Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Russian Physics Journal

The probability of multiphoton processes

Ljudmila I. Nesmelova, Stanislav D. Tvorogov

Published May 1, 1967• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/bf00843572

Related papers

Transition probabilities for coherent multiphoton absorption processes

Jacob Katriel, Shammai Speiser

Chemical Physics•Feb 1, 1976•1 citation

Probability of multiphoton processes in the optical field of a multimode laser

T. U. Arslanbekov

Technical Physics Letters•Jun 1, 1976•0 citations

Influence of the Effective Intensity of Laser-Pulse Radiation on the Rate of Multiphoton Processes

B. A. Zon, A. S. Kornev

Abstract The influence of uncertainty in intensity of radiation of individual laser pulses on probabilities of multiphoton ionization/photodetachment is analyzed quantitatively. Both multiphoton (using an example of an F− anion) and tunnel regimes are studied. It is demonstrated that intensity fluctuations substantially change probabilities of the discussed processes. As to the tunnel regime, the role of fluctuations is negligibly small not only in the region of saturation but also far from it in this case.

Optics and Spectroscopy•Sep 1, 2020•0 citations

Theory of Multiphoton Processes

Farhad H. M. Faisal

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 1987•591 citations

Theory of Multiphoton Processes

Farhad H. M. Faisal, A. Dalgarno

Physics Today•Mar 1, 1989•0 citations

Multiphoton Absorption and Coherence

Salvatore Carusotto, G. Fornaca, ERSEO POLACCO

We study the probability for multiphoton absorption processes induced by both laser and thermal light acting on an atomic system. When the thermal radiation, suitably filtered, has the same frequency spectrum and the same total energy as the laser packet, we find that the ratio between the relative probabilities for $s$-photon absorption can be expressed by ${(4\ensuremath{\pi})}^{\frac{\ensuremath{-}1}{2(s\ensuremath{-}1)}}s!{s}^{\frac{1}{2}}{(\frac{{\ensuremath{\tau}}_{c}}{\ensuremath{\tau}})}^{s\ensuremath{-}1},$ where $\ensuremath{\tau}$ is the time during which the atomic system is illuminated by thermal radiation with coherence time ${\ensuremath{\tau}}_{c}$. This shows that multiphoton absorption processes depend on the statistical properties of the incident light, and that the probability induced by the laser packet is certainly greater than that induced by the thermal light if $s<\frac{\ensuremath{\tau}}{{\ensuremath{\tau}}_{c}}$.

Physical Review•Jan 25, 1968•21 citations
Abstract The influence of uncertainty in intensity of radiation of individual laser pulses on probabilities of multiphoton ionization/photodetachment is analyzed quantitatively. Both multiphoton (using an example of an F− anion) and tunnel regimes are studied. It is demonstrated that intensity fluctuations substantially change probabilities of the discussed processes. As to the tunnel regime, the role of fluctuations is negligibly small not only in the region of saturation but also far from it in this case.
We study the probability for multiphoton absorption processes induced by both laser and thermal light acting on an atomic system. When the thermal radiation, suitably filtered, has the same frequency spectrum and the same total energy as the laser packet, we find that the ratio between the relative probabilities for sss-photon absorption can be expressed by ${(4\ensuremath{\pi})}^{\frac{\ensuremath{-}1}{2(s\ensuremath{-}1)}}s!{s}^{\frac{1}{2}}{(\frac{{\ensuremath{\tau}}_{c}}{\ensuremath{\tau}})}^{s\ensuremath{-}1},$ where $\ensuremath{\tau}$ is the time during which the atomic system is illuminated by thermal radiation with coherence time ${\ensuremath{\tau}}_{c}$. This shows that multiphoton absorption processes depend on the statistical properties of the incident light, and that the probability induced by the laser packet is certainly greater than that induced by the thermal light if $s<\frac{\ensuremath{\tau}}{{\ensuremath{\tau}}_{c}}$.