Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physical Review Letters

Ultimate quantum limits on phase measurement

Jeffrey H. Shapiro, Scott Roger Shepard, N. C. Wong

Published May 15, 1989• 154 citations
Publisher

Abstract

The Susskind-Glogower (SG) phase operator is shown to be the maximum-likelihood (ML) quantum measurement of optical phase for all input states. The ML performance of the SG measurement is optimized, at average photon number N, by an input state with number-ket representation of the form ${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\psi}}}_{\mathrm{n}}$=A/(1+n), for 0\ensuremath{\le}n\ensuremath{\le}M<\ensuremath{\infty}. The optimum phase-error behavior, measured by the reciprocal peak-likelihood, is proportional to 1/${\mathrm{N}}^{2}$, as opposed to the 1/ \ensuremath{\surd}N and 1/N dependences of coherent-state and optimum squeezed-state interferometers.

DOI
10.1103/physrevlett.62.2377

Related papers

Quantum phase measurement: A system-theory perspective

Jeffrey H. Shapiro, Scott Roger Shepard

Phase measurements on a single-mode radiation field of annihilation operator a^ are examined from a system-theoretic viewpoint. Quantum estimation theory is used to establish the primacy of the Susskind-Glogower (SG) phase operator, exp^(i\ensuremath{\varphi})==(a^a${\mathrm{^}}^{\mathrm{\ifmmode^\circ\else\textdegree\fi{}}}$${)}^{\mathrm{\ensuremath{-}}1/2}$a^; its phase eigenkets generate the probability operator measure (POM) for maximum-likelihood phase estimation. When used with an optimum input state, the SG-POM produces a local phase accuracy \ensuremath{\delta}\ensuremath{\varphi}\ensuremath{\sim}1/${\mathit{N}}^{2}$, where N is the average photon number of the state. This performance is far superior to the \ensuremath{\delta}\ensuremath{\varphi}\ensuremath{\sim}1/ \ensuremath{\surd}N and \ensuremath{\delta}\ensuremath{\varphi}\ensuremath{\sim}1/N behaviors of coherent-state and optimized squeezed-state interferometers, respectively. A commuting-observables description for the SG-POM on an extended, signal\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}apparatus, state space is derived. It is analogous to the signal-band\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}image-band formulation for optical heterodyne detection. Because heterodyne detection realizes the a^-POM, this analogy may help realize the SG-POM. Two new classes of nonclassical states are identified through study of the SG operator---the coherent phase states and the squeezed phase states. These are direct analogs of the familiar coherent and squeezed states associated with the annihilation operator. Linear system theory is used to elicit a broader class of states---the rational phase states---which includes the coherent and squeezed phase states as special cases, and affords a filter-theory derivation of the minimum average-energy quantum state with prescribed phase-measurement statistics. Fourier theory is also used to prove a number-phase uncertainty relation without recourse to the usual linearization procedures, and to show that the Pegg-Barnett phase operator has the same measurement statistics as the SG-POM for arbitrary quantum states.

Physical Review A•Apr 1, 1991•253 citations

Ultimate quantum limits on phase measurement

Scott Roger Shepard, Jeffrey H. Shapiro

In a shot-noise-limited (coherent state) phasesensing interferometer, the root-mean-square (rms) phase error is ~ 1 / N av 1 / 2 where Nav is the average number of detected photons. In an optimized squeezed-state interferometer, the rms phase error goes as 1/Nav. We have considered the phase measurement problem from the viewpoint of quantum estimation theory.1 In particular, for the problem of optimum phase-shift estimation from observation of a single mode of the radiation field under an average photon number constraint, we have found both the optimum quantum state and the optimum quantum measurement. The former turns out to have a truncated number-state expansion whose coefficients, out to the truncation point, fall off as 1/n. The latter turns out to be the Susskind-Glogower phase operator. More important, the resulting phase estimation performance improves as 1 / N av 2 .

Annual Meeting Optical Society of America•Jan 1, 1988•5 citations

Maximum-likelihood statistics of multiple quantum phase measurements

Samuel L. Braunstein, Carlton M. Caves, Alistair S. Lane

Recent theoretical studies have considered various possibilities for experimental measurements of phase using quantum states of a finite mean number of photons. Currently, the most experimentally accessible of these possibilities is an interferometric phase measurement using a squeezed state that has minimum variance for the phase quadrature; this possibility can yield, in principle, a phase measurement with uncertainty of order l/(mean number of photons). Shapiro, Shepard, and Wong1 (SSW) have proposed another possibility. They maximize the peak likelihood in an abstract measurement of the Susskind-Glogower phase operator, and they claim a phase sensitivity that goes as l/(mean number of photons).2 The SSW phase probability distribution consists of an extremely narrow peak sitting on a broad base that covers the entire 2 radians of phase; as a result, a single SSW phase measurement has poor sensitivity. Shapiro, Shepard, and Wong argue that their claimed sensitivity can be achieved in a sequence of measurements. We study the statistics of the maximum-likelihood estimator in a sequence of SSW phase measurements, and we report how the uncertainty in the estimator scales with the mean number of photons used in the entire sequence.

