Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

On Symmetric Signatures in Holographic Algorithms

Published Feb 6, 2008• 22 citations
OpenAlex

Abstract

In holographic algorithms, symmetric signatures have been particularly useful. We give a complete characterization of these symmetric signatures over all bases of size 1. These improve previous results by Cai and Choudhary (ICALP 2006, vol. 4051, pp. 703–714, 2006) where only symmetric signatures over the Hadamard basis (special basis of size 1) were obtained. In particular, we give a complete list of Boolean symmetric signatures over bases of size 1. It is an open problem whether signatures over bases of higher dimensions are strictly more powerful. The recent result by Valiant (FOCS 2006, pp. 509–517, 2006) seems to suggest that bases of size 2 might be indeed more powerful than bases of size 1. This result is with regard to a restrictive counting version of #SAT called #Pl-Rtw-Mon-3CNF. It is known that the problem is #P-hard, and its mod 2 version is ⊕P-hard. Yet its mod 7 version is solvable in polynomial time by holographic algorithms. This was ac complished by a suitable symmetric signature over a basis of size 2. We show that the same unexpected holographic algorithm can be realized over a basis of size 1. Furthermore we prove that 7 is the only modulus for which such an "accidental algorithm" exists.

Related papers

Bases Collapse in Holographic Algorithms.

Jin‐Yi Cai, Pinyan Lu

Holographic algorithms are a novel approach to design polynomial time computations using linear superpositions. Most holographic algorithms are designed with basis vectors of dimension 2. Recently Valiant showed that a basis of dimension 4 can be used to solve in P an interesting (restrictive SAT) counting problem mod 7. This problem without modulo 7 is #P-complete, and counting mod 2 is NP-hard. We give a general collapse theorem for bases of dimension 4 to dimension 2 in the holographic algorithms framework. We also define an extension of holographic algorithms to allow more general support vectors. Finally we give a bases folding theorem showing that in a natural setting the support vectors can be simulated by basis of dimension 2. 1

Electronic colloquium on computational complexity•Jan 1, 2007•0 citations

Bases Collapse in Holographic Algorithms

Jin‐Yi Cai, Pinyan Lu

Holographic algorithms are a novel approach to design polynomial time computations using linear superpositions. Most holographic algorithms are designed with basis vectors of dimension 2. Recently Valiant showed that a basis of dimension 4 can be used to solve in P an interesting (restrictive SAT) counting problem mod 7. This problem without modulo 7 is #P-complete, and counting mod 2 is NP-hard. We give a general collapse theorem for bases of dimension 4 to dimension 2 in the holographic algorithms framework. We also define an extension of holographic algorithms to allow more general support vectors. Finally we give a Basis Folding Theorem showing that in a natural setting the support vectors can be simulated by bases of dimension 2.

IEEE Conference on Computational Complexity (CCC)•Jun 1, 2007•21 citations

Holographic algorithms with unsymmetric signatures

Jin‐Yi Cai, Pinyan Lu

Holographic algorithms were introduced by Valiant as a new methodology to derive polynomial time algorithms. Here information and computation are represented by exponential sums using the so-called signatures. These signatures express superpositions of perfect matchings, and are used to achieve exponential sized cancellations, and thereby exponential speedups. Most holographic algorithms so far used symmetric signatures. In this paper we use unsymmetric signatures to give some new holographic algorithms. We also prove a characterization theorem for a class of realizable un-symmetric signatures, each of which may be used to design new holographic algorithms.

