Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

International Journal of Quantum Chemistry

Two approaches to fractional supersymmetrical quantum mechanics

Mohammed Daoud A, M. Kibler

Published Jan 1, 2003• 7 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Abstract Two complementary approaches of 𝒩 = 2 fractional supersymmetrical quantum mechanics of order k are studied in this article. The first, based on a generalized Weyl–Heisenberg algebra Wk (which comprises the affine quantum algebra Uq(sl2) with qk = 1 as a special case), apparently contains solely one bosonic degree of freedom. The second uses generalized bosonic and k‐fermionic degrees of freedom. As an illustration, a particular emphasis is put on the fractional supersymmetrical oscillator of order k. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Int J Quantum Chem, 2003

DOI
10.1002/qua.10465

Related papers

On Two Approaches to Fractional Supersymmetric Quantum Mechanics

Mohammed Daoud A, M. Kibler

Two complementary approaches of N = 2 fractional supersymmetric quantum mechanics of order k are studied in this article. The first one, based on a generalized Weyl-Heisenberg algebra W(k) (that comprizes the affine quantum algebra Uq(sl(2)) with q to k = 1 as a special case), apparently contains solely one bosonic degree of freedom. The second one uses generalized bosonic and k-fermionic degrees of freedom. As an illustration, a particular emphasis is put on the fractional supersymmetric oscillator of order k.

arXiv:math-ph/0110031•Physics of Particles and Nuclei•Oct 26, 2001•1 citation

ON FRACTIONAL SUPERSYMMETRIC QUANTUM MECHANICS: THE FRACTIONAL SUPERSYMMETRIC OSCILLATOR

Mohammed Daoud A, M. Kibler

The Hamiltonian for a fractional supersymmetric oscillator is derived from three approaches. The first one is based on a decomposition in which a Q-uon gives rise to an ordinary boson and a k-fermion (a k-fermion being an object interpolating between boson and fermion). The second one starts from a generalized Weyl-Heisenberg algebra. Finally, the third one relies on the quantum algebra Uq(sl(2)) where q is a root of unity.

arXiv:math-ph/0101009•International School on Symmetry and Structural Properties of Condensed Matter (SSPCM)•May 1, 2001•6 citations

Fractional supersymmetry and hierarchy of shape invariant potentials

Mohammed Daoud A, M. Kibler

Fractional supersymmetric quantum mechanics is developed from a generalized Weyl-Heisenberg algebra. The Hamiltonian and the supercharges of fractional supersymmetric dynamical systems are built in terms of the generators of this algebra. The Hamiltonian gives rise to a hierarchy of isospectral Hamiltonians. Special cases of the algebra lead to dynamical systems for which the isospectral supersymmetric partner Hamiltonians are connected by a (translational or cyclic) shape invariance condition.

arXiv:quant-ph/0609017•Journal of Mathematical Physics•Dec 1, 2006•31 citations

Higher-order supersymmetric quantum mechanics

David J. Fernández C.

We review the higher‐order supersymmetric quantum mechanics (H‐SUSY QM), which involves differential intertwining operators of order greater than one. The iterations of first‐order SUSY transformations are used to derive in a simple way the higher‐order case. The second order technique is addressed directly, and through this approach unexpected possibilities for designing spectra are uncovered. The formalism is applied to the harmonic oscillator: the corresponding H‐SUSY partner Hamiltonians are ruled by polynomial Heisenberg algebras which allow a straight construction of the coherent states.

arXiv:quant-ph/0502098•AIP conference proceedings•Jan 1, 2004•110 citations

Schwinger's oscillator method, supersymmetric quantum mechanics and massless particles

F. M. Mejía, V. Pleitez

We consider Schwinger's method of angular momentum addition using the SU(2) algebra with both a fermionic and a bosonic oscillator. We show that the total spin states obtained are: one boson singlet state and an arbitrary number of spin-1/2 states, the later ones are energy degenerate. It means that we have in this case supersymmetric quantum mechanics and also the addition of angular momentum for massless particles. We review too the cases of two bosonic and two fermionic oscillators.

