Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physics Letters A

Interacting spin pairs in rotational magnetic fields and geometric phase

Xin Li

Published May 30, 2008• 9 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1016/j.physleta.2008.05.057

Related papers

Geometric phase of spin-1 in a rotating magnetic field

张晓燕, 胡连

Chinese Optics Letters•Jan 1, 2006•0 citations

Dynamics and geometric phase of two spins with exchange coupling in a rotating magnetic field

Chang-Tan Xu, J.-Q. Liang

Physics Letters A•Mar 30, 2006•9 citations

Unitary transformations purely based on geometric phases of two spins with Ising interaction in a rotating magnetic field

Yu Shi

arXiv:0902.3521•Annals of Physics•Apr 14, 2010•6 citations

Design of geometric phase gates and controlling the dynamic phase for a two-qubit Ising model in magnetic fields

M. Amniat-Talab, Hossein Rangani Jahromi

We investigate how to obtain a non-trivial geometric phase gate for a two-qubit spin chain, with Ising interaction in different magnetic fields. Indeed, one of the spins is driven by a time-varying rotating magnetic field, and the other is coupled with a static magnetic field in the direction of the rotation axis. This is an interesting problem both for the purpose of measuring the geometric phases and in quantum computing applications. It is shown that the static magnetic field does not change the adiabatic states of the system, and it does not affect the geometric phases, whereas it may be used to control the dynamic phases. In addition, by considering the exact two-spin adiabatic geometric phases, we find that a non-trivial two-spin unitary transformation, purely based on Berry phases, can be obtained by using two consecutive cycles with opposite directions of the magnetic fields, opposite signs of the interaction constant and the phase shift of the rotating magnetic field. In addition, in the non-adiabatic case, starting with a certain initial state, a cycle can be achieved and thus the Aharonov–Anandan phase is calculated.

Proceedings of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences•Mar 1, 2013•6 citations

Geometric phase of entangled spin pairs in a magnetic field

Xiangyu Ge, Miki Wadati

The entanglement dependence of the geometric phase is studied in the case of two interacting spins under a time-independent magnetic field. A general entanglement-dependence geometric phase is formulated. This unification scheme covers the analyses by Sj\"oqvist for precessing spins and for isotropically interacting spins. From the general formula, the geometric phase is determined explicitly for an isotropic interaction and nonzero magnetic field.

Physical Review A•Nov 1, 2005•15 citations

Geometric Phase Associated with Spinor Rotations

Apoorva G. Wagh, Veer Chand Rakhecha

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 1993•4 citations
We investigate how to obtain a non-trivial geometric phase gate for a two-qubit spin chain, with Ising interaction in different magnetic fields. Indeed, one of the spins is driven by a time-varying rotating magnetic field, and the other is coupled with a static magnetic field in the direction of the rotation axis. This is an interesting problem both for the purpose of measuring the geometric phases and in quantum computing applications. It is shown that the static magnetic field does not change the adiabatic states of the system, and it does not affect the geometric phases, whereas it may be used to control the dynamic phases. In addition, by considering the exact two-spin adiabatic geometric phases, we find that a non-trivial two-spin unitary transformation, purely based on Berry phases, can be obtained by using two consecutive cycles with opposite directions of the magnetic fields, opposite signs of the interaction constant and the phase shift of the rotating magnetic field. In addition, in the non-adiabatic case, starting with a certain initial state, a cycle can be achieved and thus the Aharonov–Anandan phase is calculated.