Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physical Review

Relativistic Field Theories

T. S. Chang

Published Mar 15, 1949• 10 citations
Publisher

Abstract

The study of the change of the Schroedinger wave functionals on space-like surfaces as the surface changes is formulated simply. In this formulation, we let $S$ be any space-like surface with the curvilinear coordinates $u$, introduce $〈q(u)S|〉$ as the Schroedinger functional on it, with the nature of the functions $q(u)$ not specified for the moment, and write the Schroedinger equation as $\ensuremath{\hbar}i{〈q(u),{S}^{\ensuremath{'}}|〉\ensuremath{-}〈q(u),S|〉}=J〈q(u),S|〉$ where ${S}^{\ensuremath{'}}$ is a surface slightly different from $S$, and $J$ is an operator operating on $q(u)$ and depending on $S$, ${S}^{\ensuremath{'}}$, and the choice of their coordinates $u$. Obviously, the only necessary conditions for $J$ is that $J$ is Hermitian and that (1) is integrable. To get a theory resembling the existing ones, we require further that if we construct the expectation value of a certain field quantity at a point $P$ from $〈q(u),S|〉$, $S$ being a surface passing through $P$, the expectation value is independent of choice of $S$ and its coordinates $u$, and satisfies certain differential equations.When these differential equations follow from a Langrangian principle, an expression for $J$ was effectively given by Weiss. His work is given here in a complete form and the proof of the satisfaction of all requirements completed.Finally, by a simple transformation on the wave functions and the observables, we deduce from the Weiss's formalism the Tomonaga's formalism. As a consequence, it is pointed out that the Tomonaga's formalism will encounter essentially the same difficulties as the orthodox Heisenberg-Pauli formalism.

DOI
10.1103/physrev.75.967

Related papers

Problems

Oleg Boyarkin

Components of a field function are functions of coordinates and time and satisfy some definite differential equations, which are called field equations. Field equations can be given a very general variational or Lagrangian form, if one accepts, that a field as the dynamic system must be characterized by a definite Lagrangian function. For a mechanical system this function is written down as the sum over all the material points of the system. For a continuous system like a wave field, Lagrangian function is expressed by the space integral from Lagrangian function density: L(t) = ∫ Ld3x. (4.1) However, the variational principle deals not with the Lagrangian function but with an action S obtained from it by means of integration over x0 = ct S = c ∫ L(t)dt. (4.2) Therefore, noncovariant expression (4.1) in Lagrangian formalism is in fact intermediate and it is sufficient to consider the Lagrangian function density L, which depends on the four space-time coordinates x in an implicit way. Hereinafter, we shall simply call L by the Lagrangian. Analogously, the Hamiltonian function density H will be named the Hamiltonian. The Lagrangian depends on components of a field wavefunction ψk and on their first derivatives with respect to the space-time coordinates ∂ψk/∂x ν . In so doing we assign the meaning of generalized field coordinates to ψk, and the meaning of generalized field velocities to ∂ψk/∂x ν . The demand of lacking derivatives with respect to field functions above the first order in the Lagrangian is caused by the following reason. Dynamics of all known quantum fields is described either by equations of the first or the second order. On the one hand, these equations follow from the principle of a least action: δS = 0, (4.3) and under action variation the order of derivatives, entering L, is raised by one. The Lagrangian must be a relativistically covariant quantity, namely, a relativistic scalar L′(x′) = L(x). Thanks to the invariance under the space-time translations, we conclude that the Lagrangian must not manifestly contain any space-time coordinates x. Since dynamical observables (four-dimensional vector of the energy-momentum, the moment of momentum tensor, and so on) are real quantities, then the Lagrangian must be also a real quantity. We shall also impose the locality condition on the Lagrangian, that is, we assume that the Lagrangian depends only on the state of fields in the infinitely small vicinity of the point Particles, Fields, and Quantum x. So: L(x) = L(ψk, ∂ψk ∂xν ) = L (ψk(x), ψk;ν (x)) . General variation of an action, related with varying both field wave functions and of integration domain boundaries, is equal to: δS = δ ∫ L(x)dx = ∫ L(x′)dx′ − ∫ L(x)dx, (4.4) where dx = dx0dr. For L′(x′) we have the expression: L′(x′) = L (ψ′k(x′), ψ′k;ν(x′)) = L(x) + δL(x) = L(x) + δL(x) + dLdxλ δxλ, (4.5) In Eq. (4.5) we denote a form variation of corresponding quantities by the symbol δ. This way δL(x) represents varying the Lagrangian only on the account of the variation of field functions and field function derivatives: δL(x) = ∂L ∂ψk δψk + ∂L ∂ψk;ν δψk;ν , (4.6) and δψk(x) does a variation of a field function form: δψk(x) = ψ ′ k(x) − ψk(x).

