It is pointed out that accounts in the literature sometimes misinterpret the Aharonov-Bohm effect, involving the shift in interference pattern for electrons passing a long solenoid. The quantum description and experimental verification of the effect are reviewed, and it is emphasized that both theory and experiment indicate that there is no deflection of the average momentum of the electrons passing the solenoid. There is no average force on the electrons due to the solenoid. It is remarked that the Aharonov-Bohm effect involves the shift of double-slit interference fringes which is independent of the quantum unit of action ħ and yet allows a natural classical limit.
It is pointed out that accounts in the literature sometimes misinterpret the Aharonov-Bohm effect, involving the shift in interference pattern for electrons passing a long solenoid. The quantum description and experimental verification of the effect are reviewed, and it is emphasized that both theory and experiment indicate that there is no deflection of the average momentum of the electrons passing the solenoid. There is no average force on the electrons due to the solenoid. It is remarked that the Aharonov-Bohm effect involves the shift of double-slit interference fringes which is independent of the quantum unit of action ħ and yet allows a natural classical limit.
Abstract The interaction of a solenoid with a passing charged particle can be treated within classical or quantum physics. If charged particles pass around both sides of a solenoid, there is an experimentally-observed Aharonov–Bohm deflection of the double-slit particle interference pattern between charges passing on opposite sides. Such a deflection can be obtained by a classical force calculation. Although the magnitude of the angular deflection agrees between the classical force calculation and the quantum topological theory, the direction of the predicted deflection is opposite. Here we point out the simple basis for the direction of the deflection based upon classical electrodynamics and based upon quantum theory. Also, we mention some deflection analogs, both the electrostatic deflection of the particle interference pattern and the optical analog of the classical calculation. The deflection direction involves an experimental question which is addressed rarely if ever. In the deflection direction, there is a direct experimental confrontation connected with the long-standing controversy involving the interpretation of the Aharonov–Bohm phase shift.
In the Aharonov-Bohm setup, a double-slit experiment, coherent beams of electrons passing through two slits form an interference pattern on the observing screen. However, when a long but thin solenoid of current is introduced behind the slits between the two electron beams, an extra phase difference between them appears, as shown by a shift in the interference pattern. This happens even though there is no magnetic field outside the solenoid, at the location of the beams. This is known as Aharonov-Bohm effect, though the idea was mooted apparently a decade earlier, and the effect sometimes is called Ehrenberg-Siday-Aharonov-Bohm effect. This mysterious effect, purportedly arises owing to an electromagnetic momentum, attributed to the presence at the location of either beam, a vector potential due to the solenoid of current even when there exists no magnetic field outside the solenoid. The first experimental confirmation came soon and It has since been amply verified using clever experimental setups, leaving hardly any doubts that the observed effect is real. However, on the theoretical side the picture is not so clear and a satisfactory physical explanation of the existence of momentum, at least under the aegis of classical electromagnetism, is still missing since inception of the idea more than half a century back. It has remained a puzzle, how just potential, thought to be a mere mathematical tools for calculating electromagnetic field, can give rise to an electromagnetic momentum in a system, in lieu of field itself. We here show that a subtle momentum can be seen to lie in the product of the drift velocities of the current carrying charges and the mass equivalent of their non-localized potential energies in the electric field of the interfering electrons, which manifests, from a classical point of view, a linear momentum in the system. It is this hard-to-pinpoint, additional momentum, reflected through an extra phase difference between the interfering beams of electrons, which exhibits from a classical physics perspective, the presence of an elusive, long sought-after electromagnetic momentum in the system.
