Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Foundations of Physics

Preparation and measurement in quantum physics

James L Park, William Band

Published May 1, 1992• 8 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/bf01889671

Related papers

Measurements in quantum mechanics

Henry Margenau

Annals of Physics•Jun 1, 1963•5 citations

General Method for Classicality Certification in the Prepare and Measure Scenario

Carlos de Gois, George Moreno, Ranieri Nery +3 more

Preparing and measuring physical systems are the operational building blocks of any physical experiment, and to describe them is the first purpose of any physical theory.Remarkably, even when only uncharacterized preparation and measurement devices are present, it is sometimes possible to distinguish between the behaviors of quantum and classical systems from only observational data.Certifying the physical origin of measurement statistics in the prepare and measure scenario is of primal importance for developing quantum networks, distributing quantum keys, and certifying randomness, to mention a few applications, but, surprisingly, no general methods to do so are known.We progress on this problem by crafting a general, sufficient condition to certify that a given set of preparations can only generate classical statistics, for any number of generalized measurements.As an application, we employ the method to demonstrate nonclassicality activation in the prepare and measure scenario, also considering its application in random access codes.Following that, we adapt our method to certify, again through a sufficient condition, whether a given set of measurements can never give rise to nonclassical behaviors, irrespective of what preparations they may act upon.This, in turn, allows us to find a large set of incompatible measurements that cannot be used to demonstrate nonclassicality, thus showing incompatibility is not sufficient for nonclassicality in the prepare and measure scenario.

arXiv:2101.10459•PRX Quantum•Jul 20, 2021•14 citations

Quantum mechanics from two physical postulates

Mehrafarin, M

For an arbitrary preparation, quantum mechanical descriptions refer to the complementary contexts set by incompatible measurements. We argue that an arbitrary preparation, therefore, should be described with respect to such a context by its degrees of disturbance (represented by real numbers) and their probability distribution (postulate 1). Measurement contexts thus provide reference frames for the preparation space of a physical system; a preparation being described by a point in this space with the aforementioned as its coordinates relative to a given measurement apparatus. However, all measurement contexts are equivalent with regard to the description of a given preparation; there is no preferred measurement (postulate 2). In the framework provided by the preparation space, we show that quantum mechanics emerges naturally from the above postulates in a new formulation which is manifestly canonical; provided the degrees of disturbance are identified with the quantum phases of the preparation with respect to (the basis furnished by) the measurement apparatus.

•Feb 20, 2004•6 citations

Measurements in quantum mechanics

Henry Margenau

Annals of Physics•Sep 1, 1963•113 citations

Measurements in Quantum Mechanics

Mohammad Reza Pahlavani

•Jan 1, 2012•0 citations

Quantum parameter estimation

Howard M. Wiseman, Gerard J Milburn

Quantum limits to parameter estimation Introduction Many experiments can be thought of as comprising two steps: (i) a preparation procedure in which the system to be measured is isolated and prepared, and the apparatus is initialized; and (ii) a measurement step in which the system is coupled to an apparatus and the measurement result recorded. The preparation procedure can be specified by a set of classical parameters, or settings of a physical device. The measurement results are random classical variables that will be correlated with the preparation procedure. In this chapter we are concerned with the case in which the classical parameters specifying the preparation of the state are imperfectly known. Then, assuming that the physical system is well understood, these correlations allow the unknown parameters to be estimated from the measurement results. As we saw in the last chapter, in quantum mechanics the results of measurements are generally statistical, even when one has complete knowledge of the preparation procedure. A single preparation step and measurement step might not be sufficient to estimate a parameter well. Thus it is common to repeat the two steps of preparation and measurement on a large number of systems, either all at one time or sequentially. Whether measuring one quantum system or many, one is faced with a number of questions. How should one prepare the system state? What sort of measurement should one make on the system?

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Nov 12, 2009•0 citations
Preparing and measuring physical systems are the operational building blocks of any physical experiment, and to describe them is the first purpose of any physical theory.Remarkably, even when only uncharacterized preparation and measurement devices are present, it is sometimes possible to distinguish between the behaviors of quantum and classical systems from only observational data.Certifying the physical origin of measurement statistics in the prepare and measure scenario is of primal importance for developing quantum networks, distributing quantum keys, and certifying randomness, to mention a few applications, but, surprisingly, no general methods to do so are known.We progress on this problem by crafting a general, sufficient condition to certify that a given set of preparations can only generate classical statistics, for any number of generalized measurements.As an application, we employ the method to demonstrate nonclassicality activation in the prepare and measure scenario, also considering its application in random access codes.Following that, we adapt our method to certify, again through a sufficient condition, whether a given set of measurements can never give rise to nonclassical behaviors, irrespective of what preparations they may act upon.This, in turn, allows us to find a large set of incompatible measurements that cannot be used to demonstrate nonclassicality, thus showing incompatibility is not sufficient for nonclassicality in the prepare and measure scenario.
For an arbitrary preparation, quantum mechanical descriptions refer to the complementary contexts set by incompatible measurements. We argue that an arbitrary preparation, therefore, should be described with respect to such a context by its degrees of disturbance (represented by real numbers) and their probability distribution (postulate 1). Measurement contexts thus provide reference frames for the preparation space of a physical system; a preparation being described by a point in this space with the aforementioned as its coordinates relative to a given measurement apparatus. However, all measurement contexts are equivalent with regard to the description of a given preparation; there is no preferred measurement (postulate 2). In the framework provided by the preparation space, we show that quantum mechanics emerges naturally from the above postulates in a new formulation which is manifestly canonical; provided the degrees of disturbance are identified with the quantum phases of the preparation with respect to (the basis furnished by) the measurement apparatus.
Quantum limits to parameter estimation Introduction Many experiments can be thought of as comprising two steps: (i) a preparation procedure in which the system to be measured is isolated and prepared, and the apparatus is initialized; and (ii) a measurement step in which the system is coupled to an apparatus and the measurement result recorded. The preparation procedure can be specified by a set of classical parameters, or settings of a physical device. The measurement results are random classical variables that will be correlated with the preparation procedure. In this chapter we are concerned with the case in which the classical parameters specifying the preparation of the state are imperfectly known. Then, assuming that the physical system is well understood, these correlations allow the unknown parameters to be estimated from the measurement results. As we saw in the last chapter, in quantum mechanics the results of measurements are generally statistical, even when one has complete knowledge of the preparation procedure. A single preparation step and measurement step might not be sufficient to estimate a parameter well. Thus it is common to repeat the two steps of preparation and measurement on a large number of systems, either all at one time or sequentially. Whether measuring one quantum system or many, one is faced with a number of questions. How should one prepare the system state? What sort of measurement should one make on the system?