Taylor & Francis eBooks•Feb 16, 2011•1 citation

Relativistic Quantum Field Theories Viewed as Physical Theories

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 2005•0 citations

Unfinished history and paradoxes of quantum potential. II. Relativistic point of view

Эрнест Ахмеджанович Тагиров

This is the second of the two related papers analyzing the origins and possible explanations of a paradoxical phenomenon of the quantum potential (QP). It arises in quantum mechanics (QM) of a particle in a Riemannian n-dimensional configurational space obtained by various procedures of quantization of non-relativistic natural Hamilton systems. Now, two questions are investigated: 1) Does a QP appear in non-relativistic QM generated by the quantum theory of a scalar field (QFT) non-minimally coupled to the space-time metric? 2) To which extent is it in accord with quantization of natural systems? To this end, the asymptotic non-relativistic equation for particle-interpretable wave functions and operators of canonical observables are obtained from the primary QFT objects. It is shown that, in globally static space-time, the Hamilton operators coincide at the origin of the quasi-Euclidean space coordinates in both alternative approaches for any non-minimality constant $$\tilde \xi$$ , but a certain requirement of the Equivalence Principle to the quantum field propagator distinguishes the unique value $$\tilde \xi = 1/6$$ = 1/6. Just the same value had the constant ζ in the quantum Hamiltonians arising from the traditional quantizations of natural systems: the DeWitt canonical, Pauli-DeWitt quasiclassical, geometric and Feynman ones, as well as in the revised Schrödinger variational quantization. Thus, the QP generated by mechanics is tightly related to non-minimality of the quantum scalar field. Meanwhile, an essential discrepancy exists between the non-relativistic QMs derived from the two alternative approaches: QFT generates a scalar QP, whereas various quantizations of natural mechanics lead to QPs depending on the choice of space coordinates as physical observables and nonvanishing even in flat space if the coordinates are curvilinear.

arXiv:1201.5806•Gravitation and Cosmology•Jan 1, 2013•2 citations

Relativistic Wave Equations and Field Theories

Ian D. Lawrie

Up to this point, our study of quantum mechanics has concerned itself with the behaviour of particles that inhabit a Galilean spacetime. For many purposes, in atomic, molecular and condensed matter physics, this theory is quite adequate. We saw in earlier chapters, however, that our actual spacetime has a structure which is much closer to that of the Minkowski spacetime of special relativity and that more general structures must be considered when gravitational phenomena are signicant. From a purely theoretical point of view, it is therefore important to formulate quantum theory in a way which is consistent with these more general spacetimes. The benets of constructing a relativistic quantum theory actually go far beyond the aesthetic satisfaction of making our geometrical and quantum-mechanical reasoning compatible. For one thing, we shall discover that the relativistic theory provides a deeper understanding of spin and the distinction between fermions and bosons, which in the non-relativistic theory appear simply as facts of life that we must strive to accommodate. Also, of course, there are many situations in which relativistic eects become observable, for which non-relativistic theory provides no explanation. The most obvious are high-energy scattering experiments, in which particles acquire kinetic energies comparable with or greater than their rest energies mc2, and the correct 4-momentum (3.33) must be used. There are, however, more subtle eects, such as the spin-orbit coupling that is essential for interpreting atomic spectra, which are also of relativistic origin.

CRC Press eBooks•Nov 27, 2012•0 citations

Description of the Electron in the Electromagnetic Field: The Dirac Type Equation and the Equation for the Wave Function in Spinor Coordinate Space

