Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physical Review A

Limits of the measurability of the local quantum electromagnetic-field amplitude

G. Compagno, Franco Persico

Published Mar 1, 1998• 12 citations
Publisher

Abstract

The precision with which the amplitude of the free electromagnetic field can be measured locally in QED is evaluated by analyzing a well-known gedanken experiment originally proposed by Bohr and Rosenfeld (BR). The analysis is performed by applying standard theoretical techniques familiar in quantum optics. The main result obtained for the precision is significantly different from the generally accepted Bohr-Rosenfeld result. This leads to questioning the widely accepted notion of the compensating field, fostered by these authors. A misconception at the origin of this notion is pointed out by a careful investigation of the self-force acting on the apparatus designed to measure the field. The correct expression for this self-force is found to be at variance with that proposed by Bohr and Rosenfeld and generally accepted. It is argued that, as a consequence of this new expression and in contrast with the generally accepted view, no compensating force of nonelectromagnetic nature is required in order to perform measurements of the quantum field amplitude with any desired accuracy. It is shown that the only limitations to the precision of the measurement, in the BR gedanken experiment, arise from the time-energy uncertainty principle, as well as from the finite dimensions of the measuring apparatus.

DOI
10.1103/physreva.57.1595

Related papers

Comment on “Limits of the measurability of the local quantum electromagnetic-field amplitude”

Vladimir Hnizdo

It is argued that the findings of a recent reanalysis by Compagno and Persico [Phys. Rev. A 57, 1595 (1998)] of the Bohr-Rosenfeld procedure for the measurement of a single space-time-averaged component of the electromagnetic field are incorrect when the field measurement time is shorter than that required for light to traverse the measurement's test body. To this end, the time-averaged ``self-force'' on the test body, assumed for simplicity to be of a spherical shape, is evaluated in terms of a one-dimensional quadrature for the general trajectory allowed for the test body by Compagno and Persico, and in closed form for the limiting steplike trajectory used by Bohr and Rosenfeld.

arXiv:quant-ph/0210074•Physical Review A•Nov 1, 1999•11 citations

Quantum Effects on the Accuracy of Momentum Measurements

C. H. Woo

It is shown in two examples that to measure the momentum of a particle with great accuracy, allowing for large uncertainties in the position, it is still necessary to consider additional quantum effects. For the case of measurements by electromagnetic means, the uncertainties in the measurability of field strengths and of charge-current densities should be considered. Within the framework of the Bohr-Rosenfeld analysis, uncertainties in the field measurements do not limit the accuracy of momentum measurements. What happens when the Bohr-Rosenfeld approximations are not made is an open question.

Physical Review•Aug 23, 1965•2 citations

Measurement of electrical field amplitude by a needle-like detector

G. Compagno

The Bohr-Rosenfeld measurement theory of the electromagnetic field amplitude is applied to a needle-like detector. The expression of the time average of the self-force due to the measurement process is explicitly obtained. It is shown that the appearance of divergences does not allow the approximations required by the Bohr-Rosenfeld theory.

AIP conference proceedings•Jan 1, 2000•0 citations

Quantum Restrictions on Measurement of Electromagnetic Field

Michael B. Mensky

Abstract The integration over field configurations is applied for finding quantum restrictions on measurability of electromagnetic field strength. The inequalities are derived demonstrating what precision is available for estimation, with the help of measurements, of the field strength in each point of a spacetime region. The comparison is made of the obtained results with those of the known papers by Landau and Peierls and Bohr and Rosenfeld.

Annalen der Physik•Jan 1, 1988•8 citations

Measurability of quantum fields and the energy-time uncertainty relation

Michael B. Mensky

Quantum restrictions on the measurability of an electromagnetic field strength and their relevance to the energy-time uncertainty relation are considered. The minimum errors in measuring electromagnetic field strengths, as they were estimated by the author (1988) in the framework of the phenomenological method of restricted path integral (RPI), are compared with the analogous estimates found by Landau and Peierls (1931) and by Bohr and Rosenfeld (1933) with the help of certain measurement setups. RPI-based restrictions, including those of Landau and Peierls as a special case, hold for any measuring schemes meeting the strict definition of measurement. Their fundamental nature is confirmed by the fact that their associated field detectability condition has the form of the energy-time uncertainty relation. The weaker restrictions suggested by Bohr and Rosenfeld rely on an extended definition of measurement. The energy?time uncertainty relation, which is the condition for the electromagnetic field to be detectable, is applied to the analysis of how the near-field scanning microscope works.

Physics-Uspekhi•May 31, 2011•8 citations

A FORMAL PSEUDO REALISTIC MEASUREMENT OF ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD UNCERTAINTY RELATIONS

Luis Gerardo Pedraza Saavedra

Bohr and Rosenfeld showed in 1933 that the order of magnitude of precision, in the measurement of the free quantum electromagnetic components imposed by their uncertainty relations, could be estimated with thought experiments. The ingenious article by Bohr and Rosenfeld describes the complicated measuring devices that would be needed, but does not include a graphic representation of these. Neither does it show the measurement of a magnetic component in a given space-time region, nor the measurement of two parallel magnetic components, nor the measurement of two non-parallel magnetic components, nor the parallel measurement of one magnetic and one electric component, nor the non-parallel measurement of one electric and one magnetic component, nor the non-parallel measurement of one magnetic and one electric component in two different space-time regions. This article covers these pending matters and the graphics of cases studied by them.

International Journal of Modern Physics B•May 20, 2006•1 citation
The precision with which the amplitude of the free electromagnetic field can be measured locally in QED is evaluated by analyzing a well-known gedanken experiment originally proposed by Bohr and Rosenfeld (BR). The analysis is performed by applying standard theoretical techniques familiar in quantum optics. The main result obtained for the precision is significantly different from the generally accepted Bohr-Rosenfeld result. This leads to questioning the widely accepted notion of the compensating field, fostered by these authors. A misconception at the origin of this notion is pointed out by a careful investigation of the self-force acting on the apparatus designed to measure the field. The correct expression for this self-force is found to be at variance with that proposed by Bohr and Rosenfeld and generally accepted. It is argued that, as a consequence of this new expression and in contrast with the generally accepted view, no compensating force of nonelectromagnetic nature is required in order to perform measurements of the quantum field amplitude with any desired accuracy. It is shown that the only limitations to the precision of the measurement, in the BR gedanken experiment, arise from the time-energy uncertainty principle, as well as from the finite dimensions of the measuring apparatus.
It is argued that the findings of a recent reanalysis by Compagno and Persico [Phys. Rev. A 57, 1595 (1998)] of the Bohr-Rosenfeld procedure for the measurement of a single space-time-averaged component of the electromagnetic field are incorrect when the field measurement time is shorter than that required for light to traverse the measurement's test body. To this end, the time-averaged ``self-force'' on the test body, assumed for simplicity to be of a spherical shape, is evaluated in terms of a one-dimensional quadrature for the general trajectory allowed for the test body by Compagno and Persico, and in closed form for the limiting steplike trajectory used by Bohr and Rosenfeld.
It is shown in two examples that to measure the momentum of a particle with great accuracy, allowing for large uncertainties in the position, it is still necessary to consider additional quantum effects. For the case of measurements by electromagnetic means, the uncertainties in the measurability of field strengths and of charge-current densities should be considered. Within the framework of the Bohr-Rosenfeld analysis, uncertainties in the field measurements do not limit the accuracy of momentum measurements. What happens when the Bohr-Rosenfeld approximations are not made is an open question.
Quantum restrictions on the measurability of an electromagnetic field strength and their relevance to the energy-time uncertainty relation are considered. The minimum errors in measuring electromagnetic field strengths, as they were estimated by the author (1988) in the framework of the phenomenological method of restricted path integral (RPI), are compared with the analogous estimates found by Landau and Peierls (1931) and by Bohr and Rosenfeld (1933) with the help of certain measurement setups. RPI-based restrictions, including those of Landau and Peierls as a special case, hold for any measuring schemes meeting the strict definition of measurement. Their fundamental nature is confirmed by the fact that their associated field detectability condition has the form of the energy-time uncertainty relation. The weaker restrictions suggested by Bohr and Rosenfeld rely on an extended definition of measurement. The energy?time uncertainty relation, which is the condition for the electromagnetic field to be detectable, is applied to the analysis of how the near-field scanning microscope works.
Bohr and Rosenfeld showed in 1933 that the order of magnitude of precision, in the measurement of the free quantum electromagnetic components imposed by their uncertainty relations, could be estimated with thought experiments. The ingenious article by Bohr and Rosenfeld describes the complicated measuring devices that would be needed, but does not include a graphic representation of these. Neither does it show the measurement of a magnetic component in a given space-time region, nor the measurement of two parallel magnetic components, nor the measurement of two non-parallel magnetic components, nor the parallel measurement of one magnetic and one electric component, nor the non-parallel measurement of one electric and one magnetic component, nor the non-parallel measurement of one magnetic and one electric component in two different space-time regions. This article covers these pending matters and the graphics of cases studied by them.