Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Journal of Russian Laser Research

Comparison between different models for quantum jump superoperators in cavity QED experiments

Salomon Sylvain Mizrahi, Alexandre V. Dodonov, V. V. Dodonov

Published Sep 1, 2009• 1 citation
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/s10946-009-9093-y

Related papers

A generalized microscopic model of quantum jump superoperators

Huai-Xin Lu, Zeng‐Bing Chen

Optics Communications•Mar 20, 2007•2 citations

Microscopic models of quantum-jump superoperators (8 pages)

Alexandre V. Dodonov, V. V. Dodonov, Salomon Sylvain Mizrahi

Physical Review A•Jan 1, 2005•1 citation

Numerical simulation of quantum jump in the Cavity-QED microlaser

조성완

•Jan 1, 2007•0 citations

Cavity photon counting: ab-initio derivation of the quantum jump superoperators and comparison of the existing models

Teppo Häyrynen, Jani Oksanen, Jukka Tulkki

Time development of electromagnetic fields in closed cavities under continuous detection of photons continues to be a subject of confusing controversy. Recently Dodonov et al. [Phys. Rev. A, 75, 013806, 2007] argued that their model of quantum superoperators (E model) invalidates some of the predictions of the previously introduced photon counting model of Srinivas and Davies [J. Mod. Optic. 28, 981, 1981] (SD model). Both the SD and the E models are based on two postulated quantum jump superoperators: (1) the one-count operator corresponding to the absorption of a single photon and (2) the no-count operator. In this work we develop a stochastic difference equation that describes the dissipative coupling of the cavity field and the detector. The difference equation is based on non-perturbative treatment of the cavity-detector coupling. In spite of being non-integrable due to the coupling of the detector with an external reservoir it can be used to derive the exact forms of the quantum jump superoperators. When applied to a particular photon counting measurement our theory gives predictions identical with those of the SD model which should be considered a non-perturbative and ab-initio result. It is pointed out that available experimental results coincide with the results given by the ab-initio SD model. We summarize some of the key characteristics of cavity fields and photon counting processes to demonstrate that the results given by the SD model are consistent with the principles of quantum mechanics while those given by the E model are not.

arXiv:0808.1660•Aug 12, 2008•0 citations

Microscopic models of quantum-jump superoperators

Alexandre V. Dodonov, Salomon Sylvain Mizrahi, V. V. Dodonov

We discuss the quantum-jump operation in an open system and show that jump superoperators related to a system under measurement can be derived from the interaction of that system with a quantum measurement apparatus. We give two examples for the interaction of a monochromatic electromagnetic field in a cavity (the system) with two-level atoms and with a harmonic oscillator (representing two different kinds of detectors). We show that the derived quantum-jump superoperators have a ``nonlinear'' form $J\ensuremath{\rho}=\ensuremath{\gamma}\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\mathrm{diag}[F(\stackrel{\ifmmode \hat{}\else \^{}\fi{}}{n})a\ensuremath{\rho}{a}^{\ifmmode\dagger\else\textdagger\fi{}}F(\stackrel{\ifmmode \hat{}\else \^{}\fi{}}{n})]$, where the concrete form of the function $F(\stackrel{\ifmmode \hat{}\else \^{}\fi{}}{n})$ depends on assumptions made about the interaction between the system and detector. Under certain conditions the asymptotical power-law dependence $F(\stackrel{\ifmmode \hat{}\else \^{}\fi{}}{n})={(\stackrel{\ifmmode \hat{}\else \^{}\fi{}}{n}+1)}^{\ensuremath{-}\ensuremath{\beta}}$ is obtained. A continuous transition to the standard Srinivas-Davies form of the quantum-jump superoperator (corresponding to $\ensuremath{\beta}=0$) is shown.

arXiv:quant-ph/0506118•Physical Review A•Aug 16, 2005•17 citations

Quantum Trajectory Simulations of Cavity QED Systems

P. Kochan

•Jan 1, 1995•1 citation
Time development of electromagnetic fields in closed cavities under continuous detection of photons continues to be a subject of confusing controversy. Recently Dodonov et al. [Phys. Rev. A, 75, 013806, 2007] argued that their model of quantum superoperators (E model) invalidates some of the predictions of the previously introduced photon counting model of Srinivas and Davies [J. Mod. Optic. 28, 981, 1981] (SD model). Both the SD and the E models are based on two postulated quantum jump superoperators: (1) the one-count operator corresponding to the absorption of a single photon and (2) the no-count operator. In this work we develop a stochastic difference equation that describes the dissipative coupling of the cavity field and the detector. The difference equation is based on non-perturbative treatment of the cavity-detector coupling. In spite of being non-integrable due to the coupling of the detector with an external reservoir it can be used to derive the exact forms of the quantum jump superoperators. When applied to a particular photon counting measurement our theory gives predictions identical with those of the SD model which should be considered a non-perturbative and ab-initio result. It is pointed out that available experimental results coincide with the results given by the ab-initio SD model. We summarize some of the key characteristics of cavity fields and photon counting processes to demonstrate that the results given by the SD model are consistent with the principles of quantum mechanics while those given by the E model are not.
We discuss the quantum-jump operation in an open system and show that jump superoperators related to a system under measurement can be derived from the interaction of that system with a quantum measurement apparatus. We give two examples for the interaction of a monochromatic electromagnetic field in a cavity (the system) with two-level atoms and with a harmonic oscillator (representing two different kinds of detectors). We show that the derived quantum-jump superoperators have a ``nonlinear'' form $J\ensuremath{\rho}=\ensuremath{\gamma}\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\mathrm{diag}[F(\stackrel{\ifmmode \hat{}\else \^{}\fi{}}{n})a\ensuremath{\rho}{a}^{\ifmmode\dagger\else\textdagger\fi{}}F(\stackrel{\ifmmode \hat{}\else \^{}\fi{}}{n})]$, where the concrete form of the function $F(\stackrel{\ifmmode \hat{}\else \^{}\fi{}}{n})$ depends on assumptions made about the interaction between the system and detector. Under certain conditions the asymptotical power-law dependence $F(\stackrel{\ifmmode \hat{}\else \^{}\fi{}}{n})={(\stackrel{\ifmmode \hat{}\else \^{}\fi{}}{n}+1)}^{\ensuremath{-}\ensuremath{\beta}}$ is obtained. A continuous transition to the standard Srinivas-Davies form of the quantum-jump superoperator (corresponding to $\ensuremath{\beta}=0$) is shown.