Pavel Gorev

Physical processes are usually described using four-dimensional vector quantities - coordinate vector, momentum vector, current vector. But at the fundamental level they are characterized by spinors - coordinate spinors, momentum spinors, spinor wave functions. The propagation of fields and their interaction takes place at the spinor level, and since each spinor uniquely corresponds to a certain vector, the results of physical processes appear before us in vector form. For example, the relativistic Schrödinger equation and the Dirac equation are formulated by means of coordinate vectors, momentum vectors and quantum operators corresponding to them. In the Dirac equation a step forward is taken and the wave function is a spinor with complex components, but still coordinates and momentum are vectors. For a closed description of nature using only spinor quantities, it is necessary to have an equation similar to the Dirac equation in which momentum, coordinates and operators are spinors. It is such an equation that is presented in this paper. Using the example of the interaction between an electron and an electromagnetic field, we can see that the spinor equation contains more detailed information about the interaction than the vector equations. This is not new for quantum mechanics, since it describes interactions using complex wave functions, which cannot be observed directly, and only when measured goes to probabilities in the form of squares of the moduli of the wave functions. In the same way spinor quantities are not observable, but they completely determine observable vectors.In Section 2 of the paper, we analyze the quadratic form for an arbitrary four-component complex vector based on Pauli matrices. The form is invariant with respect to Lorentz transformations including any rotations and boosts. The invariance of the form allows us to construct on its basis an equation for a free particle combining the properties of the relativistic wave equation and the Dirac equation. For an electron in the presence of an electromagnetic potential it is shown that taking into account the commutation relations between the momentum and coordinate components allows us to obtain from this equation the known results describing the interactions of the electron spin with the electric and magnetic field. In the presence of a potential the momentum components cease to commute with each other. To neutralize this effect, the Schrödinger equation is supplemented by several equations with mixed derivatives on coordinates. In section 3 of the paper this quadratic form is expressed through momentum spinors, which makes it possible to obtain an equation for the spinor wave function in spinor coordinate space by replacing the momentum spinor components by partial derivative operators on the corresponding coordinate spinor component. Section 4 presents a modification of the theory of the path integral, which consists in considering the path integral in the spinor coordinate space. The Lagrangian densities for the scalar field and for the electron field, along with their corresponding propagators, are presented. An equation of motion for the electron is proposed that is relativistically invariant, in contrast to the Dirac equation, which lacks this invariance. This novel equation permitted the construction of an actually invariant procedure for the second quantization of the fermion field in spinor coordinate space. Furthermore, it is demonstrated that the field operators are a combination of plane waves in spinor or vector space, with the coefficients of which being pseudospinors or pseudovectors. Each of these pseudovectors or pseudospinors corresponds to one of the particles presented in the theory of electrodynamics. Furthermore, each plane wave possesses an additional coefficient in the form of a creation or annihilation operator. In vector space, these operators commute, whereas in spinor space they anticommutate. The paper presents the spinor and vector representations of the field operators in explicit form, comprising sets of 16 pseudospinors or 4 pseudovectors corresponding to particles represented in electrodynamics. An explicit form of the symmetric traceless tensor with spin two, zero mass and two polarizations is presented, which can serve as a model of the graviton. The results obtained may prompt changes in some aspects of the construction of Feynman diagrams.

