In this paper, a method of generalizing the Bell inequality is presented that makes it possible to include detector inefficiency directly in the original Bell inequality. To enable this, the concept of ``change of ensemble'' will be presented, providing both qualitative and quantitative information on the nature of the ``loophole'' in the proof of the original Bell inequality. In a local hidden-variable model lacking change of ensemble, the generalized inequality reduces to an inequality that quantum mechanics violates as strongly as the original Bell inequality, irrespective of the level of efficiency of the detectors. A model that contains change of ensemble lowers the violation, and a bound for the level of change is obtained. The derivation of the bound in this paper is not dependent upon any symmetry assumptions such as constant efficiency, or even the assumption of independent errors.
In this paper, a method of generalizing the Bell inequality is presented that makes it possible to include detector inefficiency directly in the original Bell inequality. To enable this, the concept of change of ensemble'' will be presented, providing both qualitative and quantitative information on the nature of the loophole'' in the proof of the original Bell inequality. In a local hidden-variable model lacking change of ensemble, the generalized inequality reduces to an inequality that quantum mechanics violates as strongly as the original Bell inequality, irrespective of the level of efficiency of the detectors. A model that contains change of ensemble lowers the violation, and a bound for the level of change is obtained. The derivation of the bound in this paper is not dependent upon any symmetry assumptions such as constant efficiency, or even the assumption of independent errors.
In many quantum information applications, a minimum detection efficiency must be exceeded to ensure success. Protocols depending on the violation of a Bell inequality, for instance, may be subject to the so-called detection loophole: Imperfect detectors may yield spurious violations, which consequently cannot be used to ensure, say, quantum cryptographic security. Hence, we investigate the possibility of giving lower bounds on detector efficiency even if an adversary has full control over both the source and the detectors. To this end, we present a technique to systematically derive Bell inequalities free from the detection loophole using only the observed measurements statistics. The violation of these inequalities certifies that the detectors used exceed a certain minimal efficiency.
This paper analyzes effects of time dependence in the Bell inequality. A generalized inequality is derived for the case when coincidence and non-coincidence (and hence whether or not a pair contributes to the actual data) is controlled by timing that depends on the detector settings. Needless to say, this inequality is violated by quantum mechanics and could be violated by experimental data provided that the loss of measurement pairs through failure of coincidence is small enough, but the quantitative bound is more restrictive in this case than in the previously analyzed "efficiency loophole".
In this thesis, the question "What kind of models can be used to describe microcosmos?" will be discussed. Being difficult and very large in scope, the question has here been restricted to whether or not Local Realistic models can be used to describe Quantum-Mechanical processes, one of a collection of questions often referred to as Quantum Paradoxes. Two such paradoxes will be investigated using techniques from probability theory: the Bell inequality and the Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger (GHZ) paradox. A problem with the two mentioned paradoxes is that they are only valid when the detectors are 100% efficient, whereas present experimental efficiency is much lower than that. Here, an approach is presented which enables a generalization of both the Bell inequality and the GHZ paradox to the inefficient case. This is done by introducing the concept of change of ensemble, which provides both qualitative and quantitative information on the nature of the "loophole" in the 100% efficiency prerequisite, and is more fundamental in this regard than the efficiency concept. Efficiency estimates are presented which are easy to obtain from experimental coincidence data, and a connection is established between these estimates and the concept of change of ensemble. The concept is also studied in the context of Franson interferometry, where the Bell inequality cannot immediately be used. Unexpected subtleties occur when trying to establish whether or not a Local Realistic model of the data is possible even in the ideal case. A Local Realistic model of the experiment is presented, but nevertheless, by introducing an additional requirement on the experimental setup it is possible to refute the mentioned model and show that no other Local Realistic model exists.
The detection loophole is a well-known loophole in Bell nonlocality motivated by the inefficiency of detectors used in Bell experiments. However, this inefficiency is actually a ubiquitous feature of any photonic platform for quantum networks since photons are readily absorbed by the surrounding environment. When the quantum system, usually a photon, is lost, what should the parties output? The most natural choice is to fall back to a deterministic strategy where each party produces an output via a function of her local input. In this paper, we study how to choose such a fallback strategy for general Bell inequalities with respect to different efficiencies η to maximize the possible violation. We mathematically prove that for the CHSH inequality, there exists a fallback strategy that is optimal for all η. However, in general, we find that the optimal fallback strategy can vary with η, sometimes in surprising ways. For example, we find an example of a Bell inequality where the optimal fallback strategy near the threshold efficiency is not an optimal deterministic strategy in the lossless setting. Our results can reduce the efficiency requirements for closing the detection loophole and thus are useful for applications of Bell inequality violation, such as quantum telepathy or device-independent quantum key distribution.
This paper analyzes effects of time‐dependence in the Bell inequality. A generalized inequality is derived for the case when coincidence and non‐coincidence [and hence whether or not a pair contributes to the actual data] is controlled by timing that depends on the detector settings. Needless to say, this inequality is violated by quantum mechanics and could be violated by experimental data provided that the loss of measurement pairs through failure of coincidence is small enough, but the quantitative bound is more restrictive in this case than in the previously analyzed “efficiency loophole.”
Let us imagine an experimentalist, who has maximally entangled photons and wants to violate Bell’s inequality in his laboratory. Among many obstacles he has to overcome, two of them are the most significant. Firstly, he has to avoid exchanging information about the measurement settings between the particles. Secondly, he has to detect particles with a high enough probability, because if the detection efficiency is too low, one can reproduce quantum correlations using a LHV (Local Hidden Variables) model. These two problems are known in the literature, respectively, as the locality loophole [1] and the detection loophole [2, 3]. Fortunately, it is possible to close the locality loophole using photons in the experiment [4, 5, 6, 7, 8]. However, closing the detection loophole is still an object of study. The authors of [9] showed that for the CHSH inequality, the lower bound for detector efficiency needed to close the loophole is 82.8% for maximally entangled states. This bound was lowered to 66.7% by Eberhard [10]. Furthermore, the detector efficiency has been studied for other Bell inequalities [11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16]. In our research, we are trying to answer the following question: If we prepare a Bell experiment and we have two detectors, having different efficiencies both smaller than 100%, which detector should each party receive? And also: Which representation of the chosen Bell inequality should we consider? These are very crucial questions, which arise in laboratories. Hence, we hope that our results will be useful for experimentalists. We focus on the I3322 inequality [17], which is a natural candidate for testing, because of its asymmetry [14, 18]. We consider the case of a post-selection strategy, which consists in rejecting all the rounds in the Bell experiment when one of the detectors does not click. We used numerical optimisation methods to find both the best classical strategy for Alice and Bob and the best detector clicking strategy. Thus, we have found minimal efficiencies of the detectors of Alice and Bob needed to violate I3322. We made the same studies also for symmetric representations of I3322 [19]. Our results show that the minimal efficiencies of Alice and Bob’s detectors of the asymmetric representation of I3322 is lower than in case of the symmetric one [20]. It is work in progress, and we are examining other post-selection methods as well as other Bell inequalities. We want to consider also the case when non-maximally entangled states are used in Bell experiments.