Revista Brasileira de Ensino de Física•Mar 1, 2002•2 citations

The Wigner-Heisenberg Algebra in Quantum Mechanics

R. de Lima Rodrigues

ly R is the Klein operator ±exp[iπ(Ĥ − E0)] while in Schrodinger coordinate representation, first investigated by Yang, R is realised by ±P where P is the parity operator: P|x >= ±|x >, P−1 = P, P = 1, PxP−1 = −x. (7) The basic (anti-)commutation relation (1) and (3) together with their derived relation (4) will be referred to here as constituting the WH algebra which is in fact a parabose algebra for one degree of freedom. We shall assume here in after, without loss of generality, that c is positive, i.e. c =| c |> 0. Thus, in coordinate representation the generalized quantization a la Wigner requires that x = x, ∞− < x < ∞, p = −i d dx + ic 2x P, R = P. (8) Indeed, following Yang representation [6] we obtain the coordinate representation for the ladder operators as given by â± −→ a±c 2 = 1 √ 2 ( ± d dx ∓ c 2x P − x ) . (9) Yang’s wave mechanical description was further investigated in [7, 8]. The Wigner-Heisenberg Algebra in Quantum Mechanics http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/55994 479 4 Advances in Quantum Mechanics The present author have applied a super-realization so that R = Σ3 to illustrate the first application of our operator method to the cases of the Hamiltonian of an isotonic oscillator (harmonic plus a centripetal barrier) system. To obtain a super-realisation of the WH algebra, we introduce, in addition to the usual bosonic coordinates (x,−i d dx ), the fermionic ones b∓(= (b±)†) that commute with the bosonic set and are represented in terms of the usual Pauli matrices Σi, (i = 1, 2, 3). Indeed, expressing a ±( c 2 ) in the following respective factorised forms: a( c 2 ) = 1 √ 2 Σ1x (1/2)cΣ3 exp( 1 2 x)( d dx )exp( −1 2 x2)x−(1/2)cΣ3 (10) a−( c 2 ) = 1 √ 2 Σ1x (1/2)cΣ3 exp( −1 2 x)( −d dx )exp( 1 2 x2)x−(1/2)cΣ3 , (11) where these lader operators satisfy the algebra of Wigner-Heisenberg. From (1), (11) and (10) the Wigner Hamiltonian becomes H( c 2 ) = 1 2 [ a( c 2 ), a−( c 2 ) ] + = ( H−( c 2 − 1) 0 0 H+( c 2 − 1) = H−( c 2 ) ) , (12) where the even and odd sector Hamiltonians are respectively given by H−( c 2 − 1) = 1 2 { − d 2 dx2 + x + 1 x2 ( c 2 )( c 2 − 1) }

InTech eBooks•Apr 3, 2013•1 citation
Abstract Two complementary approaches of 𝒩 = 2 fractional supersymmetrical quantum mechanics of order k are studied in this article. The first, based on a generalized Weyl–Heisenberg algebra Wk (which comprises the affine quantum algebra Uq(sl2) with qk = 1 as a special case), apparently contains solely one bosonic degree of freedom. The second uses generalized bosonic and k‐fermionic degrees of freedom. As an illustration, a particular emphasis is put on the fractional supersymmetrical oscillator of order k. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Int J Quantum Chem, 2003
Two complementary approaches of N = 2 fractional supersymmetric quantum mechanics of order k are studied in this article. The first one, based on a generalized Weyl-Heisenberg algebra W(k) (that comprizes the affine quantum algebra Uq(sl(2)) with q to k = 1 as a special case), apparently contains solely one bosonic degree of freedom. The second one uses generalized bosonic and k-fermionic degrees of freedom. As an illustration, a particular emphasis is put on the fractional supersymmetric oscillator of order k.
We review the higher‐order supersymmetric quantum mechanics (H‐SUSY QM), which involves differential intertwining operators of order greater than one. The iterations of first‐order SUSY transformations are used to derive in a simple way the higher‐order case. The second order technique is addressed directly, and through this approach unexpected possibilities for designing spectra are uncovered. The formalism is applied to the harmonic oscillator: the corresponding H‐SUSY partner Hamiltonians are ruled by polynomial Heisenberg algebras which allow a straight construction of the coherent states.
ly R is the Klein operator ±exp[iπ(Ĥ − E0)] while in Schrodinger coordinate representation, first investigated by Yang, R is realised by ±P where P is the parity operator: P|x >= ±|x >, P−1 = P, P = 1, PxP−1 = −x. (7) The basic (anti-)commutation relation (1) and (3) together with their derived relation (4) will be referred to here as constituting the WH algebra which is in fact a parabose algebra for one degree of freedom. We shall assume here in after, without loss of generality, that c is positive, i.e. c =| c |> 0. Thus, in coordinate representation the generalized quantization a la Wigner requires that x = x, ∞− < x < ∞, p = −i d dx + ic 2x P, R = P. (8) Indeed, following Yang representation [6] we obtain the coordinate representation for the ladder operators as given by â± −→ a±c 2 = 1 √ 2 ( ± d dx ∓ c 2x P − x ) . (9) Yang’s wave mechanical description was further investigated in [7, 8]. The Wigner-Heisenberg Algebra in Quantum Mechanics http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/55994 479 4 Advances in Quantum Mechanics The present author have applied a super-realization so that R = Σ3 to illustrate the first application of our operator method to the cases of the Hamiltonian of an isotonic oscillator (harmonic plus a centripetal barrier) system. To obtain a super-realisation of the WH algebra, we introduce, in addition to the usual bosonic coordinates (x,−i d dx ), the fermionic ones b∓(= (b±)†) that commute with the bosonic set and are represented in terms of the usual Pauli matrices Σi, (i = 1, 2, 3). Indeed, expressing a ±( c 2 ) in the following respective factorised forms: a( c 2 ) = 1 √ 2 Σ1x (1/2)cΣ3 exp( 1 2 x)( d dx )exp( −1 2 x2)x−(1/2)cΣ3 (10) a−( c 2 ) = 1 √ 2 Σ1x (1/2)cΣ3 exp( −1 2 x)( −d dx )exp( 1 2 x2)x−(1/2)cΣ3 , (11) where these lader operators satisfy the algebra of Wigner-Heisenberg. From (1), (11) and (10) the Wigner Hamiltonian becomes H( c 2 ) = 1 2 [ a( c 2 ), a−( c 2 ) ] + = ( H−( c 2 − 1) 0 0 H+( c 2 − 1) = H−( c 2 ) ) , (12) where the even and odd sector Hamiltonians are respectively given by H−( c 2 − 1) = 1 2 { − d 2 dx2 + x + 1 x2 ( c 2 )( c 2 − 1) }