•Jun 17, 2025•0 citations

General-relativistic quantum theory of wave field〔2〕

Iwao Sato

Science reports of the Tohoku University 1st ser. Physics, chemistry, astronomy•Mar 1, 1950•0 citations
The study of the change of the Schroedinger wave functionals on space-like surfaces as the surface changes is formulated simply. In this formulation, we let SSS be any space-like surface with the curvilinear coordinates uuu, introduce 〈q(u)S∣〉〈q(u)S|〉〈q(u)S∣〉 as the Schroedinger functional on it, with the nature of the functions q(u)q(u)q(u) not specified for the moment, and write the Schroedinger equation as \ensuremathℏi〈q(u),S\ensuremath′∣〉\ensuremath−〈q(u),S∣〉=J〈q(u),S∣〉\ensuremath{\hbar}i{〈q(u),{S}^{\ensuremath{'}}|〉\ensuremath{-}〈q(u),S|〉}=J〈q(u),S|〉\ensuremathℏi〈q(u),S\ensuremath′∣〉\ensuremath−〈q(u),S∣〉=J〈q(u),S∣〉 where S\ensuremath′{S}^{\ensuremath{'}}S\ensuremath′ is a surface slightly different from SSS, and JJJ is an operator operating on q(u)q(u)q(u) and depending on SSS, S\ensuremath′{S}^{\ensuremath{'}}S\ensuremath′, and the choice of their coordinates uuu. Obviously, the only necessary conditions for JJJ is that JJJ is Hermitian and that (1) is integrable. To get a theory resembling the existing ones, we require further that if we construct the expectation value of a certain field quantity at a point PPP from 〈q(u),S∣〉〈q(u),S|〉〈q(u),S∣〉, SSS being a surface passing through PPP, the expectation value is independent of choice of SSS and its coordinates uuu, and satisfies certain differential equations.When these differential equations follow from a Langrangian principle, an expression for JJJ was effectively given by Weiss. His work is given here in a complete form and the proof of the satisfaction of all requirements completed.Finally, by a simple transformation on the wave functions and the observables, we deduce from the Weiss's formalism the Tomonaga's formalism. As a consequence, it is pointed out that the Tomonaga's formalism will encounter essentially the same difficulties as the orthodox Heisenberg-Pauli formalism.
Components of a field function are functions of coordinates and time and satisfy some definite differential equations, which are called field equations. Field equations can be given a very general variational or Lagrangian form, if one accepts, that a field as the dynamic system must be characterized by a definite Lagrangian function. For a mechanical system this function is written down as the sum over all the material points of the system. For a continuous system like a wave field, Lagrangian function is expressed by the space integral from Lagrangian function density: L(t) = ∫ Ld3x. (4.1) However, the variational principle deals not with the Lagrangian function but with an action S obtained from it by means of integration over x0 = ct S = c ∫ L(t)dt. (4.2) Therefore, noncovariant expression (4.1) in Lagrangian formalism is in fact intermediate and it is sufficient to consider the Lagrangian function density L, which depends on the four space-time coordinates x in an implicit way. Hereinafter, we shall simply call L by the Lagrangian. Analogously, the Hamiltonian function density H will be named the Hamiltonian. The Lagrangian depends on components of a field wavefunction ψk and on their first derivatives with respect to the space-time coordinates ∂ψk/∂x ν . In so doing we assign the meaning of generalized field coordinates to ψk, and the meaning of generalized field velocities to ∂ψk/∂x ν . The demand of lacking derivatives with respect to field functions above the first order in the Lagrangian is caused by the following reason. Dynamics of all known quantum fields is described either by equations of the first or the second order. On the one hand, these equations follow from the principle of a least action: δS = 0, (4.3) and under action variation the order of derivatives, entering L, is raised by one. The Lagrangian must be a relativistically covariant quantity, namely, a relativistic scalar L′(x′) = L(x). Thanks to the invariance under the space-time translations, we conclude that the Lagrangian must not manifestly contain any space-time coordinates x. Since dynamical observables (four-dimensional vector of the energy-momentum, the moment of momentum tensor, and so on) are real quantities, then the Lagrangian must be also a real quantity. We shall also impose the locality condition on the Lagrangian, that is, we assume that the Lagrangian depends only on the state of fields in the infinitely small vicinity of the point Particles, Fields, and Quantum x. So: L(x) = L(ψk, ∂ψk ∂xν ) = L (ψk(x), ψk;ν (x)) . General variation of an action, related with varying both field wave functions and of integration domain boundaries, is equal to: δS = δ ∫ L(x)dx = ∫ L(x′)dx′ − ∫ L(x)dx, (4.4) where dx = dx0dr. For L′(x′) we have the expression: L′(x′) = L (ψ′k(x′), ψ′k;ν(x′)) = L(x) + δL(x) = L(x) + δL(x) + dLdxλ δxλ, (4.5) In Eq. (4.5) we denote a form variation of corresponding quantities by the symbol δ. This way δL(x) represents varying the Lagrangian only on the account of the variation of field functions and field function derivatives: δL(x) = ∂L ∂ψk δψk + ∂L ∂ψk;ν δψk;ν , (4.6) and δψk(x) does a variation of a field function form: δψk(x) = ψ ′ k(x) − ψk(x).
This is the second of the two related papers analyzing the origins and possible explanations of a paradoxical phenomenon of the quantum potential (QP). It arises in quantum mechanics (QM) of a particle in a Riemannian n-dimensional configurational space obtained by various procedures of quantization of non-relativistic natural Hamilton systems. Now, two questions are investigated: 1) Does a QP appear in non-relativistic QM generated by the quantum theory of a scalar field (QFT) non-minimally coupled to the space-time metric? 2) To which extent is it in accord with quantization of natural systems? To this end, the asymptotic non-relativistic equation for particle-interpretable wave functions and operators of canonical observables are obtained from the primary QFT objects. It is shown that, in globally static space-time, the Hamilton operators coincide at the origin of the quasi-Euclidean space coordinates in both alternative approaches for any non-minimality constant ξ~\tilde \xiξ~​ , but a certain requirement of the Equivalence Principle to the quantum field propagator distinguishes the unique value ξ~=1/6\tilde \xi = 1/6ξ~​=1/6 = 1/6. Just the same value had the constant ζ in the quantum Hamiltonians arising from the traditional quantizations of natural systems: the DeWitt canonical, Pauli-DeWitt quasiclassical, geometric and Feynman ones, as well as in the revised Schrödinger variational quantization. Thus, the QP generated by mechanics is tightly related to non-minimality of the quantum scalar field. Meanwhile, an essential discrepancy exists between the non-relativistic QMs derived from the two alternative approaches: QFT generates a scalar QP, whereas various quantizations of natural mechanics lead to QPs depending on the choice of space coordinates as physical observables and nonvanishing even in flat space if the coordinates are curvilinear.
