Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physical review. B, Condensed matter

Vortex motion in charged and neutral superfluids: A hydrodynamic approach

Edouard B Sonin, V. B. Geshkenbeǐn, Anne van Otterlo, G. Blatter

Published Jan 1, 1998• 134 citations
Publisher

Abstract

We derive a Galilean invariant expression for the electric field induced by a vortex moving through a charged superfluid at $T=0$, which holds for any superconductor, from the dirty to the superclean limit. The contribution of different areas around the vortex to the average electric field and to the charge distribution is analyzed. The results are extended to a neutral system, where the chemical potential takes over the role of the electrostatic potential in the charged situation. Different contributions to the vortex mass in charged and neutral superfluids are brought together for comparison and discussion.

DOI
10.1103/physrevb.57.575

Related papers

Vortex in the charged Bose liquid

A. S. Alexandrov

Equations describing a single vortex in the charged Bose liquid at zero temperature are derived. The zero-temperature coherence length, magnetic-field penetration depth, vortex structure and energy, and lower critical field are calculated. The vortex differs from that in type-II BCS superconductors or in neutral superfluids. Its core is charged, and there is an electric field inside the core.

Physical review. B, Condensed matter•Dec 1, 1999•8 citations

Magnus force in superfluids and superconductors

Edouard B Sonin

The forces on the vortex, transverse to its velocity, are considered. In addition to the superfluid Magnus force from the condensate (superfluid component), there are transverse forces from thermal quasiparticles and external fields violating the Galilean invariance. The forces between quasiparticles and the vortex originate from interference of quasiparticles with trajectories on the left and on the right from the vortex like similar forces for electrons interacting with the thin magnetic-flux tube (the Aharonov-Bohm effect). These forces are derived for phonons from the equations of superfluid hydrodynamics, and for BCS quasiparticles from the Bogolyubov--de Gennes equations. The effect of external fields breaking Galilean invariance is analyzed for vortices in the two-dimensional Josephson junction array. The symmetry analysis of the classical equations for the array shows that the total transverse force on the vortex vanishes. Therefore the Hall effect which is linear in the transverse force is absent also. This means that the Magnus force from the superfluid component exactly cancels with the transverse force from the external fields. The results of other approaches are also brought together for discussion.

arXiv:cond-mat/9606099•Physical review. B, Condensed matter•Jan 1, 1997•225 citations

Microscopic analysis of the nondissipative force on a line vortex in a superconductor: Berry’s phase, momentum flow, and the Magnus force

Frank Gaitan

A microscopic analysis of the nondissipative force ${\mathbf{F}}_{\mathrm{nd}}$ acting on a line vortex in a type-II superconductor at T=0 is given. All work presented assumes a charged BCS superconductor. We first examine the Berry phase induced in the BCS superconducting ground state by movement of the vortex and show how this phase enters into the hydrodynamic action ${\mathit{S}}_{\mathrm{hyd}}$ of the superconducting condensate. Appropriate variation of ${\mathit{S}}_{\mathrm{hyd}}$ give ${\mathbf{F}}_{\mathrm{nd}}$ and variation of the Berry phase term is seen to contribute the Magnus or lift force of classical hydrodynamics to ${\mathbf{F}}_{\mathrm{nd}}$. This analysis, based on the BCS ground state of a charged superconductor, confirms in detail the arguments of Ao and Thouless within the context of the BCS model. Our Berry phase, in the limit e\ensuremath{\rightarrow}0, is seen to reproduce the Berry phase determined by these authors for a neutral superfluid. We also provide a second, independent, determination of ${\mathbf{F}}_{\mathrm{nd}}$ through a microscopic derivation of the continuity equation for the condensate linear momentum. This equation yields the acceleration equation for the superflow and shows that the vortex acts as a sink for the condensate linear momentum. The rate at which momentum is lost to the vortex determines ${\mathbf{F}}_{\mathrm{nd}}$ in this second approach and the result obtained agrees identically with the previous Berry phase calculation. The Magnus force contribution to ${\mathbf{F}}_{\mathrm{nd}}$ is seen in both calculations to be a consequence of the vortex topology and motion. A preliminary discussion is given regarding finite temperature extensions of the Berry phase calculation, with emphasis on its relevance for the sign anomaly occurring in Hall-effect experiments on type-II superconductors in the flux flow regime.

