be found partly obvious and perhaps partly inconsistent or even erroneous. My excuse for giving them is that the quantum theory seem already sufficiently developed for us to attempt something more than a mathematical formulation of it, and that a generally accepted physical understanding will be more quickly reached by agreement or disagreement with expressed opinions, than by waiting for the arrival of a full-grown theory. It has been an extraordinarily difficult task to express the ideas I intended, and I wish to thank Prof. D. R. Hartree for many valuable criticisms of my first attempts to do so, though he must be exonerated from all blame if the final result is unintelligible or erroneous. 1. The quantum mechanics have been expressed in a variety of ways, which place the emphasis differently, but it has been shown that they are all exactly equivalent, so what may choose which we will. I shall use the following description, limiting myself to the simpler cases which do not involve considerations of relativity. We take a partial differential equation of the wave type, set down according to certain rules depending on the particular system considered. We solve this subject to certain boundary conditions, expressive of all the limitations imposed by silts, mirrors, diffraction, gratings, moving shutters, etc., that may occur in the proposed system, and obtain as result the wave function Ψ, a function of all the co-ordinates of the system and of the time. From this we from a set of functions, of which the simplest is |Ψ|2; this process may be called taking the intensities. We next have to prepare for the particle aspect, by applying certain rules so as to normalise the intensities, a process entirely foreign to the idea of waves. Finally, we make the interpretation, in which we say that the normalised intensities measure the probability of the particles having such and such positions, momenta, energies, etc., and these are the results verified by observation.

Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A Containing Papers of a Mathematical and Physical Character•Jun 4, 1929•49 citations

Procedure for absorbing time-dependent wave functions at low kinetic energies and large bandwidths

Ahmed N. Hussain, Gareth O. Roberts

We present a contribution to the discussion of how best to minimize time-evolving wave functions near the edge of a space-time grid. Our suggestion builds on the work of several groups and adopts an optical potential with real and imaginary parts separated in space (though not necessarily in time) to bring about an artificial acceleration and subsequent suppression of the wave-function amplitude as it approaches the boundary of discretized space-time. The emphasis of the proposal is on the absorption of incident wave functions characterized by low kinetic energy (long de Broglie wavelength) and/or a broad spread of momenta. The action of the optical potential is quantified by calculations of transmission and reflection as a function of incident wave-function kinetic energy, relative bandwidth, and de Broglie wavelength. Numerical constraints on the maximum by which a wave packet may be accelerated and the time and space over which the accelerating potential may act are discussed within the terms of the split-operator method for wave-function propagation. The perceived advantages of spatially overlapping real and imaginary potentials with respect to the minimization of broad-bandwidth wave functions are investigated. It is found that the addition of a simple, though not totally arbitrary, energy shift applied in space prior to absorption by a negative imaginary potential greatly enhances the absorption of wave packets constructed from multiple momentum components.

Physical Review A•Dec 6, 2000•21 citations

On the Boundary conditions for the Radial Schrodinger Equation

Anzor Khelashvili, Teimuraz Nadareishvili

Exploring the idea that equation for radial wave function must be compatible with the full Schrodinger equation, a boundary condition is derived.

arXiv:1001.3285•Jan 19, 2010•1 citation

Why atomic and subatomic particles have wave property and satisfy the Schrodinger Equation? It infers the structures of these ± charged particles

Sennian Chen

Advanced Studies in Theoretical Physics•Jan 1, 2021•2 citations

Kinetic energy equipartition: A tool to characterize quantum thermalization

Carlos F. Destefani, Xavier Oriols

According to both Bohmian and stochastic quantum mechanics, the standard quantum mechanical kinetic energy can be understood as consisting of two hidden-variable components. One component is associated with the current (or Bohmian) velocity, while the other is associated with the osmotic velocity (or quantum potential), and they are identified with the phase and the amplitude, respectively, of the wave function. These two components are experimentally accessible through the real and imaginary parts of the weak value of the momentum postselected in position. In this paper, a kinetic energy equipartition is presented as a signature of quantum thermalization in closed systems. This means that the expectation value of the standard kinetic energy is equally shared between the expectation values of the squares of these two hidden-variable components. Such components cannot be reached from expectation values linked to typical Hermitian operators. To illustrate these concepts, numerical results for the nonequilibrium dynamics of a few-particle harmonic trap under random disorder are presented. Furthermore, the advantages of using the center-of-mass frame of reference for dealing with systems containing many indistinguishable particles are also discussed.