Symposium on Discrete Algorithms•Jan 20, 2008•9 citations

Geometry in Algorithms and Complexity: Holographic Algorithms and Valiant's Conjecture

Sitan Chen

The $\\P$ versus $\\NP$ problem is arguably the most important open problem in all of theoretical computer science. In recent years, geometry has arisen as one of the most promising approaches for tackling this problem, both for obtaining positive results (polynomial-time solutions to seemingly intractable computational problems) and for proving negative results (impossibility results stating that such algorithms cannot exist). This work deals with both directions. \nIn the positive direction, the theory of holographic algorithms introduced by Valiant represents a novel approach to achieving polynomial-time algorithms for seemingly intractable counting problems via a reduction to counting planar perfect matchings and a linear change of basis. The connection to geometry is that a counting problem can be solved by a holographic algorithm provided a particular system of equations associated to that problem is solvable. Two fundamental parameters in holographic algorithms are the \\emph{domain size} and the \\emph{basis size}. Roughly, the domain size is the range of colors involved in the counting problem at hand (e.g. counting graph $k$-colorings is a problem over domain size $k$), while the basis size $\\ell$ captures the dimensionality of the representation of those colors. A major open problem has been: for a given $k$, what is the smallest $\\ell$ for which any holographic algorithm for a problem over domain size $k$ ``collapses to'' (can be simulated by) a holographic algorithm with basis size $\\ell$? Cai and Lu showed in 2008 that over domain size 2, basis size 1 suffices, opening the door to an extensive line of work on the structural theory of holographic algorithms over the Boolean domain. Cai and Fu later showed for signatures of full rank that over domain sizes 3 and 4, basis sizes 1 and 2, respectively, suffice, and they conjectured that over domain size $k$ there is a collapse to basis size $\\lfloor\\log_2 k\\rfloor$. In the first half of this work, we resolve this conjecture in the affirmative for signatures of full rank for all $k$. As a simple consequence, we are able to formulate Valiant's holographic framework over all domain sizes in terms of the geometry of spinor varieties and their orbits under basis change. \nIn the negative direction, Valiant's conjecture is an algebraic analogue of $\\P$ versus $\\NP$ which states that the permanent polynomial $\\perm_m$ cannot be computed as a linear projection of the determinant polynomial $\\det_n$ for $n = \\poly(m)$. This can be formulated as an orbit containment problem; for the sake of bringing tools from algebraic geometry to bear on Valiant's conjecture, Mulmuley and Sohoni conjectured that Valiant's conjecture still holds when one passes to the Zariski closures of the relevant orbits. Essential to understanding what changes in this relaxation is understanding the geometry of the boundary of the orbit closure of $\\det_n$. In the second half of this work, we study this problem for $n = 3$ and use a combinatorial approach to give a complete classification of the irreducible components on the boundary in this case. We additionally present a new infinite family of boundary components for all even $n$. Beyond these results and a general overview of Mulmuley-Sohoni's program, we also provide exposition on known lower bounds for the determinantal complexity of the permanent in Valiant's and Mulmuley-Sohoni's settings, an exponential lower bound due to Landsberg and Ressayre under a more restricted model of determinantal representations, Kumar's result on the non-normality of the orbit closure of $\\det_n$, Harris and Eisenbud's classification of maximal linear subspaces of the determinantal hypersurface in dimensions 3 and 4, and Huttenhain-Lairez's independent proof of our boundary component classification by way of resolution of singularities.

•Jun 21, 2016•0 citations

Some Results on Matchgates and Holographic Algorithms.

Jin‐Yi Cai, Vinay Choudhary

We establish a 1-1 correspondence between Valiant's character theory of matchgate/matchcircuit [14] and his signature theory of planar-matchgate/matchgrid [16], thus unifying the two theories in expressibility. In [5], we had established a complete characterization of general matchgates, in terms of a set of useful Grassmann-Pl"ucker identities. With this correspondence, we give a corresponding set of identities which completely characterizes planar-matchgates and their signatures. Applying this characterization we prove some negative results for holographic algorithms. On the positive side, we also give a polynomial time algorithm for a simultaneous node-edge deletion problem, using holographic algorithms. Finally we give characterizations of symmetric signatures realizable in the Hadamard basis.

