Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physics Letters A

The Zeno effect: measurement versus decoherence

Timothy P. Spiller

Published Sep 1, 1994• 25 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1016/0375-9601(94)90238-0

Related papers

Decoherence and the quantum Zeno effect

Anu Venugopalan, Rupamanjari Ghosh

arXiv:quant-ph/9503014•Physics Letters A•Aug 1, 1995•41 citations

THE QUANTUM ZENO VERSUS ANTI-ZENO EFFECT ALTERNATIVE

WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks•Jan 1, 2022•0 citations

Quantum Description of Classical Apparatus: Zeno Effect and Decoherence

S. A. Gurvitz

arXiv:quant-ph/0212155•Quantum Information Processing•Apr 1, 2003•13 citations

Control of decoherence: Dynamical decoupling versus quantum Zeno effect: A case study for trapped ions

S. Tasaki, A. Tokuse, Paolo Facchi A +1 more

Abstract The control of thermal decoherence via dynamical decoupling and via the quantum Zeno effect (Zeno control) is investigated for a model of trapped ion, where the dynamics of two low‐lying hyperfine states undergoes decoherence due to the thermal interaction with an excited state. Dynamical decoupling is a procedure that consists in periodically driving the excited state, while the Zeno control consists in frequently measuring it. When the control frequency is high enough, decoherence is shown to be suppressed. Otherwise, both controls may accelerate decoherence. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Int J Quantum Chem, 2004

arXiv:quant-ph/0210129•International Journal of Quantum Chemistry•Jan 1, 2004•14 citations

Counterfactual Measurements and the Quantum Zeno Effect

Onofrio L. Russo, Liang Jiang

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Mar 3, 2014•0 citations

Quantum Zeno Phenomena: Pulsed versus Continuous Measurement

P. Facchi, S. Pascazio

The time evolution of an unstable quantum mechanical system coupled with an external measuring agent is investigated. According to the features of the interaction Hamiltonian, a quantum Zeno effect (hindered decay) or an inverse quantum Zeno effect (accelerated decay) can take place, depending on the response time of the apparatus. The transition between the two regimes is analyzed for both pulsed and continuous measurements.

arXiv:quant-ph/0106026•Fortschritte der Physik•Oct 1, 2001•49 citations
Abstract The control of thermal decoherence via dynamical decoupling and via the quantum Zeno effect (Zeno control) is investigated for a model of trapped ion, where the dynamics of two low‐lying hyperfine states undergoes decoherence due to the thermal interaction with an excited state. Dynamical decoupling is a procedure that consists in periodically driving the excited state, while the Zeno control consists in frequently measuring it. When the control frequency is high enough, decoherence is shown to be suppressed. Otherwise, both controls may accelerate decoherence. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Int J Quantum Chem, 2004