arXiv:2305.02026•Physical Review Research•Sep 8, 2023•2 citations
Reasons are given for believing that the boundary conditions at a discontinuity in the potential (VVV) in wave mechanics may be \ensuremathφ1=\ensuremathφ2\ensuremathμ12{\ensuremath{\varphi}}_{1}={\ensuremath{\varphi}}_{2}{\ensuremath{\mu}}^{\frac{1}{2}}\ensuremathφ1​=\ensuremathφ2​\ensuremathμ21​ and \ensuremathφ1d\ensuremathφ1dx=\ensuremathφ2d\ensuremathφ2dx\frac{{\ensuremath{\varphi}}_{1}d{\ensuremath{\varphi}}_{1}}{\mathrm{dx}}=\frac{{\ensuremath{\varphi}}_{2}d{\ensuremath{\varphi}}_{2}}{\mathrm{dx}}dx\ensuremathφ1​d\ensuremathφ1​​=dx\ensuremathφ2​d\ensuremathφ2​​. Here \ensuremathφ\ensuremath{\varphi}\ensuremathφ is the wave function and \ensuremathμ\ensuremath{\mu}\ensuremathμ the ratio of the group velocities. With these boundary conditions the waves are either completely transmitted or completely reflected according as the energy EEE is greater or less than VVV. The particles therefore need not be supposed to enter the region in which V>EV>EV>E where their velocities would be imaginary and their kinetic energies negative. It is suggested that the group of waves associated with a particle should be identified with the particle and that the energy and momentum of the particle are the energy and momentum of the group of waves. When the group is stopped or absorbed it contracts to small dimensions and so becomes a particle.
Abstract Having examined free particles and particles that are confined in space by a potential energy term, we now consider the impact of a disturbance in the flat energy landscape for a free particle. By disturbance we means some kind of fixed “obstacle” which is either a positive (repelling) or negative (attractive) potential. We are interested in determining the impact on the free particle. Continuing to work mostly in one dimension, the particle described by a plane wave corresponding to momentum moving in the positive direction (a positive k−vector in the x−direction), we study elastic scattering. In one dimension, this means that we determine the probability that the particle is transmitted (continuing in the forward direction) or reflected (now moving in the backward direction.) We will also determine the nature of the solution inside the potential and in the case that the potential energy maximum is greater than the kinetic energy of the particle, we will show that the particle tunnels through the barrier. Interestingly, when we have two barriers, we can find conditions where the probability that the particle is transmitted is unity. This is the result of resonance, a feature of the wave-like nature of the particle’s wave function.
Abstract In the present work the wave mechanics are applied to the discussion of a collision problem of a more complicated type than has, I think, hitherto been done. Though there is nothing very new in the process it is rather interesting to see how a wave function behaves which involves two bodies, and is therefore outside our ordinary space intuitions. But the work had a much more general aim, as an attempt to see whether a sharper line of demarcation could be drawn between the particle-like and the wave-like properties of matter. Put briefly, I take a problem which would be regarded at first sight as irreconcilable with a pure wave theory, but thoroughly typical of the behaviour of particles, and show how in fact the correct result arises naturally from the consideration of wave alone. I have been led in this way to certain not very original speculation on the basis of the quantum theory and these are given at the end of the paper. These are not in the least intended to be a general formulation of the theory, but rather as an examination of a particular type of attempted formulation. I fear that the views expressed will be found partly obvious and perhaps partly inconsistent or even erroneous. My excuse for giving them is that the quantum theory seem already sufficiently developed for us to attempt something more than a mathematical formulation of it, and that a generally accepted physical understanding will be more quickly reached by agreement or disagreement with expressed opinions, than by waiting for the arrival of a full-grown theory. It has been an extraordinarily difficult task to express the ideas I intended, and I wish to thank Prof. D. R. Hartree for many valuable criticisms of my first attempts to do so, though he must be exonerated from all blame if the final result is unintelligible or erroneous. 1. The quantum mechanics have been expressed in a variety of ways, which place the emphasis differently, but it has been shown that they are all exactly equivalent, so what may choose which we will. I shall use the following description, limiting myself to the simpler cases which do not involve considerations of relativity. We take a partial differential equation of the wave type, set down according to certain rules depending on the particular system considered. We solve this subject to certain boundary conditions, expressive of all the limitations imposed by silts, mirrors, diffraction, gratings, moving shutters, etc., that may occur in the proposed system, and obtain as result the wave function Ψ, a function of all the co-ordinates of the system and of the time. From this we from a set of functions, of which the simplest is |Ψ|2; this process may be called taking the intensities. We next have to prepare for the particle aspect, by applying certain rules so as to normalise the intensities, a process entirely foreign to the idea of waves. Finally, we make the interpretation, in which we say that the normalised intensities measure the probability of the particles having such and such positions, momenta, energies, etc., and these are the results verified by observation.
We present a contribution to the discussion of how best to minimize time-evolving wave functions near the edge of a space-time grid. Our suggestion builds on the work of several groups and adopts an optical potential with real and imaginary parts separated in space (though not necessarily in time) to bring about an artificial acceleration and subsequent suppression of the wave-function amplitude as it approaches the boundary of discretized space-time. The emphasis of the proposal is on the absorption of incident wave functions characterized by low kinetic energy (long de Broglie wavelength) and/or a broad spread of momenta. The action of the optical potential is quantified by calculations of transmission and reflection as a function of incident wave-function kinetic energy, relative bandwidth, and de Broglie wavelength. Numerical constraints on the maximum by which a wave packet may be accelerated and the time and space over which the accelerating potential may act are discussed within the terms of the split-operator method for wave-function propagation. The perceived advantages of spatially overlapping real and imaginary potentials with respect to the minimization of broad-bandwidth wave functions are investigated. It is found that the addition of a simple, though not totally arbitrary, energy shift applied in space prior to absorption by a negative imaginary potential greatly enhances the absorption of wave packets constructed from multiple momentum components.
According to both Bohmian and stochastic quantum mechanics, the standard quantum mechanical kinetic energy can be understood as consisting of two hidden-variable components. One component is associated with the current (or Bohmian) velocity, while the other is associated with the osmotic velocity (or quantum potential), and they are identified with the phase and the amplitude, respectively, of the wave function. These two components are experimentally accessible through the real and imaginary parts of the weak value of the momentum postselected in position. In this paper, a kinetic energy equipartition is presented as a signature of quantum thermalization in closed systems. This means that the expectation value of the standard kinetic energy is equally shared between the expectation values of the squares of these two hidden-variable components. Such components cannot be reached from expectation values linked to typical Hermitian operators. To illustrate these concepts, numerical results for the nonequilibrium dynamics of a few-particle harmonic trap under random disorder are presented. Furthermore, the advantages of using the center-of-mass frame of reference for dealing with systems containing many indistinguishable particles are also discussed.