Electronic colloquium on computational complexity•Jan 1, 2006•1 citation

Holographic algorithms

Jin‐Yi Cai, Pinyan Lu

We develop the theory of holographic algorithms. We definea basis manifold and give characterizations of algebraic varieties of realizable symmetric generators and recognizers on this manifold. We present a polynomial time decision algorithm for the simultaneous realizability problem. Using the general machinery we are able to giveunexpected holographic algorithms for some counting problems, modulo certain Mersenne type integers. These counting problems are P-complete without the moduli. Going beyond symmetric signatures, we define d-admissibility and d-realizability for general signatures, and give a characterizationof 2-admissibility.

ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC)•Jun 11, 2007•62 citations
In holographic algorithms, symmetric signatures have been particularly useful. We give a complete characterization of these symmetric signatures over all bases of size 1. These improve previous results by Cai and Choudhary (ICALP 2006, vol. 4051, pp. 703–714, 2006) where only symmetric signatures over the Hadamard basis (special basis of size 1) were obtained. In particular, we give a complete list of Boolean symmetric signatures over bases of size 1. It is an open problem whether signatures over bases of higher dimensions are strictly more powerful. The recent result by Valiant (FOCS 2006, pp. 509–517, 2006) seems to suggest that bases of size 2 might be indeed more powerful than bases of size 1. This result is with regard to a restrictive counting version of #SAT called #Pl-Rtw-Mon-3CNF. It is known that the problem is #P-hard, and its mod 2 version is ⊕P-hard. Yet its mod 7 version is solvable in polynomial time by holographic algorithms. This was ac complished by a suitable symmetric signature over a basis of size 2. We show that the same unexpected holographic algorithm can be realized over a basis of size 1. Furthermore we prove that 7 is the only modulus for which such an "accidental algorithm" exists.
Holographic algorithms are a novel approach to design polynomial time computations using linear superpositions. Most holographic algorithms are designed with basis vectors of dimension 2. Recently Valiant showed that a basis of dimension 4 can be used to solve in P an interesting (restrictive SAT) counting problem mod 7. This problem without modulo 7 is #P-complete, and counting mod 2 is NP-hard. We give a general collapse theorem for bases of dimension 4 to dimension 2 in the holographic algorithms framework. We also define an extension of holographic algorithms to allow more general support vectors. Finally we give a bases folding theorem showing that in a natural setting the support vectors can be simulated by basis of dimension 2. 1
Holographic algorithms are a novel approach to design polynomial time computations using linear superpositions. Most holographic algorithms are designed with basis vectors of dimension 2. Recently Valiant showed that a basis of dimension 4 can be used to solve in P an interesting (restrictive SAT) counting problem mod 7. This problem without modulo 7 is #P-complete, and counting mod 2 is NP-hard. We give a general collapse theorem for bases of dimension 4 to dimension 2 in the holographic algorithms framework. We also define an extension of holographic algorithms to allow more general support vectors. Finally we give a Basis Folding Theorem showing that in a natural setting the support vectors can be simulated by bases of dimension 2.
Holographic algorithms were introduced by Valiant as a new methodology to derive polynomial time algorithms. Here information and computation are represented by exponential sums using the so-called signatures. These signatures express superpositions of perfect matchings, and are used to achieve exponential sized cancellations, and thereby exponential speedups. Most holographic algorithms so far used symmetric signatures. In this paper we use unsymmetric signatures to give some new holographic algorithms. We also prove a characterization theorem for a class of realizable un-symmetric signatures, each of which may be used to design new holographic algorithms.
