Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Nature Physics

Quantum speed limit

Andreas H. Trabesinger

Published Feb 1, 2012• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1038/nphys2236

Related papers

Physics: Quantum speed limit

Nature•Oct 28, 2009•0 citations

Family of attainable geometric quantum speed limits

Zi-yi Mai, Zheng Liu, Chang‐shui Yu

We propose a quantum state distance and develop a family of geometrical quantum speed limits (QSLs) for open and closed systems. The QSL time includes an alternative function by which we derive three QSL times with particularly chosen functions. It indicates that two QSL times are exactly the ones presented in Ref. \cite{Campaioli2019tightrobust} and \cite{mai2023tight}, respectively, and the third one can provide a unified QSL time for both open and closed systems. The three QSL times are attainable for any given initial state in the sense that there exists a dynamics driving the initial state to evolve along the geodesic. We numerically compare the tightness of the three QSL times, which typically promises a tighter QSL time if optimizing the alternative function.

arXiv:2311.07862•Quantum•Jun 17, 2025•4 citations

Relativistic Quantum-Speed Limit

Durrani, Ijaz

•Jan 1, 2025•0 citations

Controlling the quantum speed limit time for unital maps via filtering operations

Soroush Haseli, S. Salimi

Abstract The minimum time a system needs to change from an initial state to a final orthogonal state is called the quantum speed limit time. The quantum speed limit time can be used to quantify the speed of the quantum evolution. The speed of the quantum evolution will increase, if the quantum speed limit time decreases. In this work, we will use a relative purity-based bound for the quantum speed limit time. This work is applicable for any arbitrary initial state. Here, we investigate the effects of a filtering operation on the quantum speed limit time. It will be observed that for some intervals of the filtering operation parameter, the quantum speed limit time is decreased by increasing the filtering operation parameter and for some other intervals it is decreased by decreasing the filtering operation parameter.

arXiv:2006.10686•Laser Physics Letters•Aug 25, 2020•6 citations

Quantum speed limit for robust state characterization and engineering

K. Kobayashi, Naoki Yamamoto

In this paper we propose to use a quantum speed limit (QSL) as a measure of robustness of states, defining a state with a bigger QSL as more robust. From this perspective, it is important to have an explicitly computable QSL, because then we can formulate an engineering problem of the Hamiltonian that makes a target state robust against decoherence. Hence we derive an explicitly computable QSL that is applicable to general Markovian open quantum systems. This QSL is tighter than another explicitly computable QSL, in an important setup such that decoherence is small. Also, the Hamiltonian engineering problem with this QSL is a quadratic convex optimization problem, and thus it is efficiently solvable. The idea of robust state characterization and the Hamiltonian engineering, in terms of the QSL, is demonstrated with several examples.

arXiv:2007.02788•Physical Review A•Oct 15, 2020•18 citations

Quantum Speed Limits to Operator Growth

Nicoletta Carabba

Springer theses•Jan 1, 2024•2 citations
We propose a quantum state distance and develop a family of geometrical quantum speed limits (QSLs) for open and closed systems. The QSL time includes an alternative function by which we derive three QSL times with particularly chosen functions. It indicates that two QSL times are exactly the ones presented in Ref. \cite{Campaioli2019tightrobust} and \cite{mai2023tight}, respectively, and the third one can provide a unified QSL time for both open and closed systems. The three QSL times are attainable for any given initial state in the sense that there exists a dynamics driving the initial state to evolve along the geodesic. We numerically compare the tightness of the three QSL times, which typically promises a tighter QSL time if optimizing the alternative function.
Abstract The minimum time a system needs to change from an initial state to a final orthogonal state is called the quantum speed limit time. The quantum speed limit time can be used to quantify the speed of the quantum evolution. The speed of the quantum evolution will increase, if the quantum speed limit time decreases. In this work, we will use a relative purity-based bound for the quantum speed limit time. This work is applicable for any arbitrary initial state. Here, we investigate the effects of a filtering operation on the quantum speed limit time. It will be observed that for some intervals of the filtering operation parameter, the quantum speed limit time is decreased by increasing the filtering operation parameter and for some other intervals it is decreased by decreasing the filtering operation parameter.
In this paper we propose to use a quantum speed limit (QSL) as a measure of robustness of states, defining a state with a bigger QSL as more robust. From this perspective, it is important to have an explicitly computable QSL, because then we can formulate an engineering problem of the Hamiltonian that makes a target state robust against decoherence. Hence we derive an explicitly computable QSL that is applicable to general Markovian open quantum systems. This QSL is tighter than another explicitly computable QSL, in an important setup such that decoherence is small. Also, the Hamiltonian engineering problem with this QSL is a quadratic convex optimization problem, and thus it is efficiently solvable. The idea of robust state characterization and the Hamiltonian engineering, in terms of the QSL, is demonstrated with several examples.