Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Communications in Algebra

Fully Ramified Characters and Clifford Codes

Alejandro P. Nicolás, Consuelo Martı́nez, Markus Grassl

Published Dec 30, 2010• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

In this article we study relations between groups and quantum error correcting codes. Groups of central type are used to construct quantum error correcting codes. Both stabilizer and Clifford codes can be derived from a construction involving this kind of groups. A more general construction of Clifford codes will be given and their correcting properties will be examined using group theoretical techniques.

DOI
10.1080/00927870903431191

Related papers

Quantum error correcting codes: From stabilizer codes to induced codes

Edward A. Loeb

The first large class of quantum error-correcting codes that was constructed is the class of stabilizer codes. The construction method used for these codes is based on finding abelian subgroups of general Pauli groups. Stabilizer codes are a special case of a more general class of quantum error-correcting codes---Clifford codes. The construction technique for Clifford codes generalizes the stabilizer code construction by introducing abstract error groups. Abstract error groups generalize the Pauli groups so that codes can be constructed for quantum systems with any dimension. Clifford codes are thus constructed by finding normal subgroups of abstract error groups. In this dissertation we show that Clifford codes are a special case of a larger class of codes, which we refer to as induced codes. In addition to this new construction method, we also present some new results pertaining to a subclass of stabilizer codes called degenerate stabilizer codes.

•Jan 1, 2006•0 citations

Clifford codes

Andreas Klappenecker, Martin Rötteler

Quantum error control codes allow to detect and correct errors that are due to decoherence effects. We review some basic properties of these codes and give some constructions. Our main focus will be on a construction of quantum error control codes that have been introduced by Knill in 1996 with the intention to generalize stabilizer codes. These so-called Clifford codes can be constructed and analyzed with tools from representation theory of finite groups. We show that a large class of Clifford codes are actually stabilizer codes. And we construct the smallest example of a Clifford code that is not a stabilizer code.

Computational matematics series/Computational mathematics series•Feb 14, 2002•13 citations

Clifford Code Constructions of Operator Quantum Error-Correcting Codes

Andreas Klappenecker, Pradeep Kiran Sarvepalli

Recently, operator quantum error-correcting codes have been proposed to unify and generalize decoherence free subspaces, noiseless subsystems, and quantum error-correcting codes. This correspondence introduces a natural construction of such codes in terms of Clifford codes, an elegant generalization of stabilizer codes due to Knill. Character-theoretic methods are used to derive a simple method to construct operator quantum error-correcting codes from any classical additive code over a finite field, which obviates the need for self-orthogonal codes.

arXiv:quant-ph/0604161•IEEE Transactions on Information Theory•Dec 1, 2008•37 citations

Hybrid Clifford Codes via Operator Algebra Quantum Error Correction and Projective Representation Theory

Jonas Eidesen, David W. Kribs, Andrew Nemec

Clifford codes are a natural generalization of quantum stabilizer codes based primarily on representation theory. This class of codes has previously been extended to the setting of quantum subsystem codes. We formulate a two-fold generalization of Clifford codes, for both the hybrid classical and quantum information and projective representation theory settings. This leads to new classes of hybrid subspace and subsystem Clifford codes. We extend the fundamental representation theoretic quantum error correction theorem to include these codes, based on the operator algebra quantum error correction framework. We also discuss several examples throughout the presentation, of both stabilizer and non-stabilizer type.

quant-pharXiv:2606.02531•Jun 2, 2026•0 citations

Investigations on Automorphism Groups of Quantum Stabilizer Codes

Hanson Hao

The stabilizer formalism for quantum error-correcting codes has been, without doubt, the most successful at producing examples of quantum codes with strong error-correcting properties. In this paper, we discuss strong automorphism groups of stabilizer codes, beginning with the analogous notion from the theory of classical codes. Two weakenings of this concept, the weak automorphism group and Clifford-twisted automorphism group, are also discussed, along with many examples highlighting the possible relationships between the types of "automorphism groups". In particular, we construct an example of a $[[10,0,4]]$ stabilizer code showing how the Clifford-twisted automorphism groups might be connected to the Mathieu groups. Finally, nonexistence results are proved regarding stabilizer codes with highly transitive strong and weak automorphism groups, suggesting a potential inverse relationship between the error-correcting properties of a quantum code and the transitivity of those automorphism groups.

arXiv:2109.12735•Sep 27, 2021•1 citation

Clifford codes

Abstract Quantum error control codes allow to detect and correct errors that are due to decoherence effects. We review some basic properties of these codes and give some constructions. Our main focus will be on a construction of quantum error control codes that have been introduced by Knill in 1996 with the intention to generalize stabilizer codes. These so-called Clifford codes can be constructed and analyzed with tools from representation theory of finite groups. We show that a large class of Clifford codes are actually stabilizer codes. And we construct the smallest example of a Clifford code that is not a stabilizer code.

