Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physics Today

An Optical Spoon Stirs Up Vortices in a Bose–Einstein Condensate

Richard Fitzgerald

Published Aug 1, 2000• 8 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Since the early days of Bose–Einstein condensates (BECs) in atomic gases, comparisons have been drawn to the other familiar bosonic systems: liquid helium-4 and the Cooper pairs of superconductors. Two of the early questions asked of BECs were whether they had similar coherence properties and whether they were superfluids. In He4, it is rather difficult to study properties of the condensate, such as the condensate fraction, whereas the measurement of superfluidity is fairly straightforward. The opposite has proved true for atomic condensates: The condensate fraction as a function of temperature was found early on, but only recently has their superfluidity been placed on firm footing (see PHYSICS TODAY, November 1999, page 17).

DOI
10.1063/1.1310116

Related papers

Condensates in a whirl

Tornadoes, waterspouts and other atmospheric vortices are instanriy recognizable, but a detailed microscopic understanding of these phenomena continues to elude scientists. The same is true of vortices in super-fluids such as helium-4. Superfluids can flow without friction at low temperatures because the helium-4 atoms, which are bosons, all accumulate in the same quantum state, forming a Bose-Einstein condensate. Yet the strong interactions between the helium-4 atoms have hindered in-depth studies of the microscopic nature of superfluidity. Now Eric Cornell, Carl Wieman and co-workers at the JILA laboratory in Boulder, Colorado, have created a vortex in a dilute gas of rubidium-87, another Bose-Einstein condensate (M Matthews et at. 1999 Plys. Rev. Lett. 83 2498).

Physics World•Nov 1, 1999•0 citations

The Bose-Einstein Condensate — A Superfluid Gas of Coherent Atoms

Wolfgang Ketterle

International Conference on Atomic Physics (ICAP)•Apr 1, 2003•0 citations

Bose–Einstein condensation of atomic gases

Frédéric Chevy, Jean Dalibard

This chapter presents an overview of the specific experimental tools developed in the field of ultra-cold gases to achieve and probe superfluidity in vapours of bosonic atoms. First, it describes the main cooling techniques: the magneto-optical trap, which brings an atomic vapour from room temperature down to the sub-mK range, and the evaporative cooling scheme, which bridges the gap to the superfluid regime. It then proceeds to the study of interaction effects. It shows that these play a central role in the understanding of both static and dynamic properties of trapped Bose–Einstein condensates (BECs), despite the dilute character of these gases. As a consequence, gaseous BECs and superfluid helium obey the same laws of hydrodynamics and exhibit similar dynamical properties, although their densities differ by several orders of magnitude. The third section is devoted to the coherence properties of gaseous BECs. It shows that, by contrast with liquid helium, specific features of ultra-cold gases make them suitable for a direct probing of the quantum coherence associated with Bose–Einstein condensation. Finally, the possibility of tailoring trapping potentials and realizing low-dimensional systems is discussed, where one or two directions of motion are frozen.

Oxford University Press eBooks•Feb 28, 2013•196 citations

Making, probing and understanding Bose-Einstein condensates

Wolfgang Ketterle, Dallin Durfee, Dan Stamper-Kurn

The realization of Bose-Einstein condensation (BEC) in dilute atomic gases [1, 2, 3, 4, 5] achieved several long-standing goals. First, neutral atoms were cooled into the lowest energy state, thus exerting ultimate control over the motion and position of atoms, limited only by Heisenberg’s uncertainty relation. Second, a coherent macroscopic sample of atoms all occupying the same quantum state was generated,

•Apr 2, 1999•251 citations

The role of pair correlations in the formation of the ground state and the elementary excitation spectrum in a superfluid Bose liquid (A Review)