Annual Meeting Optical Society of America•Jan 1, 1990•1 citation

Phase Resolution and Coherent Phase States

Michael J. W. Hall

Various measures of phase resolution (including variance, entropy, confidence half-width, and reciprocal peak likelihood) are reviewed, and applied to the class of coherent phase states. These states arise naturally as eigenstates of the Susskind-Glogower phase operator, and are found to have near-optimal phase resolution properties for fixed mean photon number [nbar]. The mutual information for a communication channel based on coherent phase states is calculated as log ([nbar] + 1), within 1·5 bits of the theoretical maximum for single-mode channels.

Journal of Modern Optics•May 1, 1993•59 citations

Performance measures of quantum-phase measurement

Z. Hradil

Dispersion and peak likelihood---two performance measures recently used for the description of quantum phase---are compared in this Rapid Communication. The Susskind-Glogower phase operator represents the extremal quantum estimator with respect to both measures. The states with infinite peak likelihood and zero phase information explicitly demonstrate that peak likelihood is not relevant to the phase measurement, whereas dispersion represents a well-behaved performance measure of the phase variable. Peak likelihood restricts the lower limit of the variance of photon number, and the above-mentioned states represent the extremal states of the Shapiro-Shepard [Phys. Rev. A 43, 3795 (1991)] uncertainty relation.

Physical Review A•Sep 1, 1992•23 citations

Going through a quantum phase

Jeffrey H. Shapiro

Phase measurements on a single-mode radiation field are examined from a system-theoretic viewpoint. Quantum estimation theory is used to establish the primacy of the Susskind-Glogower (SG) phase operator; its phase eigenkets generate the probability operator measure (POM) for maximum likelihood phase estimation. A commuting observables description for the SG-POM on a signal x apparatus state space is derived. It is analogous to the signal-band x image-band formulation for optical heterodyne detection. Because heterodyning realizes the annihilation operator POM, this analogy may help realize the SG-POM. The wave function representation associated with the SG POM is then used to prove the duality between the phase measurement and the number operator measurement, from which a number-phase uncertainty principle is obtained, via Fourier theory, without recourse to linearization. Fourier theory is also employed to establish the principle of number-ket causality, leading to a Paley-Wiener condition that must be satisfied by the phase-measurement probability density function (PDF) for a single-mode field in an arbitrary quantum state. Finally, a two-mode phase measurement is shown to afford phase-conjugate quantum communication at zero error probability with finite average photon number. Application of this construct to interferometric precision measurements is briefly discussed.