The long‐standing controversy regarding the Aharonov‐Bohm phase shift is reviewed. The shifts of both optical and particle interference patterns are summarized. It is pointed out that a line of electric dipoles and a line of magnetic dipoles (a long solenoid) both produce experimentally observed phase shifts similar to that produced by introducing a rectangular block of glass behind one slit of a double‐slit interference pattern; the double‐slit pattern is shifted while the single‐slit envelope remains undisplaced. The quantum explanation for the magnetic interference pattern shift introduced by Aharonov and Bohm in 1959 involves completely different ideas from those suggested by a semiclassical analysis. Experiments planned by Caprez, Barwick, and Batelaan should clarify the connections between classical and quantum theories in connection with the Aharonov‐Bohm phase shift.
Classical electromagnetic lag effects can give rise to quantum interference pattern shifts such as that observed experimentally in the Aharonov-Bohm effect involving electrons passing a solenoid. This paper presents an extensive comparison between interference pattern shifts based upon classical electromagnetic fields, and based upon classical electromagnetic potentials as suggested by Aharonov and Bohm. Stress is placed upon the difference between two types of interference pattern shifts: those involving deflection of the entire interference pattern and those involving a deflection of only the double-slit pattern while leaving the single-slit envelope undisplaced. The first type of shift is produced by a classical deflecting force. The second type of shift can be produced by classical electromagnetic lag effects, and is also the type of shift associated with the Aharonov-Bohm effect. The two types are confused in the literature. A new experiment is proposed which shows the relationship between a classical lag effect, due to electrostatic fields on electrons passing along different paths, and the associated quantum interference pattern shifts. The experiment is analyzed in detail using the WKB approximation in the Schr\"odinger equation and also semiclassical ideas. The classical limit for the situation illustrates the Bohr correspondence principle, showing the relative lag between the electron wave packets becoming a measurable classical lag with a disappearance of the interference pattern as the lag becomes large compared to the wave-packet dimensions. For small shifts, the phase change predicted for the new experiment is identical with the scalar potential effect proposed by Aharonov and Bohm for a slightly different, time-varying experimental arrangement. The theoretical and experimental differences for large phase shifts are noted. The possibility is raised that a new classical electromagnetic lag effect may occur for electrons passing a small solenoid. Using a particular model for energy conservation, the predicted lag effect can be calculated and is associated with a quantum interference pattern shift of the same magnitude as predicted by Aharonov and Bohm based upon the electromagnetic vector potential. Thus the possibility exists that the experiments of Chambers and of M\"ollenstedt and Bayh may not confirm the ideas of Aharonov and Bohm on the vector potential in quantum theory. Several experiments are suggested which allow confirmation that the Aharonov-Bohm effect indeed involves local effects of the classical electromagnetic potential, rather than local electromagnetic fields leading to a new classical lag effect and hence to the observed quantum interference pattern shift.
The Aharonov–Bohm solenoid effect is related to the inequality of the forces of action and reaction of two subsystems in a three-system configuration. During the motion of the electron around the solenoid there are momentum exchanges between the solenoid and the electromagnetic field that are produced by the electron and the solenoid. The integral of the momentum of interference over the trajectory of the electron, which is equal to the integral of the energy of interference over the corresponding time, gives the Aharonov–Bohm phase shift.
In the Aharonov–Bohm setup, a double-slit experiment, when a long but thin solenoid of current is introduced between the two coherent beams of electrons behind the slits, an extra phase difference between the interfering beams appears, as shown by a shift in the interference pattern. This mysterious effect purportedly arises owing to an electromagnetic momentum, attributed to the presence of a vector potential at the location of either beam, due to the solenoid of current even when the magnetic field is zero outside the solenoid. It has remained a puzzle, how mere potential, thought to be just a mathematical tool for calculating electromagnetic field, can give rise to electromagnetic momentum in a system. Experimentally, the effect has been amply verified, with hardly any doubts that the observed effect is real. A satisfactory physical explanation of the existence of momentum, at least under the aegis of classical electromagnetism, is still missing since inception of the idea more than half a century back. We show here the presence of electromagnetic momentum in the product of the drift velocities of the current-carrying charges within the solenoid and the mass equivalent of their potential energies in the electric field of the external charges.