Any real system, no matter how well isolated, unavoidably interacts with the environment. This interaction makes the evolution of a quantum system nonunitary and destroys the coherence of quantum superpositions. This process, known as decoherence, is widely regarded as the most important and fundamental obstacle to the practical realization of quantum information processing. On the other hand, the objectives of quantum control are predicated on the ability to manipulate the system coherently over a period of time. Quantum control has been applied successfully to several experimental systems and coupling such a controlled system to an environment makes the study of coherence loss possible. The standard model of decoherence is formulated in terms of a system, defined by the observables that can be measured, and a reservoir, de¯ned by those degrees of freedom that are not accessed by observation. The vibrational and rotational degree of freedom of diatomic molecules form an experimental model of such a system and bath 1. The nature of the ro-vibrational coupling does not allow a Decoherence Free Subspace, instead we try to identify a Decoherence Resistant Subspace using closed loop control. We set up a learning control loop experiment to monitor the coherence in a vibrational wavepacket, consisting of about 6 vibrational states of the A(1Σ+g ) electronic state, excited by a shaped, ultrashort optical pulse, and then to determine the pulse shape that yielded the longest coherence lifetime. The coherence of the vibrational wavepacket was monitored by measuring the fluorescence quantum beats from the outer turning point of the wave packet's trajectory. The closed loop controller altered the shape of the driving optical pulse to maximize the the depth of modulation of the quantum beats at a prescribed time after excitation, within the constraints of the laser system. The outcome of this closed loop control experiment shows an improvement of the beat decay constant of about 60%, as shown in Fig. (1), a result which occurs for several di®erent pulse shapes. Our experiments show that a number of interesting decoherence-resistant excitations exist. The nature of the dephasing was examined theoretically. Using measured optical pulse shapes, we simulated numerically the molecular wavepacket in the limit of perturbation theory. The experiment and simulations show that there are di®erent mechanisms contributing to the decoherence resistant excitation. The shaped pulse reduces the °uctuations in the wave packet spatial extent, which in turn changes the system reservoir coupling. Other components of the optimal pulse are a sequence of pulses that creates constructive interference of the vibrational wavepacket at the desired time, and chirp which compensates for the anharmonicity of the adiabatic potential. The experimental results show general agreement with numerical simulations. We conclude that wavepackets resistant to dephasing do exist,and that learning algorithms provide an effcient means for finding them.
Any real system, no matter how well isolated, unavoidably interacts with the environment. This interaction makes the evolution of a quantum system nonunitary and destroys the coherence of quantum superpositions. This process, known as decoherence, is widely regarded as the most important and fundamental obstacle to the practical realization of quantum information processing. On the other hand, the objectives of quantum control are predicated on the ability to manipulate the system coherently over a period of time. Quantum control has been applied successfully to several experimental systems and coupling such a controlled system to an environment makes the study of coherence loss possible. The standard model of decoherence is formulated in terms of a system, defined by the observables that can be measured, and a reservoir, de¯ned by those degrees of freedom that are not accessed by observation. The vibrational and rotational degree of freedom of diatomic molecules form an experimental model of such a system and bath 1. The nature of the ro-vibrational coupling does not allow a Decoherence Free Subspace, instead we try to identify a Decoherence Resistant Subspace using closed loop control. We set up a learning control loop experiment to monitor the coherence in a vibrational wavepacket, consisting of about 6 vibrational states of the A(1Σ+g ) electronic state, excited by a shaped, ultrashort optical pulse, and then to determine the pulse shape that yielded the longest coherence lifetime. The coherence of the vibrational wavepacket was monitored by measuring the fluorescence quantum beats from the outer turning point of the wave packet's trajectory. The closed loop controller altered the shape of the driving optical pulse to maximize the the depth of modulation of the quantum beats at a prescribed time after excitation, within the constraints of the laser system. The outcome of this closed loop control experiment shows an improvement of the beat decay constant of about 60%, as shown in Fig. (1), a result which occurs for several di®erent pulse shapes. Our experiments show that a number of interesting decoherence-resistant excitations exist. The nature of the dephasing was examined theoretically. Using measured optical pulse shapes, we simulated numerically the molecular wavepacket in the limit of perturbation theory. The experiment and simulations show that there are di®erent mechanisms contributing to the decoherence resistant excitation. The shaped pulse reduces the °uctuations in the wave packet spatial extent, which in turn changes the system reservoir coupling. Other components of the optimal pulse are a sequence of pulses that creates constructive interference of the vibrational wavepacket at the desired time, and chirp which compensates for the anharmonicity of the adiabatic potential. The experimental results show general agreement with numerical simulations. We conclude that wavepackets resistant to dephasing do exist,and that learning algorithms provide an effcient means for finding them.
Manipulation of quantum interference requires that the system under control remains coherent, avoiding (or at least postponing) the phase randomization that can ensue from coupling to an uncontrolled environment. We show that closed-loop coherent control can be used to mitigate the rate of quantum dephasing in a gas-phase ensemble of potassium dimers (K2), which acts as a model system for testing the general concepts of controlling decoherence. Specifically, we adaptively shaped the light pulse used to prepare a vibrational wave packet in electronically excited K2, with the amplitude of quantum beats in the fluorescence signal used as an easily measured surrogate for the purpose of optimizing coherence. The optimal pulse increased the beat amplitude from below the noise level to well above it, and thereby increased the coherence life time as compared with the beats produced by a transform-limited pulse. Closed-loop methods can thus effectively identify states that are robust against dephasing without any previous information about the system-environment interaction.
In this thesis, we discuss the possibilities for suppression of decoherence, the loss of purity in an open quantum system, and the related process of dephasing. In the first chapter, we review the literature on the subject of open system dynamics, decoherence and methods of decoherence suppression. In the second chapter, we focus on the specific case of a rotationally hot diatomic molecule as an example of an open quantum system, where molecular vibrational wavepackets are subject to dephasing due to rovibrational coupling. We report analytical and numerical results addressing whether the dephasing rate can be controlled by adjustment of the initial wavepacket phases. It appears that over long timescales, phase-only control is not possible, but for earlier timescales the possibility of phase-only control of dephasing remains. In addition, we point out that the time-dependence of the dephasing process depends significantly upon the degeneracy of the rotational environment states. In the final chapter, we discuss the same system, but apply a qualitatively different method of dephasing suppression based on the nonlinear resonance effect in a driving field. We extend previous work on the topic (Shapiro et al. [1]) by considering the effect of using a train of laser pulses as the driving field, in place of a two-colour continuous-wave laser field. We demonstrate that the pulse train method can be more effective at suppressing dephasing than the two-colour CW case.
Experimental and theoretical work is presented on the control of wave packet dynamics in atomic and molecular systems. Using sequences of phase-locked optical pulses, the link between optical phase and quantum mechanical phase is explored in the Na atom and Naj dimer, representing a step towards the logical engineering of quantum states in more complicated systems. A novel apparatus, constructed to study and control the vibrational dynamics of vibrational wave packets on the Na ionic potential surface, is described in chapter 3. Theoretical simulations for proposed experiment are presented in chapter 4. Control is achieved by exploiting the phase-evolution of the constituent vibrational quantum states within the wave packet superposition. The phase relationship and the accumulated phase difference between the various components of the wave packet is determined, and a sequence of phase-locked optical pulses is employed to selectively enhance or depopulate specific vibrational states, or sets of vibrational states. The quantum state composition of the resulting wave packet, and the efficiency of the control scheme, is determined by calculating the multi-pulse response of the time-dependent vibrational state populations. In chapter 5, the quantum interference between Rydberg electron wave packets in the Na atom is investigated using pairs of phase-locked wave packets, allowing manipulation of the total orbital angular momentum of Na Rydberg atoms. Initially the wave packet is composed of a superposition of s and d Rydberg series. Exploitation of the difference between the quantum defects of the two series allows specific angular momentum compositions within the resultant wave packet to be engineered. Experimentally, this final quantum state distribution is analysed in the frequency domain using state selective field ionisation, and in the time domain using the optical Ramsey method. The theoretical calculations show how the phase difference between pairs of optical pulses is linked to the corresponding Rydberg frequency spectrum, therefore enabling the control of the quantum state composition of the wave packets.
Quantum mechanics, though a probabilistic theory, gives a 'deterministic' answer to the question of how the present determines the future. In essence, in order to predict future probabilities, we need to (numerically) propagate the time-dependent Schrödinger equation from the present to the future. It is interesting to note that classical mechanics of macroscopic bodies, though reputed to be a deterministic theory, does not allow, due to chaos (which unfortunately is more prevalent than integrability), such clear insights into the future. In contrast, small (e.g., atomic, molecular and photonic) systems which are best understood using the tools of quantum mechanics, do not suffer from chaos, rendering the prediction of the probability-distributions of future events possible. The field of quantum control deals with an important modification of this task, namely, it asks: given a wave function in the present, what dynamics, i.e. what Hamiltonian, guarantees a desired outcome or 'objective' in the future? In practice one may achieve this goal of modifying and finding the desired Hamiltonian by introducing external fields, e.g. laser light. It is then possible to reach the objective in a 'trial-and-error' fashion, performed either numerically or in the laboratory. We can guess or build a Hamiltonian, do an experiment, or propagate the initial wave function to the future, compare the result with the desirable objective, and correct the guess for the Hamiltonian until satisfactory agreement with the objective is reached. A systematic way of executing this procedure is the sub-field called 'optimal control'. The trial-and-error method is often very time consuming and rarely provides mechanistic insight. There are situations where analytical solutions exist, rendering the control strategies more transparent. This is especially so when one can identify quantum interferences as the heart of quantum control, the essence of the field called 'coherent control'. The experience accumulated so far by many groups is that quantum interferences are the mechanism underlying most successful control scenarios and control experiments. The identification of the control mechanism is especially facile when the time-dependence of the Hamiltonian merely serves to prepare a state which then evolves in the absence of external fields. Analytical theories also exist when the explicit time dependence of the Hamiltonian can be treated adiabatically. Under these circumstances one can identify the quantum interfering pathways that lead to control, allowing for the simultaneous exploration of entire 'landscapes' (and not just a single 'desirable' objective) resulting from varying all the experimental 'knobs' at our disposal, e.g., relative- and envelope-phases, intensities, polarizations, and pulse-sequencing. Such 'pulse-shaping' knobs are now available down to the sub-femtosecond regime in broad spectral regions ranging from the UV to the IR. We expect that comprehensive investigations of the quantum interference required to control dynamical processes will result in a more detailed understanding of the dynamics themselves. Together with experimental progress---the stage is now set for many exciting applications in fundamental and applied sciences by 'tailoring' light--matter interactions essentially at will.
Precisely characterizing and controlling the dynamics of realistic open quantum systems has emerged in recent years as a key challenge across contemporary quantum sciences and technologies, with implications ranging from physics, chemistry and applied mathematics to quantum information processing (QIP) and quantum engineering. Quantum control theory aims to provide both a general dynamical-system framework and a constructive toolbox to meet this challenge. The purpose of this special issue of Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics is to present a state-of-the-art account of recent advances and current trends in the field, as reflected in two international meetings that were held on the subject over the last summer and which motivated in part the compilation of this volume—the Topical Group: Frontiers in Open Quantum Systems and Quantum Control Theory , held at the Institute for Theoretical Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics (ITAMP) in Cambridge, Massachusetts (USA), from 1–14 August 2010, and the Safed Workshop on Quantum Decoherence and Thermodynamics Control , held in Safed (Israel), from 22–27 August 2010. Initial developments in quantum control theory date back to (at least) the early 1980s, and have been largely inspired by the well-established mathematical framework for classical dynamical systems. As the above-mentioned meetings made clear, and as the burgeoning body of literature on the subject testifies, quantum control has grown since then well beyond its original boundaries, and has by now evolved into a highly cross-disciplinary field which, while still fast-moving, is also entering a new phase of maturity, sophistication, and integration. Two trends deserve special attention: on the one hand, a growing emphasis on control tasks and methodologies that are specifically motivated by QIP, in addition and in parallel to applications in more traditional areas where quantum coherence is nevertheless vital (such as, for instance, quantum control of chemical reactions or high-resolution magnetic resonance spectroscopy); on the other hand, an unprecedented demand for close coupling between theory and experiment , with theoretical developments becoming more and more attuned to and driven by experimental advances as different quantum technologies continue to evolve at an impressive pace in the laboratory. Altogether, these two trends account for several of the recurrent themes in this volume, as well as in the current quantum control literature as a whole: namely, the quest for control strategies that can attain the highest degree of precision and robustness possible, while striving for efficiency and, ultimately, optimality in achieving the intended control task under realistic operational constraints. From a theory standpoint, this makes it imperative to take into account increasingly more realistic control settings; to assess the quantitative impact of limited control resources and/or system knowledge; and to provide a rigorous and general foundation for existing experimental approaches in order to further enhance applicability and performance. From an experimental standpoint, renewed emphasis is in turn placed on validating theoretical predictions and benchmarking performance, so that the limiting constraints can be singled out for additional theoretical analysis and guidance. This ongoing cross-talk is clearly reflected in this collection, which brings together theoreticians and experimentalists, with a significant fraction of the papers reporting on combined quantum control theory–experiment efforts. While a precise categorization would neither be possible nor desirable, contributions to this volume have been loosely grouped into five broad sections. This grouping has been made in the hope that connections between different problems and/or technical approaches will become more transparent, facilitating the transfer of concepts and methods. The special issue opens with a section devoted to open-loop control methods, with special emphasis on dynamical decoupling (DD), which is becoming an increasingly important tool for decoherence control at the physical 'quantum firmware' level. In addition to including original research results, the first two articles, by Brion et al and Biercuk et al , also serve to pedagogically review some background in their respective subjects. In particular, Brion et al revisit one of the conceptually simplest approaches to open-loop manipulation of both closed and open quantum systems, nonholonomic control , motivated by its broad applicability to QIP settings. A special instance of open-loop control based on sequences of (nearly) instantaneous `bang-bang' pulses is addressed by Biercuk et al , who reformulate the simplest DD scenario, suppression of phase decoherence in a single qubit, as a filter-design problem. Peng et al report on the implementation of 'concatenated' DD for arbitrary single-qubit decoherence in the context of nuclear magnetic resonance QIP. A dedicated analysis of the performance of different DD schemes in the presence of realistic pulse errors is given by Wang and Dobrovitski. DD is also one of the strategies used by Lucamarini et al to reduce polarization decoherence in a photon qubit. These authors additionally report on the use of active feedback to counter transmission noise, effectively setting the stage for the second section, which is centered on closed-loop control. Unlike in open-loop control, measurement is an essential ingredient in closed-loop schemes aimed at both reliably identifying features of the target quantum system and further modifying its dynamics. The importance of directly measuring the spectrum of the underlying system-environment coupling is stressed by Almog et al , who show how this knowledge is crucial, in particular, for predicting the performance of DD sequences in experiments and for optimizing performance. Riofrio et al address a weak-measurement protocol for implementing quantum state tomography , which is a necessary 'primitive' for inferring the target quantum state and thereby diagnosing the control performance. Next, the impact of realistic control and system imperfections in continuous-time Markovian feedback strategies for rapid state preparation is analyzed by Combes and Wiseman. A prominent role is played in the special issue by optimal control (OC) approaches, reflecting their central importance for quantum control and QIP. The OC contributions have been divided into two separate sections, depending on whether the target dynamics is modeled as Hamiltonian (section 3) or dissipative (section 4), respectively. The contribution by Beltrani et al deals with `control landscapes', which provide a foundation for analyzing the performance of numerical OC algorithms and their robustness against control errors. Specifically, this paper characterizes geometric properties of the control landscape, relevant to the optimal control of state-to-state transitions. Application of OC theory to the problem of population transfer and coherence enhancement in Λ-systems is studied by Kumar et al , whereas Goerz et al report on the OC-design of a high-fidelity controlled phase-gate in atomic qubits. The robustness of an OC solution is specifically addressed by Negretti et al , along with an approach for identifying easily implementable while still 'close-to-optimal' control pulses. Powerful relaxation-optimized OC schemes (based on so-called opengrape algorithms) for generating unitary target gates in the presence of known dissipation parameters are discussed by Schulte-Herbrüggen et al . Next, Lapert et al report on the problem of time-optimal control of spin-1/2 systems undergoing Bloch relaxation dynamics, highlighting the crucial role played by singular extremals in the control synthesis. Alternative approaches for optimized control of qubits exposed to various decoherence processes are developed by Esher et al and Xue et al , based on a perturbative 'bath-optimized' formalism and on numerical optimization via a genetic algorithm, respectively. Testifying to the richness of the field, the volume concludes with four contributions that address a diverse range of problems. The exploitation of properties of adiabatic quantum evolutions is common to the first two papers. In particular, Legthtas et al offer a rigorous explanation for the robustness of a control protocol, chirped pulsing , that is widely employed in 'adiabatic rapid passage' experiments, while Han et al present a theoretical framework for adiabatic Raman photo-association schemes relevant to ultracold atomic systems. In the context of cavity quantum electrodynamics, Montenegro and Orszag describe how to engineer a system of two atoms coupled to distant lossy cavities so that stable atomic entanglement is generated. Finally, still very little is known about the physical mechanisms that are responsible for and control the experimentally observed 'coherent' features of transport phenomena in biological systems. The last contribution by Alicki and Giraldi analyzes energy transport in dynamical systems that can be modeled as 'quantum networks', and points to this fascinating emerging frontier. It is our hope that the above papers may help readers to gain an overview of some of the main trends in current quantum control efforts, both theoretical and experimental. In closing, we take the opportunity to thank the organizations which sponsored the above-mentioned ITAMP Topical Group (the United States National Science Foundation and Harvard University) and the Safed Workshop (the Israeli Science Foundation, the Safed Scientific Workshop program, CECAM and ACAM). Last but not least our sincere gratitude goes to all of the contributors to the volume and the reviewers as well as the J. Phys. B staff, for their respective efforts in preparing the papers and ensuring the overall quality of this special issue.
The main goal of this PhD work is an experimental study of coherent excitation of atomic and molecular wavepackets, i.e. superpositions of many quantum eigenstates, by shaped femtosecond pulses. Approaches allowing nearly complete population transfer between quantum eigenstates were well studied in the past within the two level approximation. In this work we focus on adiabatic and non-adiabatic methods of population transfer beyond the two-level approximation. Excitation of multi-level target states is possible due to broad spectrum of an ultrashort pulse which contains frequencies needed for multiple transitions to different states in the final superposition. At the same time, the spectrum of an ultrashort pulse can be modified, or ``shaped'', in order to affect the excitation process and control the amplitudes in the final superposition. Both non-adiabatic and quasi-adiabatic methods were first implemented and studied in electronic wavepackets in alkali atoms. The non-adiabatic approach revealed features linked to the strong-field perturbations of the energy level structure of the quantum system. An adiabatic method was implemented for the first time on a femtosecond time scale, and was thoroughly characterized. The control over complex amplitudes in the target superposition was demonstrated as well as completeness of the population transfer. In the second part of this work, we focused on coherent control of rotational wavepackets in diatomic molecules. Rotational excitation by a periodic train of femtosecond pulses was investigated in the context of ``delta-kicked'' rotor - a paradigm system for studying quantum chaos, and the effect of quantum resonance was demonstrated for the first time in a system of true quantum rotors. Control of uni-directional molecular rotation was proposed and demonstrated with a novel ``chiral pulse train'' - a sequence of femtosecond pulses with polarization rotating from pulse to pulse by a predefined angle. All the developed techniques offer new tools in coherent control of atomic and molecular wavepackets on an ultrashort time scale.