arXiv:cond-mat/9408025•Physical review. B, Condensed matter•Apr 1, 1995•30 citations

QUANTIZED VORTICES IN SUPERFLUIDS AND SUPERCONDUCTORS

D. J. Thouless, Ping Ao, Qian Niu +2 more

We give a general review of recent developments in the theory of vortices in superfluids and superconductors, discussing why the dynamics of vortices is important, and why some key results are still controversial. We discuss work that we have done on the dynamics of quantized vortices in a superfluid. Despite the fact that this problem has been recognized as important for forty years, there is still a lot of controversy about the forces on and masses of quantized vortices. We think that one can get unambiguous answers by considering a broken symmetry state that consists of one vortex in an infinite ideal system. We argue for a Magnus force that is proportional to the superfluid density, and we find that the effective mass density of a vortex in a neutral superfluid is divergent at low frequencies. We have generalized some of the results for a neutral superfluid to a charged system.

arXiv:cond-mat/9709127•International Journal of Modern Physics B•Mar 10, 1999•13 citations

Nonadiabatic distortion in the current distribution around a moving vortex

D. M. Gaitonde

We study the phase distribution around a vortex in uniform motion. We consider both the cases of neutral and charged superfluids. The motion of the vortex causes the density of the system to fluctuate. This in turn produces a compensating current, thus ensuring current conservation locally. We explicitly calculate this current.

arXiv:cond-mat/9809060•Physical review. B, Condensed matter•Dec 1, 1998•0 citations

ADIABATIC EFFECTIVE ACTION FOR VORTICES IN NEUTRAL AND CHARGED SUPERFLUIDS

Machiko Hatsuda, Motoki Sato, Shigeaki Yahikozawa +1 more

Adiabatic effective action for vortices in neutral and charged superfluids at zero temperature are calculated using the topological Landau-Ginzburg theory recently proposed by Hatsuda, Yahikozawa, Ao and Thouless, and vortex dynamics are examined. The Berry phase term arising in the effective action naturally yields the Magnus force in both neutral and charged superfluids. It is shown that in neutral superfluid there is only one degree of freedom, namely the center of vorticities, and the vortex energy is proportional to the sum of all vorticities so that it is finite only for the vanishing total vorticity of the system. On the other hand the effective mass and the vortex energy for a vortex in charged superfluids are defined individually as expected. The effects of the vortex core on these quantities are also estimated. The possible depinning scenario which is governed by the Magnus force and the inertial mass is also discussed.