The P\\PP versus NP\\NPNP problem is arguably the most important open problem in all of theoretical computer science. In recent years, geometry has arisen as one of the most promising approaches for tackling this problem, both for obtaining positive results (polynomial-time solutions to seemingly intractable computational problems) and for proving negative results (impossibility results stating that such algorithms cannot exist). This work deals with both directions. \nIn the positive direction, the theory of holographic algorithms introduced by Valiant represents a novel approach to achieving polynomial-time algorithms for seemingly intractable counting problems via a reduction to counting planar perfect matchings and a linear change of basis. The connection to geometry is that a counting problem can be solved by a holographic algorithm provided a particular system of equations associated to that problem is solvable. Two fundamental parameters in holographic algorithms are the \\emph{domain size} and the \\emph{basis size}. Roughly, the domain size is the range of colors involved in the counting problem at hand (e.g. counting graph kkk-colorings is a problem over domain size kkk), while the basis size ell\\ellell captures the dimensionality of the representation of those colors. A major open problem has been: for a given kkk, what is the smallest ell\\ellell for which any holographic algorithm for a problem over domain size kkk ``collapses to'' (can be simulated by) a holographic algorithm with basis size ell\\ellell? Cai and Lu showed in 2008 that over domain size 2, basis size 1 suffices, opening the door to an extensive line of work on the structural theory of holographic algorithms over the Boolean domain. Cai and Fu later showed for signatures of full rank that over domain sizes 3 and 4, basis sizes 1 and 2, respectively, suffice, and they conjectured that over domain size kkk there is a collapse to basis size lfloorlog2krfloor\\lfloor\\log_2 k\\rfloorlfloorlog2​krfloor. In the first half of this work, we resolve this conjecture in the affirmative for signatures of full rank for all kkk. As a simple consequence, we are able to formulate Valiant's holographic framework over all domain sizes in terms of the geometry of spinor varieties and their orbits under basis change. \nIn the negative direction, Valiant's conjecture is an algebraic analogue of P\\PP versus NP\\NPNP which states that the permanent polynomial permm\\perm_mpermm​ cannot be computed as a linear projection of the determinant polynomial detn\\det_ndetn​ for n=poly(m)n = \\poly(m)n=poly(m). This can be formulated as an orbit containment problem; for the sake of bringing tools from algebraic geometry to bear on Valiant's conjecture, Mulmuley and Sohoni conjectured that Valiant's conjecture still holds when one passes to the Zariski closures of the relevant orbits. Essential to understanding what changes in this relaxation is understanding the geometry of the boundary of the orbit closure of detn\\det_ndetn​. In the second half of this work, we study this problem for n=3n = 3n=3 and use a combinatorial approach to give a complete classification of the irreducible components on the boundary in this case. We additionally present a new infinite family of boundary components for all even nnn. Beyond these results and a general overview of Mulmuley-Sohoni's program, we also provide exposition on known lower bounds for the determinantal complexity of the permanent in Valiant's and Mulmuley-Sohoni's settings, an exponential lower bound due to Landsberg and Ressayre under a more restricted model of determinantal representations, Kumar's result on the non-normality of the orbit closure of detn\\det_ndetn​, Harris and Eisenbud's classification of maximal linear subspaces of the determinantal hypersurface in dimensions 3 and 4, and Huttenhain-Lairez's independent proof of our boundary component classification by way of resolution of singularities.
We establish a 1-1 correspondence between Valiant's character theory of matchgate/matchcircuit [14] and his signature theory of planar-matchgate/matchgrid [16], thus unifying the two theories in expressibility. In [5], we had established a complete characterization of general matchgates, in terms of a set of useful Grassmann-Pl"ucker identities. With this correspondence, we give a corresponding set of identities which completely characterizes planar-matchgates and their signatures. Applying this characterization we prove some negative results for holographic algorithms. On the positive side, we also give a polynomial time algorithm for a simultaneous node-edge deletion problem, using holographic algorithms. Finally we give characterizations of symmetric signatures realizable in the Hadamard basis.
We develop the theory of holographic algorithms. We definea basis manifold and give characterizations of algebraic varieties of realizable symmetric generators and recognizers on this manifold. We present a polynomial time decision algorithm for the simultaneous realizability problem. Using the general machinery we are able to giveunexpected holographic algorithms for some counting problems, modulo certain Mersenne type integers. These counting problems are P-complete without the moduli. Going beyond symmetric signatures, we define d-admissibility and d-realizability for general signatures, and give a characterizationof 2-admissibility.