NASA conference publication•Jan 1, 1992•3 citations
The Susskind-Glogower (SG) phase operator is shown to be the maximum-likelihood (ML) quantum measurement of optical phase for all input states. The ML performance of the SG measurement is optimized, at average photon number N, by an input state with number-ket representation of the form \ensuremathψn{\mathrm{\ensuremath{\psi}}}_{\mathrm{n}}\ensuremathψn​=A/(1+n), for 0\ensuremath{\le}n\ensuremath{\le}M<\ensuremath{\infty}. The optimum phase-error behavior, measured by the reciprocal peak-likelihood, is proportional to 1/N2{\mathrm{N}}^{2}N2, as opposed to the 1/ \ensuremath{\surd}N and 1/N dependences of coherent-state and optimum squeezed-state interferometers.
Phase measurements on a single-mode radiation field of annihilation operator a^ are examined from a system-theoretic viewpoint. Quantum estimation theory is used to establish the primacy of the Susskind-Glogower (SG) phase operator, exp^(i\ensuremath{\varphi})==(a^a${\mathrm{^}}^{\mathrm{\ifmmode^\circ\else\textdegree\fi{}}}$${)}^{\mathrm{\ensuremath{-}}1/2}$a^; its phase eigenkets generate the probability operator measure (POM) for maximum-likelihood phase estimation. When used with an optimum input state, the SG-POM produces a local phase accuracy \ensuremath{\delta}\ensuremath{\varphi}\ensuremath{\sim}1/N2{\mathit{N}}^{2}N2, where N is the average photon number of the state. This performance is far superior to the \ensuremath{\delta}\ensuremath{\varphi}\ensuremath{\sim}1/ \ensuremath{\surd}N and \ensuremath{\delta}\ensuremath{\varphi}\ensuremath{\sim}1/N behaviors of coherent-state and optimized squeezed-state interferometers, respectively. A commuting-observables description for the SG-POM on an extended, signal\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}apparatus, state space is derived. It is analogous to the signal-band\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}image-band formulation for optical heterodyne detection. Because heterodyne detection realizes the a^-POM, this analogy may help realize the SG-POM. Two new classes of nonclassical states are identified through study of the SG operator---the coherent phase states and the squeezed phase states. These are direct analogs of the familiar coherent and squeezed states associated with the annihilation operator. Linear system theory is used to elicit a broader class of states---the rational phase states---which includes the coherent and squeezed phase states as special cases, and affords a filter-theory derivation of the minimum average-energy quantum state with prescribed phase-measurement statistics. Fourier theory is also used to prove a number-phase uncertainty relation without recourse to the usual linearization procedures, and to show that the Pegg-Barnett phase operator has the same measurement statistics as the SG-POM for arbitrary quantum states.
In a shot-noise-limited (coherent state) phasesensing interferometer, the root-mean-square (rms) phase error is ~ 1 / N av 1 / 2 where Nav is the average number of detected photons. In an optimized squeezed-state interferometer, the rms phase error goes as 1/Nav. We have considered the phase measurement problem from the viewpoint of quantum estimation theory.1 In particular, for the problem of optimum phase-shift estimation from observation of a single mode of the radiation field under an average photon number constraint, we have found both the optimum quantum state and the optimum quantum measurement. The former turns out to have a truncated number-state expansion whose coefficients, out to the truncation point, fall off as 1/n. The latter turns out to be the Susskind-Glogower phase operator. More important, the resulting phase estimation performance improves as 1 / N av 2 .
Recent theoretical studies have considered various possibilities for experimental measurements of phase using quantum states of a finite mean number of photons. Currently, the most experimentally accessible of these possibilities is an interferometric phase measurement using a squeezed state that has minimum variance for the phase quadrature; this possibility can yield, in principle, a phase measurement with uncertainty of order l/(mean number of photons). Shapiro, Shepard, and Wong1 (SSW) have proposed another possibility. They maximize the peak likelihood in an abstract measurement of the Susskind-Glogower phase operator, and they claim a phase sensitivity that goes as l/(mean number of photons).2 The SSW phase probability distribution consists of an extremely narrow peak sitting on a broad base that covers the entire 2 radians of phase; as a result, a single SSW phase measurement has poor sensitivity. Shapiro, Shepard, and Wong argue that their claimed sensitivity can be achieved in a sequence of measurements. We study the statistics of the maximum-likelihood estimator in a sequence of SSW phase measurements, and we report how the uncertainty in the estimator scales with the mean number of photons used in the entire sequence.
Various measures of phase resolution (including variance, entropy, confidence half-width, and reciprocal peak likelihood) are reviewed, and applied to the class of coherent phase states. These states arise naturally as eigenstates of the Susskind-Glogower phase operator, and are found to have near-optimal phase resolution properties for fixed mean photon number [nbar]. The mutual information for a communication channel based on coherent phase states is calculated as log ([nbar] + 1), within 1·5 bits of the theoretical maximum for single-mode channels.
Dispersion and peak likelihood---two performance measures recently used for the description of quantum phase---are compared in this Rapid Communication. The Susskind-Glogower phase operator represents the extremal quantum estimator with respect to both measures. The states with infinite peak likelihood and zero phase information explicitly demonstrate that peak likelihood is not relevant to the phase measurement, whereas dispersion represents a well-behaved performance measure of the phase variable. Peak likelihood restricts the lower limit of the variance of photon number, and the above-mentioned states represent the extremal states of the Shapiro-Shepard [Phys. Rev. A 43, 3795 (1991)] uncertainty relation.
Phase measurements on a single-mode radiation field are examined from a system-theoretic viewpoint. Quantum estimation theory is used to establish the primacy of the Susskind-Glogower (SG) phase operator; its phase eigenkets generate the probability operator measure (POM) for maximum likelihood phase estimation. A commuting observables description for the SG-POM on a signal x apparatus state space is derived. It is analogous to the signal-band x image-band formulation for optical heterodyne detection. Because heterodyning realizes the annihilation operator POM, this analogy may help realize the SG-POM. The wave function representation associated with the SG POM is then used to prove the duality between the phase measurement and the number operator measurement, from which a number-phase uncertainty principle is obtained, via Fourier theory, without recourse to linearization. Fourier theory is also employed to establish the principle of number-ket causality, leading to a Paley-Wiener condition that must be satisfied by the phase-measurement probability density function (PDF) for a single-mode field in an arbitrary quantum state. Finally, a two-mode phase measurement is shown to afford phase-conjugate quantum communication at zero error probability with finite average photon number. Application of this construct to interferometric precision measurements is briefly discussed.