Up to this point, our study of quantum mechanics has concerned itself with the behaviour of particles that inhabit a Galilean spacetime. For many purposes, in atomic, molecular and condensed matter physics, this theory is quite adequate. We saw in earlier chapters, however, that our actual spacetime has a structure which is much closer to that of the Minkowski spacetime of special relativity and that more general structures must be considered when gravitational phenomena are signicant. From a purely theoretical point of view, it is therefore important to formulate quantum theory in a way which is consistent with these more general spacetimes. The benets of constructing a relativistic quantum theory actually go far beyond the aesthetic satisfaction of making our geometrical and quantum-mechanical reasoning compatible. For one thing, we shall discover that the relativistic theory provides a deeper understanding of spin and the distinction between fermions and bosons, which in the non-relativistic theory appear simply as facts of life that we must strive to accommodate. Also, of course, there are many situations in which relativistic eects become observable, for which non-relativistic theory provides no explanation. The most obvious are high-energy scattering experiments, in which particles acquire kinetic energies comparable with or greater than their rest energies mc2, and the correct 4-momentum (3.33) must be used. There are, however, more subtle eects, such as the spin-orbit coupling that is essential for interpreting atomic spectra, which are also of relativistic origin.
Physical processes are usually described using four-dimensional vector quantities - coordinate vector, momentum vector, current vector. But at the fundamental level they are characterized by spinors - coordinate spinors, momentum spinors, spinor wave functions. The propagation of fields and their interaction takes place at the spinor level, and since each spinor uniquely corresponds to a certain vector, the results of physical processes appear before us in vector form. For example, the relativistic Schrödinger equation and the Dirac equation are formulated by means of coordinate vectors, momentum vectors and quantum operators corresponding to them. In the Dirac equation a step forward is taken and the wave function is a spinor with complex components, but still coordinates and momentum are vectors. For a closed description of nature using only spinor quantities, it is necessary to have an equation similar to the Dirac equation in which momentum, coordinates and operators are spinors. It is such an equation that is presented in this paper. Using the example of the interaction between an electron and an electromagnetic field, we can see that the spinor equation contains more detailed information about the interaction than the vector equations. This is not new for quantum mechanics, since it describes interactions using complex wave functions, which cannot be observed directly, and only when measured goes to probabilities in the form of squares of the moduli of the wave functions. In the same way spinor quantities are not observable, but they completely determine observable vectors.In Section 2 of the paper, we analyze the quadratic form for an arbitrary four-component complex vector based on Pauli matrices. The form is invariant with respect to Lorentz transformations including any rotations and boosts. The invariance of the form allows us to construct on its basis an equation for a free particle combining the properties of the relativistic wave equation and the Dirac equation. For an electron in the presence of an electromagnetic potential it is shown that taking into account the commutation relations between the momentum and coordinate components allows us to obtain from this equation the known results describing the interactions of the electron spin with the electric and magnetic field. In the presence of a potential the momentum components cease to commute with each other. To neutralize this effect, the Schrödinger equation is supplemented by several equations with mixed derivatives on coordinates. In section 3 of the paper this quadratic form is expressed through momentum spinors, which makes it possible to obtain an equation for the spinor wave function in spinor coordinate space by replacing the momentum spinor components by partial derivative operators on the corresponding coordinate spinor component. Section 4 presents a modification of the theory of the path integral, which consists in considering the path integral in the spinor coordinate space. The Lagrangian densities for the scalar field and for the electron field, along with their corresponding propagators, are presented. An equation of motion for the electron is proposed that is relativistically invariant, in contrast to the Dirac equation, which lacks this invariance. This novel equation permitted the construction of an actually invariant procedure for the second quantization of the fermion field in spinor coordinate space. Furthermore, it is demonstrated that the field operators are a combination of plane waves in spinor or vector space, with the coefficients of which being pseudospinors or pseudovectors. Each of these pseudovectors or pseudospinors corresponds to one of the particles presented in the theory of electrodynamics. Furthermore, each plane wave possesses an additional coefficient in the form of a creation or annihilation operator. In vector space, these operators commute, whereas in spinor space they anticommutate. The paper presents the spinor and vector representations of the field operators in explicit form, comprising sets of 16 pseudospinors or 4 pseudovectors corresponding to particles represented in electrodynamics. An explicit form of the symmetric traceless tensor with spin two, zero mass and two polarizations is presented, which can serve as a model of the graviton. The results obtained may prompt changes in some aspects of the construction of Feynman diagrams.