Chapman & Hall/CRC eBooks•Feb 14, 2002•2 citations
In this article we study relations between groups and quantum error correcting codes. Groups of central type are used to construct quantum error correcting codes. Both stabilizer and Clifford codes can be derived from a construction involving this kind of groups. A more general construction of Clifford codes will be given and their correcting properties will be examined using group theoretical techniques.
The first large class of quantum error-correcting codes that was constructed is the class of stabilizer codes. The construction method used for these codes is based on finding abelian subgroups of general Pauli groups. Stabilizer codes are a special case of a more general class of quantum error-correcting codes---Clifford codes. The construction technique for Clifford codes generalizes the stabilizer code construction by introducing abstract error groups. Abstract error groups generalize the Pauli groups so that codes can be constructed for quantum systems with any dimension. Clifford codes are thus constructed by finding normal subgroups of abstract error groups. In this dissertation we show that Clifford codes are a special case of a larger class of codes, which we refer to as induced codes. In addition to this new construction method, we also present some new results pertaining to a subclass of stabilizer codes called degenerate stabilizer codes.
Quantum error control codes allow to detect and correct errors that are due to decoherence effects. We review some basic properties of these codes and give some constructions. Our main focus will be on a construction of quantum error control codes that have been introduced by Knill in 1996 with the intention to generalize stabilizer codes. These so-called Clifford codes can be constructed and analyzed with tools from representation theory of finite groups. We show that a large class of Clifford codes are actually stabilizer codes. And we construct the smallest example of a Clifford code that is not a stabilizer code.
Recently, operator quantum error-correcting codes have been proposed to unify and generalize decoherence free subspaces, noiseless subsystems, and quantum error-correcting codes. This correspondence introduces a natural construction of such codes in terms of Clifford codes, an elegant generalization of stabilizer codes due to Knill. Character-theoretic methods are used to derive a simple method to construct operator quantum error-correcting codes from any classical additive code over a finite field, which obviates the need for self-orthogonal codes.
Clifford codes are a natural generalization of quantum stabilizer codes based primarily on representation theory. This class of codes has previously been extended to the setting of quantum subsystem codes. We formulate a two-fold generalization of Clifford codes, for both the hybrid classical and quantum information and projective representation theory settings. This leads to new classes of hybrid subspace and subsystem Clifford codes. We extend the fundamental representation theoretic quantum error correction theorem to include these codes, based on the operator algebra quantum error correction framework. We also discuss several examples throughout the presentation, of both stabilizer and non-stabilizer type.
The stabilizer formalism for quantum error-correcting codes has been, without doubt, the most successful at producing examples of quantum codes with strong error-correcting properties. In this paper, we discuss strong automorphism groups of stabilizer codes, beginning with the analogous notion from the theory of classical codes. Two weakenings of this concept, the weak automorphism group and Clifford-twisted automorphism group, are also discussed, along with many examples highlighting the possible relationships between the types of "automorphism groups". In particular, we construct an example of a [[10,0,4]][[10,0,4]][[10,0,4]] stabilizer code showing how the Clifford-twisted automorphism groups might be connected to the Mathieu groups. Finally, nonexistence results are proved regarding stabilizer codes with highly transitive strong and weak automorphism groups, suggesting a potential inverse relationship between the error-correcting properties of a quantum code and the transitivity of those automorphism groups.
Abstract Quantum error control codes allow to detect and correct errors that are due to decoherence effects. We review some basic properties of these codes and give some constructions. Our main focus will be on a construction of quantum error control codes that have been introduced by Knill in 1996 with the intention to generalize stabilizer codes. These so-called Clifford codes can be constructed and analyzed with tools from representation theory of finite groups. We show that a large class of Clifford codes are actually stabilizer codes. And we construct the smallest example of a Clifford code that is not a stabilizer code.