Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physica A Statistical Mechanics and its Applications

Mathematical properties of renormalization-group transformations

Robert B. Griffiths

Published Mar 1, 1981• 40 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1016/0378-4371(81)90206-5

Related papers

Properties of renormalization group transformations

Peter Kunszt

arXiv:hep-lat/9706019•Nuclear Physics B•Apr 1, 1998•4 citations

Reply to comment on ‘Real-space renormalization-group methods for hierarchical spin glasses’

Michele Castellana

Abstract In their comment, Angelini et al object to the conclusion of (2019 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 52 445002), where we show that in (2013 Phys. Rev. B 87 134201) the exponent ν has been obtained by applying a mathematical relation in a regime where this relation is not valid. We observe that the criticism above on the mathematical validity of such relation has not been addressed in the comment. Our criticism thus remains valid, and disproves the conclusions of the comment. This constitutes the main point of this reply. In addition, we provide a point-by-point response and discussion of Angelini et al ’s claims. First, Angelini et al claim that the prediction 2 1/ ν = 1 of (2019 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor . 52 445002) is incorrect, because it results from the relation λ max = 2 1/ ν between the largest eigenvalue of the linearized renormalization-group (RG) transformation and ν , which cannot be applied to the ensemble renormalization group (ERG) method, given that for the ERG λ max = 1. However, the feature λ max = 1 is specific to the ERG transformation, and it does not give any grounds for questioning the validity of the general relation λ max = 2 1/ ν specifically for the ERG transformation. Second, Angelini et al claim that ν should be extracted from an early RG regime (A), as opposed to the asymptotic regime (B) used to estimate ν in (2019 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor . 52 445002), and that (B) is dominated by finite-size effects. However, (A) is a small-wavelength, non-critical regime, which cannot characterize the critical exponent ν related to the divergence of the correlation length. Also, the fact that (B) involves finite-size effects is a feature specific to the ERG, and gives no rationale for extracting ν from (A). Finally, we refute the remaining claims made by Angelini et al As a result of our analysis, we stand by our assertion that the ERG method yields a prediction given by 2 1/ ν = 1.

arXiv:2102.06263•Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical•Apr 3, 2020•0 citations

Conjugative Structure of Renormalization Group Flow via Matrix Product State Representation: From Coarse-Graining Transformation on Quantum States to Density Matrix Renormalization Group

Li-Xiang Cen, Z. D. Wang

The property of quantum many-body systems under spatial reflection and the relevant physics of renormalization group (RG) procedure are revealed. By virtue of the matrix product state (MPS) representation, various attributes for translational invariant systems associated with spatial reflection are manifested. We demonstrate subsequently a conservation rule of the conjugative relation for reflectional MPS pairs under RG transformations and illustrate further the property of the fixed points of RG flows. Finally, we show that a similar rule exists with respect to the target states in the density matrix renormalization group algorithm.

•Jul 28, 2007•0 citations

Invariance properties of the renormalization group

M. S. Green

Springer eBooks•Dec 11, 2005•1 citation

One Property of the Renormalization Group Operator

Гласко Андрей Владленович

Theoretical and Mathematical Physics•Jan 1, 2004•0 citations

Nonperturbative real-space renormalization group scheme for the spin- 12 XXXHeisenberg model

Andreas Degenhard

In this paper we apply an analytical real-space renormalization group formulation which is based on numerical concepts of the density-matrix renormalization group. Within a rigorous mathematical framework we construct nonperturbative renormalization group transformations for the spin-$\frac{1}{2}$ $\mathrm{XXX}$ Heisenberg model in the finite-temperature regime. The developed renormalization group scheme allows for calculating the renormalization group flow behavior in the temperature-dependent coupling constant. The constructed renormalization group transformations are applied within the ferromagnetic and the antiferromagnetic regime of the Heisenberg chain. The ferromagnetic fixed point is computed and compared to results derived by other techniques.

arXiv:cond-mat/9910512•Physical review. B, Condensed matter•Oct 3, 2001•4 citations
Abstract In their comment, Angelini et al object to the conclusion of (2019 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 52 445002), where we show that in (2013 Phys. Rev. B 87 134201) the exponent ν has been obtained by applying a mathematical relation in a regime where this relation is not valid. We observe that the criticism above on the mathematical validity of such relation has not been addressed in the comment. Our criticism thus remains valid, and disproves the conclusions of the comment. This constitutes the main point of this reply. In addition, we provide a point-by-point response and discussion of Angelini et al ’s claims. First, Angelini et al claim that the prediction 2 1/ ν = 1 of (2019 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor . 52 445002) is incorrect, because it results from the relation λ max = 2 1/ ν between the largest eigenvalue of the linearized renormalization-group (RG) transformation and ν , which cannot be applied to the ensemble renormalization group (ERG) method, given that for the ERG λ max = 1. However, the feature λ max = 1 is specific to the ERG transformation, and it does not give any grounds for questioning the validity of the general relation λ max = 2 1/ ν specifically for the ERG transformation. Second, Angelini et al claim that ν should be extracted from an early RG regime (A), as opposed to the asymptotic regime (B) used to estimate ν in (2019 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor . 52 445002), and that (B) is dominated by finite-size effects. However, (A) is a small-wavelength, non-critical regime, which cannot characterize the critical exponent ν related to the divergence of the correlation length. Also, the fact that (B) involves finite-size effects is a feature specific to the ERG, and gives no rationale for extracting ν from (A). Finally, we refute the remaining claims made by Angelini et al As a result of our analysis, we stand by our assertion that the ERG method yields a prediction given by 2 1/ ν = 1.
The property of quantum many-body systems under spatial reflection and the relevant physics of renormalization group (RG) procedure are revealed. By virtue of the matrix product state (MPS) representation, various attributes for translational invariant systems associated with spatial reflection are manifested. We demonstrate subsequently a conservation rule of the conjugative relation for reflectional MPS pairs under RG transformations and illustrate further the property of the fixed points of RG flows. Finally, we show that a similar rule exists with respect to the target states in the density matrix renormalization group algorithm.
In this paper we apply an analytical real-space renormalization group formulation which is based on numerical concepts of the density-matrix renormalization group. Within a rigorous mathematical framework we construct nonperturbative renormalization group transformations for the spin-12\frac{1}{2}21​ XXX\mathrm{XXX}XXX Heisenberg model in the finite-temperature regime. The developed renormalization group scheme allows for calculating the renormalization group flow behavior in the temperature-dependent coupling constant. The constructed renormalization group transformations are applied within the ferromagnetic and the antiferromagnetic regime of the Heisenberg chain. The ferromagnetic fixed point is computed and compared to results derived by other techniques.