We investigate the basic assumptions leading to Schwinger’s quantum action principle in quantum mechanics. We present this principle in a new way that clarifies some previous developments, for example, the derivation of the fundamental commutators among the canonical variables and the Heisenberg equation for operators. We define operators associated with the classical transformations of the Galilei group, i.e., translations, boosts, and rotations and show their commutators obey the Lie algebra of the Galilei group.PACS Nos.: 83.65.Ca, 11.10.Ef
We investigate the basic assumptions leading to Schwinger’s quantum action principle in quantum mechanics. We present this principle in a new way that clarifies some previous developments, for example, the derivation of the fundamental commutators among the canonical variables and the Heisenberg equation for operators. We define operators associated with the classical transformations of the Galilei group, i.e., translations, boosts, and rotations and show their commutators obey the Lie algebra of the Galilei group.PACS Nos.: 83.65.Ca, 11.10.Ef
Abstract Chapter 4 introduces the Schwinger Action Principle, along with associated particle and potential sources. While the methods described here originally arose in the relativistic quantum field theory of elementary particle physics, they have also profoundly advanced our understanding of non-relativistic many-particle physics. The Schwinger Action Principle is a quantum-mechanical variational principle that closely parallels the Hamilton Principle of Least Action of classical mechanics, generalizing it to include the role of quantum operators as generalized coordinates and momenta. As such, it unifies all aspects of quantum theory, incorporating Hamilton equations of motion for those operators and the Heisenberg equation, as well as producing the canonical equal-time commutation/anticommutation relations. It yields dynamical coupled field equations for the creation and annihilation operators of the interacting many-body system by variational differentiation of the Hamiltonian with respect to the field operators. Also, equations for the development of matrix elements (underlying Green’s functions) are derived using variations with respect to particle and potential “sources” (and coupling strength). Variational calculus, involving impressed potentials, c-number coordinates and fields, also quantum operator coordinates and fields, is discussed in full detail. Attention is given to the introduction of fermion and boson particle sources and their use in variational calculus.
Recently, it was shown that when reference frames are associated to quantum systems, the transformation laws between such quantum reference frames need to be modified to take into account the quantum and dynamical features of the reference frames. This led to a relational description of the phase space variables of the quantum system of which the quantum reference frames are part of. While such transformations were shown to be symmetries of the system's Hamiltonian, the question remained unanswered as to whether they enjoy a group structure, similar to that of the Galilei group relating classical reference frames in quantum mechanics. In this work, we identify the canonical transformations on the phase space of the quantum systems comprising the quantum reference frames, and show that these transformations close a group structure defined by a Lie algebra, which is different from the usual Galilei algebra of quantum mechanics. We further find that the elements of this new algebra are in fact the building blocks of the quantum reference frames transformations previously identified, which we recover. Finally, we show how the transformations between classical reference frames described by the standard Galilei group symmetries can be obtained from the group of transformations between quantum reference frames by taking the zero limit of the parameter that governs the additional noncommutativity introduced by the quantum nature of inertial transformations.
Following previous works by E. Prugovečki [Physica A 91A, 202 (1978) and Stochastic Quantum Mechanics and Quantum Space–time (Reidel, Dordrecht, 1986)] on common features of classical and quantum mechanics, we develop a unified mathematical framework for classical and quantum mechanics (based on L2-spaces over classical phase space), in order to investigate to what extent quantum mechanics can be obtained as a simple modification of classical mechanics (on both logical and analytical levels). To obtain this unified framework, we split quantum theory in two parts: (i) general quantum axiomatics (a system is described by a state in a Hilbert space, observables are self-adjoints operators, and so on) and (ii) quantum mechanics proper that specifies the Hilbert space as L2(Rn); the Heisenberg rule [pi,qj]=−iℏδij with p=−iℏ∇, the free Hamiltonian H=−ℏ2Δ/2m and so on. We show that general quantum axiomatics (up to a supplementary “axiom of classicity”) can be used as a nonstandard mathematical ground to formulate physical ideas and equations of ordinary classical statistical mechanics. So, the question of a “true quantization” with “ℏ” must be seen as an independent physical problem not directly related with quantum formalism. At this stage, we show that this nonstandard formulation of classical mechanics exhibits a new kind of operation that has no classical counterpart: this operation is related to the “quantization process,” and we show why quantization physically depends on group theory (the Galilei group). This analytical procedure of quantization replaces the “correspondence principle” (or canonical quantization) and allows us to map classical mechanics into quantum mechanics, giving all operators of quantum dynamics and the Schrödinger equation. The great advantage of this point of view is that quantization is based on concrete physical arguments and not derived from some “pure algebraic rule” (we exhibit also some limit of the correspondence principle). Moreover spins for particles are naturally generated, including an approximation of their interaction with magnetic fields. We also recover by this approach the semi-classical formalism developed by E. Prugovečki [Stochastic Quantum Mechanics and Quantum Space–time (Reidel, Dordrecht, 1986)].
The algebra of generalized linear quantum canonical transformations is examined in the perspective of Schwinger's unitary-canonical operator basis. Formulation of the quantum phase problem within the theory of quantum canonical transformations and in particular with the generalized quantum action-angle phase space formalism is established and it is shown that the conceptual foundation of the quantum phase problem lies within the algebraic properties of the canonical transformations in the quantum phase space. The representations of the Wigner function in the generalized action-angle unitary operator pair for certain Hamiltonian systems with dynamical symmetry is examined. This generalized canonical formalism is applied to the quantum harmonic oscillator to examine the properties of the unitary quantum phase operator as well as the action-angle Wigner function.
We begin with a presentation of the Schwinger variational principle in quantum mechanics. In the second part, after a re-assessment of the problem of motion in quantum mechanics, it is shown that the Green kernel, which represents the probability amplitude of finding a particle in space at a given time, once its location at another time is known, can be represented by a sum over ‘space–time paths’. According to this interpretation, one integrates the exponential of i times the classical action divided by ħ, with a (formal) measure over all space–time paths matching the initial location x i at time t i and the final location x f at time t f . Such a way of evaluating the Green kernel is applied to any quadratic Lagrangian for a generic quantum system including, in particular, the harmonic oscillator and the free particle. Lastly, we outline a formalism which involves ordinary functions of commuting variables, and exactly reproduces ordinary quantum mechanics. It works with a phase space endowed with commuting coordinates, so that one is dealing with quantum mechanics in phase space. The Schwinger formulation of quantum dynamics In both the Schrödinger formulation in terms of wave functions (with associated state vectors) and the Heisenberg formulation in terms of noncommuting matrices (with corresponding linear operators) the dynamical evolution is specified in terms of the Hamiltonian. This has motivated our presentation of classical dynamics, but is in marked contrast with the view according to which the Lagrangian and the action specify the dynamics. Hamilton's principle is formulated in terms of the action, the time integral of the Lagrangian.