arXiv:cond-mat/9505158•International Journal of Modern Physics B•Jul 10, 1996•2 citations
We derive a Galilean invariant expression for the electric field induced by a vortex moving through a charged superfluid at T=0T=0T=0, which holds for any superconductor, from the dirty to the superclean limit. The contribution of different areas around the vortex to the average electric field and to the charge distribution is analyzed. The results are extended to a neutral system, where the chemical potential takes over the role of the electrostatic potential in the charged situation. Different contributions to the vortex mass in charged and neutral superfluids are brought together for comparison and discussion.
The forces on the vortex, transverse to its velocity, are considered. In addition to the superfluid Magnus force from the condensate (superfluid component), there are transverse forces from thermal quasiparticles and external fields violating the Galilean invariance. The forces between quasiparticles and the vortex originate from interference of quasiparticles with trajectories on the left and on the right from the vortex like similar forces for electrons interacting with the thin magnetic-flux tube (the Aharonov-Bohm effect). These forces are derived for phonons from the equations of superfluid hydrodynamics, and for BCS quasiparticles from the Bogolyubov--de Gennes equations. The effect of external fields breaking Galilean invariance is analyzed for vortices in the two-dimensional Josephson junction array. The symmetry analysis of the classical equations for the array shows that the total transverse force on the vortex vanishes. Therefore the Hall effect which is linear in the transverse force is absent also. This means that the Magnus force from the superfluid component exactly cancels with the transverse force from the external fields. The results of other approaches are also brought together for discussion.
A microscopic analysis of the nondissipative force Fnd{\mathbf{F}}_{\mathrm{nd}}Fnd​ acting on a line vortex in a type-II superconductor at T=0 is given. All work presented assumes a charged BCS superconductor. We first examine the Berry phase induced in the BCS superconducting ground state by movement of the vortex and show how this phase enters into the hydrodynamic action Shyd{\mathit{S}}_{\mathrm{hyd}}Shyd​ of the superconducting condensate. Appropriate variation of Shyd{\mathit{S}}_{\mathrm{hyd}}Shyd​ give Fnd{\mathbf{F}}_{\mathrm{nd}}Fnd​ and variation of the Berry phase term is seen to contribute the Magnus or lift force of classical hydrodynamics to Fnd{\mathbf{F}}_{\mathrm{nd}}Fnd​. This analysis, based on the BCS ground state of a charged superconductor, confirms in detail the arguments of Ao and Thouless within the context of the BCS model. Our Berry phase, in the limit e\ensuremath{\rightarrow}0, is seen to reproduce the Berry phase determined by these authors for a neutral superfluid. We also provide a second, independent, determination of Fnd{\mathbf{F}}_{\mathrm{nd}}Fnd​ through a microscopic derivation of the continuity equation for the condensate linear momentum. This equation yields the acceleration equation for the superflow and shows that the vortex acts as a sink for the condensate linear momentum. The rate at which momentum is lost to the vortex determines Fnd{\mathbf{F}}_{\mathrm{nd}}Fnd​ in this second approach and the result obtained agrees identically with the previous Berry phase calculation. The Magnus force contribution to Fnd{\mathbf{F}}_{\mathrm{nd}}Fnd​ is seen in both calculations to be a consequence of the vortex topology and motion. A preliminary discussion is given regarding finite temperature extensions of the Berry phase calculation, with emphasis on its relevance for the sign anomaly occurring in Hall-effect experiments on type-II superconductors in the flux flow regime.
We give a general review of recent developments in the theory of vortices in superfluids and superconductors, discussing why the dynamics of vortices is important, and why some key results are still controversial. We discuss work that we have done on the dynamics of quantized vortices in a superfluid. Despite the fact that this problem has been recognized as important for forty years, there is still a lot of controversy about the forces on and masses of quantized vortices. We think that one can get unambiguous answers by considering a broken symmetry state that consists of one vortex in an infinite ideal system. We argue for a Magnus force that is proportional to the superfluid density, and we find that the effective mass density of a vortex in a neutral superfluid is divergent at low frequencies. We have generalized some of the results for a neutral superfluid to a charged system.
Adiabatic effective action for vortices in neutral and charged superfluids at zero temperature are calculated using the topological Landau-Ginzburg theory recently proposed by Hatsuda, Yahikozawa, Ao and Thouless, and vortex dynamics are examined. The Berry phase term arising in the effective action naturally yields the Magnus force in both neutral and charged superfluids. It is shown that in neutral superfluid there is only one degree of freedom, namely the center of vorticities, and the vortex energy is proportional to the sum of all vorticities so that it is finite only for the vanishing total vorticity of the system. On the other hand the effective mass and the vortex energy for a vortex in charged superfluids are defined individually as expected. The effects of the vortex core on these quantities are also estimated. The possible depinning scenario which is governed by the Magnus force and the inertial mass is also discussed.