Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physics Letters A

Parallel treatment of estimation of SU(2) and phase estimation

Masahito Hayashi

Published Feb 1, 2006• 51 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1016/j.physleta.2006.01.043

Related papers

Dense covariant coding and estimation of SU(2) operations

E. Bagán, M. Baig, R. Muñoz-Tapia

•Jan 1, 2003•0 citations

Quantum Phase Estimation

Osama M. Raisuddin, Suvranu De

Springer eBooks•Nov 14, 2025•0 citations

Quantum Phase Estimation Algorithm with Performance Below the Heisenberg Limit in an Interferometer with Coherent State Light

Scott Roger Shepard

We demonstrate an algorithm which for low intensity coherent states can provide phase estimation accuracies that are over four orders of magnitude below the Heisenberg limit within the apparatus of an SU(2) interferometer.

OSA Advanced Photonics Congress•Jan 1, 2016•0 citations

Quantum Phase Estimation

Hiu Yung Wong

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 2022•6 citations

Ultimate precision limit of SU(2) and SU(1,1) interferometers in noisy metrology

Zeng, Jie, Dong Li, L. Q. Chen +2 more

The quantum Fisher information (QFI) in SU(2) and SU(1,1) interferometers was considered, and the QFI-only calculation was overestimated. In general, the phase estimation as a two-parameter estimation problem, and the quantum Fisher information matrix (QFIM) is necessary. In this paper, we theoretically generalize the model developed by Escher et al [Nature Physics 7, 406 (2011)] to the QFIM case with noise and study the ultimate precision limits of SU(2) and SU(1,1) interferometers with photon losses because photon losses as a very usual noise may happen to the phase measurement process. Using coherent state and squeezed vacuum state as a specific example, we numerically analyze the variation of the overestimated QFI with the loss coefficient, and find its disappearance and recovery phenomenon.

arXiv:2302.09823•Feb 20, 2023•0 citations

Role of phase of optimal probe in noncommutativity vs coherence in quantum multiparameter estimation

Pal, Ritopriyo, Priya Ghosh, Ahana Ghoshal +1 more

Quantum multiparameter estimation offers a framework for the simultaneous estimation of multiple parameters, pertaining to possibly noncommutating observables. While the optimal probe for estimating a single unitary phase is well understood - being a pure state that is an equal superposition of the eigenvectors of the encoding Hamiltonian corresponding to its maximum and minimum eigenvalues - the structure of optimal probes in the multiparameter setting remains more intricate. We investigate the simultaneous estimation of two phases, each encoded through arbitrary qubit Hamiltonians, using arbitrary weight matrices, and considering single-qubit probes. We also consider single-qutrit probes, for which the encoding Hamiltonians are chosen as SU(2) generators. We find that in both the qubit and qutrit scenarios, the optimal probe is a coherent superposition of the eigenstates corresponding to the largest and smallest eigenvalues of the total encoding Hamiltonian, with a fixed - and not arbitrary - relative phase. Remarkably, this optimal probe is independent of the specific choice of weight matrix, making it a universally optimal input state for the estimation of any pair of SU(2) parameters, which can be reparameterized to the phase estimation problem. Furthermore, we show that this probe also maximizes the determinant of the quantum Fisher information matrix, providing a handy tool for identifying the optimal probe state. We also examine the role of commutativity between the generators of the unitary encodings. Our results demonstrate that a high degree of commutativity degrades the achievable precision, rendering estimation infeasible in the extreme case. However, maximal noncommutativity does not necessarily yield optimal precision.

arXiv:2507.04824•Jul 7, 2025•0 citations
The quantum Fisher information (QFI) in SU(2) and SU(1,1) interferometers was considered, and the QFI-only calculation was overestimated. In general, the phase estimation as a two-parameter estimation problem, and the quantum Fisher information matrix (QFIM) is necessary. In this paper, we theoretically generalize the model developed by Escher et al [Nature Physics 7, 406 (2011)] to the QFIM case with noise and study the ultimate precision limits of SU(2) and SU(1,1) interferometers with photon losses because photon losses as a very usual noise may happen to the phase measurement process. Using coherent state and squeezed vacuum state as a specific example, we numerically analyze the variation of the overestimated QFI with the loss coefficient, and find its disappearance and recovery phenomenon.
Quantum multiparameter estimation offers a framework for the simultaneous estimation of multiple parameters, pertaining to possibly noncommutating observables. While the optimal probe for estimating a single unitary phase is well understood - being a pure state that is an equal superposition of the eigenvectors of the encoding Hamiltonian corresponding to its maximum and minimum eigenvalues - the structure of optimal probes in the multiparameter setting remains more intricate. We investigate the simultaneous estimation of two phases, each encoded through arbitrary qubit Hamiltonians, using arbitrary weight matrices, and considering single-qubit probes. We also consider single-qutrit probes, for which the encoding Hamiltonians are chosen as SU(2) generators. We find that in both the qubit and qutrit scenarios, the optimal probe is a coherent superposition of the eigenstates corresponding to the largest and smallest eigenvalues of the total encoding Hamiltonian, with a fixed - and not arbitrary - relative phase. Remarkably, this optimal probe is independent of the specific choice of weight matrix, making it a universally optimal input state for the estimation of any pair of SU(2) parameters, which can be reparameterized to the phase estimation problem. Furthermore, we show that this probe also maximizes the determinant of the quantum Fisher information matrix, providing a handy tool for identifying the optimal probe state. We also examine the role of commutativity between the generators of the unitary encodings. Our results demonstrate that a high degree of commutativity degrades the achievable precision, rendering estimation infeasible in the extreme case. However, maximal noncommutativity does not necessarily yield optimal precision.