Ernst A. Pashitskii

The paradoxes and disparities in the contemporary microscopic theory of superfluid helium (He–II) are discussed along with possible ways of resolving them by taking pair correlations of He4 atoms into consideration. It is shown that most paradoxes are associated with the commonly accepted initial assumption concerning the dominating role of single-particle Bose condensate (SPBC) in the quantum microstructure of the superfluid component ρs. The existence of intensive SPBC leads to a strong hybridization of the elementary excitation branches and to a common dispersion law for all boson branches, which is identified with the quasiparticle spectrum E(p) observed experimentally from slow neutron scattering in liquid helium. However, the stability of this spectrum during a transition through the λ-point and the large value of the gap in the vicinity of the “rotonic” minimum contradict both the Landau theoretical criterion of superfluidity and the small value of experimentally measured critical velocity. At the same time, a strong interaction between particles in the Bose liquid He4 strongly suppresses the SPBC which amounts to less than 1% of all He4 atoms and hence cannot be the main constituent of the superfluid component, unlike the case of a weakly nonideal Bose gas. Moreover, for a quite strong attraction between particles in a certain region of the momentum space, bound pairs of bosons can be formed in the superfluid Bose liquid, and a coherent pair condensate (CPC) analogous to the Cooper pair condensate in superconductors may appear. Such a strong CPC may completely suppress the weak SPBC. In this case, the one-particle spectrum ε(p) of elementary excitations does not hybridize with the collective (two-particle) spectrum and does not appear in the structure of the dynamic form factor S(p,ε), i.e., does not coincide with the spectrum measured from neutron scattering. The dispersion of one-particle spectrum is defined by the momentum dependence of the pair order parameter Ψ̃(p) and may have a minimum or a point of inflection at p≠0. This peculiarity in the one-particle spectrum of a Bose liquid with CPC but without SPBC vanishes together with Ψ̃(p) at the temperature Tc=Tλ of the phase transition from the superfluid to the normal state (unlike the rotonic minimum in the collective spectrum), while the corresponding critical velocity vc=min[ε(p)/p] vanishes at the λ-point in accordance with the Landau criterion and the experimental data. The assumption that the strong “Cooper-like” CPC is responsible for the quantum structure of the superfluid component ρs is confirmed indirectly by the successful application of the Justrow approximation (based on strong pair correlations) for describing the properties of liquid He4 and quantum liquid mixtures He3–4He on one hand, and by an anomalously large effective mass of He3 impurity atoms in He4, which is approximately equal to total mass of He3 and He4 atoms, thus pointing to the existence of helium atoms in superfluid liquid He–II. The value of the superfluid velocity circulation quantum in the Onsager–Feynman vortices in a Bose liquid with CPC but without SPBC is discussed as well as the critical velocities of superfluid He4 in ultrathin films and channels in which the creation and motion of quantum vortices are ruled out, and the quasiparticle spectrum undergoes dimensional quantization.

Low Temperature Physics•Feb 1, 1999•14 citations

Bose-Einstein Condensation and Superfluidity in Ultra-Cold Atomic Gases

S. Stringari

Springer proceedings in physics•Jan 1, 2026•0 citations
Since the early days of Bose–Einstein condensates (BECs) in atomic gases, comparisons have been drawn to the other familiar bosonic systems: liquid helium-4 and the Cooper pairs of superconductors. Two of the early questions asked of BECs were whether they had similar coherence properties and whether they were superfluids. In He4, it is rather difficult to study properties of the condensate, such as the condensate fraction, whereas the measurement of superfluidity is fairly straightforward. The opposite has proved true for atomic condensates: The condensate fraction as a function of temperature was found early on, but only recently has their superfluidity been placed on firm footing (see PHYSICS TODAY, November 1999, page 17).
Tornadoes, waterspouts and other atmospheric vortices are instanriy recognizable, but a detailed microscopic understanding of these phenomena continues to elude scientists. The same is true of vortices in super-fluids such as helium-4. Superfluids can flow without friction at low temperatures because the helium-4 atoms, which are bosons, all accumulate in the same quantum state, forming a Bose-Einstein condensate. Yet the strong interactions between the helium-4 atoms have hindered in-depth studies of the microscopic nature of superfluidity. Now Eric Cornell, Carl Wieman and co-workers at the JILA laboratory in Boulder, Colorado, have created a vortex in a dilute gas of rubidium-87, another Bose-Einstein condensate (M Matthews et at. 1999 Plys. Rev. Lett. 83 2498).
This chapter presents an overview of the specific experimental tools developed in the field of ultra-cold gases to achieve and probe superfluidity in vapours of bosonic atoms. First, it describes the main cooling techniques: the magneto-optical trap, which brings an atomic vapour from room temperature down to the sub-mK range, and the evaporative cooling scheme, which bridges the gap to the superfluid regime. It then proceeds to the study of interaction effects. It shows that these play a central role in the understanding of both static and dynamic properties of trapped Bose–Einstein condensates (BECs), despite the dilute character of these gases. As a consequence, gaseous BECs and superfluid helium obey the same laws of hydrodynamics and exhibit similar dynamical properties, although their densities differ by several orders of magnitude. The third section is devoted to the coherence properties of gaseous BECs. It shows that, by contrast with liquid helium, specific features of ultra-cold gases make them suitable for a direct probing of the quantum coherence associated with Bose–Einstein condensation. Finally, the possibility of tailoring trapping potentials and realizing low-dimensional systems is discussed, where one or two directions of motion are frozen.
The paradoxes and disparities in the contemporary microscopic theory of superfluid helium (He–II) are discussed along with possible ways of resolving them by taking pair correlations of He4 atoms into consideration. It is shown that most paradoxes are associated with the commonly accepted initial assumption concerning the dominating role of single-particle Bose condensate (SPBC) in the quantum microstructure of the superfluid component ρs. The existence of intensive SPBC leads to a strong hybridization of the elementary excitation branches and to a common dispersion law for all boson branches, which is identified with the quasiparticle spectrum E(p) observed experimentally from slow neutron scattering in liquid helium. However, the stability of this spectrum during a transition through the λ-point and the large value of the gap in the vicinity of the “rotonic” minimum contradict both the Landau theoretical criterion of superfluidity and the small value of experimentally measured critical velocity. At the same time, a strong interaction between particles in the Bose liquid He4 strongly suppresses the SPBC which amounts to less than 1% of all He4 atoms and hence cannot be the main constituent of the superfluid component, unlike the case of a weakly nonideal Bose gas. Moreover, for a quite strong attraction between particles in a certain region of the momentum space, bound pairs of bosons can be formed in the superfluid Bose liquid, and a coherent pair condensate (CPC) analogous to the Cooper pair condensate in superconductors may appear. Such a strong CPC may completely suppress the weak SPBC. In this case, the one-particle spectrum ε(p) of elementary excitations does not hybridize with the collective (two-particle) spectrum and does not appear in the structure of the dynamic form factor S(p,ε), i.e., does not coincide with the spectrum measured from neutron scattering. The dispersion of one-particle spectrum is defined by the momentum dependence of the pair order parameter Ψ̃(p) and may have a minimum or a point of inflection at p≠0. This peculiarity in the one-particle spectrum of a Bose liquid with CPC but without SPBC vanishes together with Ψ̃(p) at the temperature Tc=Tλ of the phase transition from the superfluid to the normal state (unlike the rotonic minimum in the collective spectrum), while the corresponding critical velocity vc=min[ε(p)/p] vanishes at the λ-point in accordance with the Landau criterion and the experimental data. The assumption that the strong “Cooper-like” CPC is responsible for the quantum structure of the superfluid component ρs is confirmed indirectly by the successful application of the Justrow approximation (based on strong pair correlations) for describing the properties of liquid He4 and quantum liquid mixtures He3–4He on one hand, and by an anomalously large effective mass of He3 impurity atoms in He4, which is approximately equal to total mass of He3 and He4 atoms, thus pointing to the existence of helium atoms in superfluid liquid He–II. The value of the superfluid velocity circulation quantum in the Onsager–Feynman vortices in a Bose liquid with CPC but without SPBC is discussed as well as the critical velocities of superfluid He4 in ultrathin films and channels in which the creation and motion of quantum vortices are ruled out, and the quasiparticle spectrum undergoes dimensional quantization.