Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Soviet Physics Journal

Direct mathematical methods in the theory of quantized transitions. Part I

A. N. Kushnirenko

Published May 1, 1965• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/bf00827907

Related papers

Direct mathematical methods in the theory of quantized transitions, III

A. N. Kushnirenko

Russian Physics Journal•Apr 1, 1968•0 citations

Direct methematical methods in the theory of quantized transitions. IV

A. N. Kushnirenko

Soviet Physics Journal•Jun 1, 1968•0 citations

Direct methods of mathematical physics in the theory of quantum transitions. II

A. N. Kushnirenko

Russian Physics Journal•Mar 1, 1967•0 citations

A short course on quantum mechanics and methods of quantization

Elisa Ercolessi

These notes collect the lectures given by the author to the "XXIII International Workshop on Geometry and Physics" held in Granada (Spain) in September 2014. The first part of this paper aims at introducing a mathematical oriented reader to the realm of Quantum Mechanics (QM) and then to present the geometric structures that underline the mathematical formalism of QM which, contrary to what is usually done in Classical Mechanics (CM), are usually not taught in introductory courses. The mathematics related to Hilbert spaces and Differential Geometry are assumed to be known by the reader. In the second part, we concentrate on some quantization procedures, that are founded on the geometric structures of QM — as we have described them in the first part — and represent the ones that are more operatively used in modern theoretical physics. We will discuss first the so-called Coherent State Approach which, mainly complemented by "Feynman Path Integral Technique", is the method which is most widely used in quantum field theory. Finally, we will describe the "Weyl Quantization Approach" which is at the origin of modern tomographic techniques, originally used in optics and now in quantum information theory.

International Journal of Geometric Methods in Modern Physics•Jun 2, 2015•4 citations

The Mathematics of Second Quantization

J.M. Cook

quantum field theory. Although few nonspecialists have had opportunity to become familiar with the language of modern pure mathematics, quantum theory seems to have reached a point where it must use that language if it is to find a genuine escape from the divergence difficulties. Divergence can not be properly coped with when convergence itself has never been rigorously defined. In the classical analysis of real and complex numbers, results, even correct results, can be obtained by algebraic manipulation of formal power series; but these numbers are not just algebras, they are topological algebras, and only with Cauchy's introduction of the epsilon-delta treatment was mathematics provided an explicit method of separating sense from nonsense. Similarly, in the modern analysis of infinite-dimensional algebras results can be obtained by algebraic manipulation of formal expressions, but these results often require topological justification. One standard way of introducing a topology into the algebra of observables is to make them operators on a Hilbert space. This method, which does not seem to be extensively employed in quantum electrodynamics, can be used to construct a mathematically rigorous formalism the manipulation of which is directly followable by one's physical intuition. This construction requires the exercise of two dissimilar disciplines, mathematics and physics, so the exposition is divided into two parts upon which relative emphasis can be adjusted to suit individual tastes. In particular, physicists can greatly simplify the mathematics by ignoring: (1) operator-domain considerations (as is done here in the derivation of the Yukawa-potential); (2) discussions involving the group algebra of the symmetric group (since only the FermiDirac and Bose-Einstein cases have ever actually occurred); (3) material depending on the simply-connected covering group of the Lorentz group (since it is not needed to derive Maxwell's equations). However, Part I is empty, unmotivated mathematics without Part II; and Part II does not exist without Part I. The two are designed to be read, not consecutively, but in parallel. Sections are numbered accordingly. I would like to thank Professor I. E. Segal for liberal use of his time and advice in the preparation of this paper. It is to be submitted to the Depart

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences•Jul 1, 1951•13 citations

THE USE OF DIRECT METHODS OF MATHEMATICAL PHYSICS IN THE THEORY OF QUANTUM TRANSITIONS. PART I

A. N. Kushnirenko

•Jan 1, 1965•0 citations
These notes collect the lectures given by the author to the "XXIII International Workshop on Geometry and Physics" held in Granada (Spain) in September 2014. The first part of this paper aims at introducing a mathematical oriented reader to the realm of Quantum Mechanics (QM) and then to present the geometric structures that underline the mathematical formalism of QM which, contrary to what is usually done in Classical Mechanics (CM), are usually not taught in introductory courses. The mathematics related to Hilbert spaces and Differential Geometry are assumed to be known by the reader. In the second part, we concentrate on some quantization procedures, that are founded on the geometric structures of QM — as we have described them in the first part — and represent the ones that are more operatively used in modern theoretical physics. We will discuss first the so-called Coherent State Approach which, mainly complemented by "Feynman Path Integral Technique", is the method which is most widely used in quantum field theory. Finally, we will describe the "Weyl Quantization Approach" which is at the origin of modern tomographic techniques, originally used in optics and now in quantum information theory.
quantum field theory. Although few nonspecialists have had opportunity to become familiar with the language of modern pure mathematics, quantum theory seems to have reached a point where it must use that language if it is to find a genuine escape from the divergence difficulties. Divergence can not be properly coped with when convergence itself has never been rigorously defined. In the classical analysis of real and complex numbers, results, even correct results, can be obtained by algebraic manipulation of formal power series; but these numbers are not just algebras, they are topological algebras, and only with Cauchy's introduction of the epsilon-delta treatment was mathematics provided an explicit method of separating sense from nonsense. Similarly, in the modern analysis of infinite-dimensional algebras results can be obtained by algebraic manipulation of formal expressions, but these results often require topological justification. One standard way of introducing a topology into the algebra of observables is to make them operators on a Hilbert space. This method, which does not seem to be extensively employed in quantum electrodynamics, can be used to construct a mathematically rigorous formalism the manipulation of which is directly followable by one's physical intuition. This construction requires the exercise of two dissimilar disciplines, mathematics and physics, so the exposition is divided into two parts upon which relative emphasis can be adjusted to suit individual tastes. In particular, physicists can greatly simplify the mathematics by ignoring: (1) operator-domain considerations (as is done here in the derivation of the Yukawa-potential); (2) discussions involving the group algebra of the symmetric group (since only the FermiDirac and Bose-Einstein cases have ever actually occurred); (3) material depending on the simply-connected covering group of the Lorentz group (since it is not needed to derive Maxwell's equations). However, Part I is empty, unmotivated mathematics without Part II; and Part II does not exist without Part I. The two are designed to be read, not consecutively, but in parallel. Sections are numbered accordingly. I would like to thank Professor I. E. Segal for liberal use of his time and advice in the preparation of this paper. It is to be submitted to the Depart