Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physica B Condensed Matter

Electronic correlations for a two-level dimer: dynamical susceptibilities

Lazaro A. Macedo, Roberto E. Lagos

Published Mar 1, 2002• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1016/s0921-4526(01)01184-x

Related papers

Electronic correlations in a two-level dimer

Lazaro A. Macedo, Roberto E. Lagos

Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials•May 1, 2001•2 citations

Electronic Correlations within Fermionic Lattice Models

M. Matlak, B. Grabiec, S. Krawiec

We investigate two-site electronic correlations within generalized Hubbard model, which incorporates the conventional Hubbard model (parameters: t (hopping between nearest neighbours), U (Coulomb repulsion (attraction))) supplemented by the intersite Coulomb interactions (parameters: J (1) (parallel spins), J (2) (antiparallel spins)) and the hopping of the intrasite Cooper pairs (parameter: V ).As a first step we find the eigenvalues Eα and eigenvectors |E α of the dimer and we represent each partial Hamiltonian Eα|Eα Eα| (α = 1, 2, . . ., 16) in the second quantization with the use of the Hubbard and spin operators.Each dimer energy level possesses its own Hamiltonian describing different two-site interactions which can be active only in the case when the level will be occupied by the electrons.A typical feature is the appearance of two generalized t-J interactions ascribed to two different energy levels which do not vanish even for U = J (1) = J (2) = V = 0 and their coupling constants are equal to ±t in this case.In the large U -limit for J (1) = J (2) = V = 0 there is only one t-J interaction with coupling constant equal to 4t 2 /|U | as in the case of a real lattice.The competition between ferromagnetism, antiferromagnetism and superconductivity (intrasite and intersite pairings) is also a typical feature of the model because it persists in the case U = J (1) = J (2) = V = 0 and t = 0.The same types of the electronic, competitive interactions are scattered between different energy levels and therefore their thermodynamical activities are dependent on the occupation of these levels.It qualitatively explains the origin of the phase diagram of the model.We consider also a real lattice as a set of interacting dimers to show that the competition between magnetism and superconductivity seems to be universal for fermionic lattice models.

arXiv:0711.0624•Acta Physica Polonica A•Sep 1, 2007•1 citation

Electronic correlation in two-dimensional systems

Oracio Navarro, C. Wang

Surface Science•May 1, 1993•0 citations

Electron Correlations in Two Dimensions

K. W. Becker, Peter Fulde

Physics of Low-Dimensional Systems•Jul 1, 1989•0 citations

Two-level quantum dot susceptibility and polarization in the presence of Coulomb correlations

Vladimir N. Mantsevich, N. S. Maslova, P. I. Arseyev

Susceptibility and polarization of two-level quantum dot (QD) with Coulomb correlations between localized electrons weakly connected to the reservoirs were carefully analyzed. It was revealed that both susceptibility and polarization depend strongly on high-order correlation functions of localized in QD electrons. It was demonstrated that susceptibility and polarization can be controlled by changing of applied bias voltage value, Coulomb correlations strength and Rabi frequency.

Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE•Apr 21, 2016•0 citations

Effect of coulomb correlations on the two-level quantum dot susceptibility and polarization

N. S. Maslova, Vladimir N. Mantsevich, P. I. Arseyev

We revealed that the susceptibility and polarization of two-level quantum dot (QD) with Coulomb correlations between localized electrons weakly connected to the reservoirs are determined not only by the stationary electron filling numbers difference. We demonstrated that the susceptibility and polarization also depend on high-order correlation functions of electrons localized in the QD. We found that susceptibility and polarization can be controlled by applied bias voltage value, Coulomb correlations strength and Rabi frequency. We demonstrated that susceptibility and polarization amplitudes can significantly increase and even change the sign due to the tuning of the QD parameters. Careful analysis of correlated QD susceptibility, polarization and electron filling numbers (occupancies) difference in a wide range of applied bias voltage, Rabi frequency and Coulomb correlations value was performed in terms of pseudo-operators with constraint.

Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics Letters•Oct 1, 2015•0 citations
We investigate two-site electronic correlations within generalized Hubbard model, which incorporates the conventional Hubbard model (parameters: t (hopping between nearest neighbours), U (Coulomb repulsion (attraction))) supplemented by the intersite Coulomb interactions (parameters: J (1) (parallel spins), J (2) (antiparallel spins)) and the hopping of the intrasite Cooper pairs (parameter: V ).As a first step we find the eigenvalues Eα and eigenvectors |E α of the dimer and we represent each partial Hamiltonian Eα|Eα Eα| (α = 1, 2, . . ., 16) in the second quantization with the use of the Hubbard and spin operators.Each dimer energy level possesses its own Hamiltonian describing different two-site interactions which can be active only in the case when the level will be occupied by the electrons.A typical feature is the appearance of two generalized t-J interactions ascribed to two different energy levels which do not vanish even for U = J (1) = J (2) = V = 0 and their coupling constants are equal to ±t in this case.In the large U -limit for J (1) = J (2) = V = 0 there is only one t-J interaction with coupling constant equal to 4t 2 /|U | as in the case of a real lattice.The competition between ferromagnetism, antiferromagnetism and superconductivity (intrasite and intersite pairings) is also a typical feature of the model because it persists in the case U = J (1) = J (2) = V = 0 and t = 0.The same types of the electronic, competitive interactions are scattered between different energy levels and therefore their thermodynamical activities are dependent on the occupation of these levels.It qualitatively explains the origin of the phase diagram of the model.We consider also a real lattice as a set of interacting dimers to show that the competition between magnetism and superconductivity seems to be universal for fermionic lattice models.
We revealed that the susceptibility and polarization of two-level quantum dot (QD) with Coulomb correlations between localized electrons weakly connected to the reservoirs are determined not only by the stationary electron filling numbers difference. We demonstrated that the susceptibility and polarization also depend on high-order correlation functions of electrons localized in the QD. We found that susceptibility and polarization can be controlled by applied bias voltage value, Coulomb correlations strength and Rabi frequency. We demonstrated that susceptibility and polarization amplitudes can significantly increase and even change the sign due to the tuning of the QD parameters. Careful analysis of correlated QD susceptibility, polarization and electron filling numbers (occupancies) difference in a wide range of applied bias voltage, Rabi frequency and Coulomb correlations value was performed in terms of